🔴 Huge Price Alert! If You Own Gold & Silver, Watch This Now -- David Hunter & David Morgan

I wouldn't be surprised to see gold over 5,000 or more by the end of the year. I know 5,500 is the benchmark high round numbers. And I would be scared to see that in gold. Silver, I'm not so sure. Triple digits, maybe. Silver's a little harder to analyze or project than gold is. Gold's got a steady backdrop of central bank buying. And most gold buyers, I would say, never sell, but seldom sell. I raised my target from 125 to 180. I raised my gold target from 5,500 to 6,800. And then we've gone through, from that top in late January, we've gone through a consolidation ever since. It rallied, then it went back to lower lows. It bounced around here. Last week, I raised my silver target again to 200 and my gold target to 7,000. So not big increases. According to the discussion, gold could potentially climb above $5,000 in the near term, with longer-range targets reaching $6,800 to $7,000 if current trends continue. Silver, while historically more volatile and difficult to forecast, is also expected to benefit from the precious metals bull market. They suggest that silver could move into triple-digit territory, with targets around $180 to $200 per ounce if momentum accelerates and investment demand strengthens. In my opinion, the interview presents an optimistic but well-defined bullish scenario for precious metals. While gold reaching $7,000 and silver reaching $200 are ambitious predictions, they reflect growing concerns about inflation, debt expansion, and monetary policy. Investors should view these targets as potential outcomes rather than certainties, while recognizing that gold and silver remain among the most closely watched assets during periods of financial uncertainty. If you found this helpful, like, share, and subscribe to The Metal Bar. Turn on the bell so you don't miss any updates, and comment below to share your thoughts on it. Appreciate you for tuning in. Now listen to the interview. Hitting 50 again, could. Silver, you're really smart to not rule out anything we're talking about. Believe me, I ought to know. But if it were to get into the 50 handle, 59, 58, 57, I do strongly believe that you would have a heck of a lot of fun. Not just from retail, institutional, and the industrial side as well. So can it get there? Yes. Will it? I doubt it. If it were to get in the 50 handle, I really, really think it would last. But time will tell. The logic of the silver COMEX watchers, and I watch it fairly closely, not as much as they used to, is, well, these banks have all this control. They manipulate the market. They do it through derivatives. And they sell off in the midnight hour and aftermarket in Asia, drive the price down, sell an extraordinary amount of silver and that type of thing. And then when it gets to be near first notice day on a delivery month, all of a sudden, all those bankers, all those people that have absolute total control of the market, don't have any control of the market. This one person, these couple of entities are going to stand for delivery and blow the whole thing up. And the whole COMEX is going to come down and deck their cards and throw it in the wind. And it just defies my logic. If these banks have all this control, then when it gets to the end of the month where it gets to first delivery notice, the final delivery, they don't have any control whatsoever. It just doesn't make any sense to me. Because that mean of, we're going to blow up the COMEX is going on for so long, I can't count it. But yet, there's only so many. And a lot of these people have merit. I mean, they have substance. They have each following. And they truly believe that it's imminent. So I don't think it will ever happen. Why? Because what I just said, the same banks that are controlling the market up until delivery notice are still controlling the market. Now, there could be. I mean, to be fair, there is a one-off that maybe some large trader that's somewhat in the public and creates 27 different LLCs under different names is going to corner the market and stand for delivery with 27 different entities. And they're all basically have the same idea of taking this much metal, which is above and beyond what the registered category dealer inventory has. Could it happen? Yes. I think it's much more made of it than should be because it bothers me, Jared, and I'm adamant about this. I've had people call that are almost in tears because so-and-so said that the COMEX is going to fail. They bought way more options they should have because so-and-so said it's going to fail. And then it doesn't fail. And they lost a boatload of money. Now, you have to put what was their part in it. That's greed, believing some hearsay, and not understanding how the market works. But you don't want to really just one-off it. Drain the COMEX. And we're going to talk about that later in our discussion here, Jared, because Ted Butler, who works for the Morgan Report and worked for me for a few years, writes the silver section of the Gold Report and Gold Retrust Report by Ronnie Stoffele and his group. And we'll show you the absolute facts about how badly the COMEX has been ingrained because people don't understand that mean is misconstrued and not accurate. There could be lots of deliveries that mean nothing because the metal still stays within the COMEX and the ownership just changes. The metal hasn't really moved at all. Veteran precious metals analysts David Morgan and David Hunter continue to share a strongly bullish long-term outlook for gold and silver, driven by macroeconomic instability, rising debt levels and sustained central bank demand. Their view suggests that the current cycle may still be in its early stages, with significant upside potential if monetary pressures continue to intensify. According to the discussion, gold could move beyond $5,000 in the medium term, with extended projections ranging from $6,800 to as high as $7,000 per ounce under sustained bullish conditions. Silver, however, remains more complex due to its industrial usage, volatility, and sensitivity to liquidity cycles. While extreme downside scenarios like a temporary drop into the $50-$60 range are not ruled out, the speakers argue such levels would likely trigger aggressive buying from retail, institutional, and industrial participants. In my opinion, the interview is valuable because it presents both bullish conviction and internal skepticism about extreme market narratives. The realistic takeaway is that silver can experience sharp swings in both directions, while gold tends to reflect broader monetary trends more steadily. Investors should focus less on dramatic collapse scenarios and more on understanding liquidity cycles, demand fundamentals, and long-term positioning. Let's get into the interview. Russell is showing that the market is broadening out. I think that is picking up speed here as of today. You see the financials obviously have a big move and tech got hit. It's not a beginning of a huge rollover in tech. I think it's just the beginning of a much more accelerated broadening out into some of the groups that have lagged like financials. Financials and basic materials look pretty good here. The miners, we can talk about that later, but the miners and metals to me look like they're on the verge of a turn here. There are a lot of people looking at it because gold's down at its 200-day moving average and saying it's about to break down. I view it the opposite way. We've done a full correction here and taken it right back to the trend line. I think you're going to see all of those things start to play here. That's one of the reasons why I tend to think this time maybe Trump's call is going to be proven true, that we are close to an agreement. I raised my targets in February on that sell-off because over what, 65 or 66 overnight, I raised my target from 125 to 180. Again, I just raised it to 125 in January, my January letter, and three weeks later or four weeks later, three weeks later probably, I was 180. I raised my gold target from 5,500 to 6,800. Then we've gone through from that top in late January, we've gone through a consolidation ever since. It rallied, then it went back to lower lows, it bounced around here. Last week, I raised my silver target again to 200 and my gold target to 7,000, so not big increases. In this market discussion, David Hunter examined shifting trends across equities and precious metals, suggesting that markets may be entering a new phase of broader participation beyond just large cap technology stocks. They argue that gold and silver appear to be nearing a critical turning point after a period of consolidation and technical correction. Rather than signaling weakness, recent pullbacks toward long-term trend levels are interpreted as potential setup conditions for the next upward move. Gold, in particular, is seen as holding a strong structural base, with revised long-term targets reaching $6.800 to $7,000 per ounce. Silver, while more volatile, is projected with upside potential toward the $180 to $200 range if momentum accelerates in a sustained bull cycle. In my opinion, the interview highlights an important shift in market psychology from concentrated tech-driven growth to broader asset participation. While price targets remain, the technical and macro backdrop suggests that gold and silver are increasingly being viewed as strategic assets rather than purely defensive hedges. If you enjoyed this analysis, please like, subscribe, and turn on notifications for more interviews and insights on gold, silver, inflation, central banks, and wealth.