Why Are There So Few Artemis Orion Photos?

I find it strange that a lot of people act like it's impossible to fake space when Hollywood's been doing it for years. And in fact, I would argue that Hollywood's version of space looks more convincing than NASA's. One of these videos is from NASA. One of them is from Hollywood. Can you really tell the difference? I mean, look at them. They showed us a lot of fake photos and told us a lot of lies during this recent Artemis Orion mission, the recent lunar drive-by. Let's break it down. So the globe-earthers swear that they got a nail in a coffin ever since NASA's chief commissioner, Reid Wiseman, sent back this video. And unsurprisingly, this has triggered many claims of it being fake by conspiracy theorists. In this video, Reid Wiseman is supposed to be recording with his iPhone outside the hatch window. Now, there is no communication with the Earth at this point because they're behind the moon and it's blocking the communication signal. So he's doing this with his own cell phone. And the globalists are saying, listen, you flat-earthers, you can hear the camera shutters going off as they snap away, giving us these amazing photos. How can they fake all this? Look at these images. How can it be fake? Throughout the course of this trip, if they're snapping photos at the rate that we hear right now, they should have hundreds of thousands of photos, at least tens of thousands. You got to ask yourself this question. If they snapping this many photos, why are they only sending back just a few hand-selected images? People, this is a good question to ask because I'm going to go somewhere with this in a minute. Why aren't we getting thousands of photos back from Artemis Orion in real time? We hear the cameras going off and the camera shutters sound like a machine gun. That's a lot of photos. Why are they only sending us back a handful of photos during the mission? We're going to answer that question. But to answer that question, we got to start with one lie that they tell us. I'm going to let you hear from a popular global birther why they don't send us all of the photos back, even though we hear the camera going off like a machine gun. I did find the reactions quite amusing, though, because this video wasn't released until after the astronauts had returned to Earth. By the sounds of it, the astronauts weren't sending everything back to Earth as soon as it was taken, likely due to bandwidth limitations and the huge file sizes of what they were capturing, given that raw files from the Nikon D5 DSLRs they had on board are about 25 megabytes each, and you can hear the shutter of it snapping away in Reed's video. Wow. It don't make no sense for you to give us a few little selected images when we hear hundreds of photos being snapped, and your excuse is we don't have enough bandwidth, the file size is too large. It's a big contradiction to use the excuse of bandwidth limitation in file size, while also admitting that they was live streaming from the capsule when they was in space. And not only was they live streaming back to Earth with no bandwidth issues, it was in 4K. You can't live stream in 4K with no problems, but can't send some still photos. And when they was live streaming, it ain't like it was just with one camera. They had multiple cameras active, and none of these cameras had any issues, bandwidth issues, or anything. And on top of that, you got continuous radio transmissions with the live stream footage, and ain't no glitches in none of that at all. And on top of everything I'm saying, to make things even worse, NASA claimed that they live streamed a video from deep space back to the Earth. Yeah, they claimed was that they got a probe way out there in deep space, and they live streamed a 4K video from deep space all the way to the Earth with no problems. But you can't send a still photo from right there by the moon. Today, cat videos and memes have taken over the internet. And now, they're also apparently taking over space as well. NASA has made history once again after successfully beaming this video of a cat named Taters back to Earth. It is the first time that NASA has streamed a video from deep space using a laser. The video was sent back from a record setting 19 million miles away. That is about 80 times the distance between the Earth and the moon, if you were looking for a reference point here. Joining me now is astrophysicist and NASA advisor, author Dr. Paul Sutter. Paul, this sounds like something fantastical. I can't even keep a straight face reading it, but the cat person has a great name, Taters. But let's talk about what NASA is actually doing here. Can you break down how do they do this? Why do they do this? So we have a way of communicating with our spacecraft that are deep in the solar system. And that is through radio waves. We have a network of radio dishes across the globe of the Earth. And we use these to communicate with deep spacecraft. The thing is, this is slow. It's like dial-up days. And so our spacecraft can take months or even years to send back the data that they are acquiring from the outer solar system back to our laboratories here on the Earth. And if we want to expand our presence in space with robotic missions or even human missions, we need faster communication. And that is what this test was exactly about. So how long did it take then? This is a lot faster. How long did it take to beam the cat images? How long did it take to get Taters back to Earth? It took Taters this 15 second clip of a very high resolution video. It took about two minutes, which is better than most broadband internet in the United States. So y'all being a high resolution video, which was the words you use from 19 million miles away in deep space, and it was crystal clear with no issues at all. But y'all having bandwidth issues, sending stale photos. So now that we see this contradiction, the big question we got to ask, why would they lie about something like that? And here's my theory on why they lying about that. We're told that hundreds of photos were taken, but yet we only see a handful. At the same time, we literally hear the camera shutter going off repeatedly, suggesting that a large volume of images is being captured. Now the explanation given is bandwidth limitations, but here's where the contradiction comes in. We already see high quality videos being transmitted from space and deep space, including live streams. So the idea that basic photos, which are far smaller in data compared to video, can't be sent back, it doesn't fully add up. A single high resolution image is only a few megabytes. But when you're live streaming in 4k, you're using more megabytes than that per second. In order for you to live stream with no lagging, like they do on multiple cameras, you're pushing more than 25 megabytes per second to live stream in 4k. When it comes to sending stale photos, you wouldn't have no limitations at all. And they'd be streaming in 4k with no interruptions. We get buffering and all of that on earth, and they don't get no buffering, no issues or none of that, and they'd be streaming from deep space. If the pipeline can handle a constant flood of ultra high definition video data, the idea that it's now going to have problems with just stale images don't add up. So now that we've pointed out the contradiction, why would they lie about this? In my view, the reason only a small number of photos exist is because the photos aren't actually coming from the camera. The photos are computer generated. And when you think about how CGI is typically used, you don't create hundreds of random images like someone does when they're snapping photos naturally, like what we see in the video. If this was true, every single snap represents a photo. And if this many photos were being taken, we should get that many photos sent back. You can't use bandwidth limitations as an excuse. I just debunked that. But I'm showing everyone why they're lying about this. See, it may seem like a small lie to y'all, but it's hiding a big deception. So why would they lie about snapping hundreds or even thousands of images, but only giving us a handful? Because that's how CGI is typically used. No one creates hundreds of random images to imitate a person that's just snapping photos every second, like a machine gun. No one uses CGI like that. They normally create a smaller number of convincing images, the best ones, and that lines up with what we see. A limited set of carefully presented photos, not a large batch of raw images. So when we hear the camera snapping hundreds of times, but only receive a few images, what else are we to conclude? Are we really missing these images because of bandwidth limitations or because only a small number of finalized images exist? Y'all can answer that question in the comments.