The Cash Flow “Myth” That’s Stopping You from Buying Rentals

Profitable Property
4 followers
2 Video Views·Jun 24, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedAshley Kerr and Tony J. Robinson discuss strategic real estate investing, focusing on house hacking to lower living expenses, the timing and utility of LLCs for asset protection, and the technicalities of using 203k renovation loans to acquire and improve multi-family properties.
If you are sitting there right now trying to decide whether to buy your first house hack
before your income changes or whether the rate window you call for today is worth jumping on
even if the deal does not fully cash flow, we are answering that exact question today.
And if you've ever Googled, do I need an LLC before I buy a rental property
and ended up even more confused than when you started,
we're cutting through all of that noise and giving you a straight.
This is the Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I'm Ashley Kerr.
And I'm Tony J. Robinson. With that, let's get into our first question for today. So
this question comes from the BiggerPockets forums and it says,
I'm 23 years old and I'm currently planning to house hack my first property
in the St. Charles, Missouri area with my fiance.
I'm primarily looking for a multifamily property, a duplex,
ideally since my fiance isn't comfortable with renting out individual rooms in a single family
home. We're getting married in a couple of months, but I'm hoping to buy before then
because Missouri's first place program offers below market interest rates for first time
buyers who make under 96,000 in household income. I currently earn about 92K. So once we're married,
our combined income will push us over that limit and we'll lose eligibility.
The first place non DPA option offers rates around 5.25%, which is a full percent lower
than what I'd likely get on a standard conventional loan after we're married.
The issue is that the St. Charles market is extremely competitive and I'm struggling to
find any duplex that will cashflow even modestly once I factor in long-term expenses like management,
maintenance, and vacancy. Right now, we're in a great situation,
renting a house with a friend and only paying about $800 per month total for our share.
Financially, there's no urgency to move, but I feel pressure to lock in this rate
before we lose eligibility after the wedding. My question is, number one, does it make sense
to buy now just to capture the 5.25% rate even if the first property doesn't cashflow well?
Two, how do you personally weigh below market financing versus waiting for a truly cashflowing
deal? And three, in a market like St. Charles, where duplexes are rare and competitive,
would you consider breaking even or slightly negative cashflow acceptable for your first
house hack if it's a strong long-term location? All right, lots to kind of unpack here, but we'll
kind of break it down for each question. But I think the first thing, and he didn't quite
clarify this, but the question says, or in the question he says that he's having a hard time
finding a deal that'll cashflow. I'm struggling to find any duplex that will cashflow even modestly
once I factor in long-term expenses. And then he also goes on to say they're spending right now
$800 per month for living. So I think the way that I look at this mathematically is not
necessarily how much cashflow will this house hack produce, but how much will your living expenses
change, right? So if going into this duplex, right, or this house hack situation, even if it's
not positive cashflow, if you're able to take your living expenses from $800 a month to $200
per month, that's still a net gain of $600 every single month that you didn't have before,
not to mention you're getting the appreciation and the loan pay down on this property as well.
So I think I would just maybe clarify what do you mean when you say
the deals aren't cashflow? Because honestly, in a lot of house hacking situations,
you're not typically living, quote unquote, for free. You're just significantly subsidizing the
cost of your living. Yeah, that was the first thing I was going to point out too as to were
you expecting to live there for free and to get cashflow, where that can definitely happen,
but is a lot harder to get. And I think you broke it down perfectly as to how to actually compare
it apples to apples to what you're paying now with rent and how you're able to maybe reduce
your expenses, but also the other benefits that come along, the mortgage pay down, the appreciation
that comes with that too. The next thing that he had asked that we want to look at
is how do you personally weigh below market financing versus waiting for a truly cashflow
deal? I think we kind of answered that as to this possibly could be a truly beneficial deal for you.
If you were looking at just a standard investment, I would probably not take the deal
knowing that I could get this discounted financing rate just to be able to buy something. And I would
wait to cashflow because it's not my premier residence. It's not expenses I'm already paying
in my household. I would want the deal to at least break even or be able to cashflow to cover
itself. I wouldn't want to come out of my own pocket for my first investment to be able to
cover it just because I want to lock in a 5.25% interest rate. But the situation for house hacking
is very different that I think you could make it work for you and not cashflow because it is
you're going to be your primary residence. The next question here is, so that area is really
competitive for duplexes. And again, he talks about the cashflow and how do you find a property
that has a strong location but may have negative cashflow on it. I think he's thinking of the
appreciation play as to whether it's okay to take negative cashflow because it's going to
be appreciating in that location. You're going to get that benefit from it. But I think as your
house hack, it also has some personal preference to it as to where you want to live and what type
of property you like. I do think that you probably will have an advantage making offers on duplexes
because you will most likely be able to offer more than an investor because this will be your
primary residence and you'll already be getting a lower interest rate on financing. Yes, an investor
could come in with cash, whatever, but they're going to most likely want that property to cashflow.
So I could see your offer being more, you could be able to offer more because you're accounting for
your own living expenses with the property. The only hiccup I could see is if you're using a VA
loan or FHA loan, the seller not wanting to deal with the inspections that come along.
I think the only last thing that I'd add is maybe be a little bit more creative around
what house hacking looks like. If your fiancee has already said, hey, we don't want to share
rooms in the house we're living in, that's fine. But maybe there are other options aside from a
duplex. Can you find a single family home that maybe has an ADU in the back? Either you guys
can live in the main house or you can live in the ADU and rent out the main house. I don't know if
there's maybe finished basements in that part of Missouri where, again, either you're living
or they're living downstairs. But I think there are maybe other ways aside from just,
it's got to be a duplex that you can still execute on this idea of house hacking.
Yeah. Sometimes you'll see houses listed as an in-law suite that actually have a whole separate
unit that you could rent that out and it's usually separate. The utilities probably aren't separate
and you would just have to factor that into the rent that you're paying their utilities. But
I've seen that so many times where it's listed as an in-law suite, but it's actually a
full-blown apartment. Also above garages, that's pretty standard if somebody does have an,
instead of ADUs where you're just having an additional dwelling unit on your property,
they're usually more on top of garages that I would say in my area too.
So we got question two today. This one is from the BiggerPocketsForums. I am new to real estate
investing and I would like to buy and hold rentals. I am wondering if it is best to set
up an LLC, get a business account and business credit cards before actually buying a property.
I want to keep my personal finances and rental property finances as separate as possible. So I'm
thinking, yes, I currently only own one rental property in Florida. It only became a rental
because I moved to California to work. So I decided to keep it. I manage it myself and don't
have an LLC set up. Really, all I have set up for the property is a separate checking account
and a landlord-specific home insurance policy. My questions are, should I set up an LLC just for one
property and what are the pros and cons? If so, do I set up the LLC in California where I live now
or in Florida where the property is? And if I do set up an LLC, is transferring a property
from your personal name to the LLC pretty straightforward even with an active mortgage?
Hi, these are great questions and yes, very common questions. So the first one,
the first question that she asked is, should you set up an LLC before you actually purchase
your property? And I'm going to say, no. What about you, Tony? Yeah, I would agree with that
for sure. What happens if you don't get a property under contract? You make offers,
you make offers, a year goes by or something changes in your life and now you have this LLC
I know in California, the fees are pretty expensive to have an LLC. You have to maintain it,
you have to file a tax return for it. So does that cost to pay someone to file it?
So I would say no. I would wait until you have the property under contract at least if you want
to do an LLC. When you go under contract, you can put on your contract is that, I can't remember
exactly how it's phrased, but it's like you could put it as your name and or assigns to,
and then later on during the process of being under contract, you can go ahead and fill in
your LLC. I've done that a ton of times where I use like my development company LLC and then I'll
be like, okay, where do I actually want this? Am I doing this with one of my partners or not
or whatever? And then I'll go and change it into whatever LLC it's going into before we actually
close on the property. Yeah, I agree with that notion, Ash. And I understand why, but I think
a lot of people, they put the cart before the horse and they started asking a lot of questions
about asset protection and corporate structure and all these things and they candidly don't have a
lot to protect in that moment. Now, unless just like in your personal life, you've already amassed
a lot of personal wealth, well then yeah, definitely be more diligent upfront. I shouldn't
say more diligent, be more, I guess, cautious upfront about protecting that. But I think a lot
of rookie investors maybe put the cart before the horse. Now, one thing I do want to clarify though
is that having an LLC, it doesn't mean that you can't, like the risk of liability goes away,
right? Like there's still, even with an LLC, there's ways to like pierce the corporate veil
is what they call it. So even if you set it up, you still have to make sure that you're running
it the right way and you don't do all the right things and the right attorney can help you with
that. But there are lots of real estate investors who, much like this story, right, where they have
a personal residence, they move out, they turn into a rental and it just kind of stays in their
personal name. So there are other ways to protect yourself aside from just having the LLC as well.
And I think that's a piece that maybe a lot of rookie investors don't recognize, that there's
other forms of liability protection aside from just having your LLC. Now, obviously the LLC is,
I think, a good option. And I think I'll just describe those differences really quickly,
right? Like you can have liability protection through your insurance. You can have like
entity protection, like who's actually on the deed of the property, right, or how's the property
deeded, who's on title. You can have like an umbrella policy, right, like just additional
liability protection for anything that happens to you, right? So those are all like different
forms of protection. LLCs in the right like legal structure are probably the most, I won't say air
tight, but probably the most concrete in trying to protect yourself. But even those, if they're
not structured the right way, you can still kind of break through. Insurance is probably like the
lowest level, because a lot of insurance providers, their goal is to reduce the amount of
money they spend on paying out claims, right? So it's not always the easiest. But like if someone
sues you, the insurance is what kind of kicks in to say, hey, here's what happens. I think the goal
for the LLCs in the right legal structure is that it prevents a lawsuit from happening. Like if
someone goes through all of these things and they see like, man, even if we sue this place, like
because of how it's set up, we're not going to get a whole heck of a lot. It hopefully just
prevents any lawsuit from happening in the first place. So they serve slightly different purposes.
But all that to say, does a rookie need to go out and invest $30,000 in legal fees to set up this
crazy corporate entity structure where you've got like an offshore trust and the trust is allocating
or delegating responsibilities to this entity? Like probably not. But you can probably start a
little bit simpler and still have enough protection to give you peace of mind to sleep at night.
Another kind of difference that you should think about too is financing on your property. So how
are you going to purchase your investment property? Because if you have the LLC set up
and you're buying the property in an LLC, it is much harder to get conventional residential
financing on the property. And if you do, like I did it before through a small local bank on
the residential side, and it was like 2% higher than what the interest rate would have been if
it would have been in my personal name. So you also have different financing options when the
property is in your personal name compared to an LLC. So also it was addressed that she currently
has one property in Florida that's in her personal name and what would be the process to actually
transfer into an LLC while having the mortgage. So first I would look at your mortgage documents
and what does it actually say about a loan being assumed or transferring ownership, a change in
ownership. And there can be a clause in there that says that the balance of the loan is due
upon sale. So the due on sale clause. And if that's in there, then technically the bank would
call the loan due upon the change of ownership. So there's some language in mortgage documents
that allows for the change of ownership as long as it is the same membership percentage. I don't
know exactly how it's phrased, but so if you're 100% owner of an LLC and you change it from your
personal name, 100% you owns it, to an LLC where you're 100% owner, will not trigger the due on
sale clause. I have read of a ton of people doing it even though they have a due on sale clause
and don't have that written language and nothing ever happening, they continue to make their
statements. I've also heard of it the other way, not as common as I've heard of people getting
away with it, I guess, but I've also heard of people doing it and the bank does call the due
on sale clause. So read your mortgage documents, what it says, and then if it does trigger your
due on sale clause, make sure you have some kind of strategy or plan in place to actually pay that.
But I would read your mortgage documents and what you can do is you could do a quick claim
and deed it just into your name quickly without having to do all the title work and everything
because it's just being transferred from you to you, which an attorney would do and it's not a
long process at all. Our last question today is a great one for anyone thinking about using a
203k loan to buy a duplex and house hack it, because this loan does have some specific rules
that can maybe trip you up if you're not prepared. So this question also comes from the Bigger
Pockets forums and it says, I'm planning to purchase my very first property next year,
it's a duplex, and plan to house hack it using a 203k loan. I'm doing tons of research and getting
my finances and DTI, debt to income ratio, in line. I have a few questions I'm hoping to get
answered. First, when should I start speaking to an agent? I currently have an apartment lease
that is up at the end of August, 2026. This reporting is as of April. I'd like to avoid
going month to month on this lease, so I'm trying to understand when to start the process with an
agent, a lender, and a contractor. Second, with a 203k loan, renovations must be completed within
six months. I plan to use a limited 203k. This won't be an issue for the side I'll be living in,
but how would I renovate the tenant-occupied side within those same six months if their leases goes
for another 10 months? Logistically, what would you do in this instance? Any guidance on how to
plan this out would be greatly appreciated. Ashton, have you ever used a 203k loan before?
No, I haven't. I don't think you have. No, I haven't either, but basically, guys,
think of the 203k loan as a renovation loan. It's a government-backed loan, kind of like FHA,
but it also gives you the money to make certain renovations to your property as well.
Now, again, Ashton and I haven't used it, so we can't speak from first-hand experience about
how difficult it is to actually go through that renovation process. But like many government-type
products, there's usually a lot of hoops you have to jump through. So just for table six,
I think that's an important piece to know. Now, from a timing perspective, you've got what?
Roughly four months when your lease ends to hopefully be able to move out into somewhere.
So really, you need to be under contract in about three months because that'll give you
that last 30 days to be going through your escrow and moving out of your apartment.
So the first person I would go talk to now is a lender. And I would just get a really clear
sense on, hey, what am I pre-approved for? What kind of budget am I working with? And that'll,
I think, give you better context on what types of properties you should start looking for.
And then even though you're still kind of 30 days or three months out from actually
wanting to close on that property, I would still start searching today.
Like four months, like, yeah, let's hit the ground running. Let's go start hunting today.
Worst case is that you find something that is an incredible deal, and then you move into it,
or you try and negotiate maybe a slightly longer escrow period, or you tell your apartment, like,
hey, I'm willing to leave in a month or two early. Can I get a break and not break my lease?
But I wouldn't worry too much about the timing on the lease. I would start hunting for that
deal today. Because chances are, it's going to take you some time regardless to find a duplex
that not only meets your criteria as an investor, but also meets whatever criteria you need from
the 203k loan side as well. And also too, like, worse, if you do find a great deal,
maybe that leaves extra money on the table for you to maybe pay for your lease an extra month
or two while you're, you know, living in your duplex. So, like, if there is some overlap,
you have gotten a great deal, and you're not putting as much money into the property,
and instead you can, you know, pay for your lease extra. But I would definitely start
sooner rather than later. First of all, building your team, making those connections, and then,
you know, start putting offers into properties, you know, when you have the funds and you have
the pre-approval and you're ready to go is don't wait for your lease to end.
There was another question in here as to how do I renovate the tenant occupied
side within those same six months? So, one thing you could do is when you purchase the property
is you could put it into the contract that the purchase is contingent on that unit being vacant
and going ahead and having it vacant and renovating both at the same time.
The second thing that you could do is they stay in that unit, and you go to them and say, hey,
I'm renovating this other side, and when it is done, I would like to offer it to you to move
into, and you'll get this brand-new unit. Maybe you're increasing the rent a little bit. Hopefully,
they would accept that offer, move into that, and then you go ahead and start renovation on
the other side of it too. So, basically, you're giving them first dibs at this brand-new unit
that they can move into, and then you can go ahead. And that's a nice strategy because it
offsets you having two vacancies at once and not even having to find a tenant for the first
finished unit, and then you can move into the second one when it's finished.
And maybe the easiest approach of all is just to find one that's vacant right on both sides.
And if you can move into a unit where it's vacant, then that makes the whole musical chairs
of renovation a little bit easier. One thing to note there on the 203k loan is that,
and again, double-check this, guys, but I believe that you must use a licensed contractor for all
the work. So, you got to make sure, again, like we talked about building out your team.
That's the other person I'd probably start reaching out to now as well,
just to make sure that, like, hey, not only can you find someone, but do they have the room in
their schedule to actually start when you need them to start? Because if you've got this six-month
clock on when the renovations can be completed, if the contractor you like is booked out for three
months, well, now you've got 90 days left to finish all those renovations, right? So, I think
just making sure that you're having those conversations sooner rather than later to make
sure the timing works out will be important as well. And with your bank that you're going through,
like, especially if this is a small local bank to get this 203k loan, is ask them for a list
of vendors or contractors that they've already worked with on 203k loans. Because I did a new
construction loan, and the bank had to approve my contractor, but he was already on their list
of an approved and vetted contractor. So, if you can start interviewing and working off of
contractors that are already vetted by your bank and approved by them, and also ask your loan
officer for a recommendation, because the contractor left and didn't finish the job,
that loan officer is going to know because he probably withheld their last draw, you know? So,
they're the ones most of the time issuing the draws and making sure that the work is done,
hearing back from the inspectors that are inspecting before each draw. So,
you can always ask them for a recommendation too. Well, thank you guys so much for listening to this
episode of Real Estate Tricky. I'm Ashley, he's Tony, and we'll see you guys on the next episode.
