What Really Happened Between Lawson & Lindblad?

Formula 1 News
151 followers
7.1K Video Views·Jul 1, 2026
Arvid Lindblad and Liam Lawson engaged in a fierce battle during the 2026 Austrian Grand Prix. So, what happened? Who was at fault? Let’s discuss this.
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe 2026 Austrian Grand Prix saw significant friction within Racing Bulls as Arvid Lindblad ignored team orders to hold position, overtaking teammate Liam Lawson. While the team managed to restore Lawson to P9 via a strategic undercut, the incident highlighted a clash between Lindblad's impulsive ambition and Lawson's disciplined approach within the Red Bull junior system.
The 2026 Austrian Grand Prix gave us some pretty compelling storylines, didn't it?
Red Bull resurgence, Ferrari regression, Max and Lewis scrapping like the good old days
and a double points finish for Racing Bulls for the third straight weekend.
The fans of Slash Milton Keynes' base team have been cooking as of late.
Which is great, but it can also bring its own challenges, can't it?
See, Liam and Arvid are both early on in their respective F1 careers,
they both want to make an impression and they both want nothing more than to beat one another.
Tension between the two of them was always inevitable,
and we've just seen the best example of it yet.
So what happened? Who was in the wrong? Can Racing Bulls keep these two in line?
Or is this the beginning of one of the more feisty inter-teammate rivalries in Formula 1?
Well, my name's Tom O, let's talk about it.
So some of you might not even know that there was an incident,
because it was very much glossed over in the actual broadcast.
Let me give you the TLDR.
Because in qualifying, Liam just marginally edged out Arvid P9 for Lawson P10 for Lindblad.
And come Sunday race, both had identical starts off the line.
Both held position going through turn one,
although Liam was able to get a run on Isaac Hajar and overtake him into turn three,
moving up to P8.
Now, of course, eventually Hajar's race pace paid dividends,
he got back past Lawson,
and the two Racing Bull boys were racing in tandem,
one in front of the other, through that first stint.
No dramas.
Both pitted off of their medium compound tyres,
onto hards,
and then in that second stint, lap 21,
is where things started to go a bit wrong.
Because on the exit of turn one, Pierre Hamelin,
Arvid Lindblad's incredibly experienced race engineer,
has race engineered for Gasly,
Ricciardo,
plenty of big names during his time at the team,
tells his driver,
Arvid,
hold position.
Lindblad responds,
why?
Liftoff is critical.
Liftoff remains critical.
Again, at this stage of the race,
they're both pitted,
they're both sitting comfortably P9 and P10,
best of the rest.
That's literally all a team like Racing Bulls can dream to do.
They have to hope that things go wrong for cars up ahead to gain more points.
In terms of their controllables,
9 and 10 is optimum,
and they didn't have massive pressure from behind,
so it makes complete sense for the team to consolidate their position,
not take any risk,
both with the cars fighting,
but also reliability.
Gotta remember, it was absolutely roasting in Austria,
which obviously puts a lot more stress through components,
but even team personnel, right?
I feel like pit stop problems are more likely to happen when it's roasting,
because there's just more of a physical demand on these teams.
Let alone the drivers, right?
Everything gets more challenging when the temperatures go up.
The problem is F1 drivers are typically not ones to settle.
Being told to hold position behind your teammate,
your main rival,
many drivers would not be happy about that instruction,
and Arvid decided to take things into his own hands.
Now, of course, Arvid can push as much as he likes,
but if Liam's got the pace to stay ahead, then no problem.
However, it's because the instructions of the team were given to both drivers,
one decided to listen,
one decided to not.
Because as Lindblad was told to hold position,
Liam was also communicated a very similar, equivalent message.
So his race engineer, Alex Olopoulos said,
and tyre management, as you were at the start of the last stint.
Lawson responds,
okay, copy that.
Am I going to be attacked?
Negative.
Arvid will hold position.
We are not fighting.
Yet seconds later, on the run into turn four,
Lindblad does exactly that.
He chucks one up the inside and overtakes.
Liam's response,
dude, Alex,
Alex's response,
I told you what I was told.
I lift off 50 meters early, and I get attacked.
So, yeah, Liam took some margin,
and Arvid took that opportunity to get past his teammate,
against, flagrantly against, team instructions.
So that was lap 21.
Fast forward to lap 46,
and having spent that entire second stint
on the gearbox of Lindblad,
Liam Lawson was pulled in first.
Typically, you give the car a head priority
because of the power of the undercut,
but Racing Bulls did it the other way around.
Liam in first, Arvid in second,
meaning Liam was able to jump back ahead of his teammate
on those fresher tyres earlier,
a little bit more pace,
and got him done in the pits.
So with Lindblad back behind in the run up to turn three,
Liam says,
what about now?
Are we gonna be attacked?
And Alex responds,
he's been told to hold position.
As for an Arvid's car,
well, Pierre Hamelin made sure he got the message
loud and clear this time.
We hold position.
Arvid, we hold position.
Thank you.
Four times he said it.
Also, it's kind of funny how Liam's race engineer
went from Arvid will hold position
to he's been told to hold position
because you can't control these drivers sometimes.
And look, that's how the race ended.
Liam ahead in P9,
Arvid behind in P10.
Also, Liam did a quality double overtake
on Arvid and Ollie at some point in the race.
I can't even remember what lap it was,
but oh my God,
how did we not even see a replay of that
on the broadcast?
Insane.
Team Orders, broadly speaking,
I'm not a fan of,
but in that instance,
again, no massive pressure from behind.
Scorching high temperatures as well,
meaning that unreliability can certainly creep in.
And look, we're at the start of a new regulation period.
Of course, reliability is always going to be a factor.
So when you've got a comfortable position
and you know you can't really do any more,
you manage it,
you bring it home.
I understand completely why racing bulls
would make that call.
So then there was a little bit more radio
after the chequered flag
as Liam Lawson is about to pull back into the pits.
Team Principal Alan Permain jumps on
to speak to Liam directly.
Liam, it's Alan.
Be cool.
We'll sort it out.
Don't worry.
Be cool.
Liam responds.
Yeah, copy.
The last thing the team want is Liam
to be airing dirty laundry
and having a proper Arvid over the team radio,
which is fair, I guess.
You know, from a PR point of view,
that just opens up a can of worms, right?
And the team absolutely, clearly
have taken matters into their own hands
to undo Arvid's decision
by giving Liam the undercut.
Arvid's absolutely deemed to be in the wrong here
and it's really interesting listening
to his post-race interview with F1.
Overall, I'm happy.
Started P10, running behind Liam in the first stint.
Then I gave it a good go
on the start of the second stint
and got ahead of him.
A good go.
Your teammate was told to manage.
You were told to manage.
You didn't manage and you overtook him.
But then the team pitted him a lap earlier
for the last stint
and he undercut me with new tyres.
So I gave it a go.
I kind of thought they were going to do that.
It is what it is.
Look, he gave this interview
with kind of a wry, cheeky smile.
Almost like he's kind of been told off
and he kind of knows he shouldn't really have done it.
But he was having a bit of fun
and like there was no harm.
No harm, no foul, I guess.
Liam's entitled to be annoyed.
So is Alan.
To have a driver directly go against team orders
is always a headache.
I don't just want to sit here and dunk on Lindblad
because, look, I think there's a few reasons why I get it.
First of all, it's really easy to forget.
He's only 18.
He is a kid still.
And I know some of you might think,
oh, that's not a good enough excuse.
Well, it kind of is.
I'm sitting here as a 33-year-old man.
Me, when I was 18, Jesus Christ,
I was a completely different person.
I know these drivers are very mature for their age
because they're put into a system
and they've got the people around them
to get them to that place.
He is still super young.
And with that comes arrogance, naivety, whatever it is.
We talked about this with Kimi Antonelli
as a freedom of youth to take risks
and do your thing and not maybe think about the consequences.
That's just how you're wired at that age.
I also think there is a degree of hypocrisy here.
And I've talked about this before
when we've discussed Liam Lawson's
aggressive overtaking at times,
clashing with Alonso and Perez.
You know, being overly aggressive
is kind of held up on a pedestal
and lauded when you're a top driver at the front.
If you're a midfield or lower field driver,
it's kind of used against you.
And I would say the same goes for going against team orders.
You know, when a top driver,
when a Verstappen, a Hamilton, a Schumacher, a Senna
goes against the team and wins,
that mindset is looked upon from a very kind of,
yeah, well, that's what you've got to do.
That's a winner's mindset.
You can't go with the team.
You've got to look after yourself, blah, blah, blah.
Again, whereas if you're a mid, lower field driver,
totally different.
And then, of course, there is kind of what is at stake here
because it's quite an interesting situation, actually,
at Racing Bulls, I think,
because they've got a fantastic car, clearly,
like top end of the midfield,
up there with Alpine for best of the rest, for sure,
which gives both their drivers a fantastic opportunity
to showcase their ability, not only to Red Bull,
but to the rest of the paddock, right?
They've got long careers ahead of them
and there might be opportunities elsewhere
if they can't get a seat at Red Bull Racing.
But then at the same time, you've got pressure from behind.
Obviously, we've all seen the rumours
linking Solov to Racing Bulls, unsubstantiated rumours.
It's way too early on in the season.
Solov's doing fantastic, of course,
but Soa, Liam and, I think, Arvid
is doing a very good job this year
for his first year at 18 years of age, again.
So, there is that pressure there.
If there wasn't a really highly regarded Red Bull junior
who could well win Formula 2 this year,
that would take the pressure off a little bit.
But then also, you've got to look up and ahead, okay?
So, of course, questions around Max's future
aren't going away, whether he leaves F1 entirely.
We've seen reports about him having, you know,
his management having talks with McLaren,
I can't even quantify how unlikely, I think,
McLaren, Papaya, Verstappen would be,
but what do I know?
Either way, there is a chance that that seat becomes available
and, of course, Lindblad would want it.
And look, Liam, it's new management, right?
The Red Bull that, you know,
chucked him out after two weekends,
that was a Christian Horner, Helmut Marko Red Bull.
It is totally different management at the team now
and absolutely, I think, if Liam can do enough
and keep on this, he's been one of the, arguably,
top five drivers this year, I would say,
in terms of his consistency of delivery.
Like, why not?
Maybe Lauren Macias does give him an opportunity.
You got to know that Lauren kind of was, you know,
team principal at Racing Bulls when Liam was at the team.
You know, he knows Liam as a driver,
I think, a lot better than Christian
and Helmut ever really did.
Both of these drivers, Liam's, of course,
a bit further down the line in his career.
There's, what, four, five years between them?
Liam's, you know, had a very tumultuous start
to his F1 career with in, out, in, out, all that.
He's also proven himself to be very, very, very adaptable.
He's adapted to these cars fantastically.
You know, he's been quick in F3, F2, Super Formula
and DTM for a reason.
Barvid's youngest F3, youngest F2 race winner of all time,
made an incredible impression on his debut in Australia,
scrapping at the front with the best.
So, yeah, look, they've got a good problem here, Racing Bulls.
They've got two drivers, I think, with a lot of ability
and a lot of potential to continue to build on that ability.
What I will say, though, I do think Barvid will look back
with some regret as to how he handled this,
which, again, I can understand.
He's 18 years of age, impulsive, going for what you can.
I get it.
But actually, I think the best thing he could have done
on Sunday was listen to the team,
but sit on that gearbox of Liam, lap after lap after lap,
and just keep reminding them, I'm quicker.
Like, if there's an opportunity, I've got pace in hand, I'm quicker.
Don't make the move.
Show the team you can be trusted.
You can play the team game when it's asked of you.
But also, just keep knocking on that door.
Even if you get a look at Liam, just show him there
and make sure the team know that I could have made that move,
but I didn't.
That's hopefully going to give the team much more confidence
that they can rely on you when push comes to shove.
Are you going to work for the team,
or are you only going to work in your own self-interest?
For me, this head-to-head only gets spicier as the year goes on,
and I'm looking forward to seeing how it changes and develops.
Again, Liam's doing fantastic this year.
Arvid's been less consistent,
but I think their ceilings are already pretty close.
Their peaks, their good weekends, are very, very close to one another.
So let me know your thoughts and feelings in the comments below.
Are you annoyed at Arvid?
Are you giving him benefit of the doubt?
Where do you sit on this one?
And, of course, Liam fans, what have you made of his season so far?
And what are the opportunities for him?
You know, is a return to Red Bull a realistic thing?
I don't see why not.
If he keeps driving the way he is,
then he's absolutely putting himself in the shop window.
Comment, like, subscribe, hype.
Do all that good stuff.
My name's Tomo.
Thanks again.
Have a good one.
Ta-ra.
