Key Question of Whether Lance Twiggs Could Be CHARGED as Co-Conspirator, with Geragos and Murphy

WAN NEWS
11 followers
Jul 10, 2026
Megyn Kelly is joined by Mark Geragos and Matt Murphy, hosts of In The Well, to discuss whether Lance Twiggs could face co-conspirator charges, the significance of his DNA allegedly being found on key evidence along with Robinson's, the implications of his use immunity agreement, and more.
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis discussion analyzes the legal complexities and evidence surrounding the case of Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs. The conversation focuses on the reliability of witness reports, the presence of forensic evidence, the nature of \"use immunity\" granted to Twiggs, and the procedural differences regarding hearsay and cross-examination during preliminary hearings.
Let's talk about Lance Twiggs. That Turkey Tom report, which we've been looking into for the
better part of six months on our team, running it by the FBI, we've actually done a deep dive
on that report. It hasn't fallen apart. It's been repeated by some others. It hasn't gone
far and wide because the original source behind it refuses to come forward and identify him or
herself. But it does paint a picture, Matt, I mean, literally with pictures of their alleged
apartment of like a dark, destructive, sick home in which Tyler Robinson for at least some large
portion of the final year was OK, was like holding it together while this roommate was on a trans
spiral into the depths of inhumanity. And it does make you wonder what happened.
And but it also makes me much more inclined to believe he probably did know more than he's
letting on. And now we've heard his DNA is on the towel that was used to wrap the gun. OK,
it's from their home. Maybe he just touched the towel. I get it. Also, the screwdriver that they
found on the roof that the prosecution says was used to assemble the gun by Tyler Robinson.
I mean, maybe he touched the screwdriver and making all those crazy, crazy concoctions on
that table. I don't know. But he also was the one corresponding with Tyler in those text messages
that sound somewhat manufactured. It was not you, was it, Tyler? It was I, my love. I'm overdoing
it. But this is why a lot of people think that it's a Fed behind this whole thing or it's it's
a country or somebody's manufacturing these, whereas it could be a real or be the two of them
doing this little cosplaying act to keep Lance twigs out of the Fed's crosshairs when Tyler
knew he'd either be dead or arrested, as his own note says. Anyway, what do you make of it all?
Well, the description of the house reminded me of the place I lived in law school. But
look, there's an old adage crimes and held an evangelist as witnesses. OK,
we see this all the time when you get a gang case like the your witnesses are often little
gangsters or if you have a crime in jail, you always have criminals that are your witnesses.
The question is, is he telling the truth? And the other thing is, the way I see it,
and I'd love Mark's thoughts on this. I think all they have to do with Lance twigs is lay the
foundation, right, Mark? You got a note written by by Tyler Robinson, which is incriminating as
the one found under the computer keyboard and the text messages. All you really need him for
is to talk about that. I'm curious to see what else he said. But there's a there's also a love
affair here. And this goes to motive by Tyler Robinson, that he's somehow defending the honor
of his love, which is how he refers to Lance twigs. So, you know, the furry world is weird.
The idea that Lance is weird kind of fits perfectly in my mind that this is going to be
Tyler Robinson's gone off the deep end. He's decided that he's going to embrace
the trans community and and whatever. But then going and committing a murder,
you know, as a result of it, it all kind of it fits in a way. So that's my take.
What does it mean that Lance is getting use immunity, Matt, instead of getting charged
getting used? He has to make and they have to give him use. And especially I think when they
go through that. Yeah. So there's two kinds of immunity. There's there's immunity, immunity or
what's known as transactional immunity. That's like, you know, you confess to everything you
did and you received complete legal absolution. Those are actually very rare. I only did that
twice in my entire career. The other is what's known as use immunity. That's also known in the
federal federal world as queen for a day where you sit down and they immunize you against the
statements that you make in that interview and the derivative of that. But if independent
evidence arises outside of your interview or what they learn or are able to glean from it and in
further investigation, anything else separate, they can still prosecute you for that.
So in other words, you're you're given sort of carte blanche to to talk about what happened.
And then they agree not to prosecute you based on those sentences or those statements,
if that makes sense. So that's the common way it's done. And they have to do that. Otherwise
he would have a fifth member right against testifying when the trial comes around or
even at the prelim. If he didn't have it, he'd expose himself. That's right. He has to do it.
He's going to he has a right to counsel. They have to immunize him so that he can
so that he can participate in these. Do they have a right to cross examine, Matt?
Yes. Ultimately, they certainly do. But but you you hit the nail on the head on that one, Megan.
The there is there's no right to cross examine somebody at a preliminary hearing.
Hearsay is admissible in Utah, just like it is in California. That's been
appealed to the umpteenth that's gone to the US Supreme Court. It's OK.
So why are you saying otherwise, Mark? Because in California, as Matt will tell you,
when you do a hearsay prelim, we call it a 115 prelim that was based on the proposition.
The only way the California Supreme Court said that that still withstood constitutional scrutiny
is there had to be a corresponding section, which there is in California called 866,
which allows the defense to make a proffer to say, I want to either cross examine the
declarant, the hearsay declare. And here's why, because there's exculpatory evidence that I can
show on cross examination or I want to call. Well, we're not in California anymore.
Thanks for watching this clip. If you're new here, subscribe. We got a whole lot more goodness
where that came from. Would love to hear your feedback. You can email me to Megan M-E-G-Y-N
at Megan Kelly dot com or just leave a comment below. But join the community by becoming a
subscriber. We really, really value your input and your support. We may not always agree,
but we are always going to talk about it and respect. No BS, no agenda, no fear.
For the first time since World War Two, our national debt has exceeded the gross domestic
product. America's reckless government spending keeps catching up with us.
Higher inflation, higher prices, higher cost of living expenses and higher interest payments on
the national debt. Every dollar Washington spends on interest is a dollar it has to tax, borrow or
print. Smart retirement planners prepare for potential setbacks, and they can do that by
diversifying with a time-tested asset known for weathering the storm. Consider physical gold from
Birch Gold Group. Text MK to the number 989898 and Birch Gold will send you a free info kit on
converting an existing IRA or 401k into a tax-sheltered IRA in physical gold. You don't
pull the ripcord on your parachute once you've already hit the ground. Don't wait for economic
turbulence to diversify. Text MK to the number 989898 and consider owning some gold from Birch Gold.
