In the past 10 months the posture in the US has shifted from very positive towards AI to completely against both AI and Datacenters, yet somehow in favor of them both in China. I attempt to dive into the potential reasons behind it. Articles and Document read to create his video:
The speaker, a senior cloud engineer and AI researcher, argues that a coordinated propaganda campaign led by China, Russia, and Iran is attempting to turn U.S. sentiment against AI and data centers. By fueling domestic protests and promoting Chinese AI models, these actors aim to freeze U.S. AI development and allow Chinese firms to dominate the global market.
In the past 10 months, three major shifts have happened in USA in regards to AI. First,
people are protesting both data centers and AI, which in their minds tie together. Two,
people are now preferring the Chinese AI models over the U.S.-based AI models. And three,
the government, as well as the major AI companies based out of the U.S., are claiming that the
Chinese-based companies are now distilling the U.S.-based models to create their own
new open source models, and that's where the popularity seems to be coming from. However,
I saw some patterns emerging, so I decided to take a deep dive into this to see how organic
all of this sentiment was, and the results might surprise you. As that intro suggested,
it seems that there is a 10-month or more propaganda campaign turning the Western sentiment
or the U.S.-based sentiment away from not only the U.S.-based AI companies, but against AI in
general and data center expansion in general, and I'm going to show you some evidence to back that
up. Let me pause for a second. Who am I, and why do I care about these things, and why should I
even be talking about this? Well, first, I've worked in technology for 25 years. Right now,
I'm a senior cloud engineer. I'm also an AI researcher and AI educator. I'm certified in
generative AI, and I spend a lot of time paying attention to things that are happening in the
realm of AI. Aside from that, years ago, I used to write technology articles for the Epoch Times,
as well as many other projects related to journalism and also related to activism years
ago. So, I'm used to digging into topics, and I'm used to pattern recognition when I see
things catching on with people on social media as far as buzz topics and things of that nature. So,
when I saw things starting to happen, I paid attention to it closely. This particular video
is a Ganjing World exclusive, meaning I'm going to upload it only to Ganjing World for now.
If it ends up on other platforms, that's going to happen at a later date, but I felt this was
the correct platform for it. And I sort of rushed to get this video out because I felt the topic and
the content was important enough to not wait for all the research to come in. I'm going to be doing
more videos later digging into this even deeper than today's video. And if you'll excuse me,
I will be referencing my notes during this video. I just want to make sure I know what
I'm talking about and get all the facts right as I go along. Firstly, June 10, 2026, OpenAI
bans two China-based covert operations that use ChatGPT to generate content.
Two of the names that they described, one was the data center bandwagon and the other one was
tech and tariffs. Now, what OpenAI saw is they saw all the chat messages because OpenAI reads
your chat messages. They saw everything that they were doing and their system sort of flagged it,
so they paid attention to it closely. Here's the article from OpenAI where it says the PRC-linked
influence operations are targeting AI debates in the U.S. They're basically fueling the AI
debates in the U.S. PRC means People's Republic of China. And they also published this PDF,
which actually goes into great detail and gives some great examples. So what happened is these
groups posed as real news outlets, posting tweets and posting other posts on social media with these
cartoons that were basically propaganda, turning people's sentiment away from AI, away from data
centers, basically accusing these AI data centers of causing price hikes in the electrical grid of
the United States. And they didn't just post once or twice. They kept posting and kept posting and
kept posting. This type of behavior is designed to change opinions. And these cartoons, if you
know the history of cartoons, they began as a propaganda or political machine, a way to influence
people in a simplified fashion. And it wasn't just one or two types of posts. They kept going with
different types of posts that showed all different ways of basically convincing people that AI was
sucking up the entire electrical grid and was causing everybody's electrical prices to increase
and more or less get people really angry and upset with the AI companies and the companies
that are building data centers. The other thing they focused on was the tech and tariffs campaign.
This was a huge commentary because as we all know, Trump put tariffs on just about every type of
import from just about every type of country when he first got into office. And that stayed for a long
time and it continues to this day. Of course, China did not accept that. And this was apparently one of
their moves to counter that, is to turn U.S. sentiment away from this. And one of the most
telling aspects of this, and it's laid out in OpenAI's report, it says that these were not lone
trolls. These were not just organic people. It says OpenAI assessed operators were a private Chinese
tech company social media team working for provincial government clients. So OpenAI was
able to tie these to government bodies of China. And they went on this huge campaign about PJM
capacity auction prices. If you don't know, PJM is the largest power grid supplier in the United
States. They are responsible for delivering the energy to just about everywhere in the United
States, or at least a large portion of the United States. And it wasn't just on sites like
X. It was everywhere. And it didn't just come from China. That's the interesting part. It came from
also Russia and Iran. But as many of you may know, the relations between Russia and China are very
strong. The relations between Iran and China are very strong. And not only do Russia and Iran have
expats living in China, but China has expats living in Russia and Iran. And from all these
countries, it was hundreds of times over the six-month period that we're discussing, and nearly
at least four a day, but it was probably much more than four a day. But they could verify at least
four a day. And then those would get retweeted and retalked about and commented on and shared.
Now, another thing, aside from pushing out propaganda against data centers, against AI in
general, there was a whole other campaign to get people to prefer the Chinese AI models, which
appears to be in its highest point right now in social media, especially with what just happened
with Kimi and with GLM. And then on July 17, Xi Jinping in Shanghai held a conference inviting
29 countries into this talk, basically creating a world AI conference where they would talk about
what the future of AI would be and how people would share technologies and things related to
that. Now, I did a post on TikTok about this, and a lot of people commented, well, on that entire list,
aside from China, most of those countries were completely irrelevant when we're discussing AI.
And there was a lot of truth to that. So it appears that this was more PR than it was anything else.
And the organization that was announced during this conference was the WICO, the World AI
Cooperation Organization. Some of the countries present in this conference were Brazil, Indonesia,
South Africa, Pakistan, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and many countries from Africa.
And of course, there was zero Western-aligned countries there. And then President Xi announced
that there are 5,000 AI training slots for developing nations. So this conference, nothing
was actually achieved. It was more about standing in front of the camera and showing to the world
what the future plans are for AI. And it appears, of course, I'm not going to speculate heavily on
the motive, but it appears to be completely public relations oriented. And in one New York Times
article, Kyle Chan was quoted as saying, open source serves China's twin goals of bolstering
its image as an inclusive AI leader and reducing global reliance on American AI. So it seems that
the soft power frame is deliberate here, it seems. According to them, not according to me. And of
course, as many of us know, the Chinese-based models are cheaper. Their economy can support
lower prices. So of course, it's going to be very attractive to people who are not
happy with paying high prices for AI. And not only this, if you are to browse on X right now,
you will see a large number of people pushing really hard, repeating the same scripts
of how wonderful the Chinese AI models are and how terrible the United States is. And they all
use the exact same verbiage, the exact same wording. I'm not going to present examples for the sake of
not making this video too long, but in one of my future videos, they will probably be there.
And then we shift to the distillation topic. So Anthropic has accused Alibaba of distillation.
In June 2026, Anthropic tells the U.S. Senate that Alibaba's Quinn Lab ran the largest known
distillation attack on a commercial model. 2,500 fake accounts had 28.8 million exchanges
with Claude over 44 days. That's enormous. That's an entire bot army. And the purpose was to train
Quinn to match Anthropic's frontier model on coding, reasoning, and cybersecurity. The result
of this is the U.S. Treasury Secretary has threatened sanctions on China AI firms. Open
source is not open season on American IP. It was a quote from him. And then to dive a little bit
deeper, let's keep going with this. Leaked internal documents, 399 pages from a Chinese
Academy of Sciences spinoff first reported by the New York Times and Vanderbilt in August of 2025.
So we're going back. I mentioned 10 months. We're going back. Describe a turnkey AI propaganda
system. Auto-detect regional political trends, select targets, generate tailored content,
deliver via realistic fake accounts. Its U.S. targets include every member of Congress,
4,000-plus Trump supporters, 5,000 journalists, and 20,000 companies. So this was a huge campaign
even back then. And then Meta calls spamouflage, which is linked to Chinese law enforcement,
the largest covert influence operation ever discovered. Thousands of accounts across 50-plus
platforms since 2017. So this is not new. We are just seeing the latest iteration of all this.
So if we keep digging, we keep uncovering layers of it similar to an onion.
And then Microsoft's Threat Analysis Center documented CCP-linked actors using AI-generated
content across 31 languages. So Microsoft is paying attention to, and they've documented this,
and they've published it. So this type of content, this type of campaign goes back some time. I'm
just reinforcing what I'm talking about with some evidence. And now what we're seeing is the U.S.
government is finally taking this seriously, and they're treating this as a real threat.
There's a lot of sentiment against what the U.S. government is doing because people have been
influenced to the point where they now trust anything coming out of China before they trust
anything coming out of the United States. That includes the news. That includes any government
announcements. And this is, from what I can tell from all the evidence that I'm gathering,
this is not accidental. This is on purpose. And this was the purpose of all these campaigns all
along. My research is far from complete. I wanted to get this video out today
while I'm researching this to raise awareness, but I will be digging deeper into this. I will
be taking my time and being more articulate with what I found. But hopefully this is a good
introductory video for the topic itself, for the conversations that we should be having.
So there's three basic things happening. It appears that actors from China, from Russia,
from Iran are trying to get the USA to basically protest AI and data center development to the
point where it freezes. And during this, it appears this is a great opportunity for the
China-based AI companies to step in and take over that market. Of course, a lot of this that I'm
saying is a mixture of what I'm interpreting from all these articles and documents and speculation.
So it's a healthy level of speculation. As mentioned not long ago, I will continue to
dig into this and I will present my findings then. For now, take this as you will. I've
you references and I will be including links at the bottom of this video.