Juan O Savin: New Explosive Intel 8.3.26 - What's Coming In The Next 7 Days

You and I have talked over the years and I've been very clear with you that the proper place that I think you fit best isn't so much to be the choke point of only one side or way of saying stuff, that you need to have a number of the different people on even with opposing viewpoints within reason. We don't need people that are just fractious for fractious sake that you needed to, for your audience sake, have a healthy dialogue and people with real perspectives, real histories, have the chance to say their piece and then your listeners can weigh it out and it's a pretty smart audience and then kind of see where they're at. And even when somebody maybe has even a harsh disagreement, they may have things that they say where you go, well, but I also need to dial that into the equation. You know, it's a conversation. If you have the various viewpoints, there's a scripture amongst many counselors, there is safety. Why? Because you hear not just opposing viewpoints, maybe they're saying the same thing, but they're using different terminology or they're coming from a different vector or direction. And you think about it, well, you know, I've got to go with the same objective, the same location, but maybe it's wiser, smarter, more appropriate to come from this way as opposed to that way. Okay. So that you have somebody on who has a different perspective, way of saying things, viewpoint is healthy for your audience. I mean, you're trying, you're not trying to be the internet police and only one way. And if they don't say it the way I want it said, then it doesn't get said from my channel to your listeners. I don't think that would be a very good service to the audience that you have assembled. So I think, you know, and anybody, look, the president had these people in to his office, December 18th, 2020, who wanted him to allow him to make and then sign an insurrection act document. And he agreed to it initially, they had a viewpoint, that was Pat Byrne, the Flynn brothers, Sidney Powell, and others. But then in the middle of the night after they left, and we know this from the January 6th testimony under Pelosi's Congress, he met with general staff, generals, and a couple admirals. And they advised him that if they went the route of the insurrection act for not providing the information on foreign interference, which they were required to by the executive order 14838, that if he had gone the insurrectionist route, he'd have got the same result Lincoln did, which was a civil war by late spring, early summer of 2021. And so to protect the country, even though he listened to these people, listened to what they had to say, initially agreed to allow a document to be made, on further consideration, he did not proceed. And by the way, anybody that says that there's nobody that invited Trump to run, there's nobody behind the scenes. Okay, so you're saying that Trump lied. Trump said he was invited to run, he said it was 200 generals. So you're telling me that Trump lied to the American people, there's no general staff that he's been consulting with behind the scenes. That testimony before Congress under oath was a lie, that he consulted with general staff, that you didn't get told who precisely those people were, except that that was general staff advisors to the president behind the scenes. That's a lie. That's what you were just told. Is it a lie? Now your audience gets to weigh it out and decides. And by the way, most of everything that we need to talk about here that's coming up, you're not gonna have to wait very long. The midterms are coming like a freight train. The president did the address to the nation on Thursday night, two weeks ago. These things are coming to a head very quickly. And by the way, the precise pivot point just occurred yesterday with Fauci's testimony before Congress. Let me just add this one little detail here that all of your audience should be thinking about, should be aware of. The entire COVID debacle was about elections. That's what is not widely understood right now. That's how you got the drop boxes, the surge in mail-in voting, and the push, the move that was planned over the next several years still, long before they were gonna release a vaccine, because they were saying it was gonna be five, six, seven, even 10 years before you got a vaccine. We would have already had the vaccine passports internal in America. You couldn't leave your house without a vaccine passport. You had to have every seasonal vaccine planned on. And we have the documents, including from Fauci, by the way, about the ramp up that was intended using COVID. When he took the Fifth Amendment, that wasn't just to not say anything because he didn't want to have to tell the truth. That was against his own legal protection for prosecution purposes, not to be made a witness against himself. The documents already witness what's going on here. He was part of a plan, both internal and external to the government of the United States, operating with foreign actors to impose something on not just America, but the world, which would affect the way that we can come together and vote. COVID was about the vote. That's the whole key here. And as I told your audience the other day, the inflammation... Adamantio Right, but hold on. So if you say that to someone like Jerome, they'll say, well, those are just conspiracies. No, there's no proof in that. There's no validation in that. There's no proof. What you're saying is inside knowledge. What you're saying... But Jerome would argue with you on that and say... Adamantio Okay, well, then he's arguing against people who testified under oath before Congress. Does he want to get under oath before Congress and say there's no plan? On what knowledge does he have that? I just gave you congressional testimony proof that what he said is false. Adamantio I'm saying about the putting us in lockdown and, you know, everyone would have a vaccine passport, the whole thing. That's where we're headed. That's exactly what Fauci is all about. Adamantio Right. And I agree with you. I believe that 100%. I know that. I've talked with you enough times to know that that's... and just watching it play out. We all know that. My audience knows that. And so what do you have to say to the people now that are in this camp, right, that are jumping ship? I mean, Trump saved this country already. Already, we're in the fight. I see the deep staters about to go down. Their ship is sinking. But so many people that cannot see, you know, cannot see the strategy here are jumping ship like a Candace Owens, a Tucker Carlson. What do you... can they only just see a fraction of what's going on? Do they not see the whole strategy? Do they not realize where we would be right now without Trump? We'd be in a Hillary presidency. I mean, or this country would have been done by now. Nuked. COVID. Socialism. Communism. It would have been a game over if Trump wasn't in there. So what do you have to say? Let me just say this in there. The game has been allowed to go forward. And we are in an excruciatingly serious situation. In a don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes type of mentality. When Trump stood down and did not allow an Insurrection Act document to be created, which he could then consider signing. When he, under the advice of the general staff advising him in the early morning hours of December 19th of 2020, which we have congressional testimony concerning after the meeting with the people who wanted him to allow Sidney Powell to create the document in the White House in a secure location because there's no form letter to be used. You have to have it written up. You couldn't use one Lincoln use to write that document up and then Trump consider it and sign it. When that wasn't done, the reason that was given why Trump didn't do it is because it would in fact lead to civil war. The American public wasn't ready yet, didn't understand what all was in play. So they've had to allow a lot of this to play out to show that you weren't going to get to election justice through the courts. You weren't going to get to election justice with the legislatures, both state and federal, the governors that you couldn't protect the civil rights of American citizens, their constitutional rights to an honest, fair election and vote through the normal processes. Because not only were we under attack, but as Trump showed us within his rallies, twice on the rally tour across America, he did a scene like the scene in Patton at the opening, where he walks off the stage, the curtains open and he walks off the stage and there's an American flag in front of him facing the audience. And he walks off the stage down steps out of sight. And as you look at the American flag, as the curtain is drawn wide, the stars on the flag are blacked out. I've told your audience over and over and over and over. Trump is communicating to all the ships at sea within the fleet as the admiral of the fleet. He's communicating using the language of flags, the language of semaphore. A flag with blacked out stars, who could even imagine any American political candidate using that, displaying that? How can that be allowed to happen? And what does it mean? In the language of flags, that means you're on occupied territory. It's a warning to all the soldiers and civilians present that you're on occupied territory. Right. You are the challenge. Every person. Are they actually who they say they are doing what they do? The reason that's important is because we're in a life and death situation and they're inside the gate. They're inside the country. Trojan horses have been opened up and infiltrators all through our systems. Now, as to what somebody like Corsi says or anybody else, at this point, I don't need to. I'm not the Internet police. You aren't either. They say their piece. The audience listens, weighs it out. You're now only months from finding out who's right. So I don't need to attack anybody and neither do you. Your listeners weigh it out and they watch and see what happens. And if you're in the zone where I think you should be, you should be battening down the hatches and preparing because we're moving through now. I think we, as of yesterday, left the category two storm and moved into a category. Why, as of yesterday? Because of the Fauci testimony. It's on now. So many times I lost count. But the information that he was being asked is related to documents being released. So when you say we're not going into a category three storm, what what can we expect? Well, you're going to have all sorts of of disruptions, challenges. You've got to further secure the ship because it's not going to. In fact, what you do when you move into that kind of a weather situation, you have to maintain forward progress to have steerage. So you're not just talked about by every wave, current or wind. So what you do if the sails are full up, you could break a mast. You could break the ship and now you're just driftwood. So what you do is you shorten the sails so that the wind isn't so great on those sails that it breaks the mast. And as the wind continues to increase, you'll have to the sail area, the surface area even more so in order to still have steerage for progress in the heavier weather. And, you know, to do that, you're not just down in the cabin, hunkered down, waiting for the thing to end. You're active. You're full at it to protect the ship. Every person doing their job, tied with a rope so you don't go washed overboard. And we have a lot of critical work that's going to happen to maintain forward progress as a country. Had the president signed the Insurrection Act, had it been created back in December 18th of 2020, in those intervening days before January 6th, 2021, had he done that and gone after the traitors at the heads of the various intelligence agencies who refused to give their reports about foreign interference in the 2020 election within the 45 days allotted, had he gone after them, you'd have seen the country start coming unraveled and certain sections of the country wanting to break off and go this way and other sections going another way. You'd have had the basis for civil war in America. Even now, there is talk, and I hear the information, where states like California want to lead in proceeding forward with an election on time, even if the president orders that it stops. But that is not understanding. He will not do so as the president or the chief of police of the United States of America. He does it as commander-in-chief because the origins of the threat, which is why he said what he said and put it on the record officially on that Thursday night press conference. It's China. It's a nation-state level attack. He must address the attack, not as the president, but as the commander-in-chief, and in fact, is already doing so. The hidden part that even a Corsi, in my opinion, is not acknowledging or understanding is that when he took the role of commander-in-chief March 13th of 2020 and declared a national emergency and then closed up Cheyenne Mountain on March 15th, that national emergency has never been rescinded officially correctly. Even Biden couldn't rescind it. There's a lot of technicalities that won't waste time with your listeners right now. I've mentioned it other times. The short version is that only Trump could rescind it, or if he is dead or not able to function, it would be three generals running Cheyenne Mountain. The contention has been that senior executive service created under Carter by an executive order has the right to run the country from a continuity in government standpoint. And that's where Cheney was every time he had a fake heart attack. And he'd always laugh about how he's running the shadow government. By the way, that's why at the September 10 through 13 conference that I'm holding in Vegas, the Storm Summit, one of the central points of the entire conference, how many people have addressed 9-11 in the last many, many years, but the most crucial event to create the basis for much of what's going on in the country right now originated and pivoted off of September 11, 2001. We will be addressing that in force with some of the most amazing stuff you've ever heard in your life. And by the way, the Ahern Hotel is sold out. A couple of other hotels are nearing that condition. So if you're wanting to come and do it at a reasonable cheap price on the hotels like that, the price goes up. I think we've pushed it to August 2nd, just allow people to clear their, you know, some people only get paid at the end of the month. There's some of the contracts or government employees like that. So we want to make sure that people get a chance to sign up at the lower price. It goes to $700 for the tickets as of, I think, August 2nd, midnight or whatever, August 2nd. So if you want to come, better come. It's going to be one of the most amazing conferences you've ever seen in your life, as far as I'm concerned. We have an astonishing group of speakers, including the Able Danger team from 9-11. Kurt Weldon will be speaking. His book comes out on 9-11 concerning the mischief behind the scenes related to 9-11 and his attack. So you do believe there will be a pause? You do believe there will be a pause for the midterms? There has to be, correct? Well, even for example, Bannon, who talks to the president several times a week, Bannon came out Monday and made it official. He believes that the election is going to be paused. He thinks the pause would happen late August. You know, I think it actually, myself, I think it's the last second late October. I think Bannon would probably, you know, kind of like feint in the jab. You know, he's probably making the deep state feint, like they're looking at August, but it's probably going to be really October, I think. Well, and of course, you've been a guest over at Bannon. I mean, he's a serious player, okay? He's not kidding around. But I want to think, I think he's putting out real information, but also disinformation to kind of throw him off. Well, by the way, Bannon's going to be at the conference speaking. Bannon is one of our in-person guests at the conference. Well, I'm probably going to go, Juanito, okay? I'm probably going to go. Yeah, I think you need to. I'm probably going to be there just to give me the mic. That's all I have. Okay. Well, but here's why I say this, Neil. More and more people are understanding that if we don't pause the election, I mean, serious people, if we don't pause the election, you know, Peter Tichten agreed with me on stage, the president's going to have to pause the election. He talks to the president several times a week behind the scenes. More and more very serious players. You know, Bannon, he can't toy with his listeners frivolously, and he made a very direct statement and weighing everything out. Even, you know, one of our staff over there, unauthorized Mark Cook, who's doing the presentations all over the country, the hand count paper ballot roadshow. He was hesitant. You know, we put together the 17 page proposed executive order for Trump a year and a half ago, which Trump has acknowledged was on his desk, and he's implemented with executive orders significant portions of that. He hasn't put in place that precise executive order, which was just updated recently because it wasn't enacted with enough time to affect the midterms. And now we're inside that zone. So there's still stuff that has to be done even after a pause before we can have the election run correctly. So that's been updated and sent over to the White House. But with that in mind, even Mark did an article just the other day on his ex post, comparing it to the 737 crisis that happened several years ago. He had two aircraft crashed, even though there was warnings out there and similar to the space shuttle where we had warnings that to launch during cold weather was extremely dangerous because the O-rings couldn't expand fast enough for the hot gases. And, you know, as long as you're warm weather, the temperatures above freezing when the O-rings have had a chance to acclimatize, no problem. You do it below freezing and next thing you know, you're going to kill people. And that's exactly what happened. We know that this election situation has not been corrected from 2020. The president said China interfered in our election and it flipped the outcome. And that's 2020. By the way, just one little factoid. The president, is Trump lying? Is he bald-faced lying when he says to audiences across America and around the world, and said so a year or so, a year and a half ago, spring of 2025, when he had all the generals assembled, Trump said, I was 45, 46, although I really don't want to take credit for that, and now 47. Was he 46? Is that either the most dumb-ass, bald-faced lie ever in the history of the world? Is he senile? Or is he in fact, was he operating at 40? Listen, you don't have to convince me. I'll say it out loud. I'm here publicly. But I'm doing this for your audience. I agree with the mental gymnastics. I want them to go through the mental gymnastics. Is Trump a liar? And most of my audience is going to agree with you because they were really frazzled. But there's a lot of the audience that's still on the fence. I'm helping that portion. I know I'm talking to the choir with a lot of people, but let me just say this, Nino. The amount of time that we have to wait at this moment in time, it doesn't even bother me that we've got fence riders. Stand back and watch what happens. So what do you have to say about the people that are jumping ship right now, like Tucker, like Candace? Are they part of a better or a bigger operation to maybe form a new party? You know, a lot of people have that kind of hunch like, hmm, are they, you know, the disgruntled right that will absorb the new party as the Democrat party gets destroyed and gets taken down because we're going to need another party. Well, let me let me just say something here. You know, for example, one of the things that was tough, you know, I suggested within the Flynn camp very directly, very precisely, way, way, way back when he was still headed for prison, that he would need to get himself on the ballot running for president. And in fact, he wouldn't be running for president, technically be running for vice president. But that's the way you do it. You get on there and then you show your perspectives, your worth, your insights. And then, you know, even if you're not going to get to be president, you get considered for a vice presidency or even high office in the person that wins. But you're you're in the fight, helping fight forward. When I did that, a lot of things happened in the interim. One of the things that was very directly said was, well, what if something happens with President Trump? What if something happens that comes off the rail? Do we have even a viable alternative to move forward with? Who's the person that if you don't have a Trump is in a position where the public even knows who they are somewhat, just name recognition alone, let alone what they actually think and do. Is there anybody in the wings that could pick up the baton and move forward? And so part of the logic there was that Flynn was staying in the race, fighting hard to be at least an option, one of a handful of options. Was he wrong to do that? Was the logic, the calculation, the calculus wrong to try and fight from that position? And was he truly an enemy of Trump by trying to run? And I would contend, you know, iron sharpens iron, his brother sharpens brother. I was not a fan of Flynn presidency. In fact, I think there's things that I did not do it. But would he have been the worst option in the world? No, not by a far stretch. And so but very controversial, even within the Trump camp. There's people that love and people that hate him. You know, sometimes he's in favor. And then a short while later, the president will pick up the phone, because he's pissed off about something. Is it healthy, though, that we have at least some, some options out there playing for that position? Yeah, I think it is totally healthy. It's important. That's America. That's Americana. Within that kind of a mindset, some loyal opposition or difference of opinion and viewpoint is healthy. So I think there's some utility to that. Now, at this moment, it's about closing ranks. You may disagree and still be a good guy whether or not we should pause the election this fall. At the end of the day, it's not everybody's. It's not up for discussion at some level. The decision I would contend has already been made. And in order to protect the Republic, there isn't any way to fix the election system before November 3 this year. Why? Because it's already fixed. You already have candidates on the ballot through fraudulent primaries, fraudulent votes in the primaries because you didn't clean the voter rolls. And you didn't fix the election systems, machines, etc. So now you have, if you did go proceed forward to vote, you would have a fraudulent election no matter what at this point this year on November 3. And you have states like California trying to bring in other allied states to go forward no matter what Trump does within a commander-in-chief role. So there is going to be civil unrest and there is going to be stuff at the state level to challenge Trump's support. Adam Chapnick How much civil unrest, how many threats have we neutralized, Juanito? Have we neutralized what, 60%, 70%, 80%? How many of the threats have we neutralized? I mean, what are they willing to do? What are they capable of doing? Juanito I don't know if I could quantify that precisely because there's different levels of threat. Even within what the president is doing, buying time over this last five years, through a prior election, another midterm, the presidential election 2024, how do you gauge the magnitude of each individual threat, the country falling into civil war or nuclear devices? Remember the lead up to the 2024 election, we had everything that could fly out searching for any hidden signatures of nukes loose in America, as well as other places. We still haven't located all of those missing nukes. And in fact, there's still a threat, Iran, the whole thing with, right now, Alex Jones is saying Trump's getting ready to send troops into Iran, that we're getting ready to reinstitute the draft system, and we're going to send troops whether they like it or not into Iran. It's actually a bullshit statement. And all we're doing is re-implementing a ability to sign up for a draft if it was necessary, and those processes are continuing into the fall. It's a national security issue, but it doesn't say we're sending anybody into Iran or would even need to or want to. We don't want to put troops in Iran, where Trump has shown very troops home. That's somebody else's wet dream. He's shutting down wars, not starting them up. And if you have to bring them to a head and get it over with, that's on the course of shutting it down and dismantling Iran internally from a militarized standpoint. In fact, the one thing going to the nuke stuff, what Trump is really doing there, in part, he's looking for who's going to get in control in Iran that's going to agree to give us all of the yellow cake, all of the, as he likes to refer to it, nuclear dust, the highly refined material from which you make enriched uranium material useful for a bomb. He wants all that back, as he states it, back. What do you mean back? Did we have it ever in the first place? Yeah. A lot of that stuff that came from uranium-1 sales that went to Russia and then went to Iran, and we want it back. It was done under frauds by the Clintons and the Obamas. We want it back so they can't make a nuclear bomb out of that material. And until we get a regime that's willing to give it back to us, there won't be any peace. And we're not in any rush to have peace out of Iran and then have the oil flowing again to disrupt oil supplies, providing it into China and other things. So as long as they're not willing to work with us, then, you know, let them just sit. And that is to the benefit of the Iranian people. We're not in there to kill the Iranian people. We're trying very meticulously to keep civilian deaths to the absolute bare-ass minimum, no matter what anybody's telling you from our side. It is a war zone, and there's a lot of drama there. Nothing's perfect in war. And then as far as selling out to Israel, that's the complete charade. What do you think about that? Benjamin Netanyahu being here, he was berating Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio publicly, it looked like in a video. He looks very... I didn't just look like it. It was a fact. He was berating. Yeah. So, yeah. I mean, what was that about? He looks pissed. And I told my audience today on Ringside with Nino, well, there's a reason he's mad. He's pissed because we're not playing ball. Yeah. Trump is, again, a lot of the problems in the world, people want to say it's a Jew problem, it's an Israel problem. I would contend that that is a misstatement. It is a globalista problem, and they use the shield of different factions and groups, Hezbollah, Iran, China even. China's not run internally. China's run by the banks out of the city of London. China's just a branch office. Hong Kong, just a branch office for the banks out of the city of London, where the queen has to curtsy and bow before the mayor. The king has to curtsy and bow before the mayor of the city of London once a year to show who's really in charge. What, the king of England? The queen of England has to bow to the mayor of the city of London? You bet your fat ass. What's going on here? The banks are running this stuff, including China. We're fighting a group that's different than most people even understand. It's an illusion. You're seeing a mirage of power, and who's the real powers behind the thrones. That's what Trump's really fighting. When he cut off the oil flow out of Iran and the money, and the troll tax for every tanker going through the Gulf was going to the city of London. That's what he cut off. He cut off the money supply, USCID to be used by SES and Serco, Serco being the British Commonwealth version of senior executive service here in America, doing that same stuff worldwide. We're cutting off the money flow to these places around the world. Trump is damaging and has been damaging. The generals behind Trump have been damaging the cash flow and the arms flow to the people who want to have continuous wars all across the planet. We're getting closer and closer by the hour to now coming home as we quiet things around the world, to having this internal fight to recapture control of the helm of the ship of state of America from these pirates, these globalista who have hijacked control of the ship of state of America. Trump's leading that charge with the generals behind him. It's a gruesome thing, but you don't have to wait very long. You'll be able to see pretty shortly is Trump right or is Corsi right? Is Trump on the saving path or is Alex Jones the one that knows more about what's going on? Who will be proven true in this? And your audience has been given great service by Amino in at least allowing the other people to state their case and look at it. And now time will be the test and we don't have long to wait. It's not years now to find out where this is going. You'll know in a matter of months where this is going. What's your thoughts on Lindsey Graham? I've heard you say Lindsey Graham was a rat and he was there with Trump in meetings where Trump had his hand on the rat's tail. You've referred to Lindsey Graham as a dirty rat, kind of on the same page as McCain. A lot of people now say, oh, he's a patriot. He's this and that. Did he take a deal? Did he take a deal and was given an honorary funeral? I mean, what's the story of Lindsey Graham? Can you say anything? Well, let me just say this concerning the funeral. Go look at the flag draped across the coffin. It was it was there was no wrinkles. There was a wrinkle. It was very one ******* wrinkle. Is that really? That's all it takes. Yes. And really. And yeah. And let me just add this, however. You have double agents, even triple agents. What was it that didn't want Lindsey gone for? Who is he communicating with? He was certainly within the Israeli. That's why Netanyahu showed up for the funeral. He was certainly in the Ukraine lobby. There was lots of stuff going on there and had been for a very long time. In fact, even going back to the attempt to get us into a fight in Syria with McCain and like that, Lindsey was right along with that. Was he providing some level of direct input to President Trump from the people that he was talking to? You know, communicate with everybody. And sometimes the knowledge on details on that don't come out for generations. So I think that there is it will be quite a while before we truly, really know and understand where Lindsey fell in so much of that. And by the way, the whole gay thing. Well, let me just add this. Nixon, when he needed to have an intelligence service that was his own intelligence service, not tied to the CIA or FBI because he wasn't getting accurate intelligence from them, instituted what he called the Houston Project. And in the Houston Project, most of his agents were double and triple agents and were gay to infiltrate the various places. In fact, his number one agent within the Houston Project got information weeks in advance concerning what was going to happen at the Watergate Tower and the setup of Nixon got it from a tranny security guard, a transgender security guard at the Watergate Hotel, came back and told Nixon exactly what was planned. And it was a Rockefeller operation to take out Nixon, that Nelson Rockefeller was tied into the overall operation. Nixon blew it off and said, no, even they wouldn't conceive of something that crazy. And then it happened. You can go back and look, these are records that are out in the public that you don't have to guess if I'm telling you something true. This is the history. But it was gay operatives, his chief agent, and all of the people around them were all gay because Washington is run by sex clubs in many ways. And so was England and stuff like that in that time period. And the information they got was accurate. Lindsey Graham fit somewhere in that category. Will he be remembered in history as a good or bad- Did he take a deal? Did he take a deal? I don't think it's possible for you to operate in that realm and not have taken multiple deals. Part of the problem for the bad guys and the good guys is who's he really working for? At the end of the day, he was still working for himself. He was just trying to stay alive. Was he promised an honorary death if he took the deal and he would be taken out a certain I don't know that anybody we can talk to knows the truth of that. God himself is the only one that truly knows what was promised or not promised, which operation he was actually being loyal to, etc. Although I believe that Trump understood the circumstances that Lindsey was in and that Lindsey was a conduit of information that Trump and the people around him felt was useful. It doesn't mean that Lindsey was necessarily on anybody's side. He was on his own side trying to survive. When you get in deep in that kind of a situation, and this is a hard one for people to get their minds around probably, but it's just a fact. When you get in deep in that way, there's a certain point where it's every man for himself. You're in the tsunami. At any given moment, any one of the players you have understandings with, agreements with, or conveying with, they may all converge on you and want to take you out because you're not convenient for any of them. I will add this. There is a context for what happened with Lindsey and the timing and locations and other things that were in play. He was a threat to multiple sides, I believe, at this exact moment. I know what the behind-the-scenes precise story is. I think it's accurate, but I'll not repeat it for the time being. It's not been proven adequately, but I'm fairly comfortable that I understand exactly what happened from people who were pretty close to the situation. I will wait and see how that plays out. Let me just say this. Anybody that wants to do that until the end of the month... Actually, I think we're going to the midnight on the 2nd because some people get paid at the end of the month. They need a day to reconcile the books, whatever. The September 10th through the 13th conference in Vegas is going to be one for the ages. It's the last major conference in the country, I believe. Certainly, the White House has conveyed that information to us. We're last up at bat before we go into the midterms or whatever drama happens in relation to the midterms. It's going to be a heck of a conference. The people presenting, world-class presenters, everyone, the 9-11 stuff occurs there. By the way, Tina Peters will be there. Her birthday is 9-11. We have other things that will be presented in the course of it, including the election fraud stuff, the latest, just an amazing group of speakers. By no stretch or repeat of what just happened in June, this is a very new situation. 9-11 is at the core of this because 9-11 is the pivot that allowed so much of the frauds occurring in America institutionally to move forward to capture America. Remember, the Patriot Act was passed in the aftermath of 9-11. Homeland Security, the condensation, the collection, the centralization of all of our intelligence-gathering institutions in America through Homeland Security happened in the wake of 9-11. The fraud of 9-11, free passports of the hijackers turn up unscarred, singed in any way on the streets of New York after the plane crashes. The bullshit's there. It's almost unfathomable, except in the world of illusions, to pull the wool over the American people's eyes. And then senior executive service where Cheney was running the shadow government with every fake heart attack. Take a deep breath. This is where we pivot as a people, and that conference is going to be amazing. We're re-showing the movie Dark Horse. It's the second time. It's the only other major premiere. There have been a handful of very small audiences that got to see the movie by contract with the directors and producers. They only get to show it a couple of times in the country. They chose our conference to do that, and so that's the second time. It's Jim Caviezel's latest movie. It's a fantastic movie. We'll show that. Then we're showing the first two episodes of Roseanne Barr's new TV show. There's still a clearance that has to be had within the money side of that. I think that's a little in the next day or so. That'll be epic. By the way, the trailer for Roseanne's show, my chief of staff Matt and I keep laughing with lines out of the trailer that are said. They're so funny. I mean, it's just hysterical. So yeah, you're going to be getting quite a treat if you get to be there. So be there, be square. All right, bro. All right. Stay with me just for one moment. I appreciate them giving me a chance to say this. We're not the internet police. A lot of this stuff will be known one way or the other very shortly. Relax. We'll see who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't. You got it. Stay with me.