During the third meeting of 2026, the Advisory Council will hear from a panel organized by the research subcommittee; updates from federal agencies, including an overview of the authorities of the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; legislative updates from advocacy groups; and an update on the Robotic-Enabled Microsurgical Intervention for Neurodegenerative Disease (REMIND) Study. Advisory Council subcommittees will also present their recommendations for adoption by the full Advisory Council.
---
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
http://www.hhs.gov HHS Privacy Policy
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI Generated
This meeting addressed public comments on the national plan for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). Advocacy groups emphasized the need for legal protections for asymptomatic individuals, specialized recognition and care for Frontotemporal Degeneration (FTD) and Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), and systemic reforms to prevent medication errors and discrimination.
All right, we are on the homestretch folks. We have a
One of the most important parts of our agenda where we do get to hear from the public
So I'm going to turn it over to Maria to
Launch us off for our public comments today, Maria. Oh, Maria's got a login
Because we have this meeting in the building today
Hhs social media just shared the RFI on their X and their Twitter. So please feel free to amplify
Though that our call for input on the national plan
Of course, we are so pleased to have everyone here who can make a public comment
But that really spreads the opportunity for members of the public to weigh in on what will be in the national plan
So I don't know what it's called. Now that it's X reacts retweet
Retweet the post reshare on LinkedIn. That's probably more the vibe of this room and thank you in advance
Thanks so much Helen, sorry, I didn't mention that before
We will start off with
Public comments, I think we'll start with the folks who are in person. So no particular order
We'll start with Ian Kramer with the LEAD coalition
And I think we're not in our usual microphone, but we're all the way in the corner
Good afternoon, everybody
I'm Ian Kramer executive director of the LEAD coalition where the uniting voice of approximately
260 member and allied organizations and over 500 university-based researchers
Thank you for the opportunity to provide some public comments today
And thank you all for your service on the Napa Council both federal and non-federal members
the discussion today was enlightening and inspiring and the recommendations are
Tremendously encouraging for not only what we can and need to do today for people that are already living with cognitive impairment
But how we move forward and how we prepare for what is coming in the way of innovation
In both clinical and non-clinical services and supports and and with a particular eye
Not not the only thing we should focus on but with a particular eye to where?
Dr. Bateman started us today and thinking about
identifying individuals who are at an asymptomatic or preclinical stage and
Being able to serve them better both clinically and non-clinically
I think your recommendations really set a tremendous foundation and I'll just offer a few thoughts
Maybe these are presentations you could have over the course of the next year of the Napa Council
But there there are opportunities to build
Readiness for that future that is coming and we don't know if those
Diagnostics and those treatments will be here in six months six years or 16 years
But we know inevitably they are coming and so just like the ASAP Act prepares us for a future state
Hopefully not very far in the future, but a future state
there are a number of other steps that I would recommend that the council consider building into your workflow over the course of the
Next year and and just to give a couple examples, and I'm happy to follow up offline
At greater length, but just to give a couple of examples
Thinking again through that lens of asymptomatic or preclinical disease
There there are some protections through GINA for people that are have genetic markers
And there are some protections for people who have active disability through the Americans with Disabilities Act ADA
There is an enormous gulf in between for people that have biological markers of disease
So we could say they have Alzheimer's disease the pathology, but they are absolutely asymptomatic
And we don't know at this point we will in the future which of those people will convert at what point on what?
Path of progression, but while they are purely
Asymptomatic they face enormous exposure as do their blood relatives at minimum for being discriminated against and we need a legal
infrastructure to address that gap before
before if at all possible people start in volume getting diagnosed as having the
Pathology of Alzheimer's disease or any of the related disorders
And before we we either have the option or the necessity to treat them
We need to make sure they have the legal protections in place, so it's
Ideally you would be able to sequence this and get all the legal protections in place first
I don't know the science may may move faster than the legal reforms
But we need to start yesterday on addressing those legal gaps so that if we aren't ready in advance
We're not ready so late that a lot of people face societal harms personal harm through legal discrimination and
And have that mitigate as a factor against them choosing to be diagnosed or choosing to be treated
When we have those clinical options, so let's make sure we're building as we go
And if we can do it in a logical order great
But we may not science may not wait for us to catch up
So let's get started even if we're a little late on some of these things a
Second example, I promise all I'll stop after after this one. I think in your
Recommendations there were a couple of opportunities and not at all a criticism of the recommendations
But an opportunity to build from the foundation of the recommendations and be even more inclusive
We heard references today to the work that FEMA is doing in a collaborative way to build out prepare
Preparedness for people living with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders
And I think there are opportunities to bring FEMA into that kind of public messaging campaign around
preparing communities and individuals for natural disasters
But also coping with the outcome of natural disasters similarly we heard of previous meetings
about the role of
the distinct challenges of
Active duty military
National Guard Reserve, but also veterans in TBI and other
Manifestations that increase risk for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders
And I think there would be ample opportunity to have some really rich discussion
Before the council about about not only the unique challenges and different exposures
That are important to identifying risk and people who are at elevated risk and how we might mitigate against those risks
But also particularly through the VA system to leverage opportunities again identified in your
Recommendations to engage the clinical community within the VA for better detection
diagnosis treatment
Connection to social supports both within and beyond the VA so you have the VA reach model as as an example. That's already
Tremendously evidence-based and effective but could always stand more scaling there are also opportunities to leverage that those
learnings from the VA system in clinical and non-clinical sports into the broader ecosystem, so
With all credit for the remarkable work that this council has done. I think there are opportunities to
Build on what you've already put in your recommendations and iterate on those over the course of the next year. Thank you
Really really good commentary really appreciate it
To Matt Sharp with the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
Hi everybody
My name is Matt sharply said I'm with a FTD or the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration and really appreciate this opportunity
to address the council again
As probably most of you know FTD is the most common form of dimension people under 60
It often strikes people in the prime of their working and parenting years and it can take up to five years or more
on average three years for a diagnosis to be made
During which time families can lose everything they can lose their money due to impulses spending
They can lose their job. They can lose their freedom if police are involved and
Most importantly they can lose the bonds that hold families together
Unlike me when I come to these meetings
I am often leave often leave filled with hope and all and all the work that's being done all the progress that's being made
But most families when they look at the national plan, they don't see FTD
Mainly because of three words a DRT
And when the plan says a DRT without naming FTD, it makes people
Families struggling with FTD you feel unseen unheard and ignored
Which is unfortunately how the health care system the venture care systems also often make people with FTD feel
So I was going to do a little very brief summary of our comments
For the Napa RFI, but our primary ask really is that when the national plan?
Talking about FTD we ask that you explicitly and consistently name it in the goals strategies metrics and implementation activities
And that you also consistently recognize where FTD needs diverge from Alzheimer's disease
Other than that the priorities that we see in a revised national plan include research
Biomarkers are desperately needed in FTD
across the board
Biomarkers diagnostic biomarkers could be a game-changer in FTD and really resolve a lot of the issues that come along with misdiagnosis
But we all are also needed
For research as well as clinical assessment tools to support earlier diagnosis
second
The diagnosis and care too few providers still don't recognize FTD
Misdiagnosis is routine. It's usually a misdiagnosis as a psychiatric disorder before it even goes into the world of neurology
families need real access to specialists neuropsychological evaluations advanced imaging and
particularly important in FTD genetic counseling up to 40% of cases in FTD have a genetic or familial basis unlike
And if TD families need care models built for a younger onset dementia with behavioral symptoms
communication loss and muscle and movement
disorders
And the care needs to change as the disease moves
Third are the caregivers caregivers need education respite mental health care
Financial and workplace support and help navigating systems that were not designed for them
We need home and community-based services and residential facilities equipped to serve people with complex behavioral needs and a workforce
clinicians direct care workers and even first responders that have been trained to understand and recognize the FTD and
Finally, we ask that you measure what really happened
what really matters to FTD families the communication independent safety quality of life and
Connection to family that the disease robs
Thank you, thank you, thank you so much
Hi everyone, can you hear me fine? I hope you can hear me fine
So good afternoon, and my name is Sudhir Sivakumaran and I serve as the chief scientific officer of the Lewy Body Dementia Association
And I thank you all for the opportunity to comment
Lewy body dementia is one of the most common causes of dementia yet
It remains under diagnosed under researched and too often peripheral to national discussions about dementia research care and services
individuals and families face prolonged diagnostic journeys limited treatment options fragmented care and
complex cognitive movement behavioral sleep and autonomic symptoms
Accurate diagnosis matters even in the absence of an approved disease modifying treatment
People with LBD can experience marked sensitivity to antipsychotic medications
commonly used to manage agitation or hallucinations in dementia
These reactions can be severe and in some cases life-threatening
We appreciate the council's recognition of LBD and mixed ecology dementia with an Alzheimer's disease and related dementia planning
particularly the importance of mixed and co-occurring pathologies
We now urge the council and the federal agencies to translate that recognition into specific measurable priorities within the national plan
Three areas are particularly important
first
Support the development and validation of biomarkers clinical outcome assessments and biological staging approaches
That are fit for purpose in LBD including biomarkers that characterize alpha-synuclein pathology
as well as common co-pathologies such as amyloid and tau
Second, build coordinated data infrastructure that can connect clinical, biomarker, imaging, pathology and patient-reported information
Fragmented data sets will not generate the evidence needed to accelerate therapeutic development or improve care
Third and most importantly involve people living with LBD and their care partners early in research
Regulatory coverage and care delivery decisions rather than after priorities have already been established
LBDA is committed to working with federal agencies, researchers, clinicians, industry and the patient community
to improve diagnosis, strengthen prioritiness, generate better evidence and accelerate access to meaningful treatments and care
We ask the council to make LBD visible, measurable and accountable within the national plan
Families cannot afford for this disease to remain at the margins. Thank you all once again
Thank you so much
Thank you very much and I certainly associate my remarks with those of the previous speakers
But in my limited time, I'm Scott Fry, Senior Vice President of Public Policy and Government Relations at the Alliance for Aging Research
On behalf of Project PAUSE, a coalition of patient and professional organizations focused on improving
long-term care for individuals who have neuropsychiatric symptoms
associated with Alzheimer's and other neurocognitive conditions
I'd like to discuss our long-standing concerns about CMS's long-stay
antipsychotic quality measure, which we believe is fundamentally flawed and has for too long unintentionally
denied
many individuals from consistently receiving clinically appropriate care
While intended to reduce inappropriate
antipsychotic use, something we support, the measure relies on a one-size-fits-all
approach that does not distinguish between clinically appropriate and inappropriate prescribing
Instead, it measures only three exempt conditions. How many individuals in a facility received an
With only three exempt conditions, how many individuals in a facility received an antipsychotic
It overlooks clinically appropriate indications
fails to reflect newer FDA-approved therapies and incorrectly equates lower prescribing to high-quality care
As a result, it creates pressure to reduce clinically appropriate treatment, which leads to involuntary discharges
barriers to nursing home admission and unnecessary suffering for individuals with neuropsychiatric symptoms as well as their families
To address these issues, we respectfully continue to urge CMS to retire the current measure and replace it with a targeted low-burden improvement
To the minimum data set that strengthens prescribing documentation
reinforced multidisciplinary clinical oversight and better distinguishes clinically appropriate care from this view
CMS can modernize the measure, advance person-centered care, and safeguard patients
We look forward to partnering with CMS and all of you to advance these reforms. Thank you
Thank you so much
Hi, my name is Dee Stuckelbaum
We live in St. Louis, Missouri, and we have a 38-year-old daughter, Susie, who has Down syndrome. Susie is great
She lives in an independent residential facility, works at TJ Maxx, and has a great social life
Susie currently shows no signs of Alzheimer's. Sadly, she has lost a few friends from her living facility
who did develop Alzheimer's and had to move to their parent's home or in two cases actually move to a nursing home
Susie has felt this loss deeply
The parents of these friends have shared the very difficult times that they have had caring for these children who have Down syndrome
but also have Alzheimer's
Parents have had to make accommodations in their home, get extra home care because the parents are aging as well
And in many cases siblings have had to quit their job
Susie has been participating in Alzheimer's research for adults with Down syndrome
for almost 10 years at Washington University
Susie's had MRIs, PET scans, lots of lab work, and even two lumbar punctures
Cognitive testing has also been done at least every 18 months
Most recently she started a study that she used her cell phone three times a day for seven days to answer questions
She did great
Susie loves to be on her phone
She loves the attention she gets from the great people at Washington University
But more importantly she loves to boast about the money she gets paid for these studies
Susie's dad and I have also participated in a parent study
We don't know what the future holds for Susie
But the thought of her losing her spark as many of her friends parents have said is heartbreaking
We keep Susie active. She has takes a GLP-1 to keep her weight under control
She wears a CPAP. She gets vaccines and eats mostly healthy and exercises daily all in an effort to keep her thriving
The studies indicate that even adults with Down syndrome who are high functioning and Susie would be considered high functioning
Still develop Alzheimer's often as early as in their mid-40s
We will continue to encourage Susie to take part in these studies
and when
Appropriate a medication if it becomes available. We've been told that the scans typically show
Indications of Alzheimer's up to 10 years before symptoms show in people with Down syndrome
So when that happens, we will have decisions to make
I was recently a presenter before the FDA to encourage drug manufacturers to include individuals with Down syndrome in their Alzheimer's drug trials
Thank you, and we encourage you to continue looking for answers to this dreadful disease that affects many people with Down syndrome
And the population as a whole. Thank you
Thank you, Dee and thank you for sharing so much about Susie
Hi, thank you so much, yes, um Kate had a last-minute emergency arise
So my name is Margo Rondeau and I am the chief programs officer at the National Down Syndrome Society
Thank you for this opportunity to raise awareness of the impact that Alzheimer's disease has on individuals with Down syndrome and to reiterate
Why the Down syndrome community must be included in the work of the advisory council on Alzheimer's research care and services?
I am also the mother of an eight-year-old daughter with Down syndrome
So I speak as a mother who's desperate for a different future for her daughter and really hopeful that you all will work to ensure
this
As Dr. Rafi explained earlier in today's meeting
Individuals with Down syndrome have a 90% risk of developing Alzheimer's disease in their lifetime because they are born with an extra copy of the 21st
chromosome
at a devastatingly early age
People with Down syndrome experience the changes in behavior thinking and memory related to Down syndrome associated Alzheimer's disease
the average age of onset in individuals with Down syndrome
Before with an average disease duration of four years
given
realities
The Down syndrome community advocates with a profound sense of urgency on this matter
Success together with other support organizations and experts like Dr. Rafi
Is working on multiple fronts to ensure that people with Down syndrome have access to existing emerging diagnosis therapeutic treatments for Alzheimer's disease
on June 2nd
NDSS convened an externally
externally, excuse me, led patient focused drug development or ELPFDD meeting with the Food and Drug Administration
Bringing the Down syndrome community together to focus on the lived experience of DSAD in a public forum
This was a really important milestone for our community more than 160 participants engaged throughout the day
Including 20 adults with Down syndrome and caregivers who share their experiences
They were joined by subject matter experts all the national Down syndrome organizations multiple pharmaceutical companies and the Alzheimer's association
The meeting drew strong FDA participation with 28 FDA staff members in attendance
The follow-on from that meeting will include the publication of the voice of the patient report
A formal recording of the findings of the meeting that we look forward to sharing with this council and a more technical scientific workshop
on DSAD in 2027
In addition our organization educates Alzheimer's research who are beginning Alzheimer's researchers
Excuse me who are beginning to welcome people with Down syndrome into clinical trials
We recently launched an on-demand digital training that provides tools and strategies to help research teams adapt to include
individuals with Down syndrome at their study sites
NDSS was proud to work with Congress on the 2024 NAPPA
Reauthorization Act which expanded the number of non-federal members on this council from 12 to 15
And created a new seat to represent an underserved population with an elevated lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer's disease
And made explicit reference to the Down syndrome community as such an underserved community
We strongly represent we strongly excuse me recommend that a representative of the Down syndrome community be included on this council
In light of the body of compelling data the overwhelming impact this disease has on the Down syndrome community and the exciting advances in research
Presented by Dr. Raffi all evidence points to this pivotal moment when action is critical
We urge this council to ensure that people with Down syndrome have a seat at every table and a voice in every decision
By doing so we can advance equitable research
Accelerate progress and improve outcomes for the Down syndrome community and all those who are affected by Alzheimer's disease. Thank you
Thank you so much
Hi
My name is Donna Garrick from Massachusetts
I am the daughter of Jim Tobin who lives with behavioral variant frontal temporal degeneration or FPD
I also serve as an AFPD ambassador
Thank you for this opportunity to speak today
The progress made through NAPPA has been significant but families living with FPD and other younger onset dementors are still being left behind
By policies that were built primarily around Alzheimer's disease
My father was diagnosed before the age of 65 and because of his age many dementia services simply weren't available to him
Our family as caregivers
Responsibility increased and so did the financial strain on our family
Families like ours often lose not only one income
But two while still raising children having mortgages and possibly helping to pay for college yet
Many programs remain tied to aid instead of need
Even when services were available to us
They were designed specifically around Alzheimer's disease in his nursing facility
Like every other resident with dementia
But behavioral variant FPD is different his memory remains relatively intact
So techniques commonly used for Alzheimer's such as therapeutic sitting only increased his frustrations because he knew he was being lied to
Later after we brought him home
We thought palliative care for him a nurse reviewed his condition and agreed that he met the dementia criteria until she learned that he had FPD
Not Alzheimer's
She closed her notebook said he no longer qualified stood up and walked out of my house without even examining him
No family should lose access to care simply because their loved one has a different form of dementia
I respectfully ask the council to ensure equitable access to dementia services regardless of age or diagnosis
Expand education on FPD and other dementias throughout the health care system
And continue building a national dementia strategy that recognizes Alzheimer's is not the only form of dementia
Thank you for your time and for considering the needs of all families living with dementia
Hi, my name is dawn kirby and i'm from illinois and i'm an ambassador for the association of frontal temporal
Degeneration as well. I want to echo what my
fellow ambassador said and also those
Comments from matt sharp and who talked about the difficulty with
very early onset dementia
It is the most common under the age of 60
And a lot of times you will see many talk about those that are
diagnosed between the ages of 45 and 65
Unfortunately, my daughter was in her 20s. She was a nurse. She had just had a baby
We had lost some loved ones she was married, but
She was finally diagnosed at mayo clinic with behavioral variant fpd at the age of 29
after two years of being
misunderstood
misdiagnosed
due to the lack of education in the
medical community
as far as where
fpd
Even exists let alone
The effect of the very young onset and at the time. I don't know if you can see this picture
This was about five months after carol was diagnosed
She was not even she was getting ready to turn 30
This is her and that is her grandmother my mother-in-law who had early stage alzheimer's
My husband and I were now
Sandwiched in between taking care of our young daughter whose husband divorced her
We had to put our job
refinance our mortgage
And stay home to care for kara as we cared for our parents in our mid and here we are in our mid-50s
What I would love for the council to be aware of is the enormous burden not only financially, but also
Emotionally and traumatizing as she had a young son
Who wasn't even two years old at the time?
unfortunately
My mother-in-law well, fortunately, I should say my mother-in-law lived in a care facility
And this was nine years ago. This picture was my mother-in-law is in a care facility and will be 92 next
week my daughter
What lived with us for four years and died at the age of 33?
If it had taken us as long as it typically takes for FTD
Individuals to be diagnosed we would have lost
Valuable time with her the one thing that is very upsetting as a as a mother
of a young person is that
Alzheimer's and other related dementias
That is is upsetting to me because rare does not mean
Insignificant and more than likely it's rarely diagnosed as it was in our daughter's case
She was sent to a psychiatric unit
I lived in North Carolina for two and a half months as she was in a perinatal psychiatric unit
There needs to be as in my mind
We need to be more seen because I can name these names and there are only a few
Kara, Justin, Jessica, Daria
Christina
Christian these are all Larry Matt that have either died from FTD and I have an actually longer list
that
That these are young individuals who haven't even hit their 40s yet
My daughter was not even 30 when she was diagnosed
So I believe that we need to be seen and more needs to be done because there's too many trapped in the psychiatric diagnosis
Thank you
Thank you so much
Yes, hello, thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment, my name is Julia Wood
I'm an occupational therapist and the director of professional and community education at the Lewy Body Dementia Association.
I
Urge the Napa Council to elevate a preventable patient safety issue affecting people living with Lewy Body Dementia
The use of haloperidol or haldol and other high-potency dopamine blocking
antipsychotics
Lewy Body Dementia including dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's Disease Dementia is associated with severe
neuroleptic sensitivity
LBDA clinical guidance warns that typical antipsychotics such as haloperidol should be avoided
Severe reactions can include worsening parkinsonism
sedation
immobility
confusion
autonomic dysfunction
symptoms that resemble neuroleptic sensitivity and even death
The FDA approved labeling for haldol is also clear
Haldol is not approved for dementia related psychosis and
Parkinson's Disease and dementia with Lewy Bodies are listed as contraindication
In practice this means that a person with Lewy Body Dementia who receives haloperidol in an emergency department
Hospital or long-term care setting may rapidly become rigid, sedated
less able to swallow or communicate at a greater risk for falls
Aspiration
hospitalization
institutionalization or even death
For families, this is not abstract
Too often we hear stories that they are expected to prevent these unsafe medication exposure errors during moments of crisis
When they're frightened and least able to advocate for their loved ones
That burden should not fall on families alone. It should be addressed through dementia capable systems of care
LBDA
Respectfully asked the council to recognize haloperidol exposure in Lewy Body Dementia as a national patient safety
priority. We urge practical safeguards that include clinician and first responder education
emergency department and hospital protocol
long-term care training
medication reconciliation prompt
Electronic health record alerts and
inclusion of Lewy Body Dementia specific psychosis guidance in dementia care models and quality measures
The National Dementia Strategy must reflect the realities of related dementia as you've heard from many of us today
Not only Alzheimer's disease
The clear national message is needed
Haloperidol and other typical
Antipsychotics can be dangerous and sometimes fatal for people with Lewy Body Dementia
Safer care begins with recognition
diagnosis family and provider education
Clinician training and systems that prevent contraindicated medications from being administered in moments of crisis
Thank you
Thank you all so much. Does that conclude our public comments?
So I shared with you that this is some of the most important time is the public comments because it reminds us who we're working
for
who we're searching for answers for and
It deeply humbles me each time I hear from them and inspires me
So I'm both humbled and inspired but we've got lots of work to do council don't we?
Yeah, we so you heard a lot today a lot of hopeful conversation around research and policy and recommendations
But of course, there's more to do so I just wanted to again say thank you to our ASPE leadership
Helen and Maria for taking such good care of us and getting us set up and for the work on the National Alzheimer's Plan
I can't thank you enough for all the work and dedication that goes into that
To all of our members both federal and non
Thank you so much for the hope for the direction for the recommendations for the care
For the work that's to come that I know will continue coming in for
Providing so much hope I think we are at it. I say it a lot
I think we're at the most critical time we've ever been and if for those of us that have been working in this space for
A long time, you know, it's true. Don't you? So with that we will conclude our meeting. We'll see you again
I think it's going to be November 19th or the 26th. I mean, I'm sorry
October 19th or the 26th this time. Hopefully my luggage comes with me and I come on time
Thank you again to everybody and safe travels for all of you who came to DC. Thank you
produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services