In this video I break down exactly why it happened, using the federal recall paperwork and the court filings instead of GM's marketing.
What we cover:
The 6.2L L87 recall — nearly 600,000 trucks and SUVs, 28,000 field reports, 14,000 total engine failures, 42 fires
What actually broke: debris in the connecting rods and crankshaft oil passages, plus crankshafts built out of spec
Why GM's official repair for a passing engine was an oil change from 0W-20 to 0W-40
The new federal investigation opened in January 2026 after 36 owners had engines fail AGAIN after the recall fix
The separate class action over AFM/DFM lifters on 5.3 and 6.2 engines back to 2014 — with $8,000 to $12,000 repair bills
What's inside the new 5.7L and 6.6L: forged pistons, forged rods, a redesigned oiling system, port and direct injection together
The engine codes L76 and L78, and the 1960s Corvette and Chevelle history GM is deliberately borrowing
The one detail that says the most: the new engines ship with 0W-30 instead of 0W-20 — a full grade thicker
The $1.6 billion GM spent across Flint, Tonawanda, Saginaw and St. Catharines
The question GM still refuses to answer: is cylinder deactivation gone or not?
Where I land: if you own a recalled 6.2, get the free inspection and the 10-year/150,000-mile extended warranty. If you own a 5.3 or 6.2 outside the recall, budget for a lifter job. If you're looking at a 2027, the engineering changes are real — but you'd be a first-year buyer on an all-new engine family. #machine#Equipment#Engine
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI Generated
GM is retiring the 5.3L and 6.2L V8 engines in the 2027 Silverado and Sierra, replacing them with new 5.7L and 6.6L \"sixth generation\" small blocks. This move follows massive warranty costs and recalls due to crankshaft failures and lifter issues. The new engines feature forged components and thicker factory oil to improve durability and reliability.
GM just retired the 5.3 and 6.2 V8, both engines, gone. I've spent 20 years under the hood of these
trucks, and I've watched GM pay out $300 million in warranty claims on the 6.2 alone. Now they're
replacing both with two brand new V8s, and one detail buried in the spec sheet tells you exactly
why. It's not horsepower, it's something GM quietly changed in the oil. Stick with me,
I'll show you what they're hiding and whether the new engines are actually worth your money.
27 years, that's how long the 5.3 liter V8 has been under the hood of GM trucks.
Your dad may have owned one, you may own one right now, and it's gone. GM has confirmed it.
The 2027 Silverado and the 2027 Sierra do not get the 5.3 liter L84 anymore. They don't get
the 6.2 liter L87 either. Both engines are done. In their place, GM is rolling out something brand
new, a 5.7 liter and a 6.6 liter, two engines from what GM calls the sixth generation of the
small block. That's the family that's been in Chevy trucks since 1954. Only five generations
came before this one. That tells you how big of a deal this actually is. Now here's the question
everybody's asking. Why now? Why kill an engine that's been the backbone of these trucks for
almost three decades? The answer isn't horsepower, it's not styling, it's money and trust. GM has
spent over 1.6 billion dollars across four factories to build these new engines. Flint,
Michigan, Tonawanda, New York, Saginaw, Michigan, St. Catharines, Ontario. Companies don't spend that
kind of money replacing an engine that's working fine. They spend it when the old one is costing
them a fortune in warranty claims and costing their customers a fortune in repair bills.
And that's exactly what's been happening. I want to show you the numbers because once you see them,
you'll understand why GM had no choice. The 6.2 liter L87 was hit with a recall covering almost
600,000 vehicles. Silverados, Sierras, Tahos, Suburbans, Yukons, even Cadillac Escalades.
28,000 field reports. 14,000 of those ended in total engine failure. 42 engine fires. 12 people
hurt. This wasn't a check engine light. This was engines losing power on the highway in traffic
with families inside. If you own a Silverado or Sierra with the 5.3 or the 6.2,
stick with me here. I'm going to tell you exactly what went wrong, what GM is doing about it and
whether the new engines are actually worth trusting. This is the most important truck
engine story of the year and I've read every page of it so you don't have to.
So what actually broke inside these engines? I dug into the federal recall paperwork and it
comes down to two mistakes made at the factory floor. Debris. Sediment left inside the connecting
rods and the oil passages of the crankshaft. Metal grit where it should never be. On top of
that, the crankshafts themselves were built out of spec. Wrong dimensions, wrong surface finish.
Put those two problems together and you get bearings that can't get proper oil flow.
When a bearing runs dry under load, it doesn't wear out slowly. It grinds itself apart in minutes.
Now here's the part that should really bother you. GM already tried to fix this once.
Dealers inspect the engine. If it fails, GM replaces it for free. About 3% of these trucks
needed a full engine swap, but if the engine passes inspection, the fix is just an oil change.
They drain the factory oil, which was 0W-20, and they refill it with 0W-40. A much thicker oil.
That's it. New filter, new oil cap and an insert for your owner's manual. Read that again. GM's
answer to a crankshaft and bearing failure was thicker oil. And here's the kicker. It didn't
even work for everyone. In January of 2026, the federal government opened a brand new investigation.
36 owners reported their engine failed again after they already got the recall fix. That
investigation is still open right now. So if you own a 2021 to 2024 truck with the 6.2,
get the recall done. It's free and it comes with 10 years or 150,000 miles of extended warranty.
But understand, the fix is not a guarantee. Now the recall is only half the story. There's a
second problem, completely separate, that's been quietly building for years. It's a lawsuit,
filed in federal court in Michigan, and it covers both the 5.3 and the 6.2 going back to around 2014.
The complaint is about the lifters in GM's cylinder deactivation system called Active
Fuel Management and Dynamic Fuel Management. These lifters are supposed to shut down some
cylinders to save fuel. When they fail, you get ticking, misfires, rough running,
and sometimes the engine just quits. I want you to understand how expensive this actually is,
because the numbers surprised me. Owners in the lawsuit report failures anywhere from 32,000 miles
to almost 120,000 miles. Repair costs range from $8,000 to over $12,000. That's a lifter and
camshaft job, or in bad cases, a full engine replacement. In March of 2026, a federal judge
refused to split this case up, which means it's now one large unified lawsuit. GM tried to get it
dismissed in June. That motion is still pending. Here's the thing I want you to walk away with.
The recall and the lawsuit are two different problems. The recall is about bad bearings and
bad crankshafts from the factory. The lawsuit is about the lifters wearing out over time.
A lot of people online mix these two together. Don't. Knowing the difference is how you actually
understand what you're buying. So now let's talk about what's replacing these engines,
because this is where it gets interesting. The new 5.7 liter and 6.6 liter are not the
old engines bored out bigger. GM built these from the ground up, forged pistons, forged connecting
rods. That detail matters a lot because forged rods are stronger than the cast rods that were
in the recalled engine. They also added a new oiling system built to keep oil pressure steady
under heavy load and high heat. And they're running two fuel injection systems at once,
port injection and direct injection, working together for better fueling in every situation.
There's also something GM did with the engine codes that tells you exactly who they're trying
to win back. The new engines carry the codes L76 and L78. Those aren't random. L76 was on a solid
lifter 327 cubic inch small block, making 365 horsepower back in the mid-1960s Corvette. L78
was the 375 horsepower 396 big block that built the reputation of the Chevelle and the Nova. GM
doesn't dig up codes like that by accident. They're speaking directly to the guy who remembers those
trucks and cars from when he was young. Now, GM has not released official horsepower numbers.
I want to be straight with you on this. There's a rumored figure of around 400 horsepower for the
6.6. Those numbers are not confirmed. GM itself has only said the 6.6 will be quote,
the most powerful naturally aspirated V8 in its class. Until GM publishes real numbers,
treat anything else as a rumor. I'm not going to sell you a number that might be wrong.
Now, here's the detail that tells you more about GM's thinking than anything else in this whole
story. It's not the horsepower, it's the oil. For 12 years, GM ran 0W20 oil in the 5.3 and the 6.2.
Thin oil helps fuel economy numbers on paper. The new gen six engines are factory filled with 0W30.
That's a full grade thicker. And remember what I told you earlier that GM's fix for the recalled
6.2 was to switch it to 0W40. So GM went from 20 weight to a factory installed
30 weight on the new engine after using 40 weight as their own emergency repair.
That's not a coincidence. That's an admission. Let me explain why this actually matters for
your engine in plain terms. The 0W part is about cold starts. That stays the same.
So cold mornings in the winter are no worse than before. The second number, the 20, 30 or 40,
is about how thick the oil stays once the engine is hot and working hard. A thicker hot oil film
means more protection between the crankshaft and the bearings. Those are the exact parts that failed
in the recall. Thicker oil under load is a durability decision, plain and simple. My advice,
if you end up with one of these new trucks and you tow heavy, drive in the desert heat,
or work the truck hard every day, there's a real case for stepping up to a 0W40 at your
own oil changes down the road. GM already proved that oil works on this engine family. It was their
own recall fix. Check with your dealer and your warranty paperwork first, but that's the mechanics
logic behind it. Now let's talk about whether GM actually fixed the root cause, or if they just
moved the problem somewhere else. Here's something reported, not just promised. GM is reportedly
bringing some critical parts and manufacturing processes in-house instead of relying on outside
suppliers. Remember, the recall was caused by a supplier that shipped crankshafts with the
wrong dimensions and dirty rods. Bringing that work in-house is a direct response to that exact
failure. That's a real traceable fix, not a marketing line. But there's one big question
GM still has not answered, and it's the one your comment section is going to be full of.
Cylinder deactivation. GM has not said whether the new engines keep it or drop it. Some evidence
points to it sticking around. Other evidence, including a new patent GM filed, shows they're
working on a redesigned deactivation system that pulls less oil from the valvetrain. That patent
is real. Whether it lands in these 2027 trucks is not confirmed. I won't tell you it's gone,
and I won't tell you it's staying. Nobody honest can say that yet.
Here's my honest read on the whole thing. The recall was a bearing and crankshaft problem
caused by outside suppliers. The lawsuit is a lifter problem tied to the deactivation system.
GM addressed the supplier issue with forged parts and in-house manufacturing.
They addressed oil durability with a thicker factory fill. What they have not proven yet
is whether the deactivation system itself, the piece owners complain about the most,
is actually fixed. So what are people actually saying about all this?
I went through the comment sections, and the sentiment is pretty clear. One owner wrote,
quote, GM has to get rid of the DFM in their new engines. Otherwise, it's more of the same.
Another one said, quote, there is no excuse for GM losing the ability to make a reliable
pushrod V8. They've been making them for 70 years. That frustration is earned. A lot of
these folks paid $70,000, $80,000 for a truck and got a five-figure repair bill instead.
But I also found a comment that deserves real credit, because it's more accurate than most
of the outrage. One owner wrote, quote, it wasn't the AFM that was failing. It was the bearings.
The Gen 5 5.3 has less mechanical failures than people think. It's the bearing issue
on the 6.2 that needed fixing. That lines up exactly with what the recall paperwork says.
Not everything wrong with these trucks is the same problem,
and separating them out is how you actually make a smart decision.
So here's where I land on this. If you own a 6.2 covered under the recall,
get it inspected. It's free, and the extended warranty is real value. If you own a 5.3
or 6.2 outside the recall, budget $8,000 to $12,000 for a possible lifter failure,
and keep an eye on your oil changes. If you're looking at a brand new 2027 with the new 5.7 or
the 6.6, understand you're one of the first buyers on an all-new engine family. The engineering
changes are real. Forged rods, a new oiling system, thicker oil, and parts brought in-house.
Those are the right moves on paper. But the most repeated piece of advice from your own audience,
and honestly, mine too, is to give it a year or two before you buy one.
Let the first owners find the problems first. GM has not released real horsepower numbers yet,
and they have not confirmed whether the deactivation system is truly fixed.
The moment those numbers and that answer come out, I'll break it down for you the same way I did
today with real numbers and no guessing. Two V8 retired, two replacements that nobody saw coming.
If you own one of these trucks, check your engine code and hold on to your service records.
They just got more valuable. But GM isn't the only one making big moves right now.
Ford has eight new trucks coming for 2027. So check out this video where I show you exactly
what Ford is building and why Ram and Chevy are about to be left behind.