We Detected An Anomaly Inside Mars

Heritage Horizons
23 followers
1 Video View·Sep 6, 2026
InSight discovered something unexpected under Mars’ surface.
Try Brilliant’s new interactive tutor for free and get 20% off an annual Premium subscription at https://brilliant.org/astrum/
…
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedNASA's InSight lander utilized seismology to reveal the internal structure of Mars, discovering a \"lumpy\" mantle containing ancient impact debris. By recording over 1,300 marsquakes, the mission provided a geological time capsule that helps scientists understand the formation and evolution of rocky planets, including Earth, without the interference of tectonic recycling.
How did a tiny Martian lander become one of the most important planetary science experiments
in history?
On the 26th of November 2018, NASA's InSight lander touched down on the surface of Mars
on a wide, flat plain called Elysium Planitia.
Unlike Mars rovers, InSight wasn't designed to move around or explore the surface.
Its goal was simply to sit and wait, to listen, with the most sensitive seismometer ever placed
on another world.
It was trying to detect seismic waves on Mars in an attempt to decode the planet's interior
structure.
For the very first time, scientists could begin to decipher what lies beneath the surface
of Mars, and what they found was… lumpy.
I'm Alex McColgan, and you're watching Astrum.
Join me as we unearth secrets that Mars has kept buried deep beneath its surface for billions
of years, and get to the bottom of how this chunky planetary interior may be reshaping
our understanding of all the rocky planets in our solar system and beyond.
We live in a solar system with four terrestrial or rocky planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth, and
Mars.
4.5 billion years ago, these planets formed from the same primordial cloud of dust and
gas.
Yet, each world is distinct, and for the most part, our understanding of their interiors
has been a slow process, that is, until now.
Mercury is a scorched, dry planet with no atmosphere, its surface battered with craters.
Venus is a hellish place, like a pressure cooker wrapped in suffocating clouds of sulfuric
acid.
Earth, of course, is teeming with water, life, and a protective atmosphere.
But how it became like that is, even now, somewhat of a mystery.
What we do know, however, is that the interior is constantly churning, recycling crust and
replacing it, effectively erasing much of its own history through the movement of tectonic
plates.
We simply don't know what the inside of our planet actually looked like millions of years
ago.
But Mars?
Well, Mars has been doing something entirely different.
This cold, quiet planet has a thin atmosphere and its surface appears to be frozen in time.
While Earth has been erasing history, Mars has been preserving it.
It turns out that preservation also extends below the ground to the Martian interior.
This makes it arguably one of the most valuable sources of information in the entire solar
system.
It's a time capsule of planetary formation, explaining not only how Mars came to be, but
all rocky planets, including Earth.
The inside of the rare planet could help explain the role our own planet's interior played
in creating a habitable world.
The question is, how do you explore the insides of a planet?
We know plenty about the surfaces of the other rocky planets in our solar system, because
we can see them, with telescopes, with orbiters, with landers.
Their internal structure, however, is another thing altogether.
But why?
On the surface, the answer seems obvious, and yes, I really did mean to make that joke.
You just can't see inside a planet.
But the problem is actually much deeper.
Let's look at the Earth for some perspective.
Our planet's inner core reaches a depth of about 6,378 km from the surface.
Let's say we wanted to learn about Earth's interior by drilling down as far as we could
reach.
First, we'd have to make it through the crust, and depending on where we started drilling,
that could be anywhere from 5 to 60 km thick.
If we made it that far, we would reach the mantle.
Not only would our drill have to withstand the temperatures of up to 1,000°C, it would
also have to pass through another 2,900 km of mantle to reach the outer core.
From there, there would be another 2,200 km of liquid outer core and 1,250 km of solid
inner core made of high-density metal, reaching temperatures of up to 6,000°C before we reach
the centre.
Of course, this scenario is impossible.
Not only would our tools melt or vaporise at such temperatures, but even with our best
efforts, the deepest humans have ever managed to drill down into the Earth was only a little
more than 12 km at the Kola Superdeep Borehole in Russia.
It took 22 years, from 1970 to 1992 to make it that far, and drilling had to stop when
temperatures became too extreme at 180°C.
They had made it about a third of the way through the crust where the borehole was located
over the Baltic Shield continental crust.
We did make it to the mantle once, in 2023 and 2024, a team aboard the Joyders Resolution
drilling ship managed to find a piece of crust thin enough to drill down more than 1,200
m deep and retrieve a sample of rock from the mantle.
But they had to do this in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, at the top of an underwater
mountain more than 700m under the sea.
No easy feat.
As you can see, physically accessing our own planet's interior is hard enough, so unlocking
the contents of other rocky planet's interiors is that much more challenging.
And without access to their interiors, we're missing out on a treasure trove of clues.
It's not just for our scientists to solve problems like this.
One day, the next generation will have many such problems, both on Earth and on Mars,
so giving them the knowledge they'll need to do so now is critical.
And how better to do that than with Brilliant, the sponsor of today's video.
Brilliant is a cutting edge personal tutor that helps any student excel in math, science
and coding.
We know that one-on-one tutoring can make all the difference when it comes to student
success.
Sadly, teachers in classrooms don't always have the time to go over tricky concepts if
something isn't making sense.
And when students turn to AI tools, most just hand them the answer instead of helping them
build real understanding.
That's where Brilliant comes in.
It guides students to their own aha moments by asking probing questions and by breaking
problems down step by step.
When I've tried Brilliant out myself, it actually drew on my screen to highlight key
points for me to think about.
I always found I learned most when I had someone there to help guide me through my studies
when I was younger.
So why not give Brilliant a try and see if it can do the same for your kids?
To check out what Brilliant has to offer, scan my QR code or click my link in the description
below and Astrum users who do so can get 20% off upgrading to a premium subscription.
Now back to the problem at hand.
Why do rocky planets have dramatically different core sizes?
How exactly do the different layers of a planet's interior separate?
What makes some planets tectonically active and others not?
How do interiors impact a planet's ability to retain an atmosphere, maintain a magnetic
field, hold liquid water on the surface, or support life?
These questions have profound implications for habitability, and the answers could rewrite
our understanding of both our own solar system's past and how extrasolar systems form with
rocky exoplanets of their own.
But thankfully there is another way to probe the insides of a planet.
Now as difficult as it is to study a planet's interior, here on Earth at least we have managed
to decode what it's like right now.
And that's most importantly thanks to seismometers, instruments that measure seismic waves.
When an earthquake happens, it sends ripples of energy in every direction.
These seismic waves travel at different speeds depending on the density and composition of
the material the waves are travelling through.
There are two main types of waves, one called P or primary waves, and the other called S
or secondary waves.
As you can see, when P waves encounter different layers inside the Earth, the different materials
cause the waves to change speed and direction, but the waves are still able to travel through
all the layers.
But when S waves encounter the liquid core, they can't travel through that material.
This is because of the shape of the P and S waves themselves.
P waves move by compressing and expanding the material they move through, pushing and
pulling like a slinky.
They're called primary waves because they move faster than S waves.
These P waves can travel through both liquid and solid materials, making them capable of
passing through Earth's core.
S waves on the other hand move by shifting the material they pass through from side to
side or up and down as they pass through.
This type of wave can't travel through a liquid.
By measuring and recording P and S waves around the globe, we get a sort of seismic X-ray
of Earth's interior.
The way the P and S waves speed up or slow down, and how they bend, refract or get blocked
by different layers, allow us to outline what it looks like inside the planet, what layers
there are, if they are solid or liquid, and can even offer clues about the composition
of those layers.
But Earth's interior is too active for us to understand much about its past.
The continually recycled interior makes it extremely hard to work out the original conditions
of how our planet formed.
Mars, on the other hand, happens to be a sort of Goldilocks world for studying the interior
of rocky planets.
It's very nearly geologically dormant, but was active enough in the past to develop a
Critically, the majority of Mars' geological activity slowed down to a near stop, in time
to preserve its interior structure roughly 3-4 billion years ago, like an insect that
got stuck in amber, frozen in time, and preserved for centuries.
This likely happened because Mars is significantly smaller than Earth, about half the diameter,
and only about one tenth of Earth's mass.
Smaller planets cool more quickly, like a small cup of tea will cool faster than a large
teapotful.
As it cooled, Mars likely lost most of its internal heat within a billion years of forming,
becoming a mostly quiet and cool planet.
Because of this, the interior of Mars is closer to a primordial state than anything we can
study on Earth.
It's a record of what a rocky planet can look like after the interior has separated
into layers, but before billions of years of tectonic recycling destroys the history.
And therein lies the key to why Mars is so perfect for studying planetary interiors – its
internal activity nearly stopped, but not entirely.
That makes Mars both a geological time capsule, and a planet capable of producing low-level
seismic data that can reveal its contents to us – a winning combination, if we can
measure it.
For decades, all we could do was study Mars from the surface, from orbit, or from Martian
meteorites that eventually found their way to Earth, but we couldn't do seismology
on Mars.
That changed on the 26th of November 2018, when NASA's InSight lander, which stands
for Interior Exploration Using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport, touched down
near the Martian equator.
The location was chosen for its flatness, stability and lack of rocks.
This would give InSight the best chance at successfully deploying its sensitive instruments
and then listen, unmoving silently for years.
InSight was carrying the Seismic Experimental Interior Structure, or SEIS, a seismometer
primarily built by the French space agency CNES as part of an international collaboration.
The seismometer worked by using electrodes to measure the displacement of the moving
parts of its pendulum, making for an astonishingly sensitive instrument.
At the time it was deployed, SEIS was the most sensitive seismometer ever put on another
planet.
It was sensitive enough to detect ground movements smaller than the diameter of a hydrogen atom.
The execution may have been complex, but the idea was simple, put the lander on Mars, deploy
the seismometer on the Martian surface, and wait for Marsquakes.
The Martian equivalent of an earthquake, thought to be mainly caused by the cooling and shrinking
of the planet's crust, or in the volcanic regions, ongoing magma movements deep underground.
The next part of the plan was to record the seismic waves, and use the properties of those
waves to map the interior of Mars, similar to what's been done on Earth.
Of course, some wondered if Mars would even have quakes, maybe it was too geologically
dead.
Would InSight end up listening to a completely silent planet?
Well, no, as it turns out, Mars was not silent.
In fact, InSight began detecting Marsquakes shortly after SEIS was deployed, with the
first quake recorded on the 6th of April 2019, on the lander's 128th Martian day, or SOL.
This quake was too small to provide information about the interior, but it was a promising
sign of more to come.
By the time dust-covered solar panels and dark skies brought the InSight lander's mission
to an end in 2022, it had recorded more than 1,319 Marsquakes, including a magnitude 5
quake on the 4th of May 2022, the 1,222nd Martian SOL.
Whilst on Earth this is a relatively medium-scale quake, on Mars it's pretty much as big as
scientists predict they can get, and we detected one.
InSight also carried out a radio science experiment called the Rotation and Interior Structure
Experiment, or RISE.
It used precise radio signal tracking to measure Mars' slight wobble as it rotated, called
its precession.
The wobble is primarily due to the gravitational pull of the Sun and other planets, particularly
Jupiter, but is also sensitive to the distribution of mass inside a planet, which could provide
further constraints about the interior structure, specifically the core.
Together these instruments gave scientists an unprecedented look into the Martian interior,
and although the lander's job concluded in 2022, we continue to learn from all the
data it collected.
Before InSight, we knew very little about the interior structure of Mars.
Estimates about how thick the crust was on Mars ranged from anywhere from about 20km,
similar to our own Earth crust thickness, all the way to 100km, depending on the method
used and assumptions made.
Seismic data from InSight helped dramatically narrow down this estimate, which is now between
24 to 72km thick on average.
Below the Martian crust, made up of iron, magnesium, aluminium, calcium and potassium,
is a rocky mantle that extends to a depth of 1,560km.
And then finally we get to the dense Martian core made of iron, nickel and sulphur, stretching
about 1,830km in radius.
Plenty of interesting findings have come from the InSight data, one of which is that Mars
seems to have a crustal dichotomy, a dramatic difference between the crustal thickness in
the northern and southern hemispheres.
The north has low-lying plains with thin crust, while the south has heavily crated highlands
with thick crust, but the origin of this difference is still being investigated.
Perhaps the most unexpected and unusual find to emerge from the InSight data is that the
interior of Mars is lumpy, and no, before you wonder, I'm not joking.
In 2025, a team of scientists published their results in the journal Science, fundamentally
changing our view of the Martian mantle.
Using seismic data from InSight, they found that Mars' mantle is far from uniform.
In fact, they found it wasn't smooth at all.
At first the team wasn't sure what they were seeing, until they realised that the seismic
waves were slowing down at specific regions scattered throughout the mantle.
They found significant regions where the composition, temperature and structure differed from their
surroundings, painting a picture of a mantle that is patchy, irregular and more complex
than many models had predicted.
These irregular lumps or chunks are what appear to be the leftover fragments from catastrophic
ancient impacts that happened as Mars was just forming over 4.5 billion years ago.
These could have been giant asteroids, large protoplanets or some other type of rocky debris.
The early solar system was full of it.
There's no way to know which of these sources they came from, but their remains definitely
still exist, trapped in the Martian mantle, some as large as 4km across.
The paper's lead author, Konstantinos Haralambos of Imperial College London, said the pattern
of these lumps was kind of like shattered glass, with a few large shards and many small
ones.
These ancient impacts would have released enough energy to melt all continent-sized
swaths of the early crust and mantle into oceans of magma.
Those impact fragments and Martian debris got injected deep into those vast magma oceans,
which later cooled, trapping the ancient debris deep in the planet's interior.
It may also have implications for the volcanism on Mars, which created some of the biggest
volcanoes in our solar system, like Olympus Mons, which stands nearly 22km above the
surrounding Martian plains.
Perhaps an uneven distribution of heat-producing elements helped drive volcanism in certain
regions.
And because Mars doesn't have active tectonic activity, its interior has been able to hold
onto those chunks like a planetary time capsule, waiting 4.5 billion years for InSight to find
them.
We actually have another piece of evidence that points towards this being true.
Usually volcanoes are very dense, but gravity studies of the area around Olympus Mons shows
that the entire surrounding region, known as Tharsis Rise, is unusually high and surrounded
by an area of comparatively weak gravity.
For a while, this baffled scientists, but in 2024, a multi-mission study led by Bart
Root of Delft University of Technology came up with the answer.
They found a mass 1,750km across and around 1,100km below the surface.
It's incredibly light, which is giving the entire Tharsis region a boost upwards.
They believe it could be a huge lava plume travelling up to the surface.
Perhaps this volcano isn't as dormant as we thought.
They don't know what caused it, but Mars' chunky interior could play a part.
But the bigger question is, what does all this mean for us?
These studies show that Mars had a violent early history, and that its mantle evolved
sluggishly over billions of years.
It's likely that something similar happened early in our planet's history too, we just
can't see the scars with our churning interior.
This finding is also forcing scientists to rethink their models of planetary evolution
in general.
They now think that other planets without active plate tectonics like Mercury and Venus
may also have lumpy interiors, only time will tell.
Beyond that, this has, as ever, raised more questions than it's answered.
How is it that these clumps remain in the mantle, and what impact do they have on the
planet's future?
Why is it that Earth's mantle kept churning where others didn't?
Is that key to making a planet habitable?
The Martian lumpiness is like a fossil record of early planetary formation and processes,
and a valuable lesson about a period of development that other rocky planets may have also experienced.
Now we can use this data in history as a reference point for understanding other planets that
we may never be able to put landers on.
If we can better understand what processes created the chunks inside of Mars, then we
can build models of those processes, and hopefully start to answer some of the questions this
discovery has created.
Insight has given us a remarkable start, and more discoveries are yet to come.
As for other planets and habitability beyond Earth, well first we need to get probes on
other planets in the solar system.
Beyond that, who knows if there's another remote sensing method we could use to test
what the interiors of exoplanets may look like.
Maybe one day it could be a way to work out which planets are most likely to host life,
but not quite yet.
For now, I'm content with imagining Mars as more like a Snickers than its chocolate
namesake.
In other words, we've got a long way to go.
Patreon members got access to this video ad-free, and more importantly, they keep Astrum grounded
in a community passionate about space, not just YouTube AdSense and algorithms.
So sign up with the link in the description.
Being a member means you're part of the reason Astrum can focus on the kinds of videos
people actually want to watch.
It's where our most engaged viewers are, people who care about learning, exploring,
and seeing what's out there.
If that sounds like you, join the Astrum Patreon today and be part of where we're headed.
