Massive Surveillance Unearthed

Eric Bolling asks John Solomon one explosive question about the expanding Jack Smith controversy:
“Were YOU surveilled?”
Solomon's response?
“Stay tuned on that. There’s something I can’t talk about yet.”
The exchange comes after new disclosures about the extraordinary reach of former Special Counsel Jack Smith's Arctic Frost investigation.
Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans say Smith's team obtained 4,782 checks from Trump and Trump-aligned donors, exposing information including addresses, bank account and routing numbers and signatures. Smith acknowledged during Tuesday's Senate hearing that his investigation subpoenaed financial information.
eparate committee disclosures say investigators obtained text messages involving 44 members of Congress and swept up communications involving nearly 50 journalists across outlets including CNN, Fox News, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, Reuters and the Associated Press. Senate Judiciary Committee
Republican senators have characterized the scope of the investigation as unconstitutional surveillance and political targeting. Smith strongly disputes that characterization, telling the Senate Judiciary Committee that his decisions were based on evidence and law rather than politics and defending investigative steps as necessary to examine the alleged conspiracy surrounding efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Meanwhile, Sen. Marsha Blackburn has now filed a federal lawsuit against Smith over the acquisition of her phone records, alleging violations of the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause.
But Bolling presses Solomon on another unanswered question: Was one of the journalists caught up in government surveillance John Solomon himself?
Video Summary
AI GeneratedRepublicans are accusing Special Counsel Jack Smith of conducting a political espionage campaign under the guise of a criminal probe. Evidence suggests the illegal seizure of phone records from members of Congress, surveillance of Trump donors, and the targeting of media sources, allegedly violating First and Fourth Amendment rights and the Speech and Debate Clause.
