I’m an Insurance Agent. Here’s How Much I Could Make From Your Policy

Life Coverage 101
4 followers
1 Video View·Oct 3, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis video explores the inverse relationship between insurance agent commissions and the cash value growth of whole life policies. It explains how company choice, product selection, and policy design—specifically the balance between base premiums and Paid-Up Additions (PUA)—determine whether the financial benefit favors the agent or the policyholder.
Today we'll answer the question,
do agent commissions
affect my cash value at all?
The answer is yes and no.
For example,
if you were to get a whole life insurance policy
and you worked with two different agents
and those two agents
showed you a policy
with the same insurance company,
the same insurance product,
and they were both set up
the exact same way,
the policy would be identical to you
and the agent
would receive the same commission rate
from the insurance company
meaning they're both paid the same.
It'd be like shopping for a car,
you go to 10 different dealers
but the car you look at
is identical.
The same model,
year,
specs,
features,
color,
everything's the same
and the price is the same
across the board
or at least it should be
with all the different dealers.
So it'd be the same thing
with whole life insurance.
But on the flip side
what has an impact
on the commission
is the company selection,
the product selection,
and then also the way
that the policy is designed
or set up.
So today
we'll hit on all three.
What we'll cover
is as follows.
We'll look at the
company choice,
product choice,
and then also the product design.
As these are critical
in driving your cash value growth
and also agent commission.
So let's start
with the company choice.
When choosing a life insurance company
first,
we have what I like to call
the 4 major mutual life insurance companies
or that big 4.
These companies
are Mass Mutual,
Guardian,
New York Life,
and Northwestern Mutual.
They're considered the 4 major mutuals
because 1,
they're mutual companies
2,
they're the majors
because they are massive
in terms of size
they've all been around
for more than 160 years
but the biggest selling point
in my opinion
is they can provide
proof of performance.
Meaning they don't just show
good-looking illustrations
when I look at
real whole life insurance policies
that have lived the test of time
I see strong results
with those companies.
Also,
those companies
tend to pay the lowest commissions
on whole life insurance products
in the industry.
That's been the case
as I've compared them
in almost every company out there.
So you've got your 4 major mutuals
and then we've got
other life insurance companies.
So the 1st thing that I want to say
about other companies
is they're not bad companies
compared to the 4 major mutuals.
There are times
we have used
other companies in the past
when those have been more appropriate
for the individual
we are working with.
But I do like the major mutuals
mainly because
of proof of performance.
Meaning,
if I'm getting a policy for cash value
I want proof
that that company has delivered.
I see that with the major mutuals
when I look at other companies
the proof is often limited
or non-existent.
The other thing that I see
with most other life insurance companies
is that the commissions
are much higher.
So from the consumer's perspective
you getting a policy
we've seen proof of performance
with the 4 major mutuals
and with other companies
we have seen very limited proof
or in some cases
no proof at all.
And from a commission perspective
commissions are lower
with those 4 major mutual companies.
So the company choice
will have an impact
both on the cash value growth
and the agent commission.
The second thing,
products.
So, there are a lot of different types
of whole life insurance products.
The most commonly type of sold
whole life insurance product
is a traditional
whole life insurance policy.
This will often be called
a whole life $100
or paid up at $121
and then you have
high cash value products.
These are often limited pay products
like a 10 pay policy
and sometimes you'll see it
in the name of the product itself
high early cash value
or something similar to that.
The thing is,
some products
are designed
to prioritize life insurance 1st
and cash value 2nd
by the insurance company
where other products
are designed to prioritize
cash accumulation 1st
and life insurance 2nd.
So think of it
it's not the agent
designing the policy
this is how the insurance company
designs the product
from the very get-go.
Meaning,
you can go buy a Ford
but you can either buy a pickup truck
which serves a specific purpose
or you can buy a Mustang,
my 1st car.
So, starting with traditional products.
So if we look at a traditional product
with another company
here's how it would work.
So,
assuming that you have a base premium
I'll explain exactly what that means
in a little bit
but a base premium of $10,000
the commission rate
could be as high
as 134% in the 1st year.
So what that means
is if you pay a base premium
of $10,000
I the agent
can receive a commission
as high as $13,400
in the 1st year alone.
And the cash value performance
will not be attractive
based on what I know
other products will deliver.
Now,
what if I look at a traditional product
with a major mutual company?
So if I take MassMutual for example
and their traditional
whole life insurance product
and I look at the same base premium
of $10,000
the commission rate
might be as high as 95%
in the 1st year.
Which means
if you pay that same
$10,000 base premium
the agent,
me,
is due to receive $9,500.
Now,
what I have observed
is when I look at
the cash value performance
with traditional
whole life insurance policies
with the major mutuals
like a MassMutual
versus others
and traditional products
with the others
I have seen
stronger cash value performance
with the major mutuals.
That's why I've got
$2 signed with this one
and only 1 with the 1 to the left.
But still
that's a very high commission, isn't it?
Check this out.
So,
what if we look at
a product with MassMutual again
but a product set up
for high cash value?
They're 10 PayPal's
and you have the same
$10,000 base premium
now all of a sudden
instead of a 95% commission rate
the commission rate
is 30%.
That means
the agent,
me,
is due to receive
only $3,000
but the cash value for you
is significantly higher.
I'll show you an example
in a little bit.
But first,
let's hit on our last point
which is product design.
So this is definitely
the more complicated part
of the 3
but it's also the most important
in my opinion.
So,
with a whole life insurance policy
you can choose
where your money goes.
There are 2 main areas
the base premium
and then what is called
your PUA rider.
PUA stands for
paid up additions.
Dollars that go toward
the base premium
prioritize the life insurance first
and cash value second.
Whereas dollars that go toward
your PUA rider
prioritize cash value first
and life insurance second.
A quick side note
about dollars that go toward
that PUA rider
the commission rate
is usually between 2% and 3%.
I've got 2% here
because we're about to look at
an example with MassMutual
and the commission rate
on their PUA rider
is 2%.
So,
the question
that I would ask
if I am you
and I'm interested in a
whole life insurance policy
and cash value is my goal
is how low
can the base premium be
based on my total deposit?
And the answer to that question
is it depends on the insurance company.
Most of the major mutuals
let us have very close
to a 10% minimum base premium.
Here's what that means.
So if this is you
and you're looking to put in
$10,000 per year
10% of that
can be directed toward
the base premium
and then 90%
can be directed toward
the PUA rider.
You will need a term insurance rider
to prevent what is called
a modified endowment contract
from occurring or a MEC
that's a taxable event
and the same is true
if you want to put
$100,000 toward the policy.
It's all ratios
where it can drive that base premium
typically as low as 10%.
That's not a hard number
all insurance companies
have different rules
some allow a bigger lump
some PUA deposit in the 1st year
I would check out some of our videos
that go through PUA limits
with different insurance companies
if you'd like to understand how that works.
But the thing is
when you look at money
going into a whole life insurance policy
if you drive that base premium down
what you are going to see
every single time
especially when you look at
the upfront cash value
and the guaranteed cash value
is you're going to see
more cash value
but less commission to the agent.
And how I explain that
is that's just how it works.
If someone's interested in cash value
the insurance company is going to
credit the policyholder
more cash value
and then as a result
that money is there for the policyholder
so they're going to pay out less in commission.
Let's take a look at an example.
So we'll look at
a mass mutual policy
that's traditional
and then we'll look at
a mass mutual policy
that's high cash value.
So here we've got
$100,000 per year
going into the policy
and you can take a 0 off
add a 0
it's all relative.
So this is their
whole life 100 product
which again is a traditional
whole life insurance policy.
They pay $100,000 in
in the 1st year
their cash value
is nothing, 0.
By the 10th year
they've paid a total of $1,000,000
$100,000 per year for 10 years
and their cash value
is $830,000.
They're still running a loss.
Now if we look at
their high cash value policy
one of their high cash value policies
a 10-Bay product
we did 2 things here.
1, we looked at a product
that's designed for high cash value
2, we designed it in a way
that's beefed up for cash value.
So the minimum base premium here
is $6,700.
You've got $100,000 going in
when we look at the 1st year cash value
look at that
$92,000.
And by the 10th year
you've paid the same $1,000,000 in
but your cash value
is $1.25 million.
Same out-of-pocket to you
same insurance company
but 2 different products
and both designed
in different ways
that's the difference.
Now if we compare these 2
what's the difference
in compensation or commission?
Let's take a look.
So what we've got here
is 1st,
the traditional policy
that we just looked at.
In this example
he wanted to fund
$100,000 per year for 10 years
so he did that
nothing thereafter
and by the 20th year
his cash value
has produced a little bit of a gain
$1.36 million
and if we look at the
internal rate of return
it's just over 2%.
Not that attractive at all.
Now if we look at the
high cash value policy
what's the difference?
A couple things here.
1st,
what's the same?
He paid $100,000 per year for 10 years.
Okay, got that, cool.
Now of that $100,000
we see the premium
the base premium
was at $6,700
but he also had a
term insurance rider
there are 2 of them actually
which is why I've got it at $10,000 here.
But when we look at the breakdown
as to where the money is going
in this example
we've got
the premium minimized
the PUA rider maximized
but the total out-of-pocket
is the same $100,000.
And instead of a 100% loss
in the 1st year
it's about an 8% loss.
Okay, got it.
Now if we look at year 20
cash value
is almost $2,200,000
the internal rate of return
is about 5.1%.
Same exact insurance company.
Here's the difference though
what do you think I make?
If you go with the
traditional life insurance policy
which is the most common type
of whole life insurance policy
that is sold by agents
meaning when people have a conversation
with someone advising
that they put money
into a whole life insurance policy
the traditional one
is what is shown the most.
The 1st year cash value
I've got $93,500 here.
Earlier on the whiteboard
I had wrote out 95%
for the traditional
whole life insurance product.
Here we've got $93,500
because that's based on my actual rate.
We could be at $95,000
but we kept it at $93,500
just to give a little bit of juice back
to the people that help us at MassMutual.
But with that said
that's a lot.
There are also
renewal commissions
that are paid for 10 years
and if I look at the total compensation
I would make over 10 years
here you go
almost $140,000
that I, your agent
have earned on this policy.
What if you compare that to the other one?
The 1st year
I make about $5,200.
I make renewals
but they're less than half
of what I would make in the 1st example.
So when I look at the total commission
it's just over $25,000
over a 10-year period.
So the difference
when I look at
company choice
product choice
and also how that product is designed
does have a drastic impact
on the cash value
and the commission.
So I definitely want to be aware of that
as a policyholder.
Here's the big thing to be aware of.
As an agent
I'm incentivized
to sell you a policy with low cash value.
It's just how it works
when you look at the math.
Sometimes I hear something like this
well you want to go with a policy
that has a higher base premium
because the base premium
drives dividends
on a whole life insurance policy
and that can result
in greater long-term cash value
if dividend rates go up.
Yeah personally
I think that that's nonsense
one,
because I see a lot of policies
under deliver
compared to what was shown
on the illustration
particularly those
that have higher base premiums
but also why I think it's nonsense
is because a higher base premium
drives the higher commission.
Like of course
someone's going to say that
but the issue that I have with it
is if there's no proof to support it
and a non-guaranteed illustration
is not proof
that higher commission
is paid at the consumer's expense.
So anyway,
do agent commissions
impact my cash value growth
as a policyholder?
The answer is yes and no.
When you go back to that good policy
we looked at
if you spoke to 10 different agents
and all of them
designed that policy
in the exact same way
that policy would look the same
across the board
and that commission rate
is what it is.
That's what's paid to the agent.
But if you spoke to 10 different agents
and they all showed you
different companies,
different products,
different ways to design it
that's going to cause some confusion
where you'll look at the numbers
and say wait a minute
this company
or this product
looks a lot better than this one.
Now if you really want to get
to the bottom of things
you could ask
hey, what does the commission look like?
And if you're nervous to ask that question
I would just say
hey, I really like full disclosure
can you show exactly
what your total commission is each year?
Or I'd say
can you show exactly
what the total commission is each year?
Make sure you phrase it like that
because sometimes I've seen someone ask
hey, can you let me know
what your commission is?
And if someone's splitting their commission
with another agency or partner
they'll show just the percentage
or just the amount they received.
It's like well,
that's what you asked for
it's like no, no, no.
I want to know the total amount
that way I have transparency
around what companies
and products are paying more
and if lowering that compensation
by designing the policy in a better way
can result in me having cash value.
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed this video
I would love to hear any thoughts,
comments, questions.
Please feel free to leave them
in the comments below
and as always
I hope this helps.
