Jon Ossoff Grills Trump Aide Jay Clayton With Rapid-Fire “Who Won The 2020 Election?” Questions

Oneindia - English
1 follower
Oct 12, 2026
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis transcript captures a tense congressional hearing where a nominee for the Director of National Intelligence is questioned on their honesty and integrity. The exchange focuses on the nominee's refusal to name the winner of the 2020 election and their knowledge regarding a controversial raid in Fulton County, Georgia.
Who won the 2020 election?
I'm not going to do this with you.
Who won the 2020 election?
I think I've answered the question.
We can keep doing this.
Mr. Clayton.
And I've answered it.
Who won the 2020 presidential election?
I've answered it.
You have an obligation to be honest
and forthright with this committee, correct?
Yes.
And is it the case in the Juan Orlando Hernandez case
that the president of the United States
pardoned a man who had worked with the Sinaloa cartel
to facilitate massive narco-trafficking
into the United States?
I don't remember the specifics of that case.
He was convicted in your district.
He was convicted.
We convict a lot of people for a lot of drugs.
Convicted of narco-trafficking, yes.
I believe so.
No, so at massive scale, yes.
Well, you're telling me what I know.
That's kind of...
He was, I believe...
Look, I'll take your word for it.
He was a convicted narco-trafficker.
Did the President of the United States,
Donald J. Trump, pardon a convicted narco-trafficker?
I believe we just discussed that.
The President provided a pardon, yes.
Yes or no?
Did the President of the United States pardon
a convicted narco-trafficker?
Yes.
Who won the 2020 election?
I'm not going to do this with you.
This is a job interview.
We've established that you have an obligation to be honest
and forthright with the committee, yes?
you do have an obligation to be honest
and forthright with the committee yes who won the
2020 election like i said i'm not i'm not going
to get into that with you but you do have an
obligation to be honest and forthright with the committee
is anything that i just said not honest
or forthright yes you're not being honest
or forthright who won the 2020 election we can keep
doing this well we're going to keep doing it
because you're not being honest and forthright
i'm not going to engage in in the theater it's
a simple question mr clayton and i've answered who
Who won the 2020 presidential election?
I've answered it.
You're here asking for the support of senators
to lead America's intelligence community.
We've established that you have an obligation
to be honest and forthright with this committee
and with the American public,
but you refuse to answer a simple matter of fact
about the 2020 election.
Is that right?
No, that's not right.
Then answer the question.
Who won the 2020 election?
I have answered the question.
Answer it.
What is your answer?
I've given you my answer.
what is your answer? You refuse to answer a basic question about
who won a presidential election,
but you asked to lead America's intelligence community.
Isn't it humiliating to be unable
to answer this question,
to have to indulge the president's delusions? We know, you know,
everybody in this room knows the truthful answer to that question.
Why can you not give it?
I think I gave you the answer.
Are you aware that Director Gabbard was present
at the Fulton County raid in Georgia earlier this year?
You discussed that with me yesterday in your office.
Are you aware that Director Gabbard was present
at the Fulton County raid earlier this year?
You brought it to me, my attention this year.
What is going on here?
You've said at the beginning of this you have an obligation
to be honest and forthright with the committee.
I'm asking a very simple question.
Are you aware that Director Gabbard was present
at the Fulton County raid earlier this year?
Yes or no?
Are you aware?
I was...
You won't answer that question either.
I just said I was made aware of it by you yesterday.
The first time you learned that Director Gabbard
was present at that raid was in my office yesterday?
It was the first time that, in my recollection,
I've thought about it recently.
Now, was I aware of it before?
What?
I mean, you brought it to my attention yesterday.
I had not thought...
So you had not known until...
I had not thought about it until you
brought it to my attention yesterday.
Your answers lack credibility.
Your testimony lacks credibility.
you're being evasive and you're not being candid
or forthright and everybody across the country is
going to watch this and know that are you aware
that former director Gabbard testified that her
presence at the raid was quote requested
by the president i'm not aware of that until now okay
you are now aware of that yeah are you aware
that members of this committee are already probing
director Gabbard's potential misconduct
in this matter no i don't i'm not privy to your probe
Are you aware that the General Counsel and Deputy General Counsel
of your office have already provided testimony
to this committee regarding this matter?
No.
If the White House Chief of Staff
or the President asks you to travel somewhere across the United States
and oversee the execution of a domestic search warrant
on a sensitive election facility, will you do it?
Is that appropriate for the Director of National Intelligence?
That's a hypothetical.
We all know it's not appropriate for
the Director of National Intelligence.
Will you answer the question?
Your time has expired.
will you give him the opportunity to answer
the question is it is this not material right now sir
is it appropriate for the director of national intelligence
to oversee the execution of domestic
search warrants at sensitive election facilities yes
or no i think you're asking me as you just
said in your first comment yes
or no is it appropriate no you are asking me to comment
on a matter that you just said was under
investigation no i'm asking you okay senator
Senator, if your time is expired, disqualify.
Vice Chairman.
