Judges free felons facing child indecency charges
1 Video View·Oct 13, 2026
AI GeneratedMay contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedTwo convicted felons, Leonard Houston and Cleveland Robinson, are facing new charges of indecency with children after judges prematurely terminated their probation despite repeated violations. Critics argue that rewarding non-compliance with unsatisfactory terminations instead of prison sentences directly endangered children.
Time now for Breaking Bond with Randy Wallace.
So, we have two convicted felons.
They're accused of indecent acts with children after being rewarded
by judges for not abiding by the terms of their probation.
So, Randy, let's jump right in here to the situation.
Okay, now, every defendant sentenced
to probation is told the same thing.
Follow all the rules and do all that's required
or their probation will be revoked and they will be sent to prison.
We found defendants who do nothing
but violate the terms of their probation.
But instead of sending them to prison,
judges reward them by unsatisfactorily terminating their probation.
That's the case with two defendants now accused
of indecent acts involving children.
39-year-old Leonard Houston and 49-year-old Cleveland Robinson
are now charged with indecency with a child exposed.
When you look at these two defendants, they make people
that do the right thing look foolish for doing the right thing.
Well, not only that, Randy,
when I'm looking at Leonard Houston and Cleveland Robinson,
I see not one unsatisfactory termination probation.
I see two, meaning they've already had an unsat termination probation
and they got another one.
That's unusual, normally it's one on set per customer.
What did the DA have to say about this?
Now they filed motions to the court asking
that both defendants have their
probation revoked and sent to prison.
Both of them now have pending felonies of indecent exposure.
Both of them allegedly involved juvenile victims,
child victims in which they did
things that we can't say on TV
to young people that they shouldn't be doing.
Again, if you had perhaps revoked the probation instead
of rewarding them for being a failure,
two young people wouldn't have been exposed to some horrific
and dastardly deeds.
So who are the judges responsible for these cases?
The 351st judge, Nada Cornelio,
terminated Leonard Houston's probation.
Robinson's probation was terminated by a visiting judge.
All right, Randy, thank you so much.
Of course.