Will the racism in Reform topple Nigel Farage? | The News Agents
Oct 16, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
They're behaving like criminals,
they need to be prosecuted, we will prosecute them.
He's not talking about the candidates, he's talking about
journalists who've done the undercover work.
Senior party officials are heard in some of these clips saying
they have to defend the indefensible.
Posts from Perry on social media said
that the then Deputy Prime Minister
David Lammy quotes,
must go home to the Caribbean where his loyalty lies.
Questioning David Lammy's patriotism is straight up and down racism.
The News Agents podcast is brought to you by HSBC UK,
opening up a world of opportunity.
This is a global production.
But above all, what we are going to do from today
is we are going to professionalise the party.
We are going to democratise the party.
and those few bad apples that have crept in will
be gone will be long gone and we will never have
any of their type back in our organization you have
the 100% promise, my one hundred percent promise on that promise made
promise broken Mr Farage because that was in 2024
and what we've been treated to over the past couple
of nights is a slew of allegations of racist,
homophobic, misogynist counsellors that are still
there. The ITV undercover investigation
is continuing to produce some extraordinary
undercover footage of how reform really works from the inside.
Is Nigel Farage
about to get caught in its trap? Welcome to the News Agents.
the news agents it's john it's lewis
and um the ITV exposure program
a year with reform um which
is going to air on Sunday as i was saying continues
to produce some extraordinary revelations about
how reform candidates
and indeed the reform leadership operate on a day-to-day basis and
on Thursday night a new set of clips
and new set of allegations were brought forward which go up to
and include in various ways Nigel Farage himself
so just to recap as to what came out last night
senior party officials are heard in some
of these clips saying they have to defend the indefensible
on a regular basis in one case Reform's director
of comms himself says that a reform mayoral
candidate should be sacked for being a racist
so he comes out with some credit after he questioned
black and Asian politicians loyalty to Britain
but party leader Nigel Farage allowed him to stay
and there's a clip on that insisting that he simply
be allowed to apologize instead might be
worth since we're on that just playing that clip
and hearing it apologize to Lamb yeah that's what
he's doing if David Lammy's mistaken he's not too happy with it i'm sure
but we just need to do it
can move on yeah yeah i agree tell him
that properly yeah you can text him he's showing a bit
of a bit of salt i'm sorry it's probably
a good thing yeah don't use the rear app that's the
problem the audio is not great there
but just to remind you in terms of what they're talking about
they're talking about David Lammy
and the person that they're talking about the person in question
was at the time Reform's candidate
to be Mayor of Hampshire, Dr Chris Parry,
and a post from Parry on social media said
that the then Deputy Prime Minister, David Lammy,
who of course actually was born and raised in Britain,
quotes, must go home to the Caribbean where his loyalty lies.
Now I think we can all agree that there is only one word for that,
and it is completely racist.
It's complete racism, because clearly he would
not say that about a white politician
And he's assuming that Lammy is from the Caribbean because he's black.
It's also interesting about why Nigel Farage wants
to protect this particular individual,
whereas others he's been happy to see kind of be discarded with.
And it sounds like the guy who was the mayoral candidate
for Hampshire is posh, is well-to-do, is an ex-Royal Navy officer.
And so surely we can find a way of accommodating him.
if he just apologizes a bit we'll forgive him
and you think well hang on just how can we reconcile
that with you saying those few bad apples
that have crept in will be gone will be long gone
and we'll never have any of their type back
in the organization quote unquote from Nigel Farage
after the general election in 2024 I mean
that as you say Lewis is straight up and down racism
you know questioning David Lammy's patriotism loyalty to this country
and he really needs to
go back to a country he wasn't even born
in particularly um sticks in the craw you might
say when we remember that a former uh leader
in wales from their own party is literally in
prison right now because he
was basically committing treason in favor of the russian
state so you know if there's a question about
some people's patriotism maybe they should look
a bit close to him it's also worth saying
that he did apologize to Lammy he did show that sorrow
as Farage was encouraging him to do
and he was allowed to stay as reform
was mayor or candidate even after that
might be worth noting that he was finally
suspended from the party months later pending
investigation over controversial
comments about a Jewish neighbourhood
watch group
and the reform have not revealed
or indeed published the results of those
allegations or those investigations
I should say so far so it might well
be that Mr Parry
had some form as it turned
out in these matters
You see, so I thought what was interesting is that, you know,
the expose last night from ITV was the result of a huge amount of work.
But this was inside the HQ.
It wasn't just a few random counsellors that you found
on the streets in, you know, Solihull or wherever it happened to be.
These are people at the engine in the engine room.
And actually, you know, you thought
the press officers were trying to do a good job.
I mean, you know, we are having to defend
the indefensible on a regular basis.
Well, the director of comms is clear in those clips,
and I say emerging from some credit,
for saying that Mr Parry, in his view, was being a racist.
And I think what's particularly damaging about
that clip for Nigel Farage, who has been clear
that he wanted to get rid of these so-called bad apples,
saying it's just a bad apple problem, isolated cases.
What you don't hear him in that clip say is really engaging
with the substance of whether he's been racist or not and saying,
right, if he's been racist, we don't want him as our candidate, right?
what he's doing is he's managing the press he's sort
of saying well just get him to show some
sorrow apologize to Lammy and it'll be fine
which of course might question someone to ask whether
Farage actually is very serious about changing some
of the culture in the party and of course
this wasn't all because there were other things
that were revealed um last night as well um the
undercover reporter also found that one reform councillor
was allowed to stay in the party after
being found to have been registered
on a white supremacist dating website which promoted nazi
propaganda um inside reform press office they said it wasn't wasn't
a resignation issue i mean i
wasn't actually aware there were white supremacist dating websites
but i mean i suppose i suppose
they must exist i suppose it's quite helpful for mi5
to find a compendium of all the fascists out
there they're all out there just sort of copping up
with each other well yeah exactly trying to
find all white restaurants or whatever it is i mean you know
but apparently that wasn't a problem
either um another one undercover reporter in chester
also witnessed how the vetting process
encouraged possible candidates to delete
their social media accounts before applying to disguise
any links with far-right activists tommy robinson
in greater manchester a candidate who stood for
reform in the local elections
in may said he had initially failed vetting twice because of his
support for tommy robinson and sharing offensive posts about Keir Starmer
but later had someone ring
up from reform hq saying
no you must stand like come along we really want you within the party
and indeed even um one of their elected mps
was recorded talking about the culture of the party
this is sarah poaching
who of course won the runcorn by-election here she is talking about
the culture within reform i'm
a press officer i'm starting in january oh my god
i thought we so need women press officers yeah they
are so ******* chauvinistic I go out on all
the shows to go oh that's lovely
so welcoming ---- what do they do well they just exude you
if you're a woman there's a bit
of a male issue there you have it Sarah Poaching just talking
about what a sexist club uh reform hq is um and i think
that that comes off the back of what we
heard the night before with those two guys
in the pub talking in the most disgusting terms about what
they'd like to do with some reform candidate
which started with the word um as they were discussing
kind of her attributes and i think this is a problem
and i know that i mean reform's approach
to this is to revisit bad apples
but also to say why why is everyone ganging up against us why is
the mainstream media just going after us
and i would say well two things to that it's not just
you any party that aspires to be in power is gone after
but without investigative journalism
would we have known mr farage that you got
a personal donation of five million pounds from a
crypto billionaire who lives abroad
and where you suddenly seem to have crypto policies that are
very advantageous to him it's thanks
to investigative journalism that we're finding out stuff that
broadly speaking the british people need to know
if we're going to be deciding who the next
government is going to be and who the next prime minister
is going to be i think that the look i
i think there are things you can say in reform
as a fact i mean there's been some people in reform
today i'll talk about that in a minute
but i think that i think one of the things you can certainly
say as a point of critique in this is a bit a bit
as i was saying before with farage in that clip
where we don't hear them
or hear him anyway addressing what should be the concern which is
has this guy been racist or not and what kind
of message does it send not just about us as a party
but about such casual racism to have such a hype
to retain him as a candidate i think there are
other examples of that i think what is one
of the more damning things about this is that there
it feels as if there is just a tininess
and a lack of sensitivity to the question of racism
itself so for example on that white supremacist thing
this absurd thing this guy Gavin Beals who's
a reform candidate a councillor
in North Northamptonshire registered on a white supremacist
dating website a newspaper reported the site was exclusively for whites
and Europids seeking
tribal love which had promoted the survival
of the white race you know the reform press officers in
question here seem to be unaware
or unconcerned about it in the clip so you hear a senior press
officer saying you get muslim dating sites you
get christian dating sites you get black dating
sites you get jamaican dating site it's not great
but another one says it's not a resignation issue
is it that to me reveals what is simply a kind
of complete lack of intellectual curiosity or
understanding about what racism is you cannot compare ethnic groups
or dating websites which
are dedicated to particular sorts of people with a website
or dating app which is dedicated to
what is essentially a fascist ideology based
on racism itself it is different from it would you
know i mean you could say i suppose the consistent thing
to say would be if there was a white only
dating website but we know this is this is we're talking about
a white supremacist dating website
you might as well have nazi dating website right it
is different for having dating websites which
are dedicated to particular groups of people
who might want to meet other like-minded group or
other groups of people who share
that particular characteristic as opposed to a dating website
for people who want to embed racism and white supremacy
and the fact that that is not obvious
to those people i think is a revealing thing
and i think they should ask themselves some questions
about why it's not obvious
and how that suggests that frankly they are being not only insensitive
but deeply incurious about the accusations
that are being leveled at them yeah and it's kind of
interesting to listen to Nigel Farage i mean he cancelled
a news conference uh yesterday
he has appeared on a Daily Telegraph uh podcast where some
of these allegations have been put to
him he's much more exercised by the journalists
that have done the investigation rather than what
they've found have a listen they're behaving like
criminals uh they need to be prosecuted we will
prosecute them for what they've done
um but yeah i mean what they're basically doing is saying to
the world that you know i'm fair game we're fair
game i mean it's just it's incredible to think
that our democracy has sunk to these depths they're
criminals they're going to be prosecuted he's not
talking about the candidates
who've been found to express he's talking about journalists who've
done the undercover work well or indeed yes candidates
who however fleetingly might have
indulged an interest in white supremacy you know i mean i've heard
of swiping right but that's
taking taking it to a whole nother level i mean like
this is just this is i know but like but but
look what what's the defense here well i think some
of this stuff in fairness and they've obviously
committed huge resources ITV to this some
of this stuff i think that they put out i think actually
you might hear in any political party
or dare i say for example you hear about some of these
press officers talking about some
of the nutters they've selected you'd hear that in the labour
party hq you hear that conservative party hq dare i say you'd hear it
in newsrooms that sort of
language being a bit like because and this is the other thing
which is one defense i would say for
reform would be to say that look they have it
and this is a matter of public record they have
invested a lot of money in trying to vet their vetting procedures
because they are a new part
ish party and they're not like the labour
and conservative parties which have deep roots in
local communities and normally the way it works
when you've got a local tory association or a
labour clp they kind of know
who the local people are and who the weirdos are and who they can try
and siphon out they don't always succeed by the way
and if you were to apply this level of rigor
to some local government selections even in the labour
and conservative parties you'd find some
pretty fruity characters some interesting
characters some characters with some pretty
eccentric views so i don't think that is unique to reform
and i think it is certainly true
that you know then their status as a newer party
is going to mean that you can that certain they
will have certain candidates because they're
standing so many new candidates across the
country who you know frankly do not pass the sniff test
to put it mildly i think the critique though
which that doesn't seem to occur to them is this what
is it about all these people with far-right
views which so seems to attract them to reform exactly it
is not a coincidence right and it is
not a coincidence and could it be for example let's
be let's be frank there have been plenty
of examples from the top of reform leadership down
and where they have used language and tropes
of the far right Suella Braverman which
when she did this when she was a Tory minister in fairness
but you know talking about an invasion Zia Yusuf tweeting about
a Somalian politician suggesting
that we all know what's going
on here nudge nudge wink wink Sarah Poaching talking about how when
she's watching TV she sees too many black faces
for her liking Robert Jenrick when he goes to
Birmingham saying you know he didn't see a single white face
when he was that you know on and on it
goes and each time they make an excuse
and each time you can sort of maybe logically occasionally
sort of see where they're coming from and you defend it
and they survive and whatever but taking
in the totality has it not occurred to them
that these things from the elite level of the party
might just might just attract the sort of person
who might be interested in going on a white
supremacist dating website
and until they acknowledge that tension and as I say I defend
them to some extent on on the difficulties
of candidate selection being a new party I think
that's all fair enough but two things can be true
at once it can be true that vetting is difficult
they're a new party they've invested a lot
of money in this sort of thing but it's also true
that sometimes moths are attracted to a certain type of flame exactly
and that's the point isn't
it it's also true as you say Lewis that if you look
at some of the conservative candidates some
of the liberal candidates uh some of the I mean I
was you know I used to live in Winchester and it
turned out the Liberal Democrat MP also had
a pretty fruity lifestyle that led to his demise and exiting from...
It's Mark Otten we're talking about here.
This is Mark Otten.
Look it up, everybody. If you haven't heard the story, just look it up.
Don't do it at lunchtime, that's all I'd say.
Not before eating, certainly.
So, I mean, you know, it's absolutely true.
But what you're seeing are people with the range of human frailties.
You know, they may be fraudsters.
They may have dabbled in kind of weird sexual practice.
They may have all sorts of things on which there is a consistency
of what you're finding in the recordings when ITV go undercover.
And it is racism. It's bigotry. It is misogyny.
And that is the through line that runs through all of it.
And so there is a particular problem. And as you say,
you know what Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf and Richard Tice
and Jenrick and others do brilliantly is they go up to a line
and know that they mustn't cross it because they will be accused
of racism or sowing racial discontent or whatever it happens to be.
but make an argument very cleverly
and they've got thousands of people who have suddenly been
brought into a party where it's not the same where they don't know
and haven't got an instinctive
understanding of where that line
is and articulate things now it may be that in the hours and hours
and hours of tapes and recordings there are an awful lot
of reform councillors who may be helping
little old ladies across the road
and being perfect model citizens we don't know you know
of the people that have been focused on whether
that was all they got you know every everyone
that they aimed for came up with something racist
or whether there were huge piles of reform
councillors doing decent work
and being decent human beings we don't know that but i think it
is telling a story itself
and i think actually in some ways the reaction of reform to these
disclosures is telling in itself i mean have a listen to this clip
because this is the undercover
reporter exploring how you get through vetting
in reform previously got an account where i've
denied some sort of support like tommy robinson might
be tweeting some stuff like that i don't
what were they on twitter and well x isn't it they're there
but i can find them delete them
i think tommy robinson is outdone too yeah
and i think the bulk of what he says i agree with
right not all but politically he's toxic
and what Nigel Farage has learned over 30 years
of being in politics is we've got to play the game a little bit yeah
so just do what's necessary
don't worry about your links in the past just you know wipe it i
do i do go back to this point
And again, I think Reform's biggest problem is that clearly internally,
I just don't think they have a very consistent understanding
of or sort of logic around racism itself.
And if they take in some of these things more seriously, at least
the case of Mr. Parry, then they'd be on sort of firmer ground.
But again, I mean, I saw Kemi Badenoch tweeting about
this yesterday saying this just shows how different we are to Reform.
It wasn't so long ago that Kemi Badenoch was defending a man
who had literally gone to prison for anti-Semitism, allowing him
to stand as a candidate, and who had harassed and made the life hell
of Luciana Berger, now Baroness Berger, a Labour Party peer.
And, you know, people sort of forget this now
because the news cycle is so fast.
But, you know, I mean, a truly horrific case.
And Badenoch was saying, oh, well, I just believe in rehabilitation.
so there is a you know there is a there
is a problem particularly in local government i'm
amazed to this day i think Badenoch got away
with that extraordinarily and if that had been
a reform if that had been if they had if reform right
if that had been a reform guy and they'd
found that we would be hearing about it for days
and weeks and i think that you know there is a
i think that they have some some some some legitimacy
to the critique that the burden
on some of their candidates and the scrutiny,
I think there is a greater than there would be
at the moment for some of the mainstream parties.
I think that's true.
I think that's true.
They brought it upon themselves to some extent,
but I do think that what happened, for example,
with Badenoch and how she was basically allowed
to sort of sail through that,
and I know some of the people involved
found it extraordinary that she was able to do so.
I think if that had been Farage and Reform,
I think that it would have been a far bigger story for longer.
I think that's a fair point.
I think, look, we covered this on the news extensively
and saying, you know, how is it possible?
But lots of people didn't.
Yes, I know.
But I just kind of, I suppose when I hear, oh,
this is just the media and they never attack anyone else.
And I'm thinking, Christ, well, we took Badenoch to task very firmly
over that and thought it was the most extraordinary misjudgment.
We were at the Green Party conference and I don't think
anyone could say we gave the Green Party an easy time.
And do you need to go undercover with the Greens when everything,
frankly, that they're doing is so out in the open?
You know, they're kind of doing stuff where you think,
my God, are you really hoping you're going
to win over public opinion doing stuff like this?
And, you know, and we went after Labour as well when there were kind
of stuff about, you know, Keir Starmer expressing, you know,
accepting suits and glasses and whatever else it happened to be.
because that's that's the job of journalism
is to hold people in power to account and that's
what we're doing and do we get it wrong sometimes
I mean arguably you could say that Reform have had
it easy for a very long time from large sections
of the media where they have been given a free
right now you know there's a huge volume of opinion
on the left that is furious with the BBC
at how often Nigel Farage washes up on Question Time
or wherever it happens to be.
Yeah, and look, I think it is true
that certainly in 2025, Farage enjoyed a great press.
Reform enjoyed it as well.
I think there's no doubt,
we've talked about it on the show before.
Obviously, this ITV expose has been in the works
for a long time, so I wouldn't include this in it.
But as I said before, I mean, I think there's no doubt
that over the course of this year,
the Conservative press have decided, much of it,
you know, the Daily Mail, The Times, others,
Telegraph to some extent have decided that they want
a Conservative Party revival that they're
backing Kemi Badenoch to the hilt she enjoys
as I've said before I think an extraordinary press really
I don't think there's been a single negative article about
her in any of those papers for
for a very long time and I think Reform have felt the heat as a result
because suddenly the press
that they had enjoyed for quite a long time suddenly
the eye of Sauron is turned upon them
and uh you know we've seen over the course of the year
that has had a cumulative effect that's not
to say that any of that journalism is wrong by the way
and particularly the stuff around
Farage's finances and so on but I think that they have had
to inhabit a media environment which has
turned noticeably cooler
and I think they're feeling the pressure of that I think the other
argument that they would put um is you've committed all
these resources to finding out
wrongdoing in Reform but you haven't laid
a glove really on Nigel Farage I mean that's that would
be there so you you haven't heard him saying something
that oh my god we've got the quote
now we've got him he's we've exposed him
as this or that I mean yeah he was forgiving and wanting
to get move on with the guy in Hampshire um fair dues
and you've got him sort of a bit in the
Channel 4 documentary where kind
of but you know he's got some plausible deniability there as well
and I suppose that you know is it does it go
to the very top of the party I think that Farage
will take some comfort from the fact
that it probably you know at the moment doesn't look
like it's got there well I think that all
of this still augments the idea um or strengthens the idea
that you know we really can't be certain
that Farage leads the party into the yeah election
because we know that Farage hates this sort of stuff.
He certainly hated all the stuff into his finances.
He hates this.
I think there is a feeling,
I think I could completely imagine a resignation speech
where he says what he believes,
and listeners and viewers can mock this
and find it risible or even pathetic,
but this is definitely, I know, what he believes,
which is that the establishment, quote-unquote,
are out to get him, are out to destroy him,
are out to destroy his party,
will not allow reform to survive,
will not allow reform to contest an election in a fair way.
As I say, you can think about what you like about that,
and I've certainly got some views about that, but nonetheless,
I think that would be a fair reflection of what his belief would be.
And I think that there will be an ongoing...
There's a sort of question which I don't know the answer to,
which is, does this strengthen his resolve to try and beat them,
all of these continued stories,
or does it actually make the allure of the MAGA circuit
and television appearances and Bitcoin and crypto
So on all of the stuff that he can go and enjoy,
a very nice life that he was enjoying before he got back in in 2024,
does it make that allure and that pull all the stronger?
And in a moment, we'll cross the Atlantic and Donald Trump
and the latest posturing over Ukraine and the war there.
Now time to thank our partner, HSBC UK.
So what actually makes a bank account premier?
Well, an HSBC Premier account gives you exclusive access
to plenty of perks that make you feel extra special,
including offers and rewards across travel,
dining, shopping and experiences.
That sounds great,
but I'm particularly intrigued by the experiences bit.
Yeah, through Premier Lifestyle, customers can now
enjoy priority access and exclusive ticket allocations
for major music tours, sports events and theatre productions.
Nice. So it's not just about what
your bank account does for your money.
It's about the extras it can do for you too.
Exactly. Everything's premier when your bank account is.
Search HSBC Premier.
At HSBC UK, you're backed by the current account switch guarantee.
Ukraine has lost so many of its men and Russia too,
but Russia is a massive country.
Russia has millions of people.
to 150 million people. Does that war end before you leave office?
It should end soon. I think
they actually both would like to see it end.
But I think I find Zelensky to be more difficult to
deal with than Putin. OK, I find Zelensky to be more difficult.
Could that have anything to do
with the fact that Donald Trump wants essentially
for Zelensky to surrender, for Ukraine to give
over land that Russia hasn't even conquered yet?
And Zelensky, funnily enough, doesn't think that's
a particularly alluring prospect
and so keep saying no to the terms on which Donald Trump
would like Zelensky to accept a peace deal with Putin I mean
when you're on Putin's side I bet
Putin is a pussycat to deal
with and when you're giving Putin everything he wants as Donald Trump
seems to be doing given his behavior
of the last week I bet Putin is the easiest the nicest
unkindest loveliest person to deal
with, well we have yet more uh evidence if any were needed
don't we John, that you know Putin has played Trump like
a fiddle for the last two years and
for the four years before that when Trump
was president before um look I mean Trump clearly
believes Trump has a sort of electoral prize obviously
because with the midterms he thinks
that Russian oil is some sort of potentially sort of flip to him
and to the Republicans
for the midterm elections.
But again, and we've talked about it on the show
many times over the last two years
since Trump came back,
you can hear it in Trump's voice again now
Trump is frustrated and irritated and annoyed
because he believes that the country
he is able to pressure,
i.e. the smaller country,
does not give in to him and to Putin
because they, in his head,
are both stronger than Ukraine
than the weak country and Trump can't compute he can't understand
that in his mind Russia's bigger
America's bigger therefore you little Ukraine should just
do what we say which is a you know
a deeply kind of um realist attitude
to international relations a deeply cynical one it
is you know the poor must suffer what they must
it's always Trump's sort of analytical framework
and what he doesn't spend a moment to it seems
to to think about is that being easier to deal with
i.e. Putin, is not the same as being more willing to make peace.
The Ukrainians would love to make peace tomorrow.
All the Russians have to do is stop fighting.
I mean, at the very level, never mind even leaving the disputed land
If they could get to an agreement on a ceasefire
to simply pause where things are at the moment,
that would at least be a start.
But it's not something that Putin wants to give.
And it's not something we can even see
that Trump is especially asking Putin for.
So as you say, John, it is not especially surprising
that Trump finds Zelensky harder to deal with because Trump
cannot understand that Zelensky simply doesn't submit to him.
I say this kind of cautiously, but I do think that this is the one
of the greatest stains on America and its history
of foreign entanglements that far from standing up for the underdog
or fighting communism, which it tried to do in Vietnam,
albeit absolutely cack handedly and awfully and losing.
this is about america siding with the aggressor siding
with the autocrat siding with the kleptocrat
i mean it is just incredible that a country that wanted freedom
and that wanted democracy
and that wanted to be firmly into the west's orbit
is finding itself being treated as an enemy
by the united states of america
and i find it as a piece of american foreign policy
incomprehensible that donald trump there
is something bizarre about donald trump and vladimir
putin which we've talked about before
but it really feels to me like you know that song in
the jungle book i want to be like you i think king
louis donald trump wants to be the guy who's got
the secrets of everything
and just being king of his own jungle isn't enough he looks at vladimir
putin thinks he's got everything i'd like
to be an autocrat like that i'd like to have control over
my country like that i'd like to have
the longevity that you have i'd like to be able to
control the industry and the firms
and have people paying me off in their billions that would be my
idea of heaven and he hasn't got it well i mean
the remarkable thing john isn't it is this week
is that russia has made precisely zero concessions
in exchange for trump's decision to to lift
sanctions yeah like none no like as far
as we know trump didn't even ask for any right the white
house hasn't said that he'd asked for any
um and and on top of that at least you could say well if
it's had some effect on on diesel prices in the u.s
but no effect at the pump whatsoever average
u.s diesel price 632 a gallon on thursday compared
to 629 a week earlier so all he's achieved is
given vladimir putin a multi-billion dollar bone a mil yes
and also also a clear signal that the
americans are not actually that interested
in his stopping the fighting fundamentally i mean trump
promised everyone will remember to end this war within 24 hours
then it was by easter then it was
a year then it was you know it
was just yet another fantastical you know fragment of fiction
in trump's head um but what trump has basically done
is is actually inflame a war right is actually
intensify basically a war that he promised to end
because he's basically given a very firm signal to
the russians that in exchange
for some pretty paltry transactional politics he's not interested
in exerting any pressure on the aggressor
and that's been a theme that's gone on throughout
the war look there are people who say and i think
you know we should listen to this i think you know
you and i both very much firmly of the view
that you know ukraine needs to win this war there is
obviously a perfectly legitimate critique to say
this war has gone on for four years for four years
it's longer than the first world war it's
been extraordinarily bloody on both sides ukraine has
defied all the expectations
and even the expectations of trump a year ago him and vance
basically saying you're losing if anything ukraine has
been on the offensive but we kind of know look
there's no end in sight
and it isn't clear that the current strat you know this could go on for
another two years or three years or who knows
so it's probably legitimate to maybe say right do we
need to adjust the strategy here
or ask some tough questions about what the future might look like
but that's not what trump is doing trump
is just basically insisting the ukrainians acquiesce to
him for american national economic interest whilst paying
no attention whatsoever to clear
ukrainian economic and political and security interests
which obviously is just absurd the
thing that kind of puzzles amazes bewilders me
is that you look at trump he is a proud man he wants
to be seen as a winner and he's being treated
as an absolute schmuck by putin who just walks all
over him who humiliates donald trump donald trump says there's going
to be an energy ceasefire and
russia goes and pummels the ---- out of ukrainian power plants
and leaves you know hundreds of
thousands of people sitting in dark unheated rooms
because of it and again and again Putin is just
laughing at Donald Trump
and Donald Trump like some pathetic lapdog says oh I'm going to come
back for some more because I really love you Vladimir it makes
no sense at all but you know
look it's not about any longer Donald Trump finding
a way to pathway to peace which was a
noble ambition and I think he's sincere
when he talks about the thousands of lives being lost
and how awful it is but he has come down on russia's side now
and that is a judgment that
he's made and that is a judgment he will
be judged by do you know what i love you vladimir
in russian is john well i i look forward to you explaining to it uh
vladimir okay for any russian listeners
no they're not allowed please mark lewis goodall
just do it one more time
who needs duolingo when you've got lewis goodall we'll
be back in just a moment so we're thinking
about having a new kind of section
on the podcast i don't know how long it will last it might be
quite short but i think it's russian lessons with lewis
no it's not going to be russian lessons with
lewis it is zakaria watch katie zakaria is turning out
to be the gift that keeps on giving uh we saw
her first press briefing
as donald trump's press secretary where it seemed that she'd only just
learned to read and now she's done an interview
with the friendliest of friendly fox hosts sean
hannity which didn't go that brilliantly
when hannity started berating her about only taking
questions from three news outlets, all of them friendly.
This was Katie Zakaria's explanation.
I think it's been mixed, Sean,
because they've said I only took questions from conservative
outlets. However, the Daily Mail is not known
to be a conservative outlet or friendly to
conservatives. So I do challenge that narrative.
And then, as I should have, I ended the conference
And I left as as I believe, given the fact that I'd been on the job
less than maybe eight hours and had a briefing book in the morning.
I feel like I did my very best, Sean,
to deliver for the American people that day.
What's Sean about? What's she saying?
I don't know. I mean, honestly, if the Daily Mail isn't right wing,
they've spent an awful lot of money
upsetting the wrong people, haven't they?
Yes. Had she ever read the Daily Mail, I wonder.
Well, it is a broad church, to be fair.
It's full of people who think that immigration's too high,
ranging all the way to people who think it's far too high.
So I suppose, you know, in a way, in a way, she's kind of right.
Yeah, it's a really tough audience when you're, you know,
when the only people you're taking questions
from are from the Daily Mail
and from Fox and Breitbart.
They'll be pissed off, won't they?
Basically being suggesting they're lefties.
I know.
Paper which backed the Nazis in the 30s.
Oh, oh dear.
The Rothermeers won't like that.
Never mind.
Never mind.
We'll be back next week.
We'll see you then.
Bye-bye.
Bye-bye.
The News Agents podcast is brought to you by HSBC UK,
opening up a world of opportunity.
This has been a Global Production.

