Foldables sucked until this moment—Samsung's laser-perforated display tech changes everything, and Apple's first foldable will prove it. Learn more about DREO's CES, their AIoT platform, their new misting fan, and more amplified by DREO AI - https://bit.ly/49xjXaj DREO: Ignite the Senses
Apple's rumored iPhone Fold features a 4:3 aspect ratio inner display approaching iPad mini size, Samsung's revolutionary creaseless laser-perforated OLED technology from CES 2026, and a landscape-oriented design unlike the Galaxy Z Fold 7's nearly square display. The foldable iPhone measures 9.6mm folded with dual 48-megapixel cameras matching iPhone 17, potentially lacking Face ID in favor of Touch ID, and pricing expected above $2,000. Samsung's viscoelastic creep solution uses microperforations to distribute fold stress across different microsections, preventing permanent crease formation—the exact display technology Apple has been waiting for. Comparing iPhone Fold dimensions to Google Pixel Fold, Galaxy Z Fold 7, and Motorola Razr reveals Apple's unique horizontal-opening approach optimized for iPadOS windowing, split-screen multitasking, and existing iPad app frameworks without requiring developer rework.
I am here at Samsung's CES 2026 exhibit.
If you don't know, Samsung is one of the world's
global leading display manufacturers.
And I don't know, they've got some like micro RGB
thing behind me, whatever. The important thing
is they make one of the best TVs ever made,
the Samsung Frame Pro. Wow, it is fantastic.
If you've not seen my review, you should check it
out. But that review might be one of the reasons why I
was not invited to their media day,
which happened a couple of days ago with other members of the press.
I've tried to get access and have since been unsuccessful,
but what they unveiled there
was pretty important, even though it seemed nondescript on the surface.
A special new folding screen technology that somehow doesn't crease.
Coincidentally, the exact display Apple has
been rumored to be using for years in their
upcoming iPhone Fold, a phone supposed to be released this year.
So let's talk about what that is, how it works,
how it's even possible, and if the
iPhone Fold as a general product and category even makes sense.
Here is a piece of thin 3D printed plastic.
Watch what happens when I bend it repeatedly,
in the same spot, over and over.
You'll notice two things.
First, it starts to take on a bit of memory.
It doesn't quite spring back to where it was originally.
And secondly, do you see this white stress line
that's starting to form?
Yeah, that's deformation, concentrating along a single axis.
And it's not all that dissimilar from a foldable display.
I mean, Samsung literally ships their foldables.
Unfolded and it's not just to present them nicely the longer
these displays stay closed and the more you fold them the more
prominent the crease will become and this happens due to a
phenomenon called viscoelastic creep the flexible polyimide structure
that replaces traditional glass undergoes permanent molecular
restructuring under sustained mechanical stress every time you open
and close each fold cycle leaves
microscopic changes in the polymer chains invisible at first
but accumulating along the bend axis and
Until they become that tactile ridge that you feel
when you run your finger across.
The type of ridge that you just,
no matter how hard you try, you just can't quite get
rid of.
The man behind the camera, Benjamin, has a Z Fold 7.
Which arrived with a barely there crease out of the box,
but several months and thousands
of open-close cycles later, it's noticeably more pronounced.
And it's not a defect, it's material science,
and it's been one of the barriers standing
between foldables and mainstream adoption.
It's not the barrier, that's probably cost, but it is still a factor.
The challenge is that foldable displays,
they're not just bendable glass, they are a complex
stack of layers, each responding differently to mechanical stress.
There's the polyimide substrate.
There's the thin-film transistors controlling each individual pixel.
There's the OLED itself with its emissive layer,
integrated touch sensors, and TFE encapsulation film.
There's also the ultra-thin glass on top of that,
and then finally a protective film on top of that.
Every layer has to fold and unfold without breaking,
separating, or developing permanent deformation.
And here's the takeaway.
When you fold something,
the outer surface stretches while the inner surface compresses.
Thicker materials experience greater differential stress along
that fold line, which is why
making this entire stack thinner
and thinner has been the engineering goal for years.
Like the addition of UTG,
glass thin enough actually becomes flexible because its bending
stress stays below its fracture threshold.
But thinner also means more fragile.
Drop something on a foldable and you're
almost guaranteed to crack a screen, because
there is no thick glass sandwich protecting those delicate layers.
So it's been a tricky thing of how do we balance durability
but also hand feel to make it feel
like a glass display while making sure
that the materials can fold and unfold a bunch
of times without creasing.
It's hard.
And manufacturers have tried pretty much everything.
Motorola pioneered a teardrop hinge with the original Razr.
You might remember that.
Instead of folding flat,
the screen tucks into a larger radius loop inside the hinge,
and then it actually slides the display down
into the chin as it closes.
A clever mechanical solution,
but one that didn't prove to be very reliable.
Samsung's Galaxy Z series uses
a dual-cam mechanism system that allows the device to
hold at different angles while
also pulling the display taut when it's opened flat.
And some Chinese manufacturers even use optically
clear adhesives that let the display layers
slide microscopically past each other during folding and unfolding.
These approaches all help,
but they don't solve the fundamental problem.
Repeated stress in the same location creates material fatigue.
The crease will always develop.
Samsung's new solution, the one they showed at CES,
seems genuinely clever.
According to analyst Ice Universe,
they're using a laser-perforated metal support layer
beneath the OLED stack.
Let me explain what this is supposed to do by using
an example that is, well, my in-laws'
dogs.
They are border collies.
They're animals.
They're dogs designed to herd.
And so they take the same exact path in the yard every single day.
The grass that was once there is long dead.
And left in its wake is a dirt trail.
Now, had these dogs varied their route slightly each time,
like most dogs do, the grass would
have survived, because no single spot would have taken repeated damage.
Samsung's microperforations operate on a similar principle.
They make the backing plate selectively flexible,
so rather than the entire structure bending
uniformly across a consistent crease line,
different microsections take turns absorbing
stress.
Each fold distributes the load slightly differently,
and without a stable stress path, no permanent
crease can form.
Now the force still exists,
it just doesn't have the conditions to become as visible.
Additionally, the perforated plate reportedly floats
or shifts slightly within the hinge
mechanism as well, allowing the backing to relax
when unfolded rather than pulling it
tightly against a sharp corner. Of course, Samsung
They're not going to let me anywhere near this thing.
But you know what?
They can't kick me out of CES entirely.
Around the corner is today's sponsor, DREO,
the number one seller of fans on Amazon.
And when you see this, you'll understand why.
This thing is amazing.
It is an indoor misting fan, which is no easy task.
This uses two atomizing plates to make
the beadlets basically imperceptible.
16 microns, I believe.
And so you can barely feel them.
You feel the cooling effect, but your hand doesn't get wet at all.
Important when you're inside.
As we go over here we'll find out that there are a lot of other fans
and this one in particular is
pretty neat to me because it uses a millimeter wave sensor
so it doesn't just follow you left
and right in your home but it follows you up
and down as well directing the airflow right to you.
as we continue over here into the kitchen you'll find
that they have not just water filters
and milk frothers but air fryers as well
and they're enabled and powered by AI so what you
can do is input your ingredients that you have
in your fridge it spits out a recipe you prepare it
and then well it cooks it for you pretty amazing
and that extends into the living room as well
this is a pretty cool ambiance that we have in here
and that's because using all of Dreo's
Uh, remotely controlled things, we can change temperature,
we can even change smell, we can change airflow,
we can change sound, and a whole lot more.
Let's put myself in, ah, nearby home, Colorado, USA.
I experience the scene, the air conditioning,
this room very cold, and a whole lot more. Pretty neat.
And that is capable and able to happen
because of all of the stuff that DREO makes.
If there's a product you can think of particularly involving climate,
they've probably got it.
This thing over here is also really neat.
It is an air conditioner that is unique from other air conditioners
because you typically have airflow issues.
You have positive airflow, negative airflow.
Pulls air from outside, it spits air back outside,
and importantly, doesn't need a
drain because it has its own internal dehumidifier.
Really uncommon in portable air conditioning units,
but this thing does it easy.
Check out all the DREOS products
that they've shown here at CES using the link below.
Thanks.
Here's my issue with foldables as they exist today,
and I say this as someone who has owned
and used several of them. The original Z Flip
for almost a year as my daily driver, the Z Fold 2 for
a number of months, and the Z Fold 5 for all
of like a few days before realizing that my entire
life is anchored to iOS and Android,
just cannot replicate it no matter how much I would like it
When you unfold a Z Fold 7, the inner display is nearly square.
About 1.1 to 1 in terms of aspect ratio.
Now, Samsung has been progressively squaring
their aspect ratios with each generation.
The original Fold was tall and slim.
Fold 2 and 3 hit 5x4.
Fold 4 and 5 reached 6.5.
Fold 6 went to 7x6.
And now the 7 is essentially square,
optimizing for productivity over media consumption.
If you ask me.
Because a square...
Well, it is objectively better than
a tall rectangle for things like spreadsheets and
dual-pane emails, split-screen multitasking,
stuff that benefits from horizontal real estate.
But for media?
Like, a 21 by 9 aspect ratio video,
like the one you're watching right now, is only one
centimeter wider on the inner display
in portrait mode than the cover screen is horizontally,
and only about one centimeter wider
when in landscape mode compared to portrait mode.
Most of that huge display.
Just goes unused. And plenty of apps,
including social media, just can't take advantage of that
wider format because the content itself
was designed around 20-year-old candy bar
widescreen slab-based smartphone displays.
Google tried something a little different,
because I think they realized this problem
with the original Pixel Fold back in 2023.
A phone that, well, I bought just for this video.
For over $500, so you better like and subscribe.
Please check out my merch, please. Nobody's buying it.
So they took the same 6x5 aspect ratio display found
in the Galaxy Fold 4 and 5,
but they oriented it horizontally instead of vertically.
The same proportions, but a different
approach. And they also added some beefy bezels
to make that device feel even wider.
Based on leaked CAD drawings,
Apple may be attempting something similar,
though even more distinctive.
I have here the results of those labors,
or fruits, or whatever the heck.
Yeah, 3D-printed mockup, based on the leaked dimensions.
The rumored iPhone Fold measures roughly 121
by 84 millimeters when folded,
which is slightly wider than the original OG Fold, but a lot shorter,
resulting in just a very stout device
with a 4 by 3 aspect ratio interior display.
And, uh...
Well, that's meaningful, because having
spent some time with this thing,
it's ridiculous, like, I haven't used this for a few days.
This reminds me of, like, when I was 13 years old,
and I printed out the original iPhone on a piece of paper
to just feel what it would be like.
Yeah, I'm there again as a 32-year-old man with the same job.
Everything's fine, and I've got some observations.
Yes, with a device this wide,
it is a little uncomfortable to reach the left and right
edges one-handed.
Your thumb has to stretch further than
it would with a traditional phone.
But here's the thing.
It's actually much easier to reach the top
and bottom without re-gripping.
So I don't know that it's fundamentally
less usable than phones of today.
It just requires a little bit of new muscle memory, I think.
And that wider cover screen, in my opinion,
brings two massive improvements to traditional
phone slaps.
First is the keyboard, which I've been, again, faking for the last...
several days.
But a wider display does mean a wider keyboard,
which means, theoretically, easier and more
accurate typing.
Anybody who has fat-fingered their way through
a message on a narrow phone screen knows exactly
what I'm talking about.
Second, shut up out there!
Second, and this is more important,
using the cover screen horizontally will actually
be usable.
Current phones with their 2x1 aspect ratios
are effectively useless in landscape for anything
other than video.
Forget about typing, like it's so spread apart
and the keyboard's so super shorty
and you can't see anything above it.
You're not imagining that your old iPhone
4 worked better horizontally than your new
phone.
It did.
16x9 isn't as wide.
And 3x2, the rumored aspect ratio
of this cover display, is even less wide.
There's tons of room for activities.
But this is not the display we're here for.
When you unfold this iPhone Fold prototype,
You're getting a landscape display that opens horizontally,
one of the only foldables on
the market other than, I guess,
Samsung's Trifold that is oriented this way.
And I don't think that this is coincidental
because landscape is how most people use iPads,
certainly how I do.
And Apple seems to acknowledge this.
Face ID on current iPad Pros is positioned for landscape orientation.
It's how you watch movies.
It's how you edit photos.
You run apps side by side.
But here is what I didn't fully consider until holding this,
despite being an iPad owner
with the same aspect ratio.
When you hold this screen in portrait mode, it's actually pretty great.
For 16x9 video like TikTok, YouTube Shorts,
you're getting way more usable real estate
on this display than you would expect,
way more than on a squared foldable.
Here is that aspect ratio overlaid on both displays.
That's most of the screen being used for content.
And for reading, browsing, anything text heavy,
oh, it's like a night and day improvement over a slab phone.
I think this is really the Goldilocks ratio
in between the square aspect ratio
that you find on other foldables
and the long KitKat that you'll find
on your run-of-the-mill phone slab
that's already in your pocket.
And if this inner display expands
to the roughly 7.6 to 7.9 inches that it is rumored to,
that puts it remarkably close to the 8.3 inch iPad mini.
The iPad mini runs the full iPadOS windowing experience.
And well, I don't really use my iPad mini anymore.
And so I decided to recently revisit it
and I expected cramped chaos,
but I found it surprisingly capable,
like maybe the best for this new windowing interface
You're able to hold it just in your hands.
You can move windows without flinging your arms around,
moving your hand.
It's all in the thumbs, baby.
What's more, running two full-size iPhone apps
side-by-side will work comfortably
because the front display will be three-by-two,
as will each respective landscape half of the inner display.
Now, you might be thinking,
yeah, that's every foldable.
However,
There's not many instances in which you would run two apps side
by side horizontally on other
foldables because that outer display is just too darn thin.
But here I can absolutely see this
being the case. And the reason I know that's
the case is because I already do it on my iPad. And
importantly, a foldable iPhone with this aspect ratio will
not require developers to rework all
that much because existing frameworks already support it.
Let's work through the remaining hardware rumors,
because there are a few, and they're
a bit, um, goofy.
According to the leaked drawings,
the rumored iPhone measures 9.6mm folded, not groundbreaking,
actually thicker than the Z Fold 6's 8.9mm.
But in the hand, I gotta say it feels totally fine,
and unfolded, it's only 4.5 to 4.8mm
thick, roughly 20% thinner than the already impossibly thin iPhone Air.
There my only hope for.
For a form factor like this,
is that they would use silicon carbon batteries
and use the 3D printed titanium
that they're using on the iPhone Air
to reduce weight wherever possible,
because we're to the point now
where foldables actually feel pretty good, pretty thin,
but they are all heavy, too heavy.
And that is where this thing would feel big,
is if it was very, very weighty.
The biometrics also get weird.
Face ID is rumored to appear on the outer display, but not.
The inner screen, with Touch ID embedded in the power button,
making its return for unfolded
authentication.
Um, I mean, I guess it makes sense, like, practically, but...
Two authentication methods that are different seems a bit strange.
There's even speculation that Face ID might just be entirely absent.
I actually think that's more likely,
either because the display assembly
is too thin to accommodate the sensor array,
or because they don't want to have multi,
like, different types of authentication.
And if you need Touch ID at least one place, just use it everywhere.
But in my opinion, having used Touch ID extensively
on the iPad Air and iPad Mini,
if I had to pick one, I would choose Face ID every single time.
A $2,000 flagship without it feels...
Strange.
But squeezing complex sensor arrays
into a 4.8mm display assembly might simply not be
possible.
And what I will say is that Touch ID on the iPads
is not very good, and actually in the
example of the Galaxy Fold 7,
it's got a pretty good fingerprint sensor on the side.
They've gotten much better.
Still though, I would prefer a Face ID array.
Even if you have to hide it in some weird little place,
I don't know, make it happen.
Make it happen.
I guess I'm now just thinking that this seems even less likely,
because look at the iPhone Air.
It's got Face ID, but much of it is hidden in this plateau,
and that's a lot thicker.
Cameras. Yeah, there's a couple of those, too.
The cameras are rumored to be the dual 48-megapixel cameras
that you found on the iPhone 17.
So main and ultra-wide, both 48-megapixel, no telephoto in the mix.
It is worth noting that the Z Fold 7 does include a 3X telephoto,
though it's not very good and kind of struggles in low light.
Truly proper optics, they just require more thickness and surface area
than these ultra-thin foldables seem to be willing to accommodate.
And honestly, that's okay.
For me, I mean, I'm already using an iPhone Air
that has just one camera that's not very good to begin with.
And, oh, yeah, this outer screen is widely reported
to be getting a standard punch-hole selfie camera,
which feels a bit dated, in my opinion,
for Apple to adopt in this upcoming year,
especially considering that Apple has not shipped a flagship phone
without the Dynamic Island for nearly four years.
If they do do a punch-hole...
It's because Face ID is not in the phone.
Like, if there's a punch hole, no Face ID.
And even if they don't have Face ID,
I'm like, just keep the weird dynamic island shape
because you have other sensors, ambient light,
just throw it all in.
Maybe not.
I don't know.
I'm conflicted.
I'm rambling at this point.
The inner display will either get an under-display camera
or a simple bezel-housed sensor.
And knowing Apple's historical reluctance
to compromise image quality for aesthetics,
well, I bet on the latter.
Here's what I kept returning to, though.
Apple has been watching this market for nearly seven years now.
They've seen Samsung iterate through the generations.
They've watched Google release the Pixel Fold,
and then completely start over with the Pixel Fold 9 Pro.
Pro or 9 Pro Fold.
They've watched Motorola resurrect the Razr.
They've watched Chinese manufacturers flood
the space with increasingly capable devices.
Apple didn't wait this long to release
a folding phone running stock iOS with no differentiation.
At least, I hope not.
If this device runs windowed apps side by side,
Well, that's iPadOS behavior on an iPhone.
So what is this running?
iOS?
iPadOS?
Some new hybrid fold OS?
Running an app's full screen only with slide over,
I guess, is something they could do,
but it seems limiting given the screen real estate
and price of this device.
But not having display focused multitasking
also seems equally likely coming from Apple,
so as not to infringe on the ground that is held by the iPad Pro.
Software is supposedly Apple's strength, so they keep telling me
though iOS 18 is making that claim not so easy to defend.
Regardless, they've got what Android foldables don't, and that is that
they have developers that have spent 15 years optimizing for the iPad.
Those apps will work from day one on this internal display,
and they've got the wherewithal to force developers into adopting
yet another display size in their lineup,
which, while increasing in numbers, still
pales to the volume of different sizes on Android,
where apps not specifically designed for foldables,
even seven years later,
still look weird and are still not that uncommon.
What could Apple actually do differently, you ask?
I've asked myself this much over the last several weeks.
Full windowing support, dynamic apps in a semi-folded state,
stylus support, continuity style features.
All of that has already been done by other foldables over the years.
If it's just iPhone, but it folds,
I gotta admit, I'll be a little disappointed.
And at $2,000 and up, which is the rumored price,
I think others will be as well.
But maybe Apple doesn't need to reinvent the wheel
because let's be honest,
foldables are not the future of smartphones.
This is not going to become the new iPhone Pro.
When I showed my wife the mock-up,
she balked at how ridiculous it is.
She would never even consider it,
and not just because of price.
Look at this. This is nerdy power user territory.
It was and has been on Android and it will be here
too. And that's okay. Not every iPhone needs
to be the best selling iPhone. I'm just glad to
finally be getting one as someone
who has been tied to the hip of iOS for years, but who has
yearned for things that fold.
A device where you don't feel the fold, don't see the fold and
eventually stop thinking about
the fold doesn't really seem like that big of a deal. And in the
In the grand scheme of things, it isn't.
It's just a crease on a phone, but it is very Apple.
To have waited until now.
It seems that the technology might be ready for Apple.
The question is whether Apple is ready for the technology.
And I guess that's what we're about to find out.
Thank you so much for watching.
And as always, stay snazzy.