Judge Michael Nachmanoff Refuses To Recuse Himself! Hired By Comey Twice!

James Kaufman, World News Report Today. Judge Michael Natchmanoff was hired and worked under James Comey in 1995, 1996, and 2002. He has just been assigned as the presiding judge over Comey's two felony charges. Should he recuse himself? The answer is obvious, and we're all getting played yet once again by the one-party system. If this appears to create a potential conflict of interest, it's because it does. It creates a huge conflict of interest. Judge Michael Natchmanoff, appointed by Biden. has been assigned to oversee James Comey's case, but he previously worked under and for James Comey and was hired by James Comey. To any level-headed American, this raises questions about the impartiality of this high-profile indictment for false statements I made under oath and obstruction of justice. I would expect nothing else from Pam Bondi and the DOJ but to assign the case to someone like this, a registered Democrat. But of course, this was another waste of taxpayers' money and time. Matchmanoff's past professional ties to James Comey could legally necessitate A recusal, if challenged through an appeal process, but that would mean that James Comey was already acquitted. At this point, Natchmanoff is refusing to recuse himself from the case, prosecuting the man who gave him his start within the crooked system itself. Should his recusal be forced? Well, I think so. You tell me in the comments below. Again. Pam Bondi and the DOJ playing games with our tax dollars. I think we've all just about had enough. I said that it would be impossible to get a fair trial in D.C. And the DOJ is making sure my statement comes to fruition by actually assigning the case to a judge. That was originally hired into the government by James Comey himself and worked under him for at least three years. God bless. Share, subscribe and always remember, anything's possible, bizarro world.