Lorneville residents say they’re still waiting for answers on proposed data centre
Nov 6, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Tempers flared Thursday night
at an overflowing open house between a West St. John community
and proponents behind
a hyperscale data center project planned for the area.
About 200 people packed the Lorneville Community Center,
with more spilling outside and watching live online.
And they all had a clear message.
I think it demonstrated the exact thing we wanted to demonstrate,
is that there is no social license for this project.
There is no amount of community benefits that will justify
The pollution and harm to our health and well-being.
And they don't care, and they're not willing to answer questions.
The public session was exactly one year
from when the community last faced companies
Boulder Grid and Beacon AI centers over the 390-megawatt facility
proposed for a nearby industrial park.
A year later, the community says questions around
the project's impacts remain unanswered,
like the amount of water it will use.
The session was a requirement
of the province's environmental impact assessment process
and the Energy and Utilities Board.
We have tried to, told a year ago that we would get answers
to our questions and be transparent.
Neither has come to fruition.
Residents accused the company of coming back to them empty-handed.
Any questions we can answer,
we will come back to you.
Knowing that we asked these questions a year ago,
why did you come here
this evening without clear answers for the community?
Because this feels like an empty gesture, and it feels like a checkbox,
and it feels like a big kind of a token situation,
and not something that's done in good faith.
Residents want to see the project denied,
but the director of the province's EIA branch suggested
this is not a realistic outcome.
It's the ultimate goal.
Some of the people here is to stop the project and,
you know, the EIA process is not intended to do that.
That's not what it's about.
No, we're good.
No, we're good.
So there is an ability to,
at the end of that process, to make a decision.
to deny a project as I explained
but because it's really intended to be a project planning tool
most projects get through the process
with many conditions to mitigate those impacts.
More the environment.
Hardy said she will review the results of the meeting
and decide whether more are needed.
She said additional studies
and information on the review will be posted soon.

