ISRAEL TỰ TAY ĐƯA IRAN VỀ THỜI KỲ ĐỒ ĐÁ, MƯU KẾ CAO TAY CỦA TT TRUMP

The U.S.-Iran confrontation is rapidly heading toward a historically dramatic turning point, where the order of power seems poised for a dramatic shift. Previously, the United States played a leading role and Israel a supporting role in the alliance against Iran. However, this role may unexpectedly reverse in the coming days. Israel is likely to become the main focal point of the attack. while the U.S. shifted to a supporting role in the background. This subtle delay is not accidental. but it is a feasible move to resolve the legal quagmire known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973. The issue that is becoming a legal hurdle tightening the grip on President Trump as the 60-day deadline draws to a close. Today, we will explore this story together. On April 23, Israeli Defense Minister Karol stated that Israel is ready to restart the war against Iran. You know that Trump has established a two-week ceasefire agreement with Iran. Then he continued to extend it without specifying a duration. Under this ceasefire agreement, Israel will temporarily halt its attacks against Hezbollah forces in Lebanon. However, since Hezbollah continues to threaten international peacekeeping forces and killed two French soldiers in an ambush on April 18. Therefore, Israel could no longer contain itself anymore. They had legitimate reasons to carry out Hezbollah's attacks. Hezbollah is none other than the extended arm of Western Iran. For the past forty-seven years, Iran has always regarded Israel as its primary enemy in the Middle East. Although the Iranian Constitution does not stipulate the task of eliminating Israel, However, the principles outlined in the Constitution provide the ideological foundation for the stance of confronting Israel. Iran's clerics and high-ranking military officers still frequently chant slogans such as Erasing Israel from the world map. Therefore, the relationship between Israel and Iran is one of mutual enmity, a zero-sum game where one's gain is the other's loss. For over 40 years, Israel has quietly strengthened its forces in preparation a decisive confrontation with Tehran. But Tehran knows that it cannot act alone. They need the United States to lend a hand. They have long been awaiting the opportunity to cooperate with the United States to eliminate the greatest threat. for peace in the Middle East. But after so many presidents have come and gone, why must the United States wait until today? Was it during the time when Trump was just officially attacking Iran? The reason is that previous U.S. presidents and current European leaders They all think Iran is too strong. They feared that a confrontation would bring more risks than benefits. Professor Victor David Hansen, a scholar and historian, 同时是美国古典军事战略家， Recently, he made a very insightful remark. He said, We have never dealt with a country of 93 million people like Iran. a country notorious for its danger and terrifying nature Regarding difficulty level. They are controlling the Middle East through a ring of fire in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Gaza. Lebanon, a power that never yields. The U.S. is ready to do anything in Iraq and Afghanistan. But for many years, Americans have dared not touch Iran. because that regime had sown fear into the hearts of the presidential entourage, prevent them from taking any military intervention actions. But President Trump dared to do exactly that. And he destroyed nearly the entire fighting strength of Iran within just a few weeks. Israel well knows this—that only under President Trump They can then receive assistance from the United States. Therefore, Israel has collaborated with Washington in attacking Iran. The first time was during the 12-day war in 2025. And the second is the war that we are witnessing today. Now that Hormuz remains blockaded, The U.S. and Israel are intensively preparing for the upcoming attack. then Iran sees a trump card. A figure ready to save their lives—the American Democratic Party. Therefore, in addition to provocative remarks and appearing tough, Iran still intends to wait for a change in the political landscape of the United States. so that they can escape from their current situation. Does Israel realize this? Perhaps so. That is why Defense Minister Karz Suddenly made a statement that Israel was ready. Mr. Karz said that, Our defense forces have prepared for both attack and defense. that we have identified our goal. What are those goals? Those are very likely high-ranking officers of the Islamic Network Guard force. He also emphasized that Israel's primary task is is to completely erase Khamenei's dimension. because Khamenei's second son in name only is still the supreme leader of Iran. In addition, Israel will destroy the energy infrastructure. and Iran's critical power plant, destroy the economic foundation of this country and restore Islamic theocracy to its former decadent state. Previously, Mr. Trump had said, America could plunge Iran back into a period of hardship overnight. Actually, this task seems to be about to be transferred to Israel. Why? Because according to the law of war powers, The 60-day deadline is approaching, which significantly restricts us. All military actions against Iran. If the parliament does not approve the extension, Then the president will be forced to withdraw the troops. But this law can only restrict the U.S. President, but cannot control Israel. If Israel holds the initiative, The conflict is very likely to take a new turn toward a complete ceasefire. First of all, let's talk about the limitations. but the war powers act currently poses for President Trump. Since the war began, The Democratic Party has repeatedly invoked the War Powers Resolution. to force Mr. Trump to end the military action against Iran. To date, the Republican Party has blocked at least five Democratic efforts. The Democratic Party is still waiting for the first legal deadline to end. to request that Mr. Trump end the war against Iran. As you can see, these legislators are acting entirely against the interests of the United States. They don't say that we want to protect America, Want to protect the military, want to protect the world from the threat of nuclear weapons. They want to end the war simply in order to protect Iran. Protect this extremist Islamic regime. Senator Bernie Sanders, along with seven other Democratic senators, submitted to the Senate Committee A bill to prevent the entire United States from going to war with Iran. It is still only a draft law at present. Will it pass in this Senate's full vote? That is another issue. If this bill is passed, Then what reason does the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force have to hesitate? They will do anything without fear. because they know the United States will not dare to wage war against them. This is precisely the goal that the Democratic Party's lawmakers want to achieve. They are ready to do anything to protect a brutal tyrannical regime just to defeat Trump. In reality, Mr. Trump is currently engaged in two battles at the same time. A conflict against Iran in the Middle East, And another battle is against the Democratic Party within the country. Although Khamenei's regime directly threatens U.S. security, Yet nearly 100% of Democratic Party members strongly oppose their own president. They seem not to care about national security. They just want to make Trump even worse. Professor Victor David Hansen also said, Nearly 100,000 American soldiers are risking their lives to ensure that Tehran could never attack Tel Aviv, London. even Chicago with nuclear missiles. Yet, half of the politicians in the United States strongly oppose this mission. because President Trump is in power. Returning to the original question, What restrictions does the War Powers Act impose on President Trump? In fact, this law was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1973. It stipulates that the President must inform Congress. within 48 hours of deploying the army, And the maximum duration for military campaigns is 60 days. After this period, if the National Assembly does not approve Then the president will have to terminate military operations. and withdraw their troops within 30 days thereafter. Although the power to declare war belongs to Congress, but declaring war on a country And carrying out military action against that country are two different things. Military actions are usually only of a localized nature, That is not a direct conflict between two countries. Previous military actions by the United States, such as counterterrorism and interventions in certain Middle Eastern countries none of which are considered declarations of war but only individual military operations. Despite the War Powers Act was passed by the National Assembly in 1973 with an overwhelming majority, but it had previously been rejected by President Nixon. He believes that, as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, The provisions in the law have severely interfered with the President's executive powers. Therefore, President Nixon did not sign it while it was still a bill. We know that in the United States, After a bill has been passed by Parliament, It must be approved by the President. then it becomes officially effective. Then what if the president does not sign it? At that moment, there was a second option. Just over two-thirds of the members passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate then the bill will automatically become a law, Regardless of whether the president signs it or not. The War Powers Act operates on this principle. President Nixon vetoed it. and the bill was returned to Parliament. Here, both chambers passed it by a two-thirds majority. Then it became law regardless of whether Nixon wanted it or not. Today, although it remains a valid law, but it has sparked intense controversy in the United States. Has any president ever violated that law? The answer is yes, and I would cite President Obama as a typical example. The offense committed by him provoked such widespread indignation that Both Democratic and Republican members unanimously refused to support him. In March 2011, during the hearing before the opportunity, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that The Obama administration could carry out military actions against Libya without allowing any opportunity. The doctor affirmed that military actions, in part, were often No need for approval from opportunity. This opens the door to allow the President They may circumvent the law in their subsequent military activities. At that time, the Obama administration also stated that This conflict was not initiated by the United States. Although the entire world knows about the conflict in Libya Whether it was the United States that initiated it or not, But NATO back then was different from NATO today. Some NATO members participated in the conflict between the United States and Libya. Mrs. Hillary used that to argue that The conflict was not initiated by the United States, but led by NATO. After this statement, she added further but now we still demand a chance Approved the war against Libya. Thus, Hillary's strategy is First of all, declare that the authority of the President Unlimited by opportunity, Citing the reason that this is not America's war It is the NATO war against Libya. Then, she expressed her hope for the opportunity will approve the launch of the war. Of course, the U.S. has rejected this request. A few months later, Mrs. Hillary finally admitted that Although nominally this is a NATO conflict, But the United States played the leading role. U.S. forces occupy more than 25% Total number of military aircraft deployed in the war. As of April 28, 2011, This country has completed 75% of the tasks. Continue the material above. By September, the United States had carried out 26%. total number of air missions In addition to military activities, The U.S. is also a provider of significant resources. more than any other NATO country from military equipment to bases. May 20, 2011 marking the 60th day of the war, instead of assisting the military for the legally mandated 60 days, President Obama is prolonging the war again. Then, he finally informed the opportunity that You no longer need any permission at all. because the United States has abandoned its leadership role and the commander of NATO, and the U.S. participated only in a limited capacity. Thus, there are two main points here. First, the United States has provided the majority of the resources. and carried out the majority of tasks in the war, but Obama still insisted that The United States' participation was extremely limited. Second, he said the United States had abandoned its command authority. and handed it over to the NATO countries, the countries that have supplied human resources, Funds, lives, and weapons for this war. By June 3, 2011, The opportunity for America is exploding again. The House of Representatives strongly condemned Obama violated the law on wartime powers. Although extremely enraged, but the opportunity is simply to condemn but no other actions whatsoever, And the incident passed like that. After the Libyan war ended, by 2013, Obama is once again considering launching another attack, but this opportunity has been rejected. To prevent him from using force against Syria, The opportunity has passed with a resolution. Explicitly prohibit the deployment of U.S. military forces to come to this country to take part in the fighting. At that time, most people believed that the wars in Syria and Libya Nothing at all related to the United States. However, the Obama administration insisted firmly carry out military intervention activities for the purpose of promoting democracy in the Middle East. However, the result was not as expected. Not long after the Libyan war, The terrorist organization ISIS has risen again. and ran rampant everywhere. He is also the first president faced with the opportunity to be condemned for violating the law war power But despite all the ridicule, He still participates in this controversial struggle. In the first term, President Trump once deployed military forces. to Syria, but this time, in addition to targeting Assad's regime, America's mission has another task as well, That is counter-terrorism. We still remember how IS-IS wreaked havoc. How was it at that time. Now, in President Trump's second term, The fight against Iran again has similarities. like the conflict in Libya that Obama waged years ago. However, the difference between these two wars is, Besides Israel, there is no member of NATO. who participated in supporting the United States. When the U.S. launched the operation together with Israel the air raids on February 28 Mr. Trump as Commander-in-Chief The armed forces have carried out their executive authority. to protect U.S. bases in the Middle East and protect the national interests of the United States. He said this is not a war. It's collective self-defense. Because the program he is involved in is Iran's not only threatening the security of the United States with Israel, and even beyond to the entire world. At first, he hoped for Britain, Germany, and France. will join this collective defense effort to protect the Strait of Hormuz. However, we know that The NATO countries have unanimously rejected it. Many White House officials and most Republican lawmakers believe that Trump's actions fall within the scope of the War Powers Act, It means he has still not exceeded its limit. But the issue is that even when the law entrusts the President with the authority to initiate a limited war Then you only have 60 days to accomplish it. The U.S. conflict with Iran will expire on May 1st. What will happen next? After May 1st, Trump has three main options. Let's see which scripture edition he will choose. The first scripture is Submit for approval pending. But as we have analyzed, This is impossible. The last opportunity to vote by proxy The president used force against a country. the 2002 Iraq war during the presidency of George Bush Although at present the majority of Republican party members striving to block the legislation proposed by the Democratic Party to limit Trump's war powers. The questions raised are whether after 60 days all Republican party members Do you still hold onto this viewpoint? Is the opportunity authorized? Whether to allow Mr. Trump to initiate war under certain circumstances? For example, in emergency situations for America's security. The likelihood of that is very small. Why? Because beyond the attitude of opposition from Democratic Party members, some Republican senators and congressmen also indicated unwillingness to continue the war. The second contract is a limited extension. What does "limited extension" mean? Because the War Powers Act stipulates that if opportunity does not allow termination war after 60 days then it can be extended by another 30 days. According to the law, these 30 days are exclusively for serving due to the withdrawal of troops, but Trump It is still possible to launch a more intense attack to Iran for the purpose of ensuring the safe withdrawal of troops. In this case, the U.S.-Israel alliance can launch a coordinated air strike to achieve a decisive victory while avoiding direct confrontation. Then if the opportunity does not come through and the 30-day deadline is insufficient in order to achieve the goal, What other option does Mr. Trump have? That is the end of the campaign. In this case, would Mr. Trump still be Can we continue attacking after ending this campaign? The answer is yes. That is why at the beginning of this video We have already mentioned the statement. of the Israeli Minister of Defense, Kot. Israel is clearly telling Mr. Trump that We do not accept any restrictions. when wanting to carry out attacks on Iran. As long as the United States supports it, We can destroy Iran ourselves. But does Israel have the strength to do so? We must understand that This country has continuously faced the conflicts since the very beginning of its establishment. In the past 20 years, they have achieved many accomplishments. Their army has given the world seeing the overwhelming strength in the campaign against Hamas. If focusing solely on Iran then Israel needs only, They need weapons. The provision of weapons lies entirely within the executive authority of the President. The opportunity is that the U.S. has no laws interfere with this right. Therefore, if Israel uses its entire military strength and the U.S. provides additional military resources, then launching an attack catastrophic in Iran and push this water back to the era of falling stones It is entirely feasible. Even if it fails to overthrow the regime, but it could also affect the stature of Khamenei weakened to the maximum extent rendering it irreparable for a considerably long period of time. In the end, Israel has the capability to attack Iran. but that is based on the premise supplied with resources by the United States. Otherwise, the attack will be difficult to sustain. to the final step. Of course, in addition to the three possibilities mentioned above, A fourth scenario may still exist. Given what we have witnessed, Mr. Trump always has his strategies. A sudden turn of events at the decisive moment. And those were all moves no one could have anticipated. Such a tactic is very likely to emerge. become the fourth ability we have yet to name. Therefore, in the coming days, Which option will Trump choose? The leading role of Israel Is it truly opening a new turning point? in the Iran conflict? It was just a clever move to get past legal and internal political challenges of the United States? The answer can clarify the image again. the Middle East and the global power map. Let us follow along together the upcoming developments, because history is sometimes written by by the boldest decisions, in the most unexpected moments By this point, today's program I also request permission to pause temporarily. We invite you to share your personal views. Hello and see you again!