James Webb Telescope JUST CONFIRMED The Big Bang Theory Is TOTALLY Wrong!

The Big Bang has always been the only factor that can fully explain the cosmos, regardless of how long scientists have been trying to learn more about it. But what if the Big Bang never happened? Even if everything had to start somewhere, what if the Big Bang wasn't the actual beginning? Was it really that terrible that researchers and astronauts kept spending their time on a hypothetical event? When scientists were in a dilemma to search on these questions, James Webb Telescope had taken everyone's attention on its astonishing, massive and shocking revelation that might make everyone think the Big Bang never happened. What precisely has James Webb found that has forced every scholar to rethink their presumptions about the universe's creation? Let's find out in this video. How did the cosmos begin? How did it develop into the seemingly endless location we are adapted to today? And what will happen to it later? These are the mysteries that have baffled scholars and philosophers for decades, giving rise to some bizarre but fascinating theories. Among all those theories, the most prominent is the Big Bang theory, whose foundations are pretty simple. In a nutshell, it theorized that matter in the universe's history and presence both began to exist at the same time, some 13.8 billion years ago. It further explains that at the time of existence, all matter clustered into a singularity, a tiny hot ball with infinite density. The universe as we know it began when singularity abruptly expanded, as it continues to do today. Although there have been many ideas over the years, the Big Bang has consistently received the most attention and proven accurate. All of this, however, seems to be changed as the James Webb Telescope has some shocking discoveries to make. James Webb Telescope is the cutting-edge technology created by NASA to look far, far away into the universe and back to the beginning of time, and it is already succeeding spectacularly. The scientists had spent millions of hours and almost $10 billion on the development of the James Webb. Launching this expensive and powerful telescope was not easy for scientists, yet it had been an engineering nightmare. Because it needed to be tailored to accommodate the launch rocket, no rocket could hold it, so engineers had to make it fold in several places. The massive heat shield had to be unfolded as it travelled to its permanent location, but even that was not particularly risky. But the riskiest element of the telescope was its centrepiece, the reflecting mirror, which had to be cut into 18 pieces and then folded. Because it was so delicate and there were so many potential problems, the engineers and scientists who worked on it held their breath during the launch. Their concerns were further elevated by the fact that the JWST is not capable of being repaired or maintained. The telescope is located so far away, about 1 million miles, that it is impossible to send a repair crew if something goes wrong. There's also no chance for refuelling, which means the mission ends when the fuel runs out. However, the risks with the JWST are more than worth it because it promises to broaden our knowledge of the outer cosmology in a way no scientific instrument has done. Since the telescope was declared operational, scientists worldwide have been waiting in line to use the powerful telescope to study space. Still, none of them was ready for the unexpected early surprises the telescope had in store. Recently, the JWST sent back images that showed something shocking. According to Eric Lerner, these images refute the Big Bang hypothesis, which holds that the universe has expanded since it began 14 billion years ago in a hot and dense state. Since the release of the images, a flood of technical astronomical publications has been released online. The authors of these papers repeatedly mention how the photos reveal many galaxies, in addition to strangely smooth, compact and old galaxies. The galaxies themselves appear extremely unique and incompatible with the Big Bang theory. The sheer number of these galaxies seem to have created a state of panic among all the scientists and astronomers, making them think again about the Big Bang theory. So, was investigating the Big Bang truly a waste of hundreds of researchers' sleepless nights and many individual hardships? How exactly did the universe start? Was everything a lie, or was it all really a made-up idea that seemed to fit the facts? Due to these questions, nearly all researchers, scientists and cosmologists have been in a condition of literal shock. The team examining the photographs of James Webb provided the most concise explanation, stating that if the universe is expanding, a strange optical illusion must exist. Like any other object in an expanding universe, galaxies do not become smaller when viewed from a greater distance. Instead, they become increasingly more significant as you pass a certain threshold. This is because their light might have dissipated as they got closer to us. However, because of the stark contrast, things in common not expanding spaces appear more prominent considering their distance. In other words, every galaxy that the JWST discovers is the same size as those galaxies close to us. Compared to what the Big Bang theory predicts, this shows that the universe may not even be growing and may instead be a fixed size. The two observations are now literally in conflict with one another. According to the JWST images, the new galaxies have redshifts that are two to three times greater than those in identical Hubble Space Telescope HST photographs. Even galaxies with more illumination and mass than our own Milky Way appear two to three times smaller in these images. In contrast to what one might anticipate from an expanding universe, the researchers made their prediction using a non-growing universe with a redshift proportionate to the distance. However, their prediction came true exactly. After all these publications became public, one of the Big Bang theory's founders, Paul Steinhardt, has now criticised the theory as being incorrect and scientifically worthless. One of the central aspects of the Big Bang theory is that the inflation hypothesis, which postulates that the universe first expanded at a pace that was several orders of magnitudes faster than the speed of light. Cosmic inflation has not yet been supported by science, and ever since it was first proposed, the hypothesis has been plagued by confusing complications. Our scientists have stated in the report that the Hubble telescope, which was launched into space in 1990, had already demonstrated the same thing and that it has always been their belief that the universe is not expanding as suggested by the Big Bang theory. They clarified that this is not what one would expect from an expanding universe. In 2014, they published results based on Hubble Space Telescope images that showed galaxies with redshifts up to five fit the assumption of non-expanding ordinary space. So that's certain that the JWST would show the same thing, which it already has. A study that will appear in Nature demonstrates that galaxies as massive as the Milky Way are still prevalent even hundreds of millions of years after the alleged Big Bang. The researchers claim that the new images show at least 100,000 times more galaxies than theorists predicted for redshifts greater than 10. Such massive galaxies can't be produced in such a short time, further demonstrating that there was no Big Bang. So what happens if the scientific community decides that the Big Bang theory is incorrect? There needs to be another explanation for the origin of the universe. Plasma filamentation is likely to be one explanation that has been around for about 50 years and can be explained by physical principles found in laboratories. Most matter in space, including stars and interstellar space, is made of plasma, an electrically conducting gas, while the Hubble-redshift relation would still require the discovery of a new physical process to explain the loss of energy as light travels vast distances. Plasma filamentation is one of the critical processes in plasmas that scientists have identified and studied. This is the process by which electric currents and the magnetic fields they generate draw plasma into the lacy system of filaments that can be seen at all scales in the universe. So plasma filamentation will be another possible explanation other than the Big Bang that scientists might consider to explain the cosmos. Everything finally came together with James Webb Space Telescope's photos of the early universe refuting the Big Bang were published on July 12, 2022. But it's still a mystery how long the Big Bang theory will last. The Webb Telescope will undoubtedly contribute significantly to our understanding of the universe, leaving everyone eager for additional information. Let's see what this amazing telescope will reveal further about this cosmos.