As you may already know, Derick Dillard was fired by TLC back in November after launching a bigoted twitter tirade against fellow network star Jazz Jennings.
You would think that after all that, Derick would have learned a valuable lesson about running his mouth on social media, but that doesn't appear to be the case.
Last week, Derick went on yet another tirade, and this time it appeared he was hell-bent on biting the hand that used to feed him.
In a series of tweets (some of which were quickly deleted), Derick attacked TLC for refusing to pay his son's medical bills after baby Samuel spent two weeks in the NICU.
Jill M. Duggar and Derick Dillard Derick's reasoning was that since the birth was featured on Counting On, the network should have helped cover expenses.
“We even requested that they help with some of the medical expenses from the birth that they made a pretty penny on, but they refused to help cover any of those costs,” Derick tweeted.
"We could pay for it fine; I had a great job,” he continued.
“The point is, I thought that at least since they were making money off the birth special episode, they could help soften the burden a little."
When fans pointed out that Derick and wife Jill Duggar were paid for their appearances on the show and thus were entitled to no further compensation, the former reality star dropped a bombshell that left fans stunned
Derek Dillard.
Jim Bob Duggar kept all our TV money.
Folks, it looks like the inevitable unraveling of the Duggar clan might finally be underway.
And like so many major events of the modern age, it started not with a bang, but with
a deleted tweet.
As you may already know, Derek Dillard was fired by TLC back in November after launching
a bigoted Twitter tirade against fellow network star Jess Jennings.
You would think that after that all, Derek would have learned a valuable lesson about
running his mouth on social media, but that doesn't appear to be the case.
Last week, Derek went on yet another tirade, and this time it appeared he was health-bent
on biting the hand that used to feed him.
In a series of tweets, some of which were quickly deleted, Derek attacked TLC for refusing
to pay his son's medical bills after baby Samuel spent two weeks in the NICU.
Derek's reasoning was that since the birth was featured on Counting On, the network should
have helped cover expenses.
«We even requested that they help with some of the medical expenses from that birth that
they made a pretty penny on, but they refused to help cover any of those costs», Derek
tweeted.
«We could pay for it fine, I had a great job», he continued.
The point is, I thought that at least since they were making money off the birth special
episode, they could help soften the burden a little.
When fans pointed out that Derek and wife Jill Duggar were paid for their appearances
on the show and thus were entitled to no further compensation, the former reality star dropped
a bombshell that left fans stunned.
«As far as we could tell, we were volunteers and had been paid anything for the show»,
he wrote.
Like I said, for the year we were paying off our son's birth expenses, both Jill and
I thought we had been volunteering our time to help out.
The show.
Volunteering?
Is Derek seriously suggesting that he and Jill weren't paid by producers?
And if that's the case, was anyone in the family paid a salary?
The answers, according to Derek, are yes and yes.
TLC should approach all adults if they expect any obligation from them, so they can evaluate
their own situation, dealer tweeted.
Like I said, until recently, I assumed we were just volunteering to help out and filming
where it would help out.
I knew they didn't owe anything, but I didn't think it was unreasonable to request some
expense reimbursement under the impression we volunteered all the time.
There's that volunteer word again.
Derek chose not to answer direct questions about who did receive money from the network,
but he made no effort to correct fans who speculated that Jim Bob was the only one getting
rich.
The producers were always asking for our time, so it seemed like a lucrative trade on their
part to make all the money they did and only be requested to help cover some expense, he
reiterated at one point.
We paid it, but it seemed like a reasonable trade to request, considering what they asked
of us.
Asked why in the hell he would agree to put his life on television for free?
Derek replied.
There is still little space and time on Twitter to explain my whole thought process over the
course of the past 4 plus years, but the point is, Tulsi should have handled all of it much
differently, he tweeted.
Doing the right thing should be more important than taking the path of least resistance.
In other words, Jim Bob made me doing it.