VỤ NỔ LỚN (Big Bang) - VŨ TRỤ LUÂN HỒI | Khám Phá Vũ Trụ

Radio Vũ Trụ
80 Người theo dõi
21 Lượt xem video·6 thg 10, 2023
The universe includes all existing matter, energy, and space,
which is considered to be a bulk.
The current universe has not yet been determined the exact size.
It has been expanded since the beginning of the Big Bang about 13 billion years ago.
The universe includes planets, stars, galaxies,
the components of the universe, the smallest atomic nuclei,
matter, and energy.
The observable universe has a diameter of about 28.5 billion parsecs,
or 93 billion light-years, at present,
and is estimated to have about 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe.
Astronomers have not yet known the total size of the universe,
and it could be almost infinite.
Observations and developments of theoretical physics
have helped to deduce the composition and progress of the universe.
History books, cosmology and astronomy theories,
as well as scientific models,
have been proposed to explain the observable phenomena of the universe.
The first gravitational theories were developed
by ancient Greek philosophers and Indian philosophers.
Over the centuries, more and more accurate astronomical observations
have led to the Japanese theory of Nicholas Copernicus,
based on the results obtained from Tycho Brahe,
and the evolution of that theory of the orbit of the planet
by Johannes Kepler,
which was finally explained by Isaac Newton
with his fascinating theory.
Further advances in the observable universe
have led to the discovery that the solar system
is in a galaxy containing billions of stars, called the Milky Way.
Then astronomers discovered that our galaxy
is just one of hundreds of billions of other galaxies.
On the largest scales, the distribution of galaxies
is assumed to be uniform and equal in all directions,
which means that the universe does not have borders
or any special center.
Observations of the distribution and orbit of galaxies
have led to many modern physics and astronomy theories.
Discoveries in the early 20th century
about the red transition in the orbits of galaxies
suggested that the universe was expanding,
and the discovery of the space-time gradient
must have a starting point.
Recently, observations at the end of the 1990s
showed that the expansion of the universe was accelerating,
showing that the main energy component in the universe
belongs to an unknown form, called dark energy.
Most of the mass in this universe
exists under an unknown form, which is dark matter.
The theory of the Big Bang,
often called Big Bang in English,
is an outstanding model of cosmology
that describes the initial stage of the formation of the universe.
According to this theory,
the Big Bang happened about 13.8 billion years ago,
so it is considered the age of the universe.
After this stage, the universe was in a hot and dense state
and then began to expand rapidly.
After the explosion stage,
the universe was cold enough to form many atomic nuclei,
including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Depending on the simple atomic nuclei,
they can form rapidly after the Big Bang.
Thousands of years later, the new neutron atoms appeared.
The first atom was born, Hydro,
along with the small Helium and Lithium.
The giant clouds contain atomic atoms,
which are then recombined by attraction
to form stars and galaxies,
and then super-galaxies,
and heavier atoms,
or are combined in the heart of a star,
or are born from super-galaxies.
The Big Bang theory is a scientifically proven theory
and widely accepted by the scientific community.
It provides a complete explanation
of many phenomena observed in the universe,
including the presence of light elements,
the scattering of cosmic rays,
the center of the universe,
and Hubble's laws for super-galaxies.
The main ideas in the Big Bang,
the expansion of the universe,
the super-hot state when it erupts,
the formation of Helium,
and the formation of galaxies,
are derived from these observations
and other observations
independent of any cosmic model.
Physicists know that the distance
between galaxies is increasing,
and they argue that everything
has to be closer to each other
when we go back to the past.
This idea has been carefully considered
when we go back in time
to the time when matter had a high density
and high temperature,
and large nuclear reactors were built
to carry out experiments
similar to the time of the Big Bang
to bring results and promote development
for the model.
On the other hand,
nuclear reactors only have the energy
to detonate limited nuclei
to be able to study the high energy
of the basic nuclei.
There are very few clues
about the earliest time after the explosion.
It is impossible,
and does not provide any explanation
or description of this origin.
Instead, it describes and explains
the fusion of the universe
after the time of the explosion.
The astronomer and physicist
George Lemaître was the first
to propose what later became
the theory of the Big Bang
in his study of the theory
of atomic nuclei.
For many years,
physicists based on his initial idea
have developed different theories
and gradually regrouped
into modern theory.
The framework for the theory
of the Big Bang
is based on Einstein's relatively
broad theory of physics
and on the simple hypothesis
of the universe's uniformity
and direction.
Based on Einstein's theory,
the astronomer Alexander Friedman
has found programs
for the evolution of the universe.
The distance between galaxies
is proportional to their redshift values.
A discovery that Lemaître
had made in 1927.
Hubble's observations
show that all galaxies
are very far away,
as well as supergalaxies
are moving away from the Milky Way.
The farther they are,
the faster they move.
Once upon a time,
the community of scientists
divided into two groups,
one to support the theory of the solar system.
But today,
most scientists are persuaded
by the script of the theory of the Big Bang,
which is most suitable for measuring
after the universe's uniformity
was discovered in 1964,
and especially when its magnitude,
that is, the measurement of the uniformity
corresponding to each wave,
was discovered in accordance with the black hole.
Since then,
physicists have combined
large data in observations
to add theoretical calculations
to the Big Bang model,
and its exploratory model,
or Lambda-CDM model,
has become a theoretical framework
for modern space research.
In medieval science,
there are many debates
about whether the universe
has a limited or unlimited past.
Aristotle's science
has argued that the universe
has an unlimited past.
This has created problems
for atheists,
who cannot agree
with Greek philosophers' theories
about the perspective
of Abrahamic religions.
As a result,
a variant of logical debates
argued that the universe
has a limited past,
developed by John Philoponus,
Al-Kindi, Sadia Gaon,
Al-Ghazali, and Immanuel Kant,
along with others.
In 1225,
in the Deleuze Debate on Light,
British scientist Robert Chrysostom
explored the natural nature
of objects as well as of the universe.
He described the emergence
of the universe
as an expansion and
the formation of objects
to create stars and planets
in an order of galaxies
circling the Earth.
The above argument is the first
attempt to describe heaven and Earth
using a simple set
of physical laws.
In 1610, Johannes Kepler
used the night sky
to talk about a limited universe.
77 years later,
Isaac Newton described
the great shift in the universe.
The description of a universe
as an expansion and formation
in a cycle
was pushed further
in a poem published in 1791
by Erasmus Darwin.
Edgar Allan Poe
introduced a system
in 1848
called Eureka,
a prose poem.
Of course,
it was not a scientific project,
but it started with
superphysical principles
that tried to explain the universe
using physical and psychological knowledge at the same time.
It was denied by the scientific community
and sometimes misunderstood
by the critics.
Its scientific nature
has been re-evaluated
in recent times.
According to Poe,
the initial state of an object
is a simple base atom.
The will of God
exposes itself as an energy
that breaks the base atom
into atoms.
The atoms expand in space
until the energy stops
and the attraction appears
as a reaction.
Then the objects start to form blocks
and star systems.
Meanwhile,
the material universe is pulled back
by the attraction
and finally collapses.
The final stage
is to return to the basic state
to start a similar process as above.
This passage of Eureka
describes a developing universe of Newton
and shares some characteristics
with relative models.
For this reason,
Poe puts forward some themes
that were first discussed
in 1910 by Vestal Slipher
and then by Carl Wilhelm Wirtz
who identified the most
astronomical galaxies.
Today, it is precisely identified
as astronomical galaxies
that have drifted away from the Earth.
Slipher used a telescope
to investigate the orbital stages
of the planets,
the formation of the atmosphere
of the planets.
It was also the first attempt
to study stars and galaxies.
It is difficult to show
in a universe that is filled
with stars and galaxies.
This does not draw the attention
of astronomers
and the galaxies proposed
are actually galaxies
outside the Milky Way.
Also in that decade,
Einstein with his relativistic theory
will not have a solution
to the cosmic state
and give a basic hypothesis
that the universe is expanding
or shrinking,
not being constant or unchanging.
This result comes from
a development of the orbital stages
of the relativistic theory.
At first, Einstein was led
to the conclusion that
the way he built the orbital stages
could be a mistake
and he tried to fix it
with a number of galaxies.
This number will be corrected
in the description of the relativistic theory
for the creation of the universe
or its existence.
The first person to seriously
apply the relativistic theory
without using the number of galaxies
was Alexander Freeman.
Freeman came up with
the expanding universe
using the orbital stages
of the relativistic theory
in 1922.
His article in 1924
included the possibility
of a world with unchanging
cosmic states.
Freeman's article
described a universe
named Freeman-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker.
In 1927,
the American astronomer
George Lemaitre
proposed an open model
of the universe
to explain the changes
observed in the orbital stages
and calculated the Hubble theory.
He created his theory
based on Einstein's research
and Wilhelm de Sitter's
and independently conjectured
Freeman's processes
in an open universe.
At the same time,
the outer space was not uniform
but changed in such a way
to lead to the conclusion
that there is a definite relationship
between the number of red transits
of galaxies and their distance
from the observers.
In 1929, Edwin Hubble
provided an easy-to-understand
explanation of the Hubble theory.
His experimental observations
confirmed that,
relative to the Earth
and all other observed objects,
galaxies are gradually
moving away in every direction
at a speed calculated
from the outer space,
directly proportional
to their distance from the Earth
and from each other.
In that year,
Hubble and Milton Helmholtz
came up with the Hubble theory.
The theory states that
when the outer space is shown
as a measure of the speed of distance,
it is consistent with Einstein's
relativistic theory
of a uniformly open
and divergent universe.
The natural direction of expansion
is a direct evidence that,
if the universe is expanding,
no object in the universe
can move further
and become an empty space
It is a demonstration
that allows the concept
of an expanding universe.
The theorem has determined
the importance of the distance
between any two galaxies
and their relative speed
to be independent of each other.
This discovery later led
to the establishment of the Big Bang model.
In 1931, Lemaître,
in his work Hypothèse de l'atome primitif,
argued that the universe
begins with the explosion
of an atom,
then called the Big Bang.
He argued that the stars in the universe
are the remaining traces
of that event,
although we now know
that it begins with galaxies.
Lemaître had to wait
until his death
to be able to study
the emission of cosmic rays,
the emission of traces
of something special
and hot at the beginning of the universe.
Lemaître,
who was the first
to study the Big Bang,
chose three scientists
who contributed a lot
to the research on black holes
for the Nobel Prize in Physics.
One of these three scientists
was Roger Penrose.
The scientist was a judge
when Stephen Hawking
defended his doctoral research
and later became a colleague
of Hawking
The theory of Einstein
showed the existence of black holes,
although Einstein himself
did not believe in the existence
of such objects.
One of the most notable
theories of Stephen Hawking
was that although nothing
could come out from the inside
of the black hole event,
there could be the birth
of a pair of antiparticles
caused by the quantum mechanics.
One particle in that pair
would push the other out.
Because of the conservation of energy,
the particles falling into the black hole
need to carry negative energy,
and that, in theory,
will cause the black hole to evaporate.
However, if the process of evaporation
is slow enough,
we currently have no way
to verify it.
In other words,
so far, Hawking's theory
is still just a theory.
Roger Penrose,
who won the Nobel Prize for Physics
in 2020,
has spent many years
pursuing another idea
that he called the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.
In fact,
the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology
is not a completely new idea.
Previously, many scientists
predicted that the universe
would end with a big crash
when the gravitational force
of a supernova hit the earth.
This crash created a miracle,
and since then,
another planet exploded
to bring the universe back to life.
However, observing supernovas
at the end of the 20th century
proved that there was no crash
and that the universe would go extinct forever.
Because there was no crash,
basically,
there would be no revival
as many people imagined.
But Penrose developed his theory
a little differently.
According to CCC,
the universe exists in an infinite cycle.
Each cycle is a super-long period
that he called a super-time,
originally known as A.I.N.
The super-time that we are living
comes from the big bang
at the end of an ancient super-time.
In the distant future,
the universe will expand
to the extent that all matter
will disintegrate due to the processes of distribution.
At that time,
our super-time will come to an end
and another big bang will appear.
Penrose also said
that the Hawking radiation
in black holes
is the remnants of the ancient universe
that we can observe.
In 2018,
Penrose and some colleagues
pointed out the abnormalities
in the CMB data
that they called the Hawking points
and said they were the remaining signals
of the Hawking radiation
in a previous universe.
So, is there a universe before the Big Bang?
In an article posted on Forbes,
just two days after Penrose
won the Nobel Prize
and was nominated for CCC,
astrophysicist Ethan Segal
made it clear
that there is no evidence
that there is a universe before the Big Bang,
as well as that a similar explosion
will occur in the distant future
to form another universe.
The Hawking points
are all very unclear,
as well as the CCC
cannot make any predictions
in line with the data obtained.
There is a fact that
since the Big Bang theory was proposed
and proved widely,
people have always asked
that if the universe came to life
from such an explosion,
what caused that explosion
and what was in front of that explosion?
This is a very natural question.
Surely, at this time,
no one dares to answer
whether or not there is
something in front of the Big Bang,
something that caused the Big Bang.
And so, in terms of mathematics,
there are many hypotheses
that it is possible.
However, the fact that
some hypothesis is proven
and considered a scientific theory
needs to be based on direct or indirect evidence,
not on whether
people find that meaning interesting or not.
There are people who are
always interested in the idea
of a reincarnation universe,
which helps them think of
some religious belief.
Or because a simple hope
is that reincarnation means
that the universe will never
completely end,
but only move on
to new stages.
Some others like this idea
because it seems interesting.
And there are also some people
who are just always interested
in the idea of reincarnation.
So the hope,
no matter from which engine,
beautiful or normal,
stupid or unique,
can not exceed the
strict requirements
on the possibility of
verification and prediction
that a scientific theory needs to have.
Although the talent and value
of Penrose's research
is undeniable,
a scientific theory
is the one who created it.
Don't forget that Fred Hoy
is also a famous and talented scientist,
but he still pursues
a stable model.
And Albert Einstein,
a name that no one knows,
and many people are not surprised
that he is the greatest scientist,
has also denied the existence
of the black hole,
which later Penrose proved
wrong and won the Nobel Prize
for it.
It is even considered great
as a person with great wisdom
and research spirit,
as well as contributing greatly
to the development of science.
They can answer all your questions
about things that science,
at least in their field,
knows.
But that does not mean
that if they give an opinion
or an idea about something
that has not been proven,
it will also be true.
Of course, Penrose,
as well as Einstein and Hoy
previously,
understand that.
They do not call on humanity
to believe and support them.
When they realize that their idea
has a basis for understanding
and digging deep,
they will focus on finding evidence
to prove it.
If they fail,
their idea cannot be recognized,
and the truth is that it is wrong
because science is to explain
nature in the most accurate way,
not the most attractive way.
To this day,
it is still too early
to fully deny Penrose's
theory of CCC.
However, in fact,
it does not have any clear evidence.
If someone is interested in that idea,
that person has the right
to hope that one day
that theory will be proven.
But on the other hand,
maybe in just a few years,
there will be very clear evidence
that Penrose was wrong.
So,
believing in such an idea
is not much different
from believing in life after death.
It's too vague,
and there is no convincing evidence.
