Rep. Joel Kretz delivers floor speech in favor of frontier counties legislation (House Bill 1835)

Washington State House Republicans
23 followers
2 Video Views·Feb 12, 2024
Rep. Joel Kretz, R-Wauconda, delivers a floor speech in favor of his House Bill 1835. The legislation would:
-Add a definition of "frontier county" to statutes addressing economic development, excise tax, and the Department of Commerce.
-Define "frontier county" as a county with a population density fewer than 50 persons per square mile.
-Create two categories of frontier counties, based on population density: Frontier One counties have 21 or fewer persons per square mile; Frontier Two counties have more than 21 but fewer than 50 persons per square mile.
House Bill 1835 passed on a 94-3 vote on February 9, 2024. Learn more about the legislation here: https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=1835&Year=2023&Initiative=false
this is an idea we've been playing with
for a few years and uh it it kind of
came out of some of my frustration on
when we're trying to reach the most
remote uh parts of the state with uh
funding or programs this and that and
we've been using the the term rural for
many years and it's just not tight
enough of a definition uh you know it
can range from uh 100 people per square
mile uh down to a place like Ferry
County where there's 3.3 people per
square mile and they're all on the same
playing field uh what this does is
narrow the definitions down to Frontier
2 which is uh 50 people or less and
Frontier 1 which is 20 people or less
which uh it gives us more of a surgical
ability to Target specific areas uh part
of the frustration was uh you we were
talking about uh uh getting the whole
state connected on the internet and uh
we've tried different ways of doing that
you know we've got a lot of the
Broadband fight fiber uh but we're
always talking about the first mile set
and the last mile is something that
we've never figured out a way to get to
uh and we had some work with with low
orbit satellites which is appropriate uh
out in the most remote parts uh but we
weren't able to to Target a definition
tighten enough and you know there's no
real reason to use that technology uh in
an area where there's already fiber but
the frustration of not being able to get
that out uh in areas that are really
under served uh low income generally a
lot of tribal folk that that just don't
have any options and I think uh in the
future this will give us uh a much
better method of getting money out to uh
some of our most underserved communities
in the state appreciate your support
