🔴Ecco i Burattini tecnocrati che hanno distrutto il nostro paese🔴

LVOGRUPPO
87 iscritti
37 Visualizzazioni video·28 ago 2024
🇮🇹I più grandi Nemici dell'Italia🇮🇹
🔴Ecco i Burattini tecnocrati che hanno distrutto il nostro paese🔴
‼️ASSOLUTAMENTE DA VEDERE‼️
Paolo Barnard, che in passato ha fatto tremare i poteri forti con le sue scottanti inchieste per "Report" di RaiTre, nel 2012 al Summit sulla Modern Money Theory di Rimini, scodella nomi e cognomi dei più grandi traditori del popolo italiano: Monti, Draghi, Prodi, Padoa-Schioppa, Ciampi e D'Alema, quest'ultimo è il nostro nemico numero uno.
Sottomessi all'America che ci spreme con i suoi burattini, siamo sempre peggio di ieri: sempre più poveri, sempre più infelici, sempre meno liberi, sempre più insicuri.
T.me/BuffonateDiStato
I told Alain Parguet, I went to him with a document
and I said, listen Alain, please, you can nominate these Italian politicians
which he didn't do because he was very focused on his desire to end the relationship
and behind his direct responsibility, and of course also mine because I have already written
Alain Parguet quoted these Italian politicians
as particularly corrupted by the French technocratic elite in order of importance
Romano Prodi, Mario Draghi, Carlo Zeglio Ciampi, Pado Schioppa
Mario Monti, particularly linked to the Vatican Church
and he said that the worst of all, a great personal friend of Attali, a technocrat who said
his name is Massimo D'Alema
Parole di Parguet
I'm sure that the Euro will force us to introduce new instruments of economic policy
to propose them now is politically impossible
but one day there will be a crisis and these instruments will be created
Mr. Vice-President of the Chamber, Mr. Deputy Secretary to the Presidency of the Council
Mr. Minister for Regional Affairs, Mr. President of AREL, Mr. President of ABI
authorities, ladies and gentlemen
On February 12, 1981, 30 years ago,
Mauro Beniamino Andreatta wrote to the Governor of Banca d'Italia, Carlo Zeglio Ciampi
the letter that initiated the so-called divorce between the two institutions
Monetary policy in Italy is changing course
At the beginning of the 80s, the international macroeconomic framework is rapidly changing
the second oil shock has caused a new inflationary flame in all developed countries
the risks and dangers of high inflation have returned to the attention of public opinion
the debate around nature and the institutional status of central banks is revived
how important it is that they fix the stability of prices as a prevailing goal
In the United States, Paul Volcker, succeeded in 1979 by Arthur Burns
as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
immediately imprints a radical change of course in monetary management
with the explicit goal of taking on inflation
In all major developed countries, monetary policies become restrictive
Francesco Cossiga, who seems to have returned to hit the nail on the head
the Senator has shot at zero against the Governor of Banca d'Italia, Draghi
and to do so, he has chosen one morning
the journalist Tutto Chiacchiere and Congiuntivi Sballati
has the ill-fated idea of asking Cossiga what he thinks of Draghi
the ex-president uses the language like a sabre
I was reading your very harsh statement against the hypothesis
the hypothesis, of course, Draghi, President of the Council
Why President Cossiga? Why?
A vile, a vile businessman
You can not name the President of the Council of Ministers
who was a member of Goldman Sachs
a great American back-bank
and bad, very bad, I offered to support him
almost to impose the candidacy on Silvio Berlusconi
bad, very bad
is the liquidator, after the famous crusade on Britain
of the public industry, the sale of the Italian public industry
when it was director of the Treasury
and no matter what the President of the Council of Ministers would do
would sell what remains
mechanical film
Leni and certainly his ex-companions of Goldman Sachs
Let's come to the divorce
At the beginning of the 80s
the creation of currency occurred mainly through the Treasury
The interventions of the Bank of Italy were sometimes essentially
to try to absorb the excesses of liquidity in such a way created
Since 1936, the Bank of Italy had become a residual buyer
of all the bonds issued by the Treasury
at the rate of interest decided by the same Treasury
and remained unsold at the issuance
This happened, as Paolo Baffi, the governor, said
in the final considerations of that year
I do not quote by force of an obligation of law
but because the issuance institute had believed
to accept the truth of a historical economic reason
more conscious of the pure deep conviction
of how ephemeral and dispersive is the support of the occupation
and the income entrusted to the inflation
In the time of this situation, the entire economy suffered
The conviction that we made, Andrea and I
that it was essential to give autonomy to monetary policy
Hence the idea on which both agreed
to modify the press introduced in 1976
and that I have remembered
The implementation of this proposal was accepted in the autumn of 1981
by long talks between Andrea and me
In February 1981, also on the basis of a study carried out
by a group of workers of the Bank of Italy
there was a simple exchange of letters
with which it was decided to abolish the automatic mechanism
of buying bonds from the Bank of Italy
A decision that the advertising called the name of divorce
But with that decision, we had put the first stone
to build that culture of stability
which then, over the years, would have allowed Italy
to participate from the beginning in the European single currency
Thank you
In continental Europe, a comprehensive program of structural reforms
must today space in the fields of pensions
health, the labor market, school and others
But it must be guided by a single principle
to attenuate that diaphragm of protections
that in the course of the 20th century
have gradually removed the individual
from direct contact with the hardness of living
And here, of course, I have a distortion
that concerns Europe
and it is a positive distortion that concerns Europe
Even Europe, we must not be surprised
that Europe needs crises
and serious crises to move forward
The steps ahead of Europe are, by definition
sessions of national sovereignties
at a community level
It is clear that the political power
but also the sense of belonging of citizens
to a national community
can be ready for these sessions
only when the political and psychological cost
of not doing them
becomes higher than the cost of doing them
because there is a visible and conclamatory crisis
We are witnessing, it is not a paradox
the great success of the Euro
And what is the most concrete manifestation
of the great success of the Euro?
Greece!
Why?
Because the Euro was created
yes to have a single currency
but above all to convince Germany
which made the great sacrifice
to give up the Mark
to have a common European currency
that through the Euro
through the links that were born with the Euro
the culture of stability
President Ciampi always called
the culture of German stability
would have spread a little bit everywhere
What school case could one have imagined?
The case of a Greece
that is forced to give enough weight
to the culture of stability
that is transforming itself
During the governments of the center-left
apart from the fact that many more reforms
were made than ever before
and privatizations
the Italian paradox that was
the center-left to dismantle the Lira
not to the right
that is defined as liberal
privatizations, liberalizations
pension reform
But we brought the Lira in the Euro
with the left in the government
We have compressed public spending
Those results there
the public debt when it went to the government
Ciampi
was over 120% of GDP
Progressively
at the end of the decade
it was 109%
We started a policy of progressive
debt reduction
and the global public spending
I say this because this is a very interesting fact
on which we should reflect
at the end of the decade
it was 46% of GDP
today it is 53%
That is, after 10 years
of governments of the center-right
and it is a paradoxical fact
because the right in all of Europe
normally reduces
the size of the public
public spending is 7 points
higher than that of the last
government of the center-left
It is not our fault
if the European plebiscite is convinced
that the monetary union was made for their happiness
