🧐 WHAT IS A FIELD_ Science has FAILED utterly on this 😨

Hey! How you doing there? It's a fine evening. Science has failed. Technology is something different. Technology is a byproduct of scientific investigation. And we enjoy our little scientific toys. We certainly do. But people keep forgetting that descriptions are not explanations. Math is not explicative. That's something that they didn't teach you in high school or college. Science has failed. You know, fundamentally, if you were to ask someone of any wisdom whatsoever, they would tell you that wisdom is of ultimate importance because if you genuinely understand something, then you comprehend it at its most fundamental level. I had a few people recently send me to a couple videos, and the videos are titled What is a Field? I like this guy in the lower right-hand corner. You probably can't see it. His eyes are all bugged out. He seems like a very, very nice chap. Actually, he is. He seems like a nice guy. I'll actually read in the caption of his video there. He says, In an electrical field, each point is associated with the magnitude and direction of a force that would experience a positive charge of one coulomb placed at that point. Well, that's descriptively accurate, but it in no way defines a field. There are three other videos that some people had pointed me to, and they're all entitled What's a Field, but amazingly enough, and not amazing to me, none of them actually tell you what a field is. Let me ask you a question and just ponder it for a second. All of these people with PhDs, and all of these people that think they're something, and they write books, and of course, I write books. Anybody can write a book now. Of course, their books are peer-reviewed, but as I told you before, peer-reviewed is where one academic is like a dog sniffing the behind of another dog, and that dog is sniffing another dog's behind, and then that third dog is sniffing the behind of the first dog. That's what peer-reviewed actually means, and that's what academia is like if you don't actually agree. It's like the Catholic Church. Martin Luther. The Martin Luther movie, well, it's mostly accurate. It's not entirely accurate. It's a great watch. He grew up in the Catholic Church, and he started to question things that the Catholic Church was teaching that was completely antithetical to the Bible. It's like, well, the Bible says this, but the Catholic ... Anyway, they threatened to do him in, and he argued his case successfully that what the Catholic Church teaches is not actually connected to the Bible, in many instances. I'm not trying to make a religious reference here, but what these academics teach, and they are like priests within a system and a hierarchy, and if you don't agree with the dogma of these academic priests, then you're a heretic. There's a couple brilliant, genuine scientists who ask questions like, well, this doesn't make any sense. One of them who attacks Einstein endlessly is a brilliant ... I think he's Australian. He could be Tasmanian. Anyway, his name is Stephen J. Carruthers. You just type in his name on YouTube and type in Stephen J. Carruthers Black Holes. He actually has a lot of video lectures on black holes, and explaining the insanity of the math and the beliefs of current academia on black holes, but since everything in the universe is fields, which is undeniable, and fields are not particles, you'd think that if humanity ... and we think we're so evolved, but every stage of humanity throughout history has thought that. There was a famous scholar of ancient Rome. It could have been an ancient Greek scholar. I forget his name. It falls out of my brain at this point. He said thousands of years ago that everything that can be invented has already been invented. But every epoch of humanity thinks it's got a firm clue on how the world works. It's always been proven to be wrong. Where we're at in 2021 is certainly no different. I love it too that ... and I do love genuinely the fact that many of the scholars of academia, and they are priests actually within a belief system, will at least admit they don't know what gravity is. Many of them will tell you that gravity is a force, which is completely impossible. They will tell you accurately that gravity is an acceleration. But since they're atomists, they can't tell you how this acceleration works, except without making a ridiculous assertion that space and time are curved, and this acceleration is due to a vector at a given point in the field. But of course, they can never tell you what a field is. But what is this acceleration due to? I mean, it is not atomistic. Actually, some of them will actually tell you it's virtual particles, or they'll say gravitons, but these are not the inputs or outputs of any experiments ever done. They'll say, well, there's a vector of warped space and time. It's kind of like bending down a trampoline and put a heavy bowling ball in the middle of a trampoline. It's bending space and time. Well, Nikola Tesla railed against this. He said it's completely ludicrous, and he's exactly right. Time doesn't exist. Time is a measure. Time is not a thing at all. Time is one of eight primary things. There could be 12. I know 12 of them, but there are eight primary things that don't exist, like waves, time, space, emptiness, shadows. These things don't actually exist. Time is a measure of magnitudes. Time doesn't exist anywhere within naturae naturae anseri, Mother Nature. The notion of bending time is like talking about bending unicorn farts or weighing leprechaun gold. There's no such thing as leprechaun gold. There's no such thing as time. Time exists conventionally, of course, but it doesn't exist ultimately, so it's only a measure. And space has no properties, and I'm quoting Nikola Tesla on that. This is how they get away with explaining gravity. Well, it's warped space-time. There is a curvature in the field, and it is measurable vector of acceleration of two masses. Well, as I've proven demonstrably, and you can even see it underneath the supercell, of course, is that masses are not accelerating towards one another. They're actually accelerating towards a null pressure point in counter space. Everything is ether torsion, so gravity, of course, doesn't exist in its autonomous field modality. It is non-point source mutual mass acceleration. Same distinction between a light bulb and a laser in the case of so-called magnetic attraction. What we call gravity, what we call magnetic attraction, doesn't exist. Neither one of them exists. They're both dielectric acceleration. The distinction being is in the nature of one being point source, the other one being non-point source. Same distinction between a light bulb and a laser. Anyway, these people will conceptualize things and reify things that don't actually exist. You should repeat these two words because these are the most important things. When you listen to these people, these priests of academia, they, well, I have a PhD in physics right there. It means I know what I'm saying. It's called concept reification. Specifically, there'll be three words, concept, reification, fallacy, where they're reifying things that don't exist. The things that they like to reify. Space, time, so it's just saying it's time. Space has no properties, and I'm quoting Nikola Tesla. Nikola Tesla, of course, is right, but maybe you think you're smarter than Nikola Tesla. Numbers, they love to talk about vector fields. Yes, they'll talk about vector fields of directions, and they'll actually use little arrows, and they say, well, there's this point, and there's a vector, like a torsion vector, especially in the case of an electrical field, and they'll talk about regions of space. They take all these concepts, they magnify them, like time and space, and they'll actually, which is amazing to me, not really amazing after all this time, they'll reify numbers and vectors. These are concepts which in genuine use are references to things and their attributional nature or attributional nature over a period of time, over a period of time. Once again, time is a measure. It's not a thing itself, it's a measure. I could whip out a tape measure, which I've got a tape measure over there, and say, this is a measure. Well, it's a genuine tape measure, it's made out of plastic, it's X number of inches long, but a measure does not exist. The tape measure is one thing, the measure itself is another. Time does not exist. We could talk about the movement and passes of magnitudes over a measure and quantity, which is of course, is relative and existential, but time itself doesn't exist. But anyway, getting back to fields. Fields are so, so very important, but if humanity can't define what a field is in itself, of itself, by itself, then nothing else can be said. The two most important terms, and I really mean this seriously, and it's something no one's made a video on, yet there should have been many people made a video on this, is that all these priests of academia, and that's exactly what they are, they're in a belief system of academia, which is based in peer review, where they mutually agree with each other's nonsense. The two things that they can't define, which are most fundamental, are fields, whether it be electrical fields, so called gravitational. They can't define fields, and they can't tell you what light is. Without fundamentally understanding this basement principles of light and fields, and of course, light is just a compounded field, but most things are light. Gamma radiation is a field, so is radio, so is visible light, fundamentally the most fundamental particle in the universe, which is a proton. There's nothing other than super high-energy light. I made that prediction years ago. Recently, that was proven to be true, using coherent lasers that were amplified at one point, and they actually generated matter. I knew this would happen. I knew that fundamentally matter, and all atoms are just compounded hydrogen. I knew that ultra high-energy light fundamentally must be matter, and that has been an issue now for thousands of years, the reconciliation of light and matter. If we know that via wisdom that the universe is divinely simple, there must not be two things such as light and matter. They must be one thing and one thing only, and everything must be one thing ultimately. We see multiple things due to our ignorances, like ice, water, and steam, but even a child knows that ice, water, and steam is, of course, just modalities of water. All these fields are are modalities of expression of the modulation at which, by which, and the energy amplitude at which they occur. A field is, I can explain it very simply, is an ether perturbation modality. The energy amplification and the nature of the perturbation is all a field modality is. Electricity is a compound of dielectricity and magnetism. So-called gravity does not exist. It is non-point source mutual mass acceleration. So-called magnetic attraction does not exist either. It is dielectric acceleration. Magnetism, by denotation, is centrifugal force and divergence. But these priests of quantum and of so-called physics, they can't tell you what light is, and they can't tell you what a field is. These are the words they'll actually use if you look them up or you watch any video on defining a field. Let's say a field is a region of space for which each point has a physical quality. Well, no field has a physical quality. That's ridiculous. A region is a concept, a region of what, composed of what, relative to what, of space. Space has no properties, Nikola Tesla. Each point, point is not a thing in nature. There's no such thing that anybody can point to in Mother Nature that we can call a point. A point is a concept. Region, points, numbers, these magnitudes and directions, force. The force is not a thing, a force of what, by what, and upon what. These concepts are reified as things themselves. Space, time, vectors, force, lines, regions. There is nobody on this earth, including nobody watching this video, that can point to any of these things in nature. Numbers, force, lines, regions, vectors, time. There is nothing you can point to in nature. Just think about that a second. I can guarantee you've never done it. Of course, it's not important for life, essentially. You know, pay bills, feed your family. There's nothing in nature that you could point to, so this is time. If you think you're pointing to time, you're actually pointing to the change of vectors between one or more masses, which of course have magnitude. Unless the case we're talking about a black hole. A black hole is a supermass with no magnitude. The reason why it has no footprint in the visible universe, however, its region of influence, yes I use the word region of influence, exists, is because dielectricity has overthrown magnetism's ability to keep it within the physical universe. That's why it doesn't exist in this visible universe. That's why people have a hard time understanding black holes. Mother Nature, with wisdom, is extremely simple. It's not simplex, but it's extremely simple. A black hole is a supermass with no magnitude. It means dielectricity has overthrown its ability to stay within the visible universe, because that's the only reason why anything at all has a footprint that is measurable. You know, it actually has substantial presence within the universe due to magnetism. Magnetism is the air inside the balloon of every atom that makes up everything in this universe and every molecule in this universe. If dielectricity overthrows it or overpowers it, then it vanishes from this universe. And that's all a black hole is. And it took me years to figure that out, which I feel bad about myself that it took me years. The answer was so divinely simple. There is no reconciliation of light and matter. They're already reconciled in the eyes of Mother Nature, because that's all matter is, is ultra-high energy light. My point is that these priests that make you believe through their witchcraft, and I don't mean mind control, they're mind control like, you know, PhD, I know what I'm talking about. You know, many universities have confirmed my intellect on this matter. I'm peer-reviewed and my academic peers, I really don't have any peers, but my peers agree with me. And people believe this stuff. My guy's got a PhD, he spent seven years in college and did postgraduate work, and you know, he worked on the atom smasher for four years. You know, this guy knows what he's talking about. No, he doesn't. These are not things in nature. There's no such thing in nature. Yeah, which is all there ultimately really is, because these priests have invented nonsense. These priests have invented demons and angels and all sorts of hooey, which is just religious silliness, that don't exist in nature. Regions, space, numbers, vectors, time. These are not things. This is a wave, it's not a thing. There's no such thing as a wave. A wave is not what something is, a wave is what something does. But you must fundamentally ask these people, it's like, why should I listen to you? You don't know what a field is, you don't know what light is. That's like believing in what they say about a house, but they can't tell you about the foundation. They have no idea what the foundation is, they've never seen it, they can't explain it. It's like, why would you take, if a builder were to build your house, then you didn't know his credentials, whether he was skilled enough to build a house. If he didn't know how to build a foundation or what a foundation was, would you trust him to build the house that sits upon the foundation? The answer is probably not, especially if you had a brain. This nonsense of this priestly belief system is a strain that runs through all of it. Just like the electron, which of course, Tesla, Maxwell, Heaviside, they said there's no such thing as an electron particle. These people will tell you that an electron, all of them, electron is the charge carrier. I thought the electron was a charge itself. No, the electron is a charge carrier. If you think about their language and how inaccurate they are, they basically told you that the electron is not the charge, it's the charge carrier. It's like a clown car. You ever seen a clown car where they like fit 30 clowns in a little tiny car? The electron is like a clown car and inside of it are all these little charges. When we burn electricity in a device, what we're doing is we're actually burning up the clowns inside or using them somehow. We're left with all these empty clown cars. Every time we use an electrical device, we must have a waste chamber where all the little clown cars are. This is the language. It's so imprecise. Accuracy is proximal to wisdom. Wisdom and simplicity are divinity. How can the electron be the charge carrier? I thought it was the charge. If an electron is a particle, and they really do think it's a particle, you just ask them, how does wireless power induction work? Some of them will be halfway accurate. They say, well, what we call an electron is not really a thing itself, like a particle or a bead. It is a bump. These are their exact words. It's a bump in the field. It's kind of like a ripple. If you had a big sheet of fabric, you flip the ripple in it. That's what an electron is. That's pretty accurate. I love your analogy of an electron being a bump in a field, but you can't tell me what a field is. You have no idea. I literally mean this. Talk to your professor or someone that thinks they know it all. I am a PhD professor of physics. They say, excuse me, what is a field in itself, of itself, by itself? What is a field? Well, a field is a region of influence. Well, region is not a thing. Influence? Influence of what? Well, it's a force. It's a field of force with a specific vector. It's just too complicated for you to understand. I could try to explain it to you, but you're not smart enough to get it, because you have to have a PhD in theoretical physics for me to really explain it to you, because your mind is too shallow to grasp this deep stuff that I would like to explain to you, but I'd just be wasting my breath. It'd be just like throwing pearls at swine. Some of them actually do that. That's what I dare you. The guy that these people hold up is a cult figure. His name is Richard Feynman. There's a thousand copies of this video on YouTube. I dare you to look at it. It's only seven minutes long. He's sitting in a high-backed chair. Type in Richard Feynman explains magnetism. This is the Pope, if you will, within this priesthood. He's not alive anymore. The Pope. These people look up to him like a Pope. Type in Richard Feynman explains magnetism, and the guy asks him a question in the interview. What is this magnetism? What is this force or thing between two magnets? He sits back in his high-backed chair, and he wiggles and squirms like a worm on a hot plate. Wiggles and squirms. He talks about an old woman slipping on the ice, and he wiggles some more and squirms and wiggles. He gyrates like a jellyfish, and then he says, well, it's just too complicated for me to explain it to you. You don't have a proper frame of reference. He doesn't yell, but he wants to yell. He hasn't got a clue. That's not wisdom. Wisdom would be, you know, I know a lot about a lot of stuff, if he had wisdom, which he doesn't. He's dead now, but I really, really want to know. This is a burning question that I have, but I yet to answer it. That would have been a wise answer. That would have been, but no. He pretends to know. He wiggles and squirms, and he talks about an old woman slipping on the ice. These are those priests that I warn you about. They're silly little books. They'll write books that are a thousand, two thousand pages long, but they can't tell you what light is. They can't tell you what a field is, and they're no different than a construction worker with no real skills talking about building your fancy house, but he has no idea how to lay the foundation. These are foundational to all understanding about nature. What is a field, and what is light, and if they can't tell you that, and it's okay if they say they don't. It's like, I don't know. I really want to know. These are burning questions I have. Like, that's a good answer, but they don't do that. They lie. They lie. They're full of hubris. Well, I'm an academician. I spent seven years in college. I have a PhD. I know I know this stuff because they gave me a piece of paper hanging on the wall there. Oh god, I rest my case, your honor. I rest my case. Thank you so much for watching, and goodbye.