🌑 ANTIMATTER. What is it_ 🤔

I had a 6,500 and some videos. I thought I'd already made a video about this topic, but I had not. 6,500 videos covers a lot, but it doesn't cover everything obviously and logically so. Someone recently brought up a question about antimatter. And it's like, you know, I just realized I hadn't made a video about that. Once again, it's incredibly important to have a primer in your head to understand Mother Nature. Without a primer nobody understands anything. The best so-called scientists and physicists haven't got a clue about anything. I grew up reading and looking through their books, and I knew they were completely full of it. They can't define a field. They can't define energy. They absolutely can't. I don't mean that in a figurative sense. I actually can't. You actually have to have, like I said, a primer to understand things. So understanding so-called antimatter, which is a misnomer. You want to talk about a misnomer to call it antimatter? It's ridiculous is calling scalar waves scalar waves. Nikola Tesla's death ray, as he called it, is a scalar wave energy. But the problem with calling it scalar wave energy is it has no wave component. It's actually longitudinal, and it's measured in volts per second instead of a frequency or wavelength, so something that has no wave component calling it scalar wave. So antimatter is not the opposite of matter. Let's get on to the second. Let's first give a little quote from Nikola Tesla, who said that if you want to find the secrets of the universe, you need to think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration. Of course frequency and vibration kind of mutually redundant there. We're talking about oscillation or vibration. We can refer it to frequency, which is a oscillation or vibration, and a vibration of course has a frequency. So Nikola Tesla himself was a little bit redundant there. He should have just said you need to think in terms of energy and oscillation, and that's true. And ironically enough, like I said, no branch of science has ever defined the term energy. I have no idea. Nihilex Nihilo is something that they enjoy. If you don't know what Nihilex Nihilo is, you should look it up. It means from not comes not. But let's get on to what antimatter is not and discuss what actually antimatter is. There's no such thing as antimatter, which of course would be the opposite of matter. It's inverse. It's an inverse of what we conventionally call matter, of course, which is a harmonic, like an upper side band or lower side band, actually produced from galactic jets. We also too call these astrophysical jets. It's actually a super fascinating phenomenon. Everybody should look up galactic jets or astrophysical jets. We have countless thousands observances of astrophysical jets or galactic jets being emitted from the centers of galaxies and from the centers of black holes. And it is literally, I don't know if you've, and I have a gyroscope here, but I'm not going to spin up a gyroscope. You know, this apple shape is essentially a toroidal shape and around this toroidal shape, we actually have geomagnetic precession. Also too called the Lamour frequency, but we actually see these geomagnetic precessional jets emitting out trillions and trillions of tons of hydrogen from the centers of galaxies. We have thousands of photographs, real photographs, of this. There are people who actually always leave comments. So that's not real. Oh, really? Dozens of different countries with thousands of pictures of these astrophysical jets are not real. Of course, they're real. Anyway, they're emitting out trillions and trillions of tons of hydrogen, which is nothing other than super high-energy light. And of course all atoms, all atoms are just compounds of hydrogen. And we know for a fact, one thing that science is right about, you know, accurate observational declarations. Of course, we have to enjoy them and agree with them. However, descriptions are not explanations. That all free neutrons, given about 17 minutes, turn into protons. This means a neutron is nothing other than a frequency abstraction of a proton. So there's only one fundamental particle. The notion of an electron, of course, does not exist. And that's not my view, or my position. It's the view, a position of Nikola Tesla, James Burke Maxwell, Oliver Heaviside, and the so-called discoverer of the principle of the electron, who's J. J. Thompson. J. J. Thompson actually said the electron, a particle, is one unit of dielectric induction. Accurate, precise, demonstrably and denotatively accurate. So there's only one fundamental particle. So let's read a passage from the LHC, the Large Hadron Collider. Now, of course, all their conclusions are incorrect, but I'm going to make a reading of their declaration on anti-matter. As a team led by physicists from Oxford University, I'll analyze data from the LHC and discover that a subatomic particle, meaning a proton, can switch between matter and anti-matter. You see, we have this idea that, and to say anti-matter, it's like, say, what's the opposite of God? In an abstraction, the opposite of God would be Satan. He's the complete antinomy. You know, they're mutually destructive. Not literally, but I mean, the notion of anti-matter is the opposite of matter, is completely ridiculous. There's no such thing as anti-matter, nor is there any such thing as scalar waves. The phenomena, of course, is true, but it has no wave component, so anti-matter is not anti-matter. It's just constructive and destructive interference, a spatial phase harmonic in all binary systems. Let me repeat that again. Upper sideband, lower sideband. I don't know if you know much about radio. For communication, we have upper sideband, lower sideband communication. They're just spatial harmonics. They are out of phase and therefore mutually destructive, the exact same way we actually have the dual slit experiment. We have constructive and destructive interference from light, but people love, and there's nothing better, and I keep getting so many thousands of questions about the dual slit experiment, and you can actually recreate that using the shaft of a needle, of course, and you can recreate it using laser light or incoherent light, and they say, well, it's just, there's an observer effect, and you know, we don't, you know, don't know how this works. Well, it starts out with the false supposition that light's an emission, light has a speed, light's a particle in a wave, and a wave-particle duality, and all these things are incorrect, yet we all suffer from that delusion. Humanity does. If aliens were to land tomorrow, they would actually facepalm themselves over the fact that all of humanity thinks that light is an emission, and a particle, and a wave-particle duality, and it has a speed, and it's moving from point A to point B, but none of that's the case. Actually, hysteresis is the ether, or specifically, the rate of induction for it to occur, is the reason why Nikola Tesla said that light can be nothing other than a sound wave in the ether, because sound is not an emission. We actually suffer the same delusions about sound as we do from light. We know of a speed of sound, we can talk about breaking the sound barrier, but sound is not an emission, because everybody, when you say speed of sound, you say speed of light, every human being on this earth suffers the delusion that something is moving from point A to point B, or anything that has a speed is moving, you know, it's going from here to here, and that's not the case. It's the rate of induction. Sound is not an emission at all. It is a perturbation of the air, you know, caused by my voice, the vibration of oxygen and nitrogen. The actual speed of sound changes on elevation, i.e. density of the air, how cold or hot it is, which is also true about density of the air. There are many things that actually affect the speed of sound, but sound is not an emission. It has a speed, it has to be an emission. It's traveling. Well, the perturbation, yes, is occurring, just like a person in the middle of a pond flapping their arms is causing perturbations in the pond, but they themselves are not emitting anything. Every little kid on this earth, including every adult, suffers a delusion when they flip the light switch that a light emits light. It's emitting light! Superficially and conventionally, that, of course, is accurate, but it's ultimately incorrect. The light bulb doesn't emit anything. The speed of light is the rate of induction or the hysteresis of the ether. So, anyway, we're talking about constructive and destructive interference. The notion of antimatter is incorrect, just as we call scalar waves. Scalar waves have no wave component. It's completely illegitimate. Instead of calling it antimatter, I've actually thought, and of course, I haven't come to any conclusion on what to accurately call it. We could call it lower sideband matter, or we could call it inverse phase matter, relative to conventional matter, and the collision between matter and so-called antimatter is undeniable. Subatomic particles have been collided in the LHC and other places. We know antimatter does exist. We've actually seen these explosions in deep space. Antimatter does exist, but it's completely incorrect to call it antimatter. It is nothing other than inverse phase matter. We shouldn't call it antimatter, because that develops in our mind, human beings' minds, things that are incorrect. Speed of sound and speed of light infers that something is traveling. Well, nothing is traveling. It's a disturbance of the medium. Antimatter infers that it is the inverse or the antichrist of matter, for example. It's like it's darkness, you know? We'd have matter as light and antimatter as darkness. Well, darkness doesn't exist. By the way, darkness is just like time and space and shadows and emptiness. There's seven primary things that don't exist. Human beings think do exist. It doesn't exist at all. A shadow is an absence of light. We can't have this notion that antimatter is like the shadow of light. When they collide, they mutually destroy each other. Well, antimatter is just matter that is out of phase. We could call it lower side band matter, which is kind of an abstraction, or we could call it inverse phase matter. And it is no different than the constructive and destructive interference you see in the supercell or the ferrocell I have over here behind my shoulder, which I have a thousand videos of. No different than constructive and destructive interference actually seen in the dual slit experiment, which is everybody's so confused about. So it's just upper side band and lower side band polar harmonics of matter. I'm going to get on to light here. I meant to talk about light itself being a binary coaxial circuit. I was talking about binary systems. I'm going to get on to this as the last mention in this video in relation to constructive and destructive interference. We're talking about spatial phase harmonic in all binary systems. A black hole is a binary system. It's geomagnetic, processional, and galactic jets or astrophysical jets. Look up those in a Google search. Astrophysical jet or galactic jets. So a black hole is a binary system. And calling it a black hole is also to a misnomer. It's not a hole and it's not black. It is a super dielectric system that has enormous mass, but no magnitude because dielectricity has overthrown its capacity to stay within the visible universe. It has literally blinked out of our cartesian cosmos. It's extremely simple, actually. Mother nature is divinely simple, but nobody could understand mother nature and natural order without a primer. The most important thing anybody could have in their head if they want to understand mother nature and it's a mother nature and natural and natural. I don't care what anybody calls it. God, mother nature. I don't really care. You have to have a primer. Without that primer, understanding is impossible. Light itself, of course, is a binary coaxial circuit. It's a binary system just like a black hole is. This is the reason why we actually see constructive and destructive interference between matter and so-called antimatter, which is also to just matter. So light is this coaxial circuit, which can be mutually constructive or destructive as we can see in thousands and millions of experiments. And this constructive or destructive interference is relative to the other light's perturbation and where it is at relational to the coaxial interference of other light that it comes into contact with, i.e. other disturbances. But you could actually see this mutual cancellation or mutual addition in two people in a pond, you know, flapping their arms and generating waves. You'll actually see constructive or destructive interference depending on the harmonic of the time and the location of interference. That's all antimatter is. It's not antimatter at all. It is inverse phase. We could call it lower sideband matter or inverse phase matter. That would be demonstrably and denotatively accurate, but antimatter is a misnomer. Just as scalar waves are a misnomer. You shouldn't call it scalar waves. Because it has no wave component. That's something else that doesn't exist either. There's many things that human beings think exist. Emptiness, shadows, time, waves. There's all these things that human beings believe in that don't actually exist. They are not principles in themselves. Shadows and absence of light. It's a qualifier and said in reference to something else. It's not a thing in itself. It has no essay or essence. So anyway, I hope you liked this video. I hope I kept it simple, short and sweet. Which is what I like to do rather than drone on and on and on. Usually I'll not say enough and people's like, I wish you said more about that. Or I'll say too much and people's like, you said too much. You could have said all that in five minutes. So you can't make anybody happy. You either don't say enough. Or you talk a lot about it. People say, oh man, it took you forever to talk about it. You could have summed it up quicker. Nobody can be pleased. Thanks. Goodbye.