🔴💣AVVELENAMENTO INTENZIONALE AVENTE COME SCOPO UN DEMOCIDIO

My biggest frustration today and over the years is with all sides of freedom trying to position this whole situation as a scientific debate or medical issue or even public health issue. The deluded side thinks it's a virus and it's a pandemic. The side that's ostensibly health freedom side says a lot of them still say oh yeah it's a pandemic but mismanaged public health issue and then you know some factions that are more aware are saying it's intentional poisoning and that was my first position when I saw it. I said it's intentional poisoning even in 2021. I knew it was an intentional poisoning but since then we've uncovered the whole scheme of the crime, the whole nature of the crime and it has nothing to do with science or medicine or public health. It's a crime of genocide. So if you are a truth seeker and the person who is dedicated to the truth you have to move as the new data comes in. You have to make additional conclusions and what frustrates me about the majority of commentators on the health freedom side and forget about the deluded side for a while. You know what frustrates me is they will come to a certain point but no further and that's a hallmark of brand building and trying to get a political power versus seeking the truth because somehow they got to here but they can't get past this point that this is a mismanaged health event. No it's not a mismanaged health event. So that's just a kind of introductory part. The main thing so how this crime was committed and is being committed currently. We used to have a public health policy prior to 2018-2019. We had a public health policy which dealt with things like pandemics. Now assume that this is a valid point. I personally believe pandemics do not exist but even if you assume that this is a valid point and the government should have a policy on such situations or let's say local epidemic. The policy said that the Department of Health and Human Services is in charge of the policy. It was reasonable and it also had fairly reasonable public health measures such as masking wasn't advised. There was you know sort of a little some quarantine measures or some advisory to stay home if you're sick. You know some normal public you would say reasonable public health advice. There was no mandates of vaccines or anything like that. Now that and that policy was documented. Somehow in 2020 or maybe late 19 or 2020 it's not clear when that switcheroo happened but that policy was replaced by a brand new policy. Unclear who the author of it and unclear how it was changed but it was changed into a new updated policy that said that all of a sudden put the National Security Council in charge of a pandemic policy and that's a shocking switch. And still only few authors have commented on it. The first person who identified this was Debbie Lerman to my knowledge and she is a journalist writing on Brownstone and so she wrote several articles about it. I found the documents and I referenced her and I also found additional documents after that. So in charge of the whole policy is National Security Council. National Security Council is an advisory body to the President of the United States. Consists of heads of military and intelligence. It does not have any representatives from health and human services on the council. So immediately and this was known now this has been known now for at least three years, two or three years. So everybody pretending like it's a public health event. That's why I'm saying you know it's not. It's clearly not. With you crime against humanity I call it a democide you know I mean it's yeah mass murder. Mass murder so and again everybody pinning it on Anthony Fauci. I'm not defending him. He is he's a mangulate type and he should be prosecuted for what he did both in during the AIDS and you know all the all the years that he's done similar crimes and now. But you know he wasn't in charge of this policy. He is an NIH NIAID and again nothing to do with the policy. So he was part of designing certain things and he was advisor. So HHS played advisory role. So obviously he was involved in designing certain certain things and he is clearly the spokesperson for the cabal. But it's not his policy. It's the National Security Council military and intelligence.