💥Cataclysme Antédiluvien 🌍❄️Le basculement de l’écorce terrestre survenu il y a 12 000 ans 🔥🌊

If you like our work and want to support the channel, I remind you that you can activate the join button. This gives you access to exclusive videos and all without advertising. The full details of this offer are on our website vegeta.com. Now that all this is said, let's get to the video and I'm counting on you, friends. If I tell you that there is a link between Charles Abgood, The Last Glacial Heir, Mammoths, Albert Einstein and The Flood. Do you believe me? Well, even if all these subjects frankly seem to have nothing in common, there is indeed a link between them and their convergence could well push us to have to change our vision of history. It all started in 1955 when Charles Abgood, a graduate of Harvard University who had worked for the strategic services of the CIA during the Second World War and Executive Secretary to the American President Frank Roosevelt, published his first book, The Movements of the Earth's Crust. This work will be prefaced by the most famous physicist in history, Albert Einstein, who will strongly support Agad's work. In this work, as well as in the two that will follow in 1966 and 1970, Charles Abgood proposes an innovative theory concerning the geological past of our planet. He thus advances the hypothesis according to which the Earth's crust would have tilted like a shell on the Earth's magma causing a rotation of all the continents of approximately 30 degrees GR. This tilting of the Earth's crust would have occurred approximately 12,000 years ago, at the end of the Pletocene, marking the end of the last Ice Age. Our planet is made up of an inner core burning at more than 6,000 degrees GR, covered with a magmatic mantle approximately 5,000 kilometers thick on which rests the solid Earth's crust, 35 kilometers thick, composed of the different continental tectonic plates. The Earth's crusts on which we live therefore float on a bed of viscous magma. According to the theory of Charles Abgood supported by Albert Einstein in 1955, the entirety of this solid crust would have tilted by about 30 degrees about 12,000 years ago. The core of the Earth as well as the internal mantle would not have moved, remaining on their axis and maintaining the Earth's magnetic field. Only the external solid crust would have undergone this rotation, moving the different continents by nearly 3 kilometers. To give you a little idea, it is as if the city of Paris suddenly found itself at the level of southern Algeria. Since the Earth's axis of rotation was not modified during this tilt, the previous location of the poles would therefore have had nothing to do with the one we know today. The North Pole is located today in the center of the Arctic Ocean, but before the movement of the Earth's crust, it would have been in northern Canada. In contrast, the South Pole, today in the center of the Antarctic continent, would have been on the eastern coasts of the latter. This modification of nearly 3,000 kilometers of the Earth's shoulder directly influences the Arctic and Antarctic polar zones. Consequently, the climate of our planet was necessarily totally different. Most of the North American continent was then taken under ice while the western coasts of Antarctica were in a climate to be tempered in the same way as Siberia. The equator of the Earth at that time would therefore have formed a line passing through Josette, Easter Island and Cambodia. The face of our beautiful blue planet was then very different from the one we know today. But for what reason could the Earth's crust have tilted so suddenly? The most likely hypothesis is that 12,000 years ago, under the influence of global warming at the end of the Pleistocene, leading our planet towards the end of the last ice age, a gigantic part of the ice pack would have detached itself from the Antarctic continent and rushed into the oceans of the southern hemisphere. Since the Earth's South Pole was not located in the center of the Antarctic continent, but 3,000 kilometers to the east, the polar zone also extended 3,000 kilometers to the east. As a result, like today's Greenland, a large part of this cold zone extended over the oceans, forming a colossal layer of floating ice attached to the Antarctic continent. The warming of the planet and these oceans would then have caused the breakup of this ice pack at the South Pole, releasing a quantity of several million cubic meters of ice into the oceans. The volume thus released would have then unbalanced the distribution of masses on the surface of the Earth's crust floating on the magmatic mantle, causing the entire crust to tilt around its axis of rotation. Polar areas of several million square kilometers would then suddenly find themselves under a temperate climate, while regions with a mild climate would have been plunged into polar cold, all in a cloud of devastating earthquakes and terrifying volcanic eruptions. This new configuration of the Earth's surface would have given birth to the current geography as we know it today with a North Pole in the center of the Arctic Ocean, a South Pole in the center of Antarctica and an equator passing through the Galapagos Islands, Gabon and Sumatra. All this would have happened because following the warming at the end of the last glacial era, a huge part of the Antarctic ice pack would have been released into the oceans of the southern hemisphere. And what happens when you put an ice cube in a glass of water? Well yes, the water cools down. With several million cubic meters of ice released into the waters of the planet, this resulted in a sudden cooling of the oceans and consequently of the atmosphere, causing torrential rains. The climatic result of this hypothesis can only bring to mind the legendary myths of the biblical flood which testifies to an ancient flood and massive precipitation across the entire globe. And since in the texts of the Old Testament, the world after seems to be very different from the world before, the tilting of the Earth's crust as proposed by Charles Abgu could perfectly and rationally and scientifically explain the biblical events of the flood. But if such a planetary cataclysm took place during the dry, can we find traces of it? Well yes. In 2020, a study conducted jointly by the Universities of Texas, Bayer and Houston, entitled, Volcanic Origin of the Younger Dryas Geochemical Anomalies, approximately 12,900 years before Jesus Christ, attests that sedimentary layers found in Hall Cave in Central Texas, testify to intense volcanic activity approximately 12,000 years ago. These massive volcanic eruptions that left their mark on the planet's soils may perfectly correspond to the result of the tilting of the Earth's crust, which in fact led to major seismic and volcanic consequences. But other evidence can attest that a radical and sudden change struck the Earth approximately 12,000 years ago. Discoveries of mammoths preserved frozen in the permafrost are not uncommon. However, analyses of the bodies of these antediluvian pachyderms have revealed very interesting facts. In 2002, the Yaukajir mammoth discovered in Bari revealed the presence of undigested frozen plant remains in its stomach. Composed of tall grass and grass, these stomach remains not only attest to a relatively mild climate at the time for a region that is now polar, but also, the freezing of these plants in the pachyderm's stomach testifies to the speed with which the animal was taken by the cold. Seven years after the discovery of Yaukajir in 2009, Kroma, a baby mammoth only two months old, was discovered in an exceptional state of preservation, also in Siberia, frozen in the permafrost. In-depth analyses of the remains present in its stomach revealed the presence of frozen breast milk. Just like the Yaukajir mammoth, the discovery of Kroma shows that Siberia 12,000 years ago was not in a polar climate, devoid of vegetation, but enjoyed conditions that were sufficiently mild in clemency to allow the proliferation of plants in quantities abundant enough to feed these colossal pachyderms. In addition, the freezing of food remains in the stomachs of these mammoths demonstrates a sudden change in the thermal conditions of this region. The intensity of the cold necessary to freeze the body and its entrails goes against an environment where there would be enough vegetation to feed these animals. Just as the theory of the terrestrial Corsica tilt suggests, Siberia therefore experienced a sudden and brutal cooling, propelled during this cataclysm from temperate regions to northern Arctic zones and imprisoning in the ice of the permafrost the that were present during this tragic event. Carbon-14 dating of these two animals estimated that they were respectively 20,000 years old for Yakuji and 50,000 years old for Kroma. While this official dating seems far removed from the supposed period of the tilting of the Earth's crust that occurred around 12,000 years ago, a 2012 study proved by demonstration in front of an expert that the reactivity of the isotope used for carbon-14 dating could be significantly altered by certain chemical components contained in water. If the validity of carbon-14 dating beyond 30,000 years was already questionable, the discovery undermines all archaeological chronologies since an altered organism can then be backdated by carbon-14 by several hundred thousand years. The official age of the Yakuji mammoth and Kroma cannot therefore be a determining factor that would invalidate Charles Abgaud's theory. The Dryas, this glacial period that closed the air of the Pleistocene 12,000 years ago, also saw the great extinction of giant mammals. In a sudden and brutal manner, the entire megaphone of the planet seems to have been eradicated. If the mammoth are the standard bearer, the saber-toothed tigers, the rhinoceroses, the neo or the megaterium also saw their species become extinct at this time. Obviously, a major cataclysm, as violent as it was sudden, seems to have struck the planet 12 years ago. Torrential rain, volcanic eruption, sudden climate change and mass extinction attest to this event, which if Charles Abgaud is right, could well be explained by the tilting of the Earth's crust.