The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee (established 1795) in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing committee. The Energy and Commerce Committee is at the forefront of all issues and policies powering America’s economy, including our global competitive edge in energy, technology, and health care. The committee is led by E&C Chairman Brett Guthrie (KY-02) and E&C Ranking Member Frank Pallone (NJ-06). The Subcommittee on Environment is led by Chairman Morgan Griffith (VA-09) and Ranking Member Paul Tonko (NY-20).
Welcome. I am really looking forward to working with you, ranking
member Toco, as we, uh, start this adventure I'm hopeful we can work
together on some bipartisan legislation going through the subcommittee.
Today is not only my first hearing as chair of this subcommittee,
but it is the first subcommittee hearing of the Energy and Commerce
Committee
for the start of the 119th Congress. The American people have spoken
loud and clear. They've had enough of rising prices and the regulatory
burden that threatens energy reliability, reduces American competitiveness
and in some cases makes for stagnant economy.
In general, I've long believed Congress needs to get back into the
practice of passing regular authorizations as chair of the subcommittee,
is my goal to modernize some of our major environmental laws and
enable predictable, common sense regulation. I'm glad we've hit the
ground running with this hearing and hope that we have signaled our
commitment to dig into the statutory language to find out where we
can make the law work better for all interested parties. To that
end, today's hearing we'll examine the Frank Laudenberg chemical
Safety. For the 21st Century Act or the Lautenberg Act, nearly 10
years ago, members of this committee worked tirelessly to develop
the Landenberg Act to reform toxic substances Control Act, often
referred to as Tosca. Tosca governs the environmental Protection
Agency or EPA's regulation of new and existing chemicals in the chain
of commerce for products containing those chemicals. This was no
easy task. The Laudenberg Act made the most significant changes to
Tosca since it became law in 197. 6. Wattenberg Act enjoyed strong
bipartisan support in this committee before becoming law in 2016.
And I was proud to be a part of that process. However, nearly 10
years have passed since the Lautenberg Act's passage. Both Democrat
and Republican administrations at EPA have had the opportunity to
implement the acts procedures for collecting new information on chemicals,
reviewing new chemicals and for regulating those that the EPA determines
pose an unreasonable risk and each administration. as we will hear
today has encountered a number of challenges in implementing the
Act. In 2023, the Government Accountability Office found that between
2017 and 2022, EBA completed only 10% of the pre-manufactured chemical
reviews within the time limit laid out in the Latenberg Act. With
the 10-year anniversary of the Landenberg Act's passage quickly approaching
today's hearing will provide us an opportunity to learn more about
what's working and what's not working at the EPA's Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics and it's important that we make the most of
this opportunity to create that record. Among other things, Tosca
as amended by the Lawenberg Act governs the EPA's process for reviewing
new chemicals or in allowing new uses for existing chemicals before
those products can be sold to consumers in the United States.
Chemicals are part of manufacturing and methods and products that
we depend on for our everyday life. New chemicals utilized in a safe
manner, not only lead to new products that enhance our quality of
life, but are also necessary for addressing crucial challenges like
harnessing energy resources and treating disease. Similarly, our
economic competitiveness and national security depend on our ability
to innovate and bring new technologies to market safely and efficiently
as chemicals are part of Nearly every product and new chemistries
are essential to develop better products. The task of regulatory
scheme has profound impact across nearly every sector of our economy.
New chemicals and new uses for existing chemicals must undergo EPA
review. If these reviews don't take place in a timely manner, our
international competitors could gain an edge and more production
would likely shift overseas. We are fortunate to have a panel of
experts joining us to help pinpoint shortcomings with our current
regulatory mechanisms and to discuss potential opportunities for
reform. Today we will hear from Mr. Chris John, president and CEO
of the American Chemistry Council. Uh, also known as the ACC, of
course, where I come from, that's the Atlantic Coast Conference.
The ACC, the ACC serves as an organization of chemical companies
who often engage in EPA's regulatory process, including new chemical
reviews. Also joining us is Mr. Jeff Moody, the vice president of
government relations for the American Fuel and petrochemical manufacturers.
He will share the experiences of refiners and manufacturers that
comply with Tosca to make the products we depend on every day. We're
also glad to have Doctor Richard Engler prior to his current role
as director of chemistry at the ACTA Group, Doctor Inglis served
at the, at the Environmental Protection Agency for 17 years, and
we'll be able to share more about the agency staff experience in
implementing the act. Additionally, doctor, uh, Maria Doa, the senior
director of chemical policy at the Environmental Defense Fund will
offer testimony before joining the Environmental Defense Fund in
2021. Doctor Doa
served. At the Environmental Protection Agency for 30 years working
on chemical chem working on chemical safety and Tosca.