Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon on the business environment, AI, and private credit

David Solomon
5 followers
19 Video Views·Feb 2, 2025
Description: Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO David Solomon shares his views on why he sees a “more constructive” business environment and a pickup in capital markets activity in 2025. In the latest episode of Goldman Sachs Exchanges, Solomon explains how businesses are harnessing AI for their own businesses, and how Goldman Sachs is thinking about its strategic priorities, including the growth of private credit.
Date of recording: January 27, 2025
The global economy has shown impressive resilience over the past year, but
questions about economic policy and technological innovation are becoming
increasingly urgent.
So where are the risks and the opportunities in this environment?
I'm Alison Nathan, and this is Goldman Sachs Exchanges.
Today, I'm again sitting down with a very special guest, David Solomon, the
chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs.
We'll talk about his views on economic growth and markets, the firm's
strategic priorities, and what he's most focused on in the year ahead.
David, welcome back to the program.
Thank you. Glad to be here with you.
So, David, we have had this annual conversation for several years running now,
but I must say this seems like a particularly interesting time to be the CEO of
Goldman Sachs. There are what looks to be a lot of tailwinds to the economy and
markets and substantial optimism, of course, with the new Trump administration
coming in. And there seems to be a lot of optimism that he's going to usher in a
friendlier environment for businesses.
But the unknowns also seem unusually large.
So let me first ask how you would characterize this business environment.
Well, I think you did a pretty good job characterizing this business
environment. It's going to be more constructive than it has been the last few
years, particularly on the regulatory front.
But there are a range of significant policy areas where this administration is
ushering in change.
And whenever you have change, that creates uncertainty.
And so until we have a clear view of the policy trajectory, I think that it's a
moment to kind of take stock of where we are.
It's great that there are clearly some tailwinds.
There's obviously a lot of optimism.
But at the same point, the ultimate implementation of the different policy
focuses will be important.
And so we have to step back and realize people are obviously very focused on
immigration policy.
And when you look at the executive orders that have come out so far, that's where
the primary focus has been.
That can have an impact on labor supply, which ultimately can filter through into
the economy. I'm not saying it will, but that's something to watch.
People have been very focused on trade.
We still don't have answers.
But at the moment, the market's perception is that the direction of travel on trade
will be more as a tool of negotiation in the short term than the breadth of
tariffs that have been talked about.
You have tax policy, which is obviously important.
You have energy policy, which is also important.
So these are big, complicated areas that the combination of the policy
implementation will have an implication for growth.
But as I talk to CEOs, CEOs are optimistic because the regulatory burden and kind of
the former administration's approach to the business community was quite impactful.
And people are excited about the fact that it feels like there's going to be more
collaboration toward driving investment and therefore driving growth.
It will be a more growth oriented agenda.
Let me just follow up on some of those comments you made about the macro
environment, because as you said, some of these policies may create inflation.
There are concerns about that when it comes to tariffs, when it comes to the
immigration policy you mentioned.
We've obviously already seen a lot of volatility in the bond markets year to
date. I think volatility that no one really expected, at least the extent of what
they're down today, but generally have been quite volatile.
You know, what are you thinking in terms of the trajectory of inflation and interest
rates from here? And are you concerned at all that both or either could dent the
outlook for markets?
Well, significant changes in rates and more importantly, a change in the expectation
on rates can have an impact on markets.
I've been cautious around this topic, particularly around inflation.
There's no question that durable goods have been soft in terms of the inflation
rate around durable goods, but services and now food, you know, big headwinds.
And those things ultimately matter and filter through, you know, into the economy.
I think that we will see the Fed take no action, you know, at this meeting.
As you look out through 2025, I think the range of outcomes is a pretty narrow
position on policy.
Unless we get some policy action that really changes the trajectory of inflation, I
think we'll be in a narrow band with the policy rate.
We could see some cuts.
We might not. But that's my base case assumption.
And so you've got to watch this closely.
I think you should take it meeting to meeting and evaluate the data as we go.
But going back to where we were in the previous question, if some of these policy
implications and discussions get put in place in a way that is more inflationary,
that will change the trajectory of this discussion around rates.
There's a lot of enthusiasm, though, about capital markets activity.
What are you seeing from your seat?
Well, capital markets activity has run really below trend for the last few years.
We had an extraordinary period, obviously, in 2020 and 2021.
A lot of things got pulled forward and then we had a rebalancing in 2022 and that brought
capital markets activity and M&A activity, for that matter, meaningfully below 10 year
averages. With the change in the regulatory environment and the business environment,
confidence has improved and that confidence generally opens up the capital markets a
little bit more. I think there are a couple of things that are clearly obvious.
Less M&A activity hampers capital markets activity.
Secondarily, the financial sponsors, the private equity firms have really been on the
sidelines. We're hearing more and more and seeing more indications of them pulling
stuff forward now. So I think there's going to be a meaningfully improved environment
of capital markets activity in 2025.
It improved in 2024, but it still ran below 10 year averages.
We'll get back to 10 year averages or better in 2025 and we'll see how the year plays
out. We've talked a little bit about the macro risks, but of course, geopolitical risks
are always front and center. As we enter Trump 2.0, certainly still front and center.
How is the firm navigating that risk and how are clients thinking about geopolitical risk
at this point? Well, there are three, you know, there are three principal geopolitical
hotspots. The bilateral relationship between the U.S.
and China being one, the situation in Ukraine being a second and the situation in the
Middle East being a third. All of these have the potential to create more volatility in
markets. But at the same point, you know, I think the market's view is that there will
be more progress made, you know, certainly on our relationship with China under this
administration. I think the president is looking to kind of restrike the balance in that
relationship. And I'm hopeful that he will make some progress and could be very good
for the U.S. It would be very good for the world and it would be very, very good and
well-received for markets. You know, in the Middle East, I think the president views
that as an opportunity to continue some of the work he did in his first administration.
Obviously, given where we are right now, there's some progress in stabilizing that region.
But my hope would be that more progress could be made around a longer term solution,
normalization around relationships and more stability with respect to the region broadly.
And so that's something certainly to watch. A resolution in Ukraine is much more
complicated. And so I think it'll be interesting to see whether or not progress can be
made. But that, to me, seems to be the one that's a little bit a little bit tougher to see
an obvious path towards a resolution of progress.
All these things create risk.
All these things, if they go the wrong way, can upset markets.
But for the moment, I think there's a lot of focus on these three hotspots.
It'll be interesting to see how the new administration tries to move these forward.
And how are you viewing growth in economies outside of the U.S., many of which seem to be
in the crosshairs of potential shifts in U.S.
policy and the geopolitical risks you just mentioned?
Well, one of the things global growth has been OK, but it's really been driven by better
growth in the U.S. and weaker performance in across Europe and China.
And, you know, those things make up a significant portion of global economic activity.
For all the optimism with respect to the U.S., I think there is much more caution and
pessimism with respect to Europe and a real questioning of whether or not the nations in
the European Union feel enough pressure at this point to finally act on some of the policy
things they need to act on to strengthen the European Union as an economic competitor more
broadly. I think that's a big question.
You know, I was just in Davos and there's a lot of discussion on this topic, and I think
people would like to be optimistic that there's been enough pressure and underperformance
on a relative basis of the European economic system that there will be more aggressive
policy action to try to improve growth.
But my own view is until the nations of Europe start thinking about really trying to
create national champions and really think about how they make Europe a better economic
competitor, it's hard to see that movement.
We need we need the Netherlands to work with France as opposed to compete with France.
And ultimately, if you can't drive national champions across Europe and really create
the power of the economic union in Europe, the relative growth trajectory will be lower.
And that's kind of what we see based on the policy implementation of the last 10 to 20
years. Let's shift gears and dig into some developments in finance in the coming years.
You've already mentioned the regulatory landscape near and dear to our hearts.
What are you expecting for financial regulatory shifts in 2025?
So people are policy.
And one of the most important things to watch here as we go into the new administration
is, you know, we obviously have a new head coming into the SEC, but there are some
important positions that affect the regulatory environment for the financial system,
the vice chair of supervision for the Fed, the head of the OCC, the head of the the
CFTC, the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the CFPB.
So, you know, all of those appointments are important.
And I think it's very important that the administration moves forward and gets people
into these jobs so that the policy discussion around the regulatory environment for the
financial system can move forward.
I hope and expect that they will.
And once they do, I think the industry will continue to be very engaged to try to create
a little bit more balance around the regulatory environment to try to free up capital that
can be reinvested in the system.
One of the things that's going on in the large financial institutions is there's been
uncertainty around CCAR because there's litigation now around CCAR, stress testing.
There's been uncertainty around Basel III.
There's uncertainty around G-SIB.
That's leaving all the large banks to hold extra large buffers of capital.
We want to get policy in place so we know and can plan around capital and that excess
capital that's being held because of the uncertainty can be released into the system.
That drives more investment, loans, growth, et cetera.
And so I'm hopeful that people will get appointed quickly, that dialogue can continue,
and we'll see a clear understanding, clear transparency around some of the principal
regulatory areas that I think are important to keep the economy moving forward.
Let's dig into another big trend in the broader industry, which is that growth in
private credit. How is Goldman Sachs navigating that growth and how is it navigating it for
its clients?
Sure. So Goldman Sachs has been the private credit business for a long time.
We started in the private credit business 30 years ago in the 1990s and we manage $140
billion of private credit for our clients.
But I think what's interesting about Goldman Sachs is we sit at the center of the
ecosystem between public markets and private markets.
We have an enormous origination engine.
And while there's a lot of capital in the world to manage in the private credit space,
the real value add to the private credit deployers is origination.
And interesting investment opportunities.
And so, you know, I think we sit in a very interesting place in the middle of that
ecosystem. We have the ability to distribute credit and interesting investment
opportunities to our clients through the typical originate and syndicate process.
We have the ability to originate and use our balance sheet.
We have the ability to originate and direct to our asset management franchise.
And so the formation of our capital solutions business that we put forward is a way for
us to take some of the advantages we have as a firm sitting in the middle of this
ecosystem. I think you're going to see good secular growth in private credit lending.
And, you know, we're certainly in a very, very interesting position to participate in
that, both for our investing clients and for our trading and markets clients.
And we have an incredible set of corporate relationships, really unprecedented, to
drive origination of product that can be interesting for those markets.
Interesting. It's been about 15 minutes this interview.
We have not yet asked about AI, which obviously is a huge focus for financial markets.
It's really driven the market over the last couple of years.
And yet we have seen news over the weekend about low cost competitors potentially
disrupting the space, generating a lot of volatility.
What's your take in all of that and where you see AI from here?
Well, wherever wherever this change is going to be volatility and people tend to to run
ahead and then pull back and adjust.
But the broad trend of the power of this compute and the ability to leverage it to
create productivity gains and efficiency, it were early, you know, in the ramp up of
that. I think one of the ways to think about it, I've heard this from from big, you
know, big tech tech leaders, is the cost of this compute is going to come down or the
the power of the compute at the same cost is going to go up and you're going to see
meaningful shifts in that every three months.
So this is happening.
It's happening quickly.
And the power of that to generate productivity gains is real.
And so take away the short term noise, the short term volatility.
This is another example of technology continuing to drive growth and productivity.
And also, you know, interestingly, you know, we sit, you know, in the middle of a lot of
this here in the United States, although there's obviously competition around the world,
as this morning's announcement shows.
But I just think the direction of travel with respect to the ability to load this
technology into the enterprise and make people more productive were very early in that
cycle. And I'm quite optimistic about it.
And how is Goldman Sachs thinking about harnessing AI for its own businesses?
And what are you advising clients in terms of using it for their businesses?
Well, at the moment, you know, the compute's very expensive.
And so you really want to focus on use cases where you think you can move the needle and
really drive productivity gains.
The most obvious one for us, we're an organization of 46, 47,000 people and we have
12,000 engineers in our organization.
We would have more if we weren't constrained by our desire to drive returns in our
business. The ability to increase engineering productivity so that we can do more is
hugely advantageous to us.
So that's an obvious place where we've been very focused.
And I tell you that from what I've seen and what I've been shown, that technology is
really accelerating, which can allow us to do things that could take a handful of
engineers, you know, weeks in very short periods of time.
And so we're very, very focused on that.
But we're also focused, if you think about our business as a knowledge business, there
are lots of places we're putting these tools into the hands of very productive knowledge
workers can accelerate their productivity and also where they focus their time to add
value to their clients.
And you're seeing businesses that we talk to doing the same.
Absolutely. I mean, it's it's all businesses are wrestling with how these technologies
can either improve the productivity of their people or change processes in ways that
drive efficiency. The first is easier than the second.
But CEOs I talk to across all industries are thinking carefully about this, but also
being slow and prudent and thoughtful because you have to look at the costs, make sure
it's going to work. You have to have good governance around this from a risk management
perspective. And so a lot of focus.
But I think you'll continue to see it accelerate.
So, David, as we're talking, I hear about plenty of opportunity, but also plenty of
risk. I'm going to ask you a question you often get asked, which is what keeps you up
at night?
Oh, there are lots of things that keep me up at night.
But generally speaking, you know, I sleep well and, you know, the glass is half full.
I think we're in an incredible position to continue to drive growth.
I think the fact that in the U.S., where we really, you know, have had for a period of
time kind of preeminence from an investment perspective, preeminence from a technology
and innovation perspective, preeminence from a financial system and a capital formation
perspective, leads me very, very optimistic about the U.S.
and, you know, our ability to navigate significant things that will come our way.
I worry about all the things that we worry about.
I worry about geopolitics and instability in the world.
I worry about cyber, you know, significantly.
I think it's a real issue.
There are lots of things to worry about.
And look, one of the things that I think we should be thinking about at a time like this
when everything feels, you know, so optimistic to the forward is what could go wrong.
If we woke up a year from now and markets were 20 percent lower, why were they 20 percent
lower? And what happened?
And thinking about those things and kind of looking around the corner, I always think is a
helpful exercise in something we spend a lot of time doing at Goldman Sachs.
So I'd just like to end with the fact that five years ago, the firm held its first
Investor Day and you laid out the firm's strategic objectives at that time, many of which
we have achieved, if not exceeded in many cases.
So, David, how are you thinking about setting up the firm for the next five years?
So we are executing a plan that we really initiated five years ago to grow the firm,
strengthen our core franchise and really create value for shareholders.
We're well on our way on that journey.
I think the firm is very, very aligned and we have room to continue to execute on our
growth plan, which is particularly centered around asset and wealth management.
I think we've done a great job strengthening our core business of banking and markets and
capturing share.
There's still more we can do there.
And as we generate capital as a firm, we will continue with growth in the world to
allocate more financial resources so we can keep growing that client franchise.
I think we can grow asset and wealth management business high single digits, continue to
improve the margins and the returns in that business, which uplift the overall returns of
the firm. And I think the firm is very well positioned for further growth in the
future. So I feel very, very good about where we are.
We are hugely focused on productivity and efficiency, which I think is a very good
thing to always be focused on in our business.
And I'm excited about the opportunities that we have in front of us as a firm to serve
our clients with distinction in an environment that I think is going to be a little bit
more constructive for the business community broadly.
David, I'm glad to hear you're sleeping well at night.
You know what? We need our rest to tackle the challenges in 2025.
Thanks again for joining us.
Absolutely. Thank you very much for having me.
It's always good to talk to you.
This episode of Goldman Sachs Exchanges was recorded on Monday, January 27th, 2025.
I'm your host, Alison Nathan.
Thank you for listening.
