The National Anthem Should Bring Us Together

PragerU
793 followers
3 Video Views·Apr 4, 2025
Watch what happens when this Portland grad student starts singing the National Anthem for their graduation ceremony. 🇺🇸 Beautiful!
O say can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming,
And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
Is America's national anthem racist?
Had you asked this question just a few years ago
to fans at a baseball, basketball, or football game,
they would have assumed you had imbibed one too many beers.
Today, thanks to an assault by the progressive left
on the star-spangled banner and its composer, Francis Scott Key,
you might get a different reaction.
For example, here's what Jason Johnson,
journalism professor at Morgan State University
and popular cable news commentator, wrote about the anthem.
It is one of the most racist, pro-slavery, anti-black songs
in the American lexicon.
Is Johnson serious?
Actually, he is.
And sadly, a lot of progressives agree with him.
But why?
To answer that question, we need a brief history of the song.
Key wrote the star-spangled banner
after witnessing the American victory
at the Battle of Fort McHenry during the War of 1812,
a rare bright spot in the young country's
a conflict in which the Americans mostly got their butts kicked.
Critics like Johnson focus on the third stanza,
in which Key mocks the retreating British soldiers.
Before describing those lyrics, I need to make a point.
The third stanza is virtually unknown.
Almost no American has ever sung, read, or heard it.
But even so, it's not nearly as offensive as it's made out to be.
Here's what Key wrote.
The claim of racism focuses, of course,
on Key's use of the word slave,
which, so the argument goes,
refers to the British Second Corps of Colonial Marines.
This unit was composed of former American slaves
who had been encouraged to escape bondage
and fight alongside British troops.
According to this line of thinking,
the slave-owning Key, a prominent attorney,
was terribly upset by the idea of freed blacks
fighting against their former masters
and was so gratified by their defeat
that he inserted this line into his poem.
Like many Americans living in the early 19th century,
Key's record on race was mixed.
On the one hand, he owned slaves himself.
On the other, he offered free legal representation
to slaves petitioning the Maryland court for their freedom.
In 1835, he served as prosecutor
in a case in Washington, D.C.,
of an enslaved black man, Arthur Bowen,
who was accused of threatening his white female owner.
But when a riot ensued over the incident,
Key bravely stood between Bowen and a lynch mob
bent on killing him.
With respect to the anthem, there's no direct evidence
that Key was referring to the Second Corps of Colonial Marines,
that he even knew the unit existed or cared if it did.
It should further be noted that this unit
was not even present at the battle,
so Key could not have seen them fleeing the field.
Why then did Key use the word slave?
We'll never know for sure, of course,
but it's important to note that Key was not the first person
to use the expression hirelings and slaves.
It was a common rhetorical device of the time
used on both sides of the Atlantic.
You find it in newspaper articles and English-language literature
well before the onset of the war.
It was an all-purpose insult that could be used to refer to
enemy troops, foreign leaders, corrupt politicians,
or anyone else in need of a put-down.
For example, in 1795,
long before the Second Corps of Colonial Marines even existed,
a dispatch from Baltimore condemned
And remember, slave was a convenient rhyme for grave.
Key was, after all, writing a poem.
It may be as simple as that.
Before the recent ruckus,
no one who sang the national anthem
thought it sent a racial message.
If anything, people believed that the anthem promoted unity,
as it was intended to do.
Besides, as previously noted,
hardly any Americans even knew the third stanza existed.
During World War II,
G.I.s trying to uncover German infiltrators
would ask suspected spies
to sing the second or third or fourth verse
of the Star-Spangled Banner.
If they didn't know the words,
they were assumed to be genuine Americans.
Those who declare the flag and the national anthem to be racist
would do well to remember
that Martin Luther King Jr. and his supporters
carried the American flag during their famous Selma March.
When they reached the Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama,
guess what song they sang?
That's right, the Star-Spangled Banner.
I'm James Robbins, columnist for USA Today
and author of Erasing America for Prager University.
