Velký reset – spiknutí ultrabohatých

The Great Reset, which is being held by the World Economic Forum, is a tyrannical plan run by the ultra-rich. And the COVID-19 pandemic is considered an opportunity for its implementation. The message is the freedom of the world. The agendas of the Great Reset, which undermine the basic rights of people all over the world, according to Michael Walsh, author, filmmaker and editor of the book against the Great Reset, 18 theses against the new world order. We are talking to Michael Walsh about the impact of the World Economic Forum, what is their policy and why it and other people are against the Great Reset. Michael Walsh, thank you for coming to us to the Crossroads. Thank you for the invitation. You published this new book against the Great Reset, I think with a very good timing. It seems that people are beginning to realize the threat posed by the Great Reset. Some of the real capacities from our country are being brought together here. It's very interesting to see how all these people come together to pay attention to it. Tell me for starters, what led you to do it? Well, it started with our website, ThePipeline.org, which we launched about two and a half years ago. To develop two subjects involving energy and national energy security. When the COVID hit, lockdowns became part of our restrictions that we had to deal with. What they told us was true, was not true, and there was also a shift from climate change, and we are against it. We think it's a setback. From that, the Great Reset was born. Because every year in Swiss Davos, which is a city near which the novel Thomas and the Magic Mountain takes place, powerful and good people come to Davos every year. Or in some cases, or rather in most cases, powerful and evil private planes. While they fight against carbon monoxide and spend three days in some atmosphere similar to the fame of Luke Cohen in Davos. Where they can talk about ecological and social issues. For example, ESG is a new thing. Environmental, social and legal score, which aims to destroy shareholder capitalism and replace it with the capitalism of interested parties. Well, all these things came together two years ago. And we always had the idea that what we do in ThePipeline will somehow translate into a book. In this case, we decided to focus on the Great Reset, Klaus Schwab and basically on his cohort of Bond bastards, who forced this nonsense on people. Then they believed me. I got the bill to hire whoever I want. Certainly with the fact that they want to share it. They assigned everyone what they were going to focus on. So it's not 18 theses about it either. It's 18 different theses about different aspects. So economic is one of them, personal, social, government, national state. I took the art because I am the most suitable for this in this particular group of authors. We are very happy with the results. We publish it on Tuesday, October 18. And we hope to find a large and wide range of readers. But our idea is subsequent. The Great Reset in Davos is generally a plan for the totalitarian eyes of the world according to what plutocracy wants. Which is less people, less movement of people. The state of totality is very annoying. Stop effectively managing. I live in Irsk and there is a lot of income in my neighborhood. They want to set fire to everything. They want you to eat brooks. They want you to live in skyscrapers. They want you to drive an electric car. But not completely, because they will control where you can and where you can't. And that's all, of course, for your own good. And their slogan is, you won't own anything and you will be happy. And we said, I don't want to have anything. I'm happy with the way I am now. Fortunately, there are many important personalities. Intellectual groups and authors have agreed with us on this. On this concept of the Great Reset. And they agreed that they will write something. And for two years I organized them and asked them what they would work on. I edited their output. And now we're finally publishing it. But it took about two. Like making a movie from start to finish. If you're lucky, it takes at least two years. And now it's here. I think the most important thing about this book is, people have to understand how much this horror is hidden. It's not just Klaus Schwab and the German accent living inside a burned-out house on the top of Switzerland. It's dangerous. And like any totalitarian movement, communism or anything else, it's all over the place. And it always happens under the guise that it's for your own good. It's for your own good, comrade, right? I always add to that, comrade, because that's what they really mean. I hope that this book will give everyone who is interested in this topic a tool to fight against it. That's our start. It's the first word of what we hope will be an international movement against the Great Reset. Our authors are basically from the English-speaking world. They're from the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. And only a few exceptions. We have an Italian writer who deals very, very well with the concept of shareholder and business capitalism. And now, like any book, it's like your child. As soon as it grows up and goes to high school, it's on it. But we'll see what happens. It's interesting, because this is more of a centrist approach that considers most of the views around the center. And usually, I think until recently, the whole idea of the Great Reset and the world economy was considered to be a conspiracy theory. A lot of people didn't believe it. It seemed kind of far out. They may have imagined Klaus Schwab in his uniform from Star Trek or whatever. But other than that, there was nothing. And it seems to be going into a lot more focus now. So the whole world is maybe waking up to some of this and saying, you know, these guys, these crazy guys up there, they're actually doing something. And again, what are they working on? What are they actually trying to do? What are they trying to do? You don't know what they're trying to do. Well, I'm telling you exactly what they're going to do. You won't own that thing, and you won't like it. It's as simple as that. And here, the richest people are the richest people of all time. When we're at Star Trek, it's interesting that Jeff Bezos really did play in Star Trek. In Reboot with Chris Pinn and Zachary Quint. They've been thinking about it for a long time. And I think it's always a weakness of the victim, Jelen. Like when Predator comes, it won't happen to me. Or he doesn't mean it seriously. But we've seen how he doesn't mean it seriously. Throughout history, especially during the Holocaust, when Hitler got to power, literally with the hate program against Jews and everyone else who stood in his way. And a lot of people said, well, he doesn't mean it seriously. And then later, only because of that, 6 to 12 million people died. We know that well. So when we started with it, it's true that people said, well, it's just some kind of a joke, a rightist, a conspiracy joke, a rightist joke, right? And it's not like that. And now they're finally waking up. But even very recently, one of our authors wrote to me that he was trying to get advertising or rather support from a prominent British intellectual. And he said, that's crazy. This is not happening. What are you talking about? So it's hard to get people out of their seats until it's almost too late. We hope it's not too late. So stupefying, so bold. So you're fighting it all the time. And don't think that Zuckerberg, Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook, who is now a meta, wants the meta to be actually the whole alternative world in which they will control what we are doing here in this, as if in a matrix-simulated life. Not at all. I mean, a lot of the wealth they've accumulated is stupefying. No Roman emperor could ever have that much money. So it's kind of funny to see Elon Musk driving them crazy just because he's a wild card that doesn't follow their blinkers. It's a way of thinking in the style of the Soviet gulag. You mentioned Zuckerberg again, Paypal. How do these relate to the things you're doing? How do these relate to what's going on in the world economy? It's not a conspiracy. I don't think it's precise. It's a voluntary association of extraordinarily rich people and extraordinarily influential political figures. Charles, the new English king, is very keen to go back to the world economy. He's an environmentalist. So he likes the whole ecological aspect of what people are doing with the reset. Schwab as an entrepreneur. And during the COVID lockdowns, we saw that small businesses were suffering and collapsing, and large businesses were thriving. So someone told me this. Oh, you can have open supermarkets, but not a Sam's Club down the street. Correct. And it's paradoxical if you don't understand that the point was to tear down the supermarkets and leave the supermarkets open. You have to praise them for their intentions, but you can't believe what they're saying, because they're all born liars. Aung San Klaus Schwab wrote a book about the Great Reset and COVID-19. Yes, it's called COVID-19, the Great Reset. COVID was basically a beta test for can we get the whole world to voluntarily join the domestic prison? And the answer was, how fast can we do it? And they said, in two weeks, just flatten the curve, in 15 days, slow down the spread. You knew they were lying. I don't think there's a single sensible being who would know, who would expect the world to go back to normal in two weeks. Not a single one. And I remember someone saying, they'll never, never, never, never let us until they're forced to. I think that raises the next big question. What do we need to do to get people to wake up? I think everybody just got that old bolt in the head, which is a crazy, crazy situation we're in. You mean like in the movie, this land isn't for old people? Exactly. The one who got the bolt in the head and then fell dead. But keep going. People are dealing with it right now. They wake up in the middle of the day and say, what just happened? And what is still happening? People are going after farms, trying to shut down the farm, trying to shut down the agri-industry. Are they trying to shut down the travel? Are they trying to do that? We're seeing all these new things that are suddenly in a crisis. And as a journalist, we're seeing that it's a crisis that is meant for people. It is meant for people, really. And they're talking about it openly. They tell you what they want. For example, in the Middle East, they want to get rid of the dung beetle, which is what their farmers get rid of. Nobody knows about it, but the underground is a country with a huge export of food. That's pretty much what the farms from several cities are made of. But the local government, the left-wing government, wants to shut down those farms. In Iraq, the local government is ruled by the green, which is a small, inconsiderate minority. But they joined a coalition with two major parties. And the green, it really puts a green agenda in the ground, which has never been industrialized. So apart from Dublin, they're just farmers. And yet they want to prepare those farmers for business. I'll tell you one thing about Iraq, because it's close to me. One of our mythical stories is about the arrival of coal mining, which goes back thousands and thousands of years. It says that mining was a means of wealth and change in Iraq. So the more mining you had, the richer you were. It was like money. We didn't have money. We had income. So the reality that the Iraqi government is actually attacking the foundations of the Iraqi nation, the Iraqi people, is devastating. And yet it's happening. And everyone says, Hmm, what? Yeah, what? They don't know it's happening? Yes, they know. And that's the answer. Because every time we make a mistake, they say, Well, don't they realize it? Of course they realize it. And I think that's where it's problematic. Because usually when we see that something doesn't work, when we see that the government ultimately creates more problems than it can solve, we think, Oh, they should have learned that it was a bad move. They won't do it again. It's not logical. And you're calling them conspiracy theorists if you believe it's intentional. But as you said, it seems like they're writing their intention. They're telling us their intention. They seem to be writing their intention. They're telling us their intention. Well, if you've ever read Mein Kampf, Hitler exactly laid out what he was going to do. Exactly. And he dictated it to his secretary when he was in prison, right? And everyone who read it said, Oh, he doesn't mean it seriously. Who would do it? Only a fool would do it. Well, welcome to the club. So if we look at these various social phenomena of destroying the agricultural industry, disrupting digital currency, digital monitoring systems, what are the digital indicators of this kind, destroying the fossil industry, I don't know what will happen to Europe this winter. All these crises are developing and so is the new type of medical tyranny. The World Health Organization is under very strong control of the Chinese Communist Party which has the ability to even declare a pandemic and govern the policy of their solution. We see all these things emerging at the same time and the idea that it's all part of the same general movement, something that's happening behind the scenes, I think people are starting to have suspicions that it's part of the agenda of these groups. It's not a coincidence. It's really happening. And if the conspirators tell you, Hey, tomorrow we're going to murder President Lincoln. No, you're not going to do it. And then they do it and you say, Well, I thought it was just a conspiracy theory. You don't want to go crazy but you also have to wake up to reality. And if you see that politics is literally designed to destroy everything in Western civilization, including its technology, then you have to ask yourself, Are they doing it for fun? Or do I really have to realize it? And the answer is, you have to realize it. Luckily, the idea of the COVID vaccine didn't work out in the end. In the end, a lot of people, the Canadian rockers, helped a lot. Even though, of course, everyone was immediately punished by the Canadian dictator Justin Castro, oops, Trudeau, or whatever you want. They had frozen bank accounts, they couldn't transfer money. You know, they were severely punished. But Trudeau, who is one of the members of the World Economic Forum, was enough to break his legs. They didn't even set up a health pass. You'd have to get a code to be able to travel from one country to another. But they want to do it, so it will come. And I have one note to that. You know, a lot of people say, Why do they want to do this? I mean, if they're businessmen, why destroy the economy? If they're businessmen, why destroy the economy? Why destroy the economy? It was a really great book. I read it. Thank you. You know, there's a statement from Batman, said Michael Caine. He says some people just want to watch the world burn. It's simple. That's the answer. You think so? Yes, I'm absolutely convinced of that. The left always had a strong self-imposed impulse. They can't stop there, like Sherlock did. They can't stop, they'll stop and die. So no victory for the left will ever be enough. Conservatives have a problem. Every time we stop someone, let's say, on Catalan soil, which was the last resistance of the Roman legions against Attila, every time we stop them, we say, OK, OK, that's saving the civilisation. As long as there are no more, right? As long as there are no more. My book, my most recent book, called Last Stance, is about famous battles in history. And one of them is the battle of Sigetvar in Hungary, which most Americans have never heard of. It's a big event in Hungary. And at Sigetvar, a small unit of Croats and Hungarian Christians was defeated by Turkish Ottomans. I don't remember exactly, let's say Turkish Muslims, who were pushing forward. But the Turkish Muslims, you know, after the conquest of Jerusalem and Constantinople, it was the third goal of Islam to conquer Rome. Because without those three Christian cities, Hungary would lose its balance forever. So they were pushing for Rome. And they were in Hungary, where they were stopped by the Hungarians. And all the Hungarians and Christians were beaten to the last man. But the Turkish Sultan died during the battle for unknown reasons, which we don't know. As was customary with the Turks. The doctor of the Turkish Sultan was then crucified the next day. And so the mystery of the Sultan's death died with everything. The Turks, however, withdrew after that. And so the battle was called the battle that saved Christianity. And the battle that saved Western civilization. Well, a hundred years later, the Muslims were again taken to Vienna. And then a large coalition of Christians rebelled against them, which stopped them in Vienna. But they never stopped. So I have a sentence that became a part of the lexicon. They never stopped, they never gave up, and that's all. But what is their goal? I don't know. Some people just want to watch the world burn. And that has something to do with the fact that we have always seen a phenomenon among the real thinkers of communism that they are usually not poor and oppressed. They are usually sons and daughters of really wealthy families. It's always a divided class, yes. And even Marx himself in his books was a spoiled kid. He was a professional schneur. You see? And my only... The only thing that comes to mind when I look at it as a whole, is that maybe they just had so much wealth and so much extravagance that it just stopped being fun. And maybe there is some meaning that when life is not difficult you need to create difficulty. That's absolutely true. Like an old sleeve on a shirt for three generations. You need a generation that will create something. A generation that will keep it until the next generation starts to live from the accumulated wealth and then it collapses. Which is the reason why it's not popular in the conservative movement, but I'm very much for wealth. I mean the confiscation of wealth. If you didn't earn grandpa's money it wouldn't affect you. That would affect Kennedy, and all those plutocrats who don't pay any taxes directly. Because guess what? They don't have any income. You do. They don't. They live off of Joe Kennedy who was a character of organized crime and the money he made in collaboration with a man... I love and admire the theme of my book and all the saints with Owen Madden who was an Irish-New York gangster during the prohibition. He's very attached to Joe Kennedy. And all that money shouldn't be in the family. Some of it, yes, but not all of it. And when you talk about billions of dollars the only thing it does is that it creates that famous social class of over-educated vagabonds who have no other job than to make problems. Maybe that's a good way to explain it. These are wealthy people who live on social welfare. Family welfare. When you don't have to earn you can do other things and you can become a drug addict. You know, some of the British in the 19th century didn't know what to do with their wealth. So they just became so poor. And we do see it with communism. When we get into the idea of what these groups do especially the World Economic Forum and they're trying to remake humanity if you get into the writings it's very similar to what Marx talked about in Das Kapital the idea of remaking the world and the image of man. The remaking of everything not just the economic system but the re-engineering of plants and the re-engineering of human DNA. Marx got into the idea of re-engineering humanity down to the very core. And we see that they're doing it even now. Well, you know, there was this thing called the new Soviet man which was too much. It was the reversal of Christianity. That's what Marxism really is. Don't forget that Marx came from a long line of rabbis who converted to Christianity not for religious reasons but because German Jews would prosper more if they were Lutherans. So you saw that it's happening all the time. Felix Mendelssohn, his grandfather was an Orthodox Jew and he changed his religious obedience to give his children a chance at success. So Marx is on the same page. He denied his rabbinic origin but just like a lot of religious fanatics I feel like we can change the nature of man. That's where he started with his ideas about how we're born free and everything changes. That's the original text of his book and that's what it's all about. And that's what Marx is doing. And that's what Hegel is doing in Hegel's synthesis. So we're in a position where we say no, we're satisfied with how it is now. Thank you. And they say no. We have to improve you. We have to be a new Soviet man. The Chinese communist revolution did the same thing. You know, a big leap forward and social punishment imposed on the incapable. The ability to adapt is enormous and this is what happens when you cross ideological lines and religions. Conformity is always fascist. So, for example, Milton on whom I spent a lot of time because of the book and his poem Lost Paradise. He was always on the same page with the British representatives of the religion, with the representatives of the Protestants because he was incapable and dangerous for them. And that happens often in history. They're totalitarians and they want to impose their vision on you. And it's that simple. So in the West, we've always valued personal freedom. For example, the beautiful film Michael Mann, which is the last Mohican. There's a scene where a British officer who is trying to influence the colonists to join the royal service during the French and Indian wars says to the hero, Tim Bump, correctly, whose name is Daniel Day-Lewis, you call yourself an owner and a subject of the crown. And he says, I don't call myself a subject of the crown. I don't call myself a subject of the crown. That's what America is. That's what America is. Michael Walsh, again, you're looking at the book against a big reset. I guess just as a last point about you need to take a different technic conservatively. You have artistic background, maybe a different approach and more based on the idea of freedom, which you just mentioned. And it seems that freedom as such is now in danger. Freedom in every way, even the basic ability to own anything. The ability to own anything is at risk. If you had to tell people one thing, why we should care about the idea of a big reset and why you and others reveal it from a really centrist position, why should people care? Well, freedom is very important. There's a famous statement by Camilla Gibson from the heart of the century. Freedom. You know, when they attack the Brits. It was in the movie After Awakening. Now he wants freedom. In the Cate's letters, not the Roman Cate, but the British writers in the 18th century, who had a fundamental meaning for the development of our understanding of the first edition, there's a statement. And it says that if a person can't call a language his own language, he can't call anything his own. So they were talking about the importance of the freedom of speech, as Milton did in his famous essay. I want to freely publish what I want to say, and you can't censor it. Because the British London authorities censored it. So freedom used to be very, very important. And I think that, again, to the artists, when you do a research of artists throughout history, and why I chose Nerr in my final thesis against the big reset, is that they demand to do what they not only want to do, but have to do. So most people under the concept of Nerr imagine, as you know, a lot of things about tyranny, tyranny dictators, perversion. Basically, he wrote a book about it. The Lord of all, the one who burned Rome, burned Christians. All truth. But what Nerr thought he was, and this is important, he thought he was a great poet and singer. And you will recognize his genius. So he competed. He was also a sportsman. He competed in these games in Greece. Because Greece was mainly a center of education. The Roman Empire was a river-viewing country. So he went to Greece and wrote his poems and sang them. He played the lyre, not the violin. And he competed in the race for the title. And he always won. But he saw himself as an artist. That's dangerous for artists. But it's something we have to live to see things that other people don't see. They won't speak to you ideologically. They will speak to you at a certain emotional level. And that's my defense of art. But the reset wants to fall back to the ground. It wants everything to be ideological. And once you have ideological art, you have the old Soviet union. And look how much art has survived. Nothing. That's it. Thank you very much.