Hard Work Won't Save You: The TRUTH About Success in America

Andrew Yang
1 follower
What I think is dangerous about this mythology around hard work, anything is possible,
even the son or daughter of an immigrant can ascend to great wealth and success.
If it's not true, if you've been told, go to school, apply yourself, work hard,
and it's not working out for you, you're going to be furious.
People are not buying into the idea that hard work will save them.
That is the reality of it.
It is my pleasure to welcome to the podcast, the author of the brand new book, 99% Perspiration,
A New Working History of the American Way of Life, former writer for The Atlantic,
now writer for The Wall Street Journal and a whole bunch of other publications,
a very good looking man, Adam Chandler.
Welcome, Adam.
Thank you.
So Adam, the title of your book is from a famous quote from Thomas Edison,
success is 1% inspiration, 99% perspiration.
How did that set you on this path of writing this book over what I'm sure was many long months,
if I know what it takes to produce a book like this?
Yeah, over the course of a few years, I myself went through the perspiration of writing a book,
which is mostly just stress and procrastination.
But for me, the quote speaks to a quintessential American idea about hard work and how it's
central to life and how it is what will bring you success and how that's increasingly not true.
Unfortunately, when we look at statistics around opportunity and wages and
even mortality rates in this country, it has changed significantly for the negative when you
look at how the health of this country is. And so the idea that hard work is this salvation force is
for me, something that we really need to unpack. And that's pretty much what the book is about,
looking at how opportunity is central to American life in ways that is mythological.
And so I also wanted to pick a little bit on Edison because he's seen as this lone tinkering
genius. But the reality is that he had taxpayer benefits and government research and well-placed
connections and mentors and underlings helped create some of his life-altering innovations.
And that often gets left out of the story. We focus on the individual in American culture.
And as a result of that, we are not focused on making communities strong. We look at success
as an individual pursuit. And if you fail in America, it's because you didn't try hard enough.
It turns success and failure into a question of moral worth or grit as opposed to structural
obstacles. And that's a big problem. And I think it's fueling a lot of the anger that
people feel right now. Yeah, it's one reason why I was happy to read this book and interview you,
is that as you can imagine, as maybe the most prominent proponent of universal basic income,
I encountered all sorts of versions of this. And one of the things I was fond of saying when
people would be like, oh, it's socialism, I'd say, no, it's capitalism where income doesn't start at
zero. And capitalism works much better if people have money to spend. And if you make everyone a
participant, then markets get stronger. I know it was something I was glad to do in the sense of
trying to broaden people's understanding. But one of the things that's made me sad,
it's challenged me over this last number of years, is that I grew up in the 70s. I was born in 75.
And there was a fairly positive sense that, hey, if I bust my ass and work hard, things will work
out okay to great. And over the last number of years, it seems like Americans don't really buy
that anymore. And they don't buy that as much for good reason. I think you had a poll or a statistic
where a certain percentage of Americans thought that hard work would improve their lot. And then
that percentage has declined over the last 20 years. Yes, there was an economic opportunity
poll in 2002. And Pew does this every few years, where they ask people, are you getting ahead
through hard work, essentially? And in 2002, 23% of Americans said, I'm working hard, but I'm not
getting ahead. And that's a big number, but it's not that big compared to 20 years later,
when 39% of Americans just two years ago said that I'm working hard, but I'm not getting ahead.
And in a country where you're told that hard work is the thing that will get you ahead,
applying yourself and being focused in your career as a pursuit will get you the American dream,
that's a calamity. That's an existential crisis. That's a spiritual crisis. That's a social crisis.
And so that is very true. And if you look at the statistics around how the economy has grown,
since 1979, the economy has doubled in size. And workers of color and people without college
degrees are making less money now than they did in 1979. That's insane. That's a problem. That's
enormous problem. So the fact that Americans are 64% more productive, but are getting paid 17% more
in the last 40 years is something that we need to unpack because it is causing people to fall into
traps of extremism and xenophobia and all of these negative forces that we're watching unfold in real
time right now. So obviously, Thomas Edison is a part of this founding mythology, but you have
other figures in your book that kind of give rise to this work hard, get ahead. And, you know,
in all fairness, I mean, my parents immigrated to this country for that sense of opportunity.
But you have founding myths of America, you have even the way it was discovered.
Go ahead and walk us through a few of the generative figures and narratives.
Yeah, sure. Well, if you look back to, you know, the Pilgrims are these American founders in a
very broad sense of the Protestant work ethic and the idea that you view jobs as callings or
vocations. There's almost a religious quality to the work. And for them, through the frontier,
settling the West, it wasn't done because individual brawny pioneers with their taming
plows cut down forests and killed a bunch of people. It also happened because there was
government investment, because we had troops putting down rebellions and fighting the frontier
wars. We have all of these moments where opportunity has emerged and happened and
progress, if you'll call it that, and in some instances has happened because of community
investment and focus as opposed to individual grit. And those kind of stand out to me because
they're so encoded in our mythology about hard work, about individuals. And you can look at,
it's not just political figures. It's not just someone like Benjamin Franklin, who's a founding
father, who came from nothing and has a great story about becoming a wealthy person, but
did it in the context of a country where slavery was everywhere. That was not something that he did
on his own. The country didn't boom as a result of that. And he, as a publisher, profited from
posting about enslaved people who'd run away. He profited from that because he lived in the
Northeast where cotton went North and fueled the textile mills. So going back throughout history,
there are all these stories of individual aspiration that, again, was caused and turned
into success only because of economic forces and lucky breaks and privilege. And it's not a bad
thing to reckon with that. It's not a bad thing to admit that we're a work in progress. And the
idea that we were always united around this American idea that the founders all magically
agreed on everything is a bad lesson for us to teach people. We worked through compromise.
You're in New York right now, which was a loyalist hotbed during the Revolutionary War.
They all just wanted to remain English. And elsewhere in the country, there were people who
wanted to break free. And there were other people who didn't want anything else to do with
what was going on with the revolution. And we all worked together eventually to form a system of
government. The Articles of Confederation failed. We had to form another one. But it's all a work
in progress. So there's never been this idealized time where everything has worked. And that's such
a big part of the story that we miss. And it's a better story than all of us just worked hard
and America was built. It was, no, we compromised and we found ways to work together. The Pilgrims
needed the indigenous tribes around them to teach them to farm and fish. So there's so much in all
these stories that I try to get into in the book that kind of lay out a clearer way for us to look
at success and opportunity over the years. Hello, YouTube, please do hit that like and
subscribe button. And don't forget, you can ask questions at mailbag at andrewyang.com.
See you on the interwebs. This podcast is sponsored by ExpressVPN. How did you choose
which internet service provider to use? The sad thing is most of us didn't have much of a choice
because ISPs operate a lot like monopolies in the regions that they serve. They then use this
monopoly position to take advantage of customers. And yes, they even sell your data, your activities
to advertisers and big tech companies, and you don't see a dime. That's why I protect my internet
surfing and devices with ExpressVPN. When you use ExpressVPN, it's like a magic portal to a perfectly
safe and anonymous internet. And don't take my word for it. This is the number one VPN service,
according to CNET. It's used by major companies all over the world. So stop handing over your
personal data to ISPs and other tech companies to then mine your activity and sell off your
information. Protect yourself with a VPN I trust to keep my privacy online. Visit expressvpn.com
slash yang. That's expressvpn.com slash yang to get three extra months free. Go to expressvpn.com
slash yang right now to learn more. Hey, I'll give you the example from today, where you have AI
that's generating billions and billions of dollars worth of value on the backs of data that we all
produced or are part of our data is getting sold and resold for hundreds of billions of dollars a
year. And we're not seeing a dime of it, but there are a number of companies that are becoming
incredibly wealthy. And so, you know, like that, that's the biggest example where it's like,
hey, that person's a billionaire, but they're a billionaire because of all of our data
in many cases. And it's like, did that person work hard? It's like, sure. I remember that there was
a moment on the debate stage where Mike Bloomberg was asked like, Hey, you're worth $70 billion.
Like, do you think that you should be worth that much? And he was like, I worked really hard for
that money. And part of me, I was like, you kind of grown to that moment because you're like, oh,
like, I mean, you probably did work very hard for that money. But then there's like some
janitor who's working hard to that is not making any way. It's like it's not like industry,
you know, correlated to the wealth. I mean, I think that's one of the arguments that you make
in the book. I will speak to. And one of the reasons why I enjoyed the book is that I was
included in it. You did interview me for this book. I did show up. I you know, so by the way,
I've shown up in a number of books. And like when I show up in a number of books, I always I'm like,
oh, snap, like there I am. You know, I wonder how I'll appear as a figure character in this book.
But one of the points you make about me and my presidential campaign is that I'm the child of
immigrants. And I had some success, but I did not run on the like, hey, America is a great place.
Like, you know, you know, like, look, I'm successful. You can be successful, too.
Like I read on something of the opposite case, which was is coming. You're fucked. We're all
fucked. You know, it's time to implement something much bigger and broader. And I dare say that that
one reason why you had an interest in interviewing me is because like that argument
kind of recurs in your book. Absolutely. Yeah. I appreciated I appreciated that aspect of your
campaign because people are not buying into the idea that hard work will save them. That is that
is the reality of it. People aren't they're not buying it anymore, especially younger people who
are inheriting this terrible planet and this terrible economy. You know, you're a few years
older than me. I graduated from college into the Great Recession where I just kind of watched
everything get hollowed out. And, you know, what I think is dangerous about this myth,
mythology around hard work, anything is possible, even, you know, even the son or daughter of an
immigrant can ascend to great wealth and success is that if it's not true, you are frustrated and
you're furious about it, because if you're doing everything right, if you've been told, go to
school, apply yourself, work hard and it's not working out for you, you're going to be furious.
You're going to be furious at institutions. You're going to be furious at at at, you know, at media,
at expertise, at policies. And you're going to be open to all of those negative forces we were
talking about before. And so what I appreciated about your campaign is is that you were able to
say, listen, we need to protect people against what's coming and what's already here in a lot
of instances to make sure that they can leave, you know, live a normal life or have some measure
of success and some measure of protection. And that's really what what I think is guiding a lot
of the the rage and frustration right now is that during the pandemic in the early days of the
pandemic, we had this moment with the, you know, extended child tax credit and a lot of the pandemic
protections that gave us a measure of safety that is normal in all the countries that we compare
ourselves to. But for us felt extraordinary. Right. And then it all went away. We couldn't
extend the child tax credit because Joe Manchin apparently said that people are going to use the
money, parents going to use the money to buy drugs or that we couldn't have paid family leave because
they're going to use the time off to go hunting. Like it's the most ridiculous ---- in the world.
So what are we supposed to do with that? How do we how do we process this information and how do we
you know, you talk about feedback mechanisms in the book, which I think is really interesting.
How do we actually solve what's wrong with us if we can't have honest conversations about where we
are? Yeah, the child tax credit was the greatest thing we did in recent memory. And the fact that
we undid it so quickly breaks my heart. I mean, it shows just how inchoate and irrational our
policy has become, because all the data said that it had child poverty and it all went to
clothing and books and food and fuel and kids started learning better. And in the scheme of
what we're spending, like this was a no brainer. And when it was removed, I thought to myself,
I remember this vividly, it was January 15th of 22, where it stopped happening. And I waited to
see whether there would be any outcry or protests or anything. And there was nothing. Because if
you're working poor, and we take away the lifeline, then you just go back to being really poor. And
you don't exactly have a lot of bandwidth or time to figure out, you know, how to organize or any of
that. It's, it's bleak, like that stuff makes me super sad and frustrated. So where I want to go
with you on this, and so that this is, here are a couple of things I think on this, it's one reason
I'm so glad to have this conversation. I consider myself a pretty hardworking person. I think hard
work is good. And I used to make some Asian jokes about on the trail sometimes, whereas like some
people thought I like didn't want anyone to work. It's like, I love work. I like hard work. Now I
have a fortunate position where the you know, the work I'm doing is quite white collar or whatnot.
You know, it's like, it's like, not not as difficult and arduous as a lot of work other
people do. I do not think that my success, you know, is something that even though in the scheme
of things, I mean, you know, I will say it's not like I had, like tons of nepotism going on in my
life or anything like that. I genuinely did it. But but but still, they're like so many things
that went into it, including happenstance, including the fact that in my case, it was that
the founder of a company wanted to start a charter school for underprivileged kids, and so enlisted
me to be the incoming CEO. And if he is just a greedier person, then that opportunity never
arises. So you know, like, I've always had, I think, some context for anything I've accomplished,
or, you know, when we talk about the presidential campaign, it's like, hey,
I worked very hard, but I would give most of the credit to the Americans who actually decided to
get behind me. I would like donate 20 bucks. I mean, it's like, that wasn't me, it was
very much other people. So the the tough part is that, and you referenced young people,
if a young person says like, Oh, man, like, my hard work doesn't make a difference. So I might
as well stop trying. Like that, that stuff also breaks my heart. It's like, look, you should be
trying really hard, even though I'm not going to bullshit you and say like,
you're trying really hard means that you're going to accomplish, you know, all of your goals that,
you know, or the rest of it. But we still need you to be positive and work on whatever it is,
whether it's, you know, like, something in your community or an artistic endeavor or at your job,
or whatever. It's like a both and or a nuanced thing. It's like, I do not think that hard work
is going to be the path to accomplishing your dreams, as much as we've been selling it.
But we still need folks to act like them showing up and working hard will be at least helpful
toward increasing their chances. Yeah, absolutely. And, you know, these are all these are all really
important points, I think, because, yeah, the alternative, the alternative of having people
completely disengaged is, is disastrous. And we're seeing in a lot of instances. But part of
what I what I'd add to that is, businesses would benefit if they invested in people,
the studies that they do about attrition and turnover at big companies and small companies,
will blow your mind that over a trillion dollars each year in profit is lost in American in America
alone, from people leaving their jobs, because they can't make their lives work, or they're
burnt out. And if you if you took a trillion with a T, if you invested that money into making life
sustainable, and and having people take time off and have lives outside of work, you could still
work hard, you would find people would be more productive, more creative, loyal to their companies,
if they were able to have better separation, it's, it's a boon to innovation, it's a boon to
the economy, it makes us more durable and more dynamic as a country to invest in workers. And
that is really what I think is missing from the from the conversation. It's, if you pay people
more, it's not that people are entitled or don't want to work, it's that they want it all to work,
they want people in this country do love to work, it's embedded in our in our DNA, in ways that it's
not in other countries. I go to France in this book. And one of the things that really stands
out to me is when you go to a museum in France, and tons of cultural institutions, there's on the
admissions board of a, you know, ticket counters, it says, if you're a job seeker, you're unemployed,
there's a lower rate of admission, you pay less. Can you imagine that in the States where if you
are employed, you could walk and get out of here. And you they want you to have a life outside of
work, even if you don't have a job. That is that is a cultural norm in other places that I think
is so meaningful, that we could never fathom introducing here, even though it just sends a
message that there's more to life than work. And I think that that would make work seem less daunting
and terrible to people if it wasn't so all encompassing. This podcast is sponsored by
Helix Sleep. I've been a mattress guy ever since I can remember ever since I started working out,
honestly, because I thought to myself, you know what, you're going to do something ideally eight
hours a day to try and do it right. I've been partnering with Helix Sleep for several years,
ever since they sent me a Dawn Firm mattress that was identified via personalized sleep quiz,
because I knew I needed extra support. And it's been exactly what I was looking for. I wake up
healthier, recharged, more energized. And for some reason, it's my kids' favorite mattress
in the whole house, even though it was not made with them in mind. I've had numerous friends
buy Helix Sleep mattresses at my recommendation. And they say it's exactly what they're looking
for too. Don't take my word for it. It's the number one mattress recommendation of GQ,
Wired, my kids, the list goes on and on. Go to helixsleep.com slash yang for 27% off sitewide,
plus two free dream pillows with mattress purchase. Again, that's helixsleep.com slash
yang for 27% off sitewide, plus two free dream pillows with a mattress purchase.
helixsleep.com slash yang with Helix, better sleep starts now. Yeah, you cite various studies about
how Americans see their work and career as more a fundamental part of their identity than other
cultures do. And it is true, even though I tried not to do this. But when you meet someone in
America, one of the questions out of your mouth eventually is like, oh, so what do you do?
And yeah, it is a deeply American phenomenon. You should know too that I randomly watched some
Emily in Paris episodes. So I understood your references. There's a chunk of a chapter on
Emily in Paris. And it was fascinating how they made Emily this scrappy, super workaholic type.
And then the French around her like, oh, like, well, you know, why are you working so hard?
Right, right. And then, you know, you can look at that. It was funny. It was funny about watching
that shows. I'm writing a book about work. And then this this amazing show comes on. And it's
not amazing in that it's the best made, most brilliant show. But it really, it really it
only works because you have an American culture that is notorious for being so careerist. And
you have a French culture that is so notorious for being about leisure and time off. And it
makes for good comedy. My wife disagrees with me. She wouldn't watch the show. She'd walk out
of the room any time that we would watch it. I would turn it on. It's usually the opposite, Adam.
Geez, man. I know. And her name is Emily. So we go to Paris and I'm on an Emily in Paris tour
because I want to hear, you know, about the show's interaction with, you know, French culture. And
she she very kindly and politely says, I'm not going with you. Have a great time. But what I
love about this also is when you look at French culture and again, they have a 35 hour workweek
with tons of loopholes in it. It's not it's not bulletproof and it isn't like solving all the
problems. Neither is the right to disconnect where you don't have to respond to work emails or slacks
or text messages after certain hours. None of these are perfect things that make life perfect
or, you know, more productive or, I guess, successful in France, the way that you would
hope them to. But they create boundaries and in social and cultural norms that we could stand to
benefit from if we thought about it, because French people are living longer than us. They
have their five years longer life expectancy. They have an hour more of sleep than us. They
have an hour more for leisure every single day. They work hundreds of hours less than us.
And all of these things add up to a life that I think a lot of us are missing out on. And it's
again, it's robbing. It's making us lonely and it's making us angry. And I think learning from
that is is important just to see what other places are doing, even though France is a very extreme
example of it. They're still very productive. They're one of the top top 10 countries in
productivity just behind us. So it's not as if they're not working hard. They just have these
boundaries that studies show make them more creative and more productive ultimately to have
these breaks kind of etched into their day and time away from the office. And again, not the
utopia, but ideas that we could we could stand to look at without sneering at them for being,
oh, these lazy French. Well, the U.S. is certainly somewhat pathologically industrious.
And one of the reasons why I was for a four day work week was because of studies that have shown
that you can get just about the same thing done or more in some cases, but also just experience.
It's that, you know, work just kind of expands or gets compressed based on the schedule. I mean,
if you give me four days to get it done, I'll get it done in four days. You give me five days to get
it done to get it done in five days. You know, I would. Yeah. What I love about that also is
there's not a perform when you when you condense the time, it takes out the performative aspect
of work. This is something in Denmark's another example where if you are at the office at seven
o'clock at night or 11 p.m. at night, cranking out a long day, it doesn't make you seem loyal or
like you're committed to the cause. It makes people wonder, are we understaffed? Is there
some kind of inefficiency here? What's wrong with this company that somebody is working this late?
It's a problem. It's not honorable. It's a it's an issue. And for us, this work theater
and this sort of performative staying late and devotion to cause is part of how we prove that
we're getting ahead. But again, if we condense the time, we would still get the work done and
we're not judging the work based on whether it's actually good. It's all these other
sort of ancillary things like, oh, the person shows up later, goes to all the happy hours.
There's this great onion headline that's, you know, most incompetent worker
shines at the office holiday party once again. You know, it's it really stands out how the things
that have nothing to do with work, but the performance of work matter here in ways that
other places kind of don't adopt or don't don't buy into. Hey, all, if you know me, you know,
I'm not that handy in the kitchen. And I have become a huge believer and booster of factor
factors, delicious, ready to eat meals, make eating a joy. It's so fast. You just pop that
thing two minutes later and you are eating a restaurant quality, healthy meal, making you
feel excellent about yourself. My favorite is the turkey chili with zucchini. And there is so much
more to choose from. You never get tired of it. It fits any budget. It's fast, healthy. It is going
to be the new factor in your life. Yes, I'm a fan. Head to factor meals dot com slash Yang 50 and use
code Yang 50 to get 50 percent off your first box and two free wellness shots per box while
subscription is active. That's code Yang 50 at factor meals dot com slash Yang 50 to get 50 percent
off your first box. Get factor today. It's going to change the way you eat. So your book in many
ways is arguing for like a different work culture, a lot of policy measures that you're and you don't
like come out and be like, hey, we should do this, this and this. But there's certainly a suggestion
that that like America maybe should be approaching some of these problems a little bit differently,
most all of which, by the way, I agree with. And so it does seem, though, that neither our
culture nor our policy are trending in that direction. It seems that we're heading more.
And this is something I think a lot about. So check it out. I run for president and I'm like,
look, guys, is coming. We should think bigger. We should have like a better, more abundant approach.
We can afford a thousand bucks a month a person. By the way, now GDP is going gone up even since
four or five years ago where it's now approaching eighty thousand ahead. So if your GDP is eighty
thousand ahead, you probably can afford like an income floor of a thousand bucks a month.
And even when I was running, there was a better attitude towards some people being like, huh,
yeah, that makes sense. Like, let's maybe do that. And then I think today there is like this,
like the anger you're talking about is already taken hold where there's like this negativity.
And I'm going to use Elon as an example. Like, you know, four years ago, Elon endorsed me. He was
much less political. And I joke now that if he was in Iowa giving away a million dollars on my behalf,
I might have done a lot better. I mean, in his case, he was at the time very technocratic
in the move. I was like, oh, I like him, but he wasn't like, you know. And then now,
you know, he obviously campaigned very hard for Trump and moved a lot of resources in that
direction where like four or five years ago, like the tech folks in Silicon Valley were very,
very open to a positive, expansive solution in the form of universal basic income.
And then today there's like this anger about how, you know, much crap they've had to deal with.
And the approach is different. I think we're in like a nastier general frame of mind in part
because of COVID. I think COVID ended up accelerating institutional distrust in various
ways. And so now I'm still working on trying to make these good things happen, including reviving
the enhanced child tax credit, which, you know, you referenced in the book very heavily. What do
you see as the path forward? Like, how can we, if you believe what your book seems to very strongly
suggest you believe, which is that like we should try and evolve, what does that path look like in
your mind? And what is the feedback you've gotten even in, you know, the book events you've done
thus far? That's a great question. I obviously think that UBI or even just the negative income
tax where, which is much cheaper than a UBI, where if you are at poverty line or below,
they raise your income up to through a negative tax income tax to 150% above the poverty line.
And that's a couple hundred million dollars. You eradicate poverty. That's doable. Like,
why not? Why not do this thing that would just stabilize the most vulnerable people in this
country? Amen. Yeah, I love negative income tax. So that's, you know, that's a simpler,
more measured approach than a UBI, even though I think we need UBI. And I think the,
I think the payback that we would get in innovation, in people not having to cluster in
cities, expensive cities for jobs. We could have all of these different places,
all of these innovation hubs and, you know, brand new centers of growing exploration and
the tinkering that we used to love, the garage narrative would come back. You know, there's,
there's a program, I'm going to Tulsa next week to speak. And they have this great remote Tulsa
program where a philanthropist is basically bribing people to come work in Tulsa for a year,
$10,000, no strings attached. And it's working because people are interested in seeing if they
can make their lives work in a new place with a little boost. And that's, again, another example
of something that is, is really working to undo the narratives. It's, it's, it's reframing all
these things, traveling around the country. So I'm from Texas. I grew up in Texas. I live in New York.
I traveled all around the country for this book. And if you've got a lot of people together from
places like Texas and New York to have a conversation about ambition and aspiration
and opportunity, there would be so much overlap. That is one of the biggest problems that I think
we have is that we live in a country where people are kind and caring and our chosen policies are
not kind or caring, but on a basic level, people tend to agree about a lot of things. We're just
kind of, it's hard to talk about what a basic common sense solution would be when someone's
talking about annexing Greenland or renaming the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America. There's,
there are all these distractions and all these, you know, bits of subterfuge that get in the way
of us having reasonable, rational conversations where there is so much overlap and agreement. And
I think national service is something that I bring up as, you know, as a potential solution
for the future, but it can work in the here and now. If you bring old and young, rural and urban,
wealthy and poor together in all of these ways with all of these benefits, you would see the
social cohesion return that I think we very badly need. We live in these very polarized environments,
not just politically, but economically. There's fascinating studies about how you could live
30 years ago in a neighborhood where people were lower income and higher income and they
still went to the same schools and they played, you know, hockey on the same street or whatever
it was. And now that separation exists in all the neighborhoods, politically and economically.
And in our basic experiences, boarding an airplane, going to a baseball game,
there are all these red, you know, red velvet ropes and VIPs that separate us from having
interactions with people that are different than us in ways that are troublesome. The third places
where we used to congregate and gather have gone because we're either working too much or
we have these other things that are occupying our time and energy that are keeping us from
interacting with people. So just talking to people will make a huge difference because
shatters your expectations of what people are and who they are and what they're going through.
So it's a little Pollyannish, but you know, I live in New York as well. And I was just asking
a Lyft driver the other day about congestion pricing and how it's affecting his life. You
know, we just instituted this ostensibly good thing to make people hopefully use their cars less.
And if you are a driver, every time you go in and out of a congestion zone,
you get charged $9. And apparently not everyone is getting that money back. If you're a driver,
that's a huge problem. But there, I would never know that unless I had a conversation with someone
about those kinds of things. I always would love, I was a bartender for a lot of years. And so
talking to different people and hearing the stories about what it means to work sick,
you know, if you don't have paid sick leave, or your rent is due is something that everyone goes
through in the hospitality industry. 25% of our workforce has a disability. And that's very
complicated. That is something that again, we don't have real meaningful conversations about
because we're not having real meaningful conversations about a lot of things. So
this is part of what I appreciate about your approach to politics and policy is that it
encourages thinking that transcends party affiliation, because it's the only way we're
going to get out of this mess. Oh, I certainly agree with you there. And, you know, my first
job was as a busboy at a Chinese restaurant, the Imperial Walk. And I still try and tip well as a
result. Because there were a lot of people that were better at that job than I was. They used to
make fun of like how when the when the bowls and plates came out of the steamer, it was too hot for
me to handle. I had like the those, you know, like the Chinese restaurant napkins I was using
to handle and they were like scoffing at me just because their hands I guess were very calloused
and heat resistant in a way that my soft suburban hands were not. So I certainly appreciate
the fact that, again, there are a lot of people are working very, very hard in circumstances that
are not giving them sick days or any of that jazz. Like none of the people I work with at that
restaurant, I don't think got a single sick day. We just all did our thing. But in my case, I was
a teenager trying to make some extra pocket money. But I got to say, the experience does stick with
you. Adam, congratulations to you on this book. I think you're you're kickstarting and continuing a
conversation that America really would benefit from a great deal. It's 99 percent perspiration,
a new working history of the American way of life. And if people want to follow you,
I think you have some events even like there's a book tour going on. How can they keep up with you
and your work in addition to grabbing this book? Well, I'm trying to spend much less time on X for
obvious reasons. But Adam Chandler dot com is a great place to keep up with my work. And
my last book was about fast food. So I have a newsletter called The Crunch Wrap that, again,
I sort of use as a as a way to tell people what I'm up to. But I'm you know, I'm so grateful for
your for your time and for the work that you do, because it is like I knew going into this that
this would be and I mentioned this before, a different kind of conversation that I than I
normally have when I'm talking about work and opportunity and how hard work can be meaningful
and good. And that's, again, surprising in a lot of ways. But so thank you very much for
taking the time and for reading the book and for letting me interview you for it,
because you really add an important element of how ridiculous some of the disparities are.
We have to get there, Adam. I'm still working on it. And you are, too. You know,
we need more and more people to see what your book says and say, hey, guys, you know, like,
this isn't working so hard for a whole lot of us. And maybe it's not because we're somehow
of weak morals or lazy, like maybe we're being set up.
Maybe this structure is good use of modernization and evolution.
Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, thank you again. I really I'm really grateful for your time.
