You Will NEVER Own a Home... | US Housing Crisis

America Uncovered
1.1K followers
226 Video Views·Nov 13, 2025
Leave a 🇺🇸 in the comments FOR THE ALGORITHM!
The housing crisis is CRUSHING the American Dream. Trump has put forward some controversial solutions, like a 50 year mortgage, but what CAN we do to fix this train wreck?
Join our fight to expose what powerful people want to keep covered up—regardless of political affiliation: http://americauncovered.tv
SOCIAL:
Facebook...► https://facebook.com/America-Uncovered-1819821761677650/
Instagram..► https://instagram.com/americauncovered
Twitter........► https://twitter.com/USUncovered
OTHER CHANNELS:
China Uncensored ..► https://www.youtube.com/c/ChinaUncensored
China Unscripted ....► https://www.youtube.com/c/ChinaUnscripted
Gamers Unbeaten...► https://www.youtube.com/@gamersunbeaten
The housing crisis is crushing the
American dream. Trump has put forward
some controversial solutions, but what
can we do to fix this train wreck?
Welcome to America Uncovered. I'm Chris
Chapel. Before we begin, be sure to
leave a comment below with the American
flag emoji to show YouTube's algorithm
that we've got engagement. And while
you're down there, make sure you're
still subscribed. So, as you're probably
aware, affordability has been one of
America's top concerns since, well,
since as long as I've been alive, but
economic anxiety rocketed Trump to
success in 2024 and gave Democrats the
edge in last week's elections. In the
immortal words of Democratic strategist
and LSU superfan James Carville,
>> "It's the economy, stupid."
>> And chief among these economic concerns
is the cost of housing. To put it
bluntly, the situation is pretty bad,
particularly for young families who need
housing the most. According to the
Apollo Academy, the average age of a
home buyer today is 56.
Compare that to 1981 when the average
age was only 31. And baby boomers hold
the top spot in terms of home buyers,
despite most being well into their
retirement years. As a matter of fact,
for 2025, boomers accounts for 42% of
all home buyers compared to millennials
who account for less than a third.
Zoomers are even worse off and could be
stuck waiting until their 40s until they
can buy a home. So, what can actually be
done to address the housing crisis?
Well,
one idea that's been getting a lot of
play is Trump's proposal to create a
50-year home mortgage. Somewhere Dave
Ramsey is crying. On Truth Social, the
president posted this image comparing
the proposal to FDR's introduction of
the 30-year mortgage. This would
technically allow more people to jump on
the property ladder since the initial
costs would be lower. But let's just
think about this for a second. If you
take out a home loan at 30, you'll be
done paying it off when you're 80 in a
country where the average life
expectancy is only 78. Okay, so that's
more like a lifetime rental. I suppose
you could transfer your mortgage to your
next of kin. In that case, it's less of
a rental and more like a
multi-generational loan parents take out
that children need to continue paying
on. Plus, the lifetime costs of owning a
home would be way, way higher. I'm
talking an extra $400,000.
So, this plan has some serious
drawbacks. Even among Trump's
supporters, the fallout from the plan
has been harsh. It's a bad look. But who
even gave Trump this weird idea in the
first place? Well, it seems to have
originated with the director of the
Federal Housing Finance Agency, Bill Py.
And he's catching hell for it. According
to Politico, the White House is furious
with PY with insiders telling reporters
Bill Py doesn't know the first thing
about how the mortgage markets operate.
and that after publicly humiliating the
president with his moronic 50-year
mortgage plan, it's safe to assume that
his days are numbered. Ah, better luck
next time, Bill. But, okay, the 50-year
loan thing is a non-starter. Instead,
the administration needs to focus on the
systemic causes of the housing crisis.
Simply put, there's too much demand and
too little supply, hence the increasing
costs. Now, you could try decreasing
demand, thus bringing it more in line
with the supply side, but that means
having more people just give up on
buying homes altogether. Whether that
means renting or living with their
parents or just being homeless. And I
got to say, that's a pretty good plan if
you want a communist revolution. At that
point, you'd be better off suggesting a
modest proposal to deal with all the
boomers eating up America's housing
supply. All my Jonathan Swift heads out
there will know what I'm talking about.
But maybe there's another way. As one
senior economist puts it, as a country,
the mortgage term is not what we should
be worried about. We should be focused
on building more supply. Okay, so the
solution is to just build more houses.
But as any Victoria 2 player will tell
you, capitalist countries aren't really
in the habit of plopping down government
commie blocks. The last time the
government built anything on this scale
was in the period right after World War
II when the Army Corps of Engineers
helped build America's vast suburban
sprawl for returning GIS. By the 1960s,
these sorts of projects pretty much
ceased to exist. Nowadays, the
government relies on more indirect
methods to spur on new construction via
the private sector. One such method is
to open up federal land for private
development. Back in March, the
Department of the Interior and the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development created a joint task force
to identify federal land suitable for
development and to hand it over to local
authorities at a reduced cost. These
agencies also plan to cut red tape to
make it easier to build. Think
environmental regulation, zoning laws,
and the maze of paperwork needed to
classify and finance new projects.
Speaking of financing, the big beautiful
bill, which passed earlier this year,
doubled the amount of lowincome housing
tax credits given to Fanny May and
Freddy Mack to the tune of $4 billion a
year. Rather than subsidizing home
buyers, that money will go straight into
building new homes and add real supply
to the market. And finally, you have
energy. Cheap energy is kind of like
Chili Crisp. It can make pretty much
anything taste better. eggs, pizza, ice
cream. Likewise, cheaper energy doesn't
just mean cheaper gas. It means cheaper
cement, steel, and transport, which also
means cheaper homes. That's one big
reason why the government has made a
massive push in the energy sector from
offshore oil to coal to a multibillion
dollar deal with Japan to rebuild
America's nuclear sector. With all these
factors, the administration hopes it can
push that supply curve and make home
ownership more affordable again.
Otherwise, Americans may have to
consider some more Swiftian proposals.
But what do you think? Leave a comment
below and be sure to head over to
americanover.tv.
That's where you'll always get updates
on our recent episodes, access to
exclusive deep dives, and a chance to
talk with me and the team. That's
america.tv.
Just click this button. Once again, I'm
Chris Chapel. Thank you for watching
America Uncovered.
