C1 Schreiben_ So meisterst du den schriftlichen Ausdruck (Aufbau _ Tipps) #2 #telcc1

Welcome to a new video on the written expression on C1 level. Today we are dealing with an exciting and controversial topic, the parental right to choose, i.e. the question of whether parents may choose for their children in addition. This topic is perfect for the C1 textbook, because it can be viewed from different perspectives. In the exam, the task is roughly like this. In a seminar, you should explain the topic So you should find arguments for and against it, name examples and in the end show your own point of view convincingly. In the task you will often find two quotes that give you a direction. I have easily rephrased them for you so that you can use them as inspiration. Quote 1, pro This could lead to more consideration for children and a more family-friendly society. Quote 2, contra These two statements clearly show the two sides of the issue. The introduction should briefly introduce the topic and show why it is currently relevant. In a democracy, every adult has the right to choose. But again and again it is discussed whether children and adolescents should also be politically represented by their parents. The idea of ​​parental right to choose raises exciting questions about equality, responsibility and justice. So you have the reader directly on the subject. Clear, precise and neutral. Let's start with the arguments for parental right to choose. 1, more weight for family interests Parents know what their children need. They experience daily how political decisions influence family life. An additional right to choose could lead to 2, demographic balance In many countries the population gets older while young people are politically underrepresented. A parental right to choose would ensure that the future of the younger generation is also taken into account. 3, strengthening of family consciousness If parents know that they also vote in the name of their children, they could deal more intensively with social issues. This promotes responsibility and solidarity. On the other hand, there are also weighty counter-arguments. 1, injustice between families and children. Parents would have more votes than other citizens. This contradicts the principle that every vote is equally valuable. 2, danger of distortion Not all parents act in the interest of their children. Some would vote for selfish or party-political reasons and not in the interest of the younger generation. 3, complexity in implementation It would be difficult to control who is allowed to vote for how many children and whether abuse can be excluded. In the end, you formulate your own opinion clearly and reflectively. In my opinion, parental right to choose is an interesting idea that would be difficult to implement in practice. While the interests of children should be taken into account in politics, other solutions are needed. For example, more participation for young people or a targeted family policy. A fair election system should treat all people equally, regardless of whether they are parents or not. Finally, a few tips for your exam. Use clear structure. Introduction, main part, end. Pay attention to connections like on the one hand, on the other hand, also, consequently, nevertheless. Show differentiated thoughts. Not just opinion, but justification. Use appropriate vocabulary. Zanzibar election law, equality, political participation, representation, civil rights. Central nouns, the right to vote, political participation, representation, political representation, the vote, the additional vote, the demographic imbalance, the distortion of the election, the distorted election result, equality, family policy, generational justice, the conflict of interests, the election participation, the legal implementation, take into account verbs for argumentation, take into account the needs of politics, represent, politics represents young people, distort, a parent election law could distort results, influence, it influences political decisions, weights, voices are weighted differently, prefer, disadvantage, a group could implement, avoid abuse, prevent abuse, decide in the name of, answer, parents must answer their decision. Adjectives to typical C1 expressions, family-oriented, family-friendly, democratically legitimized, constitutionally problematic, socially relevant, politically underrepresented, Useful phrases. A central argument is that from a democratic theoretical point of view it is to be considered that this would inevitably lead to the question of whether advocates argue that opponents warn against that a parent election law could bring advantages at the same time. Overall, the question is whether such a model is compatible with the principle of equality. If this video helped you, I am very happy about a like. This way you support my work and help other learners to find the video as well. Feel free to write me in the comments. Should parents be allowed to vote for their children? Yes or no? I am looking forward to your opinions. And if you don't want to miss any more C1 writing videos, subscribe to the channel and activate the bell. Thank you for watching. See you in the next video.