In the aftermath of the deadly shooting in Washington, President Trump announced new anti immigration policy proposals.
On Friday, the State Department ordered a hold on issuing visas to Afghan passport holders and the U.S. has paused all asylum applications.
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) also announced a review of applicants from 19 high risk countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, and Cuba.
NTD spoke with Jessica Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigration Studies for more. -- 📺 Watch NTD News 24/7 on cable, broadcast, and streaming: https://www.ntd.com/watch
Welcome back. I'm Tiffany Meyer. In the
aftermath of the deadly shooting in DC,
President Trump announcing new
anti-immigration policy proposals on
Friday. The State Department ordered a
hold on issuing visas to Afghan passport
holders. And the US has paused all
asylum applications. The USCIS also
announced a review of applicants from 19
high-risk countries, including
Afghanistan, Iran, and Cuba. Joining us
to unpack all of this is Jessica Vaughn,
director of policy studies at the Center
for Immigration Studies. Jessica, thank
you so much for joining us. Great to
have you. Now, President Trump vowing in
a long truth post in part to remove
those deemed not a net asset to the
United States or incapable of loving the
country, adding only reverse migration
can fully cure this situation. First,
how would that work in practice?
Well, um, what the president is talking
about is a strategically targeted review
of certain types of categories of people
who were allowed to enter the country
under the Biden administration under
what we know were very lenient vetting
standards. And it's targeted um toward
first of all people from Afghanistan who
were evacuated in a in a very chaotic
way. Um it's also people who were
granted asylum because there are
concerns that um some of those approvals
um perhaps were not done correctly. Uh
that not enough time was taken to make
sure that they qualified and that they
were not a risk. and also to um to
examine more thoroughly applicants from
about 19 countries that are deemed to be
of potentially more risk than other
countries uh because of conditions in
those countries, connections to
terrorism, and frankly problems that we
have had recently from the very large
increase in immigration that occurred
under the Biden administration.
And expanding on that, along with the
enhanced screening and the pause in
asylum cases, how big of a policy shift
would this be if it is all implemented?
Well, it's a dramatic shift from the
policies of the Biden administration,
but what the Trump administration is
doing is really applying the law and
trying to meet the increased challenge
that we have now from threats around the
world and to mitigate um the problems
that were created under the overly
lenient policies of the Biden
administration in which we saw saw
historic increases in illegal
immigration. I mean, there were more
than 8 million people who were allowed
to enter the country who came in
illegally or were admitted uh even
though they did not qualify for legal
immigration. So that's, you know, and
they were not really thoroughly vetted
as we're finding out unfortunately now
um particularly from Afghanistan. So
this is really a um a correction that is
being implemented. It's it's um it's
it's really a very prudent change in
policy from before, but it's really
nothing new for the Trump
administration.
>> And Jessica, in terms of the Afghan
pause and vetting, some advocacy groups
are now raising concerns that Lacon Wall
is painting all Afghans in a negative
light, pointing to the help many Afghans
provided in the war against terror. What
is your response to that?
Well, look, uh, there have been some
very serious problems that have been
uncovered by both congressional and, uh,
government investigations into Operation
Allies. Welcome.
um because of uh the um discovery that
the Biden administration
chose to not do all of the background
checks on people that would be typical
uh under a refugee program or under the
special immigrant visa program. And um
at one point they had found almost 7,000
people who ha had derogatory
information. and they're finding this
out after they've been allowed to enter
the United States. And so, um, you know,
we and we've seen so many incidents from
people who came in under the Afghan
evacuation who've been causing problems,
either terrorist plots or criminal
problems or other sorts of problems
that, you know, we need to deal with. We
cannot just um sweep this under the rug.
It It's too important to keep Americans
safe. We've got to address and
re-evaluate all of these cases.
>> And really quickly on that, given that
these people are already in the country,
how hard will it be to vet all of them
now?
>> Well, it's not easy. Um, but since
they've been living here, we we can
examine what they've been doing since
they got here. Um we are not really
going to be able to do much of you know
find out much about what they were doing
in Afghanistan but um at least we will
be taking more time to see how things
have developed since they arrived here
and many of the people will probably
pass this vetting but uh some of them
will not. I think the lesson here is
that certain populations in the world
are higher risk than others and we need
to adjust our systems to account for
that. We cannot just think that we can
wave people in by tens of thousands you
know in a very hurried manner uh from a
place that was at war with many people
um you know expressing hatred for our
country. We can't expect that, you know,
we can do that without certain problems
happening.
>> And zooming out a bit here, President
Trump has been calling for tougher
immigration enforcement since
inauguration day, but he's also voiced
support for, say, H-1B visas. So, how do
you see all of this playing out?
>> Well, the president has expressed
support for skilled immigration. These
are people who have been identified by
employers who that you know have skills
that they want to have uh available to
them in this country for on a temporary
basis and if they work out then they can
potentially be on a path to citizenship.
But um this doesn't affect the need to
do proper vetting. I'm I'm sure the
president would agree that you know we
have to vet all applicants. We have to
do a better job of it and we cannot
simply um wave in very large numbers of
people. And there are concerns about
labor market impacts as well as national
security risks of of huge immigration
programs. We can do a better job at
making sure these visa programs are
serving our national interest and not
harming Americans. I think the president
recognizes that. He wants to show that
he is not against immigration, but it
has to be immigration that benefits our
country.
>> A lot at stake for sure here. Jessica
Vaughn, thank you so much for joining
us.
>> Thank you.