Chairman Aguilar on ABC News Live

House Democrats
164 followers
Jan 7, 2026
House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, and former member of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, joined ABC News Live with host Elizabeth Schulze to discuss the five year anniversary of the January 6th insurrection and the military strikes conducted by the U.S. in Venezuela.
Joining us now from Capitol Hill is
Democratic California Congressman Pete
Aguular. Congressman, thanks so much for
being here today. On the Senate floor
today, we heard Senate uh Minority
Leader Chuck Schumer say that his
briefing with top administration
officials last night, including
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, failed
to answer key questions about Venezuela.
We know that all lawmakers, sources tell
us, will be briefed tomorrow, including
you. What are your biggest unanswered
questions at this point, Congressman?
>> What's the strategy? uh what's the
endgame? I think that uh all members of
Congress want to know what the strategy
that the administration has. Uh look, we
we all understand that Nicholas Maduro
was an illegitimate leader and a and a
dictator. Um I don't lose any sleep
about him not being in power, but what I
do lose sleep over is the potential for
young service members to be in harm's
way. the fact that the president didn't
rule out uh boots on the ground uh in in
Venezuela. The fact that he continues to
talk about this being about oil, not
about narot trafficking. Uh these are
all questions that the administration
has to answer. Uh and they have to come
to Congress and repres and understand
that Congress is a co-equal branch of
government here and uh they are uh
dangerously close uh to this uh edge and
uh they continue to go their own way
which is just deeply problematic and I
think the American people understand
that.
>> Steps can you are you prepared to take
to get some of those answers from the
administration?
>> We'll see. Sometimes in these, you know,
larger classified settings, um, it's
difficult to to get them to answer
questions. Uh, they do a very good job,
as we've seen in prior classified
sessions, of just filling up the time
talking. Um, and, uh, as Marco Rubio did
in prior classified sessions, um, when,
uh, it has been, you know, reported that
he, you know, said that occupation was
not, um, what, uh, what the
administration was seeking. I mean,
those things are not, you know, helpful
to to the relationship that we have uh
with between the executive and and the
congressional branch here. Um, but we're
going to go and we want to hear what the
administration has to say, hoping that
they detail more concrete plans and a
detailed strategy on what the path
forward is.
>> What do you think or hope is the plan
forward? I'm sure a lot of your
constituents asking you that question,
wondering why did we do this? What what
is the plan here in the next few days,
weeks, months, years?
>> I think what a lot of constituents are
asking is, you know, why is the
president talking about investing in oil
infrastructure when we have in
infrastructure here at home that needs
help? Why are we going to send billions
of dollars uh potentially to oil
companies um you know, multi-trillion
dollar uh entities uh when we have needs
here at home? I think that's what the
American public wants to know and that's
what they're asking us as elected
officials to to be mindful of. So I
think those are some of the big, you
know, variables or the the lack of the
president ruling out boots on the ground
and the resources that could be expended
uh in this V Venezuelan mission. Um the
president hasn't detailed any of that
and as an appropriator, we're concerned
about the resources that the DoD has
already spent on these activities. We've
been briefed uh in a classified session
on those activities. We're going to have
to continue to get briefed on on what
those costs actually are.
>> The president even suggesting that the
US could reimburse those oil companies.
Congressman,
>> yeah, I mean, and that's that's that
would take an act of Congress. Um and
clearly uh that's not something that
they're that they're interested in
seeking. So, we don't know where this
money would be coming from. This is
again all part of uh the plan that the
administration should have to come and
and detail for people like Marco Rubio
who have been you know here in Congress.
You know as a senator he would not
accept uh what uh what the
administration is saying right now is an
adequate answer. The fact that he's
pedalling this now, these these theories
now is just incredibly frustrating to a
lot of us who respect the norms and and
the rule of law and the uh and how
things, you know, have been done in the
past uh here in Congress.
>> As you well know, there in Congress
today marks 5 years since the January
6th attack on the capital. In a new
website today, the White House is
attempting to rewrite the history of
what happened that day, putting the
blame on Capitol police officers,
blaming former House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi. Uh you were there at the capital
that day. Your reaction to this,
Congressman?
>> I was there that day. I served on the
January 6th commission. Uh my my face is
featured on that um you know, website
that I thought was uh you know, a fake
website, honestly, when I saw it the
first time. Uh this is just another
reason. And another example of Donald
Trump trying to whitewash what actually
happened. Uh we were there that day. We
understand uh that you know uh the
thousands of people who came uh to the
capital grounds here, many of them
wishing harm on members of Congress,
Democrats and Republicans, who got in
the way of Donald Trump and who weren't
listening to him. Um we understand that
the president sat for 3 hours in the
White House while the attack on the
capital was going on. Uh and those
people came and some of them testified
again here this morning uh to members of
Congress uh that you know they came at
the request of President Trump. They
knew uh that he wanted them here. Um and
as a result uh they received a pardon uh
for that. So after years of
prosecutorial work
uh the those individuals the first act
that the president did in you know when
he assumed office last year was
pardoning 1500 violent individuals uh
many of them were serving sentences uh
in federal prisons as a result of their
actions. And now many of them have gone
on to reaffend um carrying on uh a
litany of charges from assaulting police
officers uh to domestic abuse uh all
around the country. Uh these individuals
are spread across um you know virtually
every state uh reaffending uh all
because Donald Trump um you know asked
them to come to the capital. They did
what he asked them to do and he rewarded
them.
>> Congressman Pete Aguilar appreciate your
time today. Thanks so much for joining
us.
>> Thanks Elizabeth.
