How a $300 Seiko SSB479 "Speedmaster" Out-Shined the Speedtimer

Heritage Timepieces Channel
21 followers
#seiko #seytona #watches
In this video I compare two very different Seiko chronographs: the well-known and heavily praised Seiko Speedtimer SSC813, and the far more underrated Seiko SSB479. I’ve always loved the Speedtimer and still think it’s one of the best modern chronographs Seiko makes in terms of history, execution, and everyday reliability. But the SSB479 genuinely surprised me.
Okay so let's get this out of the way first. The Seiko speed timer is probably the best
chronograph Seiko makes right now. I'm sure you've seen it all over social media, it's super popular
on Reddit, Instagram. It's become a modern classic, it's historically grounded and it's very sought
after. But after spending time with both of these, I honestly find myself liking this one a little
bit more. This is the new Seiko SSB479. It could be because I'm still in the honeymoon phase with
this watch. It's not as nearly as popular as the speed timer, in fact I'm pretty sure most of you
probably haven't even heard of it yet. And that's partly because it's freshly released in late 2025.
But that's why I want to show you a few reasons why at more than half the price this one actually
makes more sense. Let's first start with the obvious, the design. The speed timer isn't pure
Seiko DNA. The white dial with black chronograph accents might not be groundbreaking, but it's a
proven formula and a big part of what makes the watch instantly recognizable. I would even argue
it's the element that helped make the speed timer internet famous. So there's definitely some Daytona
energy here, but it feels less like a straight homage and more like a modern reinterpretation of
Seiko's chronograph heritage. Now put it next to the SSB and this is where things get interesting.
There's still a touch of 60s Daytona to it, but with a noticeable Speedmaster nostalgia.
Just check out the new 2026 version and it looks exactly the same. The whole design leans more
mid-century, slim bezel, domed crystal, applied logo. It is one of those watches you really have to
experience in person. Photos honestly just don't capture how cool and high-end this feels.
Where they diverge is the dial and crystal. The speed timer gives you sapphire, which is expected
at any watch above $300. However, the SSB skips sapphire, which is a shame, but the raised hardlex
bubble crystal adds character, wrapping the dial, adding depth and still keeping excellent legibility
and in the same time keeping the price down. Shaping sapphire like this would be costly,
so sticking with hardlex makes perfect sense. The dial itself has a glossy, almost enamel-like look
that feels more premium than its price, but if I had to nitpick, the sub-dials are a little flat.
Don't get me wrong, I still like them, they work, but a touch of more texture I think would have
been nice. While the speed timer's dial look a little bit more modern, but the solar sub-dials
can be a little bit distracting. The tiny date window throws off the symmetry and I really wish
at this point they do a version without it. Then you have that curved, almost ceramic-looking bezel
that really works with the dial and makes the whole watch look bigger. So design-wise, the SSB
leans into the retro vibe and as a complete visual package, I think it just edges it out for me.
When it comes to the wrist presence, these watches are actually closer than you think.
The speed timer comes in at about 39mm wide, 45.5mm lug-to-lug and around 13.3mm thick.
It wears solid, slightly bulky, but very much like a modern tool chronograph. The SSB on the other
hand, kind of surprised me at 38.7mm wide and roughly 45mm lug-to-lug, it feels more
faithful to vintage proportions. On the wrist, it actually seems a bit smaller than the speed timer,
even though the numbers are almost the same. And yes, the crystal does make it look thick at around
12.8mm, but here's the trick, once you ignore the bubble, the actual case underneath is closer
to 8.5mm, which gives it a much slimmer visual profile. And then we get to the area where most
of the time, almost every Seiko disappoints, the bracelet. The speed timer bracelet is fully
brushed, no frills, no polishing. It suits the watch perfectly, but it doesn't really excite.
It does offer solid endings and the clasp is miles ahead of the abysmal entry-level crap that Seiko
offers. It's not perfect, but it's still my favorite Seiko bracelet. And while the SSB's
bracelet definitely isn't on the same level as the speed timers, as you can see here it's thicker and
sturdier, I was actually pleasantly surprised for a cheap Seiko. The bracelet is way better than
expected, the pattern fits the retro vibe perfectly, it comes with solid endings, drilled lugs and
micro adjustment, even if it's just one position. And then you have the clasp, which feels really
cheap, definitely time for Seiko to improve their entry-level clasps. That said, I get the feeling
that this watch would look even better on straps, thankfully Seiko went with the standard 20mm
lug width, so options wouldn't be a problem here. So on the wrist, the speed timer feels solid and
purposeful, its bracelet is clearly better, but I still prefer how the SSB wears. It's flatter,
lighter and more relaxed, especially if you have smaller wrists. Now when it comes to movement,
technically speaking the speed timer wins. The V192 solar movement is accurate to plus minus 15
seconds per month, runs for 6 months on a full charge and even gives you a power reserve indicator
hidden in the subdial layout. It's a super efficient movement that is just simply hard to
ignore. The SSB on the other hand uses a mecha quartz chronograph and while it doesn't sound as
sexy on paper because it's not mechanical or solar, it does get the job done. The classic
pump-style pushers feel crisp and I can't have enough of that satisfying second-hand instant
snapback. Given the accuracy quirks of Seiko's entry-level mechanical movements and the added
cost of solar, I'd take the quartz any day if it means better accuracy without driving up the price
and I forgot to mention they both offer a chronograph function, but let's not kid ourselves,
no one's timing anything with it anymore. And finally the question that makes or breaks a
watch for most people, the price. The speed timer comes in at around 725 dollars and that's a tough
sell. If you can find it somewhere on eBay or secondhand for closer to 500, then the pricing
starts to make more sense, but the SSB, depending on where you shop, can come in at even half that
price. I picked up mine from Jomashop for around 300 dollars, which I'll have a link down in the
description, and for a watch that looks this good and wears this well, the value is hard to ignore.
So while the speed timer is probably the best Seiko chronograph winning on specs across the board,
the SSB479 I think is an incredible value for money watch. It's slimmer, a bit more vintage,
more versatile and frankly more fun to wear. And that's why it wins for me, but let me know down
in the comments which one you prefer, what do you think about this new release from Seiko,
and I'll catch you in the next one.
