Trans Activists Meltdown, Demand People Boycott Harry Potter Series Over J K Rowling

When the Harry Potter trailer dropped far earlier than a lot of people expected a full trailer to drop for Harry Potter. Yes, it's an official teaser trailer, but it's two and a half minutes long. And I can't imagine that Warner Brothers, despite knowing there would be backlash for the terrible decision to make Severus Snape black, to race swap Snape, of all characters, one of the worst people that you could race swap in the history of all race swaps. I'm sure they expected some backlash. I don't think they expected the trailer to get ratioed like it did. As it currently sits, it has 327,000 dislikes to 273,000 likes. It got absolutely annihilated, obliterated, and nearly every comment, and we've gone over this multiple times, is about black Snape and what a terrible mistake this is. And certainly they're having to deal with that backlash. But there's also another backlash against this show, far less significant, won't be meaningful at all in any way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the very same people who told you to boycott Hogwarts Legacy because J.K. Rowling believes in biology are now saying that there's a big problem with the Harry Potter series because of that. Fans continue to justify the new Harry Potter series by ignoring why people are boycotting J.K. Rowling. I hate to break it to you, the Mary Sue. I mean, you guys are ******* retards. There's no secret about that. I hate to break it to you, but the J.K. Rowling boycott has been nearly as ineffective as any boycott ever has in history. Throughout the entirety of this boycott, the sales of her books skyrocketed. The deals that she gets for her properties skyrocket. The video game that comes out based off her property is the highest selling game in history, despite a coordinated attempt by the media to push a boycott. The boycott is completely ineffective because 99% of people, regardless of what you think about all of J.K. Rowling's other opinions, agree with her when it comes to men are men and women are women. Bottom line, period. End of story. But that hasn't stopped people from saying that if you don't boycott this series, you're part of the problem. And look, I think there's people that aren't going to watch it, but I don't think it has anything to do with J.K. Rowling. A lot to do with race swapping a beloved character. A lot to do with the messaging surrounding this ******* new series about reinventing canon, about all the stuff they're adding. Way more people are going to tune out of this series for those reasons. But when it comes to this, J.K. Rowling's views on trans people, there is no impact from these people out there. But you can't exactly say that these people have a great grasp on reality, considering they don't even know their own pronouns. But let's listen to this gentleman. All right, listen up. I'm tired of having this conversation, so I'm only going to talk about this once. If you claim to support trans people, but you decide to watch the Harry Potter show, you are choosing to harm trans people and you are not a trustworthy ally. Yes, it is that deep. Jowling Cowling Rowling directly uses the money that she gets from this franchise to support anti-trans legislation in the UK and anti-trans efforts around the world. So I just I want to be very clear because, you know, I'm saying anti-trans legislation and blah, blah, blah. In reality, what all this legislation is about, it's about protecting spaces for women, right? It's about making sure, hey, we have female only, you know, doctor areas. There's female only prisons, female only things. It's about that. It's about making sure that women's spaces stay safe. And regardless of whatever you think about that, you can think this or think that that's what they're defining as anti-trans when it's really about protecting women. Most people look at this and they think, hey, it actually makes sense to protect women who in a lot of cases are vulnerable from predators, from sexual degenerates who will say that they are this in order to get into a women's prison and then have access to women who can't get away from them. Right. But that's labeled anti-trans legislation. I guess it all depends on your point of view. This isn't about separating the art from the artist. It's about giving money to bigotry. Sometimes there's discussion to be had about what boycotts are feasible for everyone, like if we were talking about boycotting the one grocery store in your neighborhood. But this show, this is a no brainer. You don't need to watch it. I don't care how much you love the franchise. I was a big Harry Potter fan when I was a kid. It was a big part of my childhood. You were way out. Well, you know, a lot of little boys really liked Harry Potter. So it doesn't surprise me that when you were a kid, you're a big fan of it. But guess what? When Moldy Locks made her bigotry known, I stopped giving money to that ----. And the idea that in the year of our Dark Lord 2026, when trans people are under attack around the world, losing rights, losing access to health care, being pushed out of the public sphere, being discriminated against en masse as policies are enacted to literally erase us. It's somehow too much to ask for you not to watch a show is absolutely ridiculous. It tells me that you are not a safe person and that you cannot be counted on. So just just to wrap all this up in a bow, they have been doing this for almost a decade now. When it comes to the Harry Potter boycott, you've got trans people who are completely delusional about how everybody else feels about this. And they're saying, if you watch this show, you're an enemy, you're unsafe. And I and I need to make sure I stay away from you and your subordinate. What they don't understand is that 99 percent of people in the world, right, what I would qualify as normal people, but ultimately 99 percent of people in the world, for the most part, across racial lines, across religious lines, across across political lines, 99 percent of people believe that biology is real, that biology is a thing. And it's not controversial to say otherwise. But between the mainstream media targeted attacks and between the trans mafia, which seems to be getting smaller and smaller by the day, I mean, by a rate of about, I don't know, 41 percent or so, like they can't understand that they are in the vast, vast, vast, vast minority. They have had no impact. Their boycotts for Hogwarts legacy were completely and totally ineffective. Do you know why? Because there's not enough people that think like this. There just isn't. And so it's ironic as we witness the massive, massive amount of backlash for the Harry Potter trailer. And you've got these trans people out there that are calling for a boycott. There's a good chance a lot of people are going to boycott this show, but it has zero. And I mean zero to do with J.K. Rowling's controversial views, which aren't actually controversial. It has everything to do with Black Snape and them changing the story. That's why all the comments are about Black Snape. That's why all the comments are about this. You know what? None of the comments in this trailer are actually about. None of the comments in this trailer are about. I can't watch this because I'm not going to support J.K. Rowling. None of them, because these people, as we've seen over and over again, have zero impact because they're completely and totally delusional.