Election Interference, Censorship, and the CCP's Growing Influence in Canada

Hello, everyone. Hi. Can you guys hear me? Excuse me. Yes. Audio sounds okay. Loud and clear. Excellent. All right. Let me see. What do people say? Yeah. Can you guys hear me? All right. Can someone tell me? Okay. I assume you can hear me. Yes. No response. Oh, okay. Jeff Ramos. Well, thank you. Thank you for letting me know. All right. As you are aware, I'll be traveling to Toronto for my very first meet and greet in less than two weeks. To be honest, I've always been reluctant to do a meet and greet because of security concerns. When you spend years talking about CCP politics, you inevitably become cautious. I can never be completely sure who every guest or attendee really is, whether they are genuinely a supporter or someone with other motives. But despite those concerns, I feel compelled to go to Canada. Now, over the years, many Canadian viewers have written to me expressing deep concerns about the direction of their country. Some fear that Canada is becoming increasingly vulnerable to CCP's interference. And infiltration. And I have made a couple of videos on that topic. But recently, I decided to look into it because I told you I was going to make a series of videos about CCP's infiltration around the world. I covered Japan, I believe. No, I covered South Korea. I covered another country. And then Canada is next on my list. To be honest with you, I was shocked by what I found. The deeper I dug, the clearer it became that this is not a story about a few isolated incidents. It's a story about a pattern. For decades, China and Canada built deep ties in business, academia, politics, culture, and sports. What many people once viewed as bridges of cooperation may have now become channels of infiltration. And that is why I'm going to Toronto. I want to meet the people who have supported this channel over the years. And I also want to show my support for those who care deeply about Canada's future. I hope you can join me at the event. Now, for my other viewers, Americans in particular, I would encourage you to pay attention to this topic as well. The US and Canada share not only the world's longest border, but also deep economic, security, and cultural ties. What happens in one country inevitably affects the other. Now, this conversation about foreign interference is not just about Canada. It's a North American issue. Influence is open while interference is hidden. Influence is legal. Interference is not. And what Canada faces today is not just foreign influence. It's foreign interference. So tonight, we will examine how the CCP operates inside Canada. While this program focuses on Canada, I suspect the warning extends beyond its borders. Because if this can happen in Canada, it can happen in other democratic countries as well. So let's begin with the foundation of Canadian democracy elections. First and foremost, many Canadians assume foreign interference happens on the sidelines. Maybe some lobbying, maybe some media influence, maybe pressure behind closed doors. But according to multiple investigations, the CCP's activities in Canada go much further than that. The goal is not simply just to influence policy. The goal is to influence elections and control who gets elected. And so the first tactic we need to discuss is what I call political targeting. And so let's go back to the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. During both campaigns, the Conservative Party and its leader at the time, Aaron O'Toole, took one of the toughest positions in Canadian politics on Beijing's human rights record. That put them directly in Beijing's crosshairs. Investigations later revealed that during those two elections, Chinese diplomatic missions in Canada, working alongside the CCP's vast United Front network, were involved in at least 15 separate interference operations targeting conservative candidates. This was not only grassroots opposition inside the Chinese Canadian community. The allegation was far more serious. A foreign state apparatus working to manipulate electoral outcomes in specific writings. And so the message was simple. If you criticize the CCP in Parliament, the CCP will try to defeat you at the ballot box in Canada. But taking down opponents in Canada is only the first step. The more important objective is placing friendly figures inside the system itself. And that brings us to the second tactic, elite capture, and the Trojan horse strategy. And one of the most controversial examples is this guy, Michael Ma, Ontario's MP. And he was all over the news a little while ago. He maintained ties, or he allegedly maintains ties, to organizations associated with the CCP's United Front system. Yet despite those concerns, he successfully passed a party vetting, secured a conservative party nomination, and won a seat in Parliament. But that was only the beginning. After being elected, he carried out one of the most remarkable floor crossings in recent Canadian politics. He abandoned the Conservatives and joined the Liberal Party, the ruling party. So with a single move, he gained access to the center of political power. Eventually, he accompanied Carney and his delegation to visit Beijing. Think about that progression. Whether one agrees with that interpretation or not, critics argue that it represents a textbook example of elite capture. I think this is CCP's ultimate weapon against a free democratic society. So it's a complete political infiltration loop. And if you think this kind of activity is limited to Parliament Hill, think again. Investigators now warn that CCP interference has spread throughout all three levels of government. Federal elections, provincial elections, municipal politics, even school board elections are affected. So you may ask, why school boards? Because influence over education means influence over future generations. It means access to community networks, local resources, and a pipeline for cultivating future political leaders. So this is not a top-down strategy, it's a ground-up strategy. And that proves how much influence or control a foreign regime has in Canada at the ground level, at the grassroots level. So from Parliament Hill to the neighborhood school board, the concern raised by Canadian citizens is increasingly clear. These are not isolated incidents. They are pieces of a much larger effort to build long-term political influence. And by the time Canada approached the 2025 federal election, it becomes more obvious. The mask had largely come off. One of the most disturbing cases involved a former Hong Kong democracy activist. His name is Joe Tay. He now lives in Canada and he ran for MP as a conservative in 2025. Now in late 2024, Hong Kong authorities placed a HK$1 million bounty on Joe. Many people view that as a strategy, a CCP strategy, and to some extent it worked in Canada. So this bounty helped Beijing send a signal to the pro-Beijing networks operating in Canada that Joe Tay had become a target. What happened next raised even more concerns. MP Paul Cheung publicly discussed the bounty during a Chinese-language media event organized by a group allegedly having links to the CCP's United Front system. People argue that this effectively amplified Beijing's message inside Canada and helped create a climate of fear among Chinese-Canadian voters. And that fear was not theoretical. In the heavily Chinese Markham Union View writing, leaders of several hometown associations reportedly used WeChat groups to portray Joe Tay as a wanted fugitive. According to investigative findings, some United Front-linked community organizations were also accused of collecting information on voters who supported Joe. Even more troubling were allegations that some voters were warned that supporting Joe Tay could jeopardize their ability to obtain visas or travel to China to visit family members. Think about that for a moment. A candidate running in a Canadian election. Canadian voters living in Canada. Yet the pressure allegedly comes through family connections in China, travel restrictions, and fear of retaliation by a foreign government. This is no longer ordinary political campaigning. This is a transnational oppression or intimidation. As a result, Tay was reassigned by the Conservative Party and ultimately ran as a candidate in Don Valley North during the federal election. But he lost. So when you step back and look at the bigger picture, a pattern begins to emerge. CCP operations in Canada are no longer limited to illicit donations, targeted attacks against Conservative candidates. They are no longer limited to elite capture cases such as Michael Ma. What we're talking about is an elaborate system that includes multiple players and multiple layers of influence operations working simultaneously to shape the outcome of Canadian elections. So you have bounty notices issued from Hong Kong, pressure campaigns conducted through community organizations. You have voter intimidation. You have local CCP controlled media. You have WeChat coming to play. WeChat I think should be banned outside in Canada and the US. And then you may possibly even have a local politician voluntarily or involuntarily playing to that to propagate the message. And then you have the use of family ties as leverage. So the objective remains the same. It's to shape political outcomes inside Canada. And this type of influence operation has spread throughout every layer of political system in Canada as warned by Canadian security experts. It's not me standing here telling you this. Canadian security experts have warned this. It's like a network of capillaries. They extend into communities that most Canadians would never suspect. And that is precisely what makes them so difficult to detect and so difficult to stop. Now let's talk about political infiltration targeting Canada's democratic process. That's also happening in academia, think tanks, and community organizations targeting something that's even deeper. That is the ultimate goal is trying to control the Canadians. In academia, CCP's methods are sophisticated and time-tested. It's through money. It's the same as the United States. The CCP donates large amounts of donations to higher education institutions, and these schools or institutions don't disclose the details. And that's how influence works. Once research funding, institutional partnerships, and careers become dependent on access to China because of the financial donations or contributions, many academics begin censoring themselves long before anyone has to tell them what they can or cannot say. But the university system is only part of the story. Think tanks, policy organizations are the same. Beijing has also built their influence there. So they target former cabinet ministries, I mean, former cabinet members, former ministers, retired diplomats, retired government officials, individuals who once held positions of influence inside Canada's political and business communities. And these people, after leaving whether public office or executive office, some are offered prestigious board positions, consulting roles, speaking opportunities, or research funding connected to organizations with ties to China. And the concern is not simply that Beijing is buying access. The concern is that Beijing is buying credibility. This year, the Jamestown Foundation released a report that painted a far larger picture. The report said that the CCP has established at least 575 United Front-linked organizations across Canada. Now, the U.S. also has these organizations. The U.S. has far more than Canada. But here's the thing. The population in the U.S. is much larger. So when you compare Canada's population to the number of CCP United Front-linked organizations, that makes Canada one of the most heavily penetrated countries in the world when it comes to United Front activity. And the report identifies two major components of that network. The first is a community-level political infrastructure. Organizations that present themselves as cultural associations, hometown groups, or immigrant service organizations. So these are more like community service functions. And based on my experience with the Chinese community here in the U.S., almost all of them are infiltrated or influenced by the CCP. They have to form a relation with the Chinese consulates here in the U.S. for them to survive in the Chinese communities. Some have even become vehicles for political mobilization and influence operations. And the second component is technology and talent acquisition. So organizations such as Chinese university alumni associations or professional associations often fill this role. And according to the report, some have received support from individuals or entities connected to the United Front system. Now these networks can facilitate the transfer of expertise, research, and advanced technologies developed in Canada back to China. So the concern is the same as that of the United States. Our intellectual capital may be flowing back to China through these channels, but most people don't pay attention. The next I want to talk about is cultural infiltration. And in July 2025, Canada's highest-profile cultural institution, the National Arts Center in Ottawa, suddenly announced that it was cancelling Shen Yun Performing Arts' scheduled I think their 2026 performance. Now Shen Yun has been touring in Canada and performing at the National Arts Center in Ottawa for almost two decades. Every year they return to Ottawa. But somehow the Arts Center cancelled their schedule in 2026. And the official explanation was administrative and contractual issues or disputes. But according to internal documents later obtained through access to information requests, that public explanation may tell only part of the story. Those documents review what appears to be a two-year campaign of relationship building and influence campaign directed at NAC leadership by the Chinese embassy. And that brings us to one of the most important lessons in understanding modern interference operations. Now the highest form of influence does not require direct orders. It does not require threats. It does not require a signed document from Beijing. The most effective influence operation is one in which the target institution begins censoring itself. To understand why this matters, we need to first understand why Beijing cares so much about Shen Yun. Where is that? Okay, sorry, I didn't mention this guy. Yeah, this is the Canadian NAC. So you've seen this poster. Now Shen Yun was founded by Chinese Americans in New York with a mission to revive traditional Chinese culture that was systematically destroyed during decades of communist rule. Its well-known slogan is see China before communism. And that tagline alone is enough to trigger paranoia in Beijing. Adding to the sensitivity is the fact that Shen Yun was founded by members of the Falun Gong community, a spiritual meditation group that has been the target of CCP suppression for more than two decades. So against that backdrop, the events surrounding the National Arts Center becomes much more significant. So what happened was the newly appointed Chinese ambassador Wang Di moved quickly after arriving in Canada in July 2024. Within six weeks of taking up his post, he met with NAC president and CEO Christopher Deacon. I believe that was his name. There he is. Afterward, according to the publicly released documents that people requested, Deacon wrote a cautious note in an internal email. He said something like, I received the advice that I should meet with the ambassador. Now pay close attention to how this operation unfolded. The embassy never appeared to have demanded that Shen Yun be banned. There was no public ultimatum, or at least not on record, no written order. Instead, what we see is something far more sophisticated, a relationship saturation campaign. According to the documents, embassy officials spent years cultivating NAC leadership through a steady stream of invitations and personal outreach. The tactics included inviting NAC executives to private dinners at the ambassador's residence, inviting them and their family members to exclusive social events, requesting that the NAC president personally accompany embassy-related visits and authorize official publicity, inviting NAC executives to celebrations marking the 97th anniversary of the People's Liberation Army, inviting them to Chinese film festivals associated with Beijing's international messaging efforts, sending holiday gifts, and maintaining regular personal contact. Each individual interaction may seem harmless, but together they create something powerful, a web of relationships, favors, access, prestige, and mutual expectations. This is how Chinese operate their influence campaigns in the real world, not necessarily always through commands, but through incentives, through access, through the desire to avoid conflict. According to the documents, embassy officials also explicitly expressed a desire to see more Chinese performing groups brought to the NAC during Deakin's tenure. At the very same time that these relationships were being carefully cultivated, NAC officials were reportedly discussing whether Shen Yun Performing Arts should be removed from the institute's stage. And when you examine the NAC's board structure, another layer of vulnerability appears. NAC's chairman of the board, this guy, what's his name, Guy Pratt, he serves as a senior counsel at one of Canada's prominent law firms, BLG. Now, BLG has long been at the forefront of legal work involving Chinese business interests in Canada, providing regulatory, compliance, and national security review services for Chinese state-owned enterprises investing in Canada's energy and mining sectors. In other words, the individual responsible for helping guide one of Canada's most important cultural institutions comes from a professional background deeply involved in facilitating the expansion of Chinese capital in Canada. And NAC's vice chair, and his name is Daryl Moriyama, his background reveals a similarly significant connection. His 31-year career at the Bank of Montreal coincided almost exactly with the bank's major expansions into China. From gaining access to the Chinese market to developing partnerships with major Chinese SOEs, such as Coffco, Moriyama spent much of his career within the senior leadership structure overseeing that expansion. And BMO is the first, I believe, possibly still the only Canadian bank with a license to operate a subsidiary in mainland China. Now, consider the implications. When a board is composed of legal and financial elites whose professional careers have been deeply intertwined with the Chinese market, can we realistically expect complete cultural independence when faced with repeated engagement from the Chinese embassy? The NAC's leadership sits at the center of a profound conflict of interest. And that is the cost. I'm going to point out something that most people ignore. This is the invisible hidden cost that West pays when they interact with China. The West naively believes that by engaging China in the global market, by doing business with the Chinese, we can inevitably change China without realizing that it's the other way around. This is the perfect example to show the price we pay. We sacrifice our democracy. We invite CCP influence and infiltration into our country by doing business with China. And that is precisely what makes this case so troubling. The system simply encouraged decision makers to conclude on their own that avoiding conflict with Beijing was the safer choice. None of this proves wrongdoing, but it does illustrate how these decision makers are surrounded by financial incentives, diplomatic relations, and constant signals from a foreign government. And therefore, for them, neutrality becomes fragile. Somewhere along the way, Canada's national cultural institution removed one of the performances that Beijing feared the most. If this case represents CCP's soft power operating inside Canada's cultural, diplomatic, and business establishment, what happened outside the NAC was far more direct, far more aggressive, and far more disturbing. Now, at the same time these events were unfolding inside the National Arts Centre, a systemic map of pressure campaigns directed at Shen Yun Performing Arts, and their theatres, and their patrons across Canada. And that impact is even worse. First, bomb threats. Now, in the spring or early and late spring of 2026, Shen Yun Performing Arts in Mississauga, Vancouver, Hamilton, Kitchener, and Toronto all received bomb threats. Some came from the same email with a Chinese pinyin name. So obviously, it's from a Chinese. Performances were disrupted or delayed. Audience members were forced to evacuate amid confusion and fear. In Toronto, the Four Seasons Centre ultimately cancelled six remaining shows of the run, despite the police ruled out that it was a fake bomb threat. Actually, all of them were fake bomb threats. And this is not just in Canada, it's all over the world. I mean, we've seen that in other parts of the world as well. But Canada seemed to be the most severely impacted country. I don't know why, maybe because the CCP had the confidence that it's fake bomb threats will work in Canada. Just imagine the logistics nightmare and the financial loss for everyone involved and the patrons. I mean, you bought tickets, you spend the time, you travel to the theatre, and then only to find out that everything's delayed. And in Toronto's case, it's even cancelled. So that's why it's called unrestricted warfare. For the CCP, the cost is nothing. All it took was an email from a nefarious person, possibly sitting in Beijing. And here, a democratic country has to go through all these procedures, right? You have to close the theatre, you have to call a bomb threat squad to come in. I mean, you have to go through all these procedures before you can reopen the theatre. So that's why it's an uneven war. And then you have systemic disinformation and character assassination. Individuals allegedly impersonated Falun Gong practitioners, had sent bizarre and inflammatory messages to theatres and elected officials, making weird demands and statements. The goal was not to promote Falun Gong or Shen Yun, the goal is to discredit to make both Shen Yun and then its hosting organization appear unreasonable, extreme, and socially disruptive. That is to create the narratives so that when people actually do get a bomb threat, they, quote unquote, connect the dots, and then these people develop this paranoia or fear. So they have these nefarious individuals sending weird messages. They deliberately behaved irrationally in front of politicians and theatres to create this paranoia. And then CCP-controlled Chinese-language media outlets in Canada continue to publish in negative coverage, because when these things happen, then media jump on the stories and start covering it. So all of that, the media, the social media, they jump on the stories, and that's designed to reinforce hostility. So taken together, these cases reveal a pattern. They put pressure inside cultural institutions. They put pressure inside community organizations. They put pressure against artists, against theatres, against elected officials. Different tactics, but the same objective. Who ultimately paid the price? Canadians. Which brings us back to a larger question. When a national cultural institution excludes a particular voice because it may create diplomatic discomfort, is it still acting independently? So when decisions about Canada's cultural stage can be shaped by a foreign communist government, then this story is not just about the NAC or Shen Yun. It's about whether Canada's institutions still remain capable of making decisions free from foreign pressure. And it's a question of sovereignty itself. So what the CCP is doing in Canada is even more ruthless than, I think, in the United States. It's what people call a system of—it's a systemic extraction. And there's a man by the name of Gary Clement. He was a former senior at RCMP. And he had issued—I actually have a picture of him. Do I have a picture of him? There he is. He issued a warning. He argued that the CCP is attempting to replicate in Canada the same infrastructure takeover model that it has used through its Belt and Road Initiative. The pattern is straightforward. Chinese financing or Chinese money is used to build major infrastructure projects. And when the host country can no longer service the debt, Beijing takes control of strategic assets through debt for equity arrangement, transforming them into strategic footholds. So in Canada's case, it may not be infrastructure projects. It's anything, right? As long as you accept CCP's money, then it's going to tell you what to do. And when you refuse, then it will aim to take over. Then you'll be in trouble. And one example is Canada's Prince Edward Island. Gary argued that Canada's PEI is becoming a testing ground for this model. So I did two videos about PEI, and you can check it out. There's a book written about CCP's takeover of the Prince Edward Island. There's a quasi-religious organization building massive compounds on the island. But they are running their own fiber optic networks. They're running their deep underground tunnel systems, independent water and power infrastructure. And so Gary argues that Canadians must recognize that this is not simply a religious investment project. It is the construction of a state within a state. It is the creation of a potential military and intelligence outpost on Canadian soil, positioned in the heart of North America for future strategic purposes. I have gotten emails from residents from PEI being so concerned that the Canadian government is doing almost nothing to address this national securities threat. And then not only do you have the national security threat, there's also money laundering involved. It's what's called a Vancouver model. It's a system in which illicit money flows through casinos, real estate, and underground banking networks before emerging as seemingly legitimate assets in Canada. And that's not just in Vancouver, that's everywhere in Canada. So Canada has effectively become a safe harbor for foreign capital seeking to wash money through legitimate channels. And when foreign capital aggressively acquires land, I mean, if you think about it, if the money is laundered in Canada, it's going to stay there for a while. So it's going to acquire Canadian properties. That's Canadian land. And when that happens, who ultimately pays the price? The next generation of Canadians. So experts argue that the social burden of this infiltration can last for decades. Local supply chains are pushed aside. See, when the Chinese bought these properties or lands, they don't use local supply chains. Construction projects rely heavily on imported labor. Wealth becomes concentrated in the hands of foreign connected elites. And when elderly island residents are persuaded to sell family land for large sums of cash, they're not simply just selling a piece of property. They're surrendering part of the future autonomy of the land itself. So Canada's openness is being used against itself. And that's not just in Canada. I think same in Australia, in the US. Canada's lack of defense safeguards is being exploited to reshape its own security boundaries. The Canadian government's own response to CCP's transnational operations is increasingly troubling. In this January, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police signed a memorandum of understanding with China's Ministry of Public Security, restoring a framework for police cooperation. That's under Carney. Yet months earlier, a federal court in New York had concluded that the so-called Chinese police station operating in Manhattan was, in reality, a tool of transnational repression used to monitor and intimidate dissidents, Americans. Faced with this contradiction, the RCMP chose not to comment. And when asked whether it viewed China's Ministry of Public Security as being responsible for transnational repression targeting people in Canada, the RCMP declined to provide an answer. Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom have also reached a very different conclusion. Recent British assessments argue that Chinese organized crime groups have evolved from being a purely criminal concern into a national security issue. So according to these findings, such networks have been used by the regime, by the CCP, for espionage, political influence operations, and coercion directed at CCP's targets. So, at a time when democratic countries are increasingly treating transnational repression as a top-tier security concern, Canada is moving in the other direction. Canada is providing legitimacy to one of the world's largest repression apparatus. So it is self-sabotage that places Canada in a dangerous position. It raises a fundamental question. Are our law enforcement institutions protecting the public from foreign intimidation? Or are they providing cover for foreign governments that use criminal networks and state security organs to conduct espionage and political influence operations in Canada? So, based on everything that I've told you, CCP's interference, it's not just infiltration, interference in Canada has reached an alarming level. Because when influence reaches our ballot boxes, our universities, our courts, and even our national cultural institutions, this is no longer a diplomatic issue. It's a question of sovereignty. And what do we do? Well, sovereignty is not defended by government alone. It's defended by citizens who are willing to see reality as it is, speak openly about it and refuse to look away. I think the greatest threat of any democracy is not infiltration. It's indifference. And that's what I'm going to Toronto. Actually, after negotiation, the Four Seasons Centre agreed to let Shen Yun return to Canada or to Toronto to finish their run. And so, I want to go there and to support my fans who bought tickets, but were not able to see the performance. And at this point, I don't care what the security risk is. I think we need to be stronger than them. So, that's my view. I think fear or concern is no longer my vocabulary. Because if we forever fear them, and they will always be successful. So, Saturday, June 27th, at 2pm, I will be at that performance. And you can watch my, I think Chris released the video. My team, they posted on social media and tell people about how to sign up for the meet and greet. And so, that's what that is. That's what I have for you. Excuse me. Let's see. Someone says, God bless you. Thank you. Thank you very much. You know, as a YouTuber, we're always under pressure to produce videos that has gigantic views, that we're always obsessed with growing our channel so fast that we reach to, I don't know, as many viewers as possible. Even that is my goal. But as I have been doing this for long enough, I realized that that is important. But a more important part is doing programs that really matter, doing programs that other people don't do, and cover topics that other people do not talk about. Because when you do that, you're inevitably not so popular. But that's okay. Because you fill a void. And that's what motivates me. So, even though this program may not be that popular, as we're not having a lot of viewers joining the live stream, but I think it's important. All right. So, someone says, hopefully, someone says, oh, George Washington, 1776. I remember a similar behavior just before the USSR. Russian money left the country just before it collapsed. Do you think this is another indication that the CCP collapsed? Of course, it is. The CCP money is, Chinese are bringing their money out of the country as fast as they can. But the question is, I mean, the CCP does not want to see this happening, right? Because it needs the money. But on the other hand, because the CCP has such tight control on the Chinese people, and also the overseas Chinese communities, so that, as long as the regime controls these people living in our society, living in our communities, then they, to some extent, indirectly control the properties they own in our societies. And that's the threat. Because you have the people in the equation, right? So, even though these are private properties owned by Chinese Canadians or Chinese Americans, but because the CCP has such tight grip on Chinese people living all over the world, and most of Chinese people, and out of fear, these people would do what the CCP forces them to. And so, that's a national security threat. Because these are not exactly, they're not 100% private properties owned by the individual. Just like how these police stations are, that's how CCP is able to operate police stations in Europe, in New York, in other parts of the world. Because it's done through the people. Yeah. All right. All right, let's see. What do people say? Okay. Let me see. Questions, comments? Observations? Okay, here's from Inquisitor. Political February 2026 poll. 48% of Canadians say US is the biggest threat to peace versus 29% say biggest threat is Russia, 10% say China, 50% of Canadians prefer to align with China, and 23% prefer the US. Yes, I remember that survey. I actually mentioned it in one of my live streams. It is concerning. It is very concerning. All right. If you could share this video, please do. If you could tell people about our concern, please do your part. Like I said, the biggest threat is not infiltration. The biggest threat is indifference. That's why I feel compelled to do this program. All right. All right, let's see. Questions, comments? Let's see. All right, questions, comments? Oh, someone is talking about me. I'm getting the attention of some troll here. Oh, here's a question. Someone, Lana Lombardo, does this mean that Canada stands for nothing, has no moral backbone? We can't say that about a country because, of course, there are Canadians who know exactly what's happening, who are trying to control the direction of their country, but there are still a lot of Canadians who don't know, who are not aware. I believe that survey by Politico is exaggerated. I do not believe that's the reality. I think that survey, that data sampling could be problematic. I think that the reality is better than those percentages present, but we can't say that for Canada. I know for a fact that's not what Canadians all feel. There are many Canadians that I know who are trying to change the fate of their country or change the direction that their country is going. Someone says, oh, we have a troll here. Why are you so upset? Okay. Oh, good. You agree with me. All right. He's calling me an old kid. I found that hilarious. I'm an old kid. All right. I enjoy that sense of humor. I'm a kid. Okay. An old kid. All right. Yeah. PEI. Check out the references in the description. There's a very good movie called Puppeteer. Is it Puppeteer? Yeah. It's a thriller made about CCP's infiltration in Canada. I watched it. It's very good. And then there's a book. I provided the link to the book written by some investigative journalists who spent quite, I think, 18 months investigating CCP's infiltration on PEI. And the book link is also in the description. Please check them out. All right. Someone asked me, Lei, how about we end it here? All these lights are generating all this heat. I think my AC is off for some odd reason. I accidentally turned off my AC and it's not serving me well. All right. Oh, we released a video in Lei's Looking Glass channel and it's about China's stealth jet, the J-20. You should check it out. Nicole, if you could provide the link, I'd appreciate it. Yeah. Okay. Nicole provided the link. All right. We'll end it here. I need to go turn on my AC. Thank you very much. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. I'll see you next week. All right. Bye.