Roberts Court Hit With Brutal Reality Check by Founding Fathers!!!
Jonathan Gienapp, professor of history and law and Stanford University, joins Mike Sacks of Court Accountability Action. Gienapp, a constitutional historian, draws on his historical research to show that the Roberts Court's originalist rulings and our modern acceptance of judicial supremacy are at odds with the founding generation's own understanding of how to interpret our constitution and who gets to decide what it means.
Jonathan Gienapp's Website https://www.jonathangienapp.com/
Video Summary
AI GeneratedProfessor Jonathan Gnapp critiques modern \"originalism,\" arguing that the Supreme Court has replaced the founders' vision of democratic resolution with a \"juristocratic\" system. He contends that the Constitution was designed with intentional ambiguity to be settled through political debate and elections, rather than by judicial decree, urging a return to self-government over judicial supremacy.