In this video, we explore the latest archaeological discoveries made in May 2026 that are reshaping our understanding of ancient civilizations and human history. Join as I break down what we’ve found, why its important and what questions still remain unanswered.
CHAPTERS 00:00 - Start 01:47 - Neanderthals used stone drills to treat cavities 59,000 years ago 04:19 - Monte Verde dating debate update 07:32 - The Great Pyramid was engineered to be earthquake-proof 10:11 - Doctor’s kit found on Pompeii victim 12:35 - Teotihuacan era tombs found with dozens of burials and grave goods 14:49 - Interview with Dr. Nicholas Skopal, who has found new clues to the Century-Old Mystery of the Plain of Jars in Laos 28:38 - Manta Sleep Sponsorship 29:29 - 1,000-year-old Viking gold hoard in Denmark 31:43 - Largest ever Viking coin hoard in Norway 34:26 - Same-sex hugging skeletons in Poland 37:57 - Earliest shipwreck in Singapore 40:50 - Conclusion
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI Generated
This video explores ten groundbreaking archaeological discoveries from May 2026, demonstrating how modern technology—from AI and CT scans to DNA analysis—is rewriting human history. The findings span the globe, covering prehistoric medical practices, ancient engineering, and the complex social structures of early civilizations.
Oh hey there! Have you been wondering what kind of discoveries archaeologists have made lately?
Well, off the tip of my trowel I can think of Neanderthal root canals,
the Great Pyramid was engineered to be earthquake proof, one of the victims of Pompeii was a doctor,
two, yes two, major viking hordes, one of gold bracelets and another of silver coins,
a burial of two unrelated female hugging skeletons,
a porcelain cargo shipwreck in Singapore, Teotihuacan era tombs,
the bones of 37 people inside a stone jar in Laos.
Finding this size and the fact it's just like full of these skeletons is what's so unique.
Oh and the debate about which dirt layer came first at Monteverde
and how that relates to pre-Clovis settlement of the Americas
rages on with three new scathing rebuttal letters
published by the original excavator and 29 other scholars.
These are just 10 of the many discoveries archaeologists made
in the past month that are rewriting history.
Let's go on a journey through time exploring these exciting stories from around the world
that I've curated just for you using my years of experience as an archaeologist
to sift through the clickbait AI and pseudoscience to find out what's really rewriting history.
And if that wasn't enough incentive to keep watching,
my executive producer Emma will also be making a few cameos throughout the video.
Won't you Precious? Say hello!
If this all sounds like it's right up your trench,
let's dig in to the latest discoveries from May 2026.
I'll be presenting this list in chronological order
starting with the discovery that goes the farthest back in time.
Our journey begins nearly 60,000 years ago in the Altai Mountains of Siberia
where evidence of the world's earliest known dental treatment has been found in a cave.
This cave contains the most extensive collection of Neanderthal fossil remains in North Asia
with over 70 fossils and 26 dental specimens that have been found here during excavation.
New analysis has focused on one particular molar
that was found on what would have been the cave's floor
and thus has been associated with the earliest stage of the cave's occupation,
roughly 59,000 years ago.
It is a lower second molar of an adult and features a deep hole in the center of the tooth
extending into the pulp cavity.
Microscopic x-ray imaging revealed changes in mineralization that indicated severe tooth decay.
Very well, do you want to show them your molars?
I didn't think so but...
The researchers conducted experiments on three modern human teeth
to demonstrate that a hole of the same shape and pattern of grooves
could be drilled into the tooth manually by rotating a narrow elongated tool
made from local jasper between two fingers, essentially doing this motion.
Penetrating the dentin using this approach took between 35 and 50 minutes of continuous work.
Talk about a hand cramp.
Such a procedure would have been incredibly painful for the patient
but ultimately would have relieved the pain of a dental infection
by removing the damaged part of the tooth.
Modern dentists have described the treatment as the beginnings of a root canal.
Further wear on the tooth that could only have happened after the procedure
shows that the individual lived for a while after it was done
although since the resulting hole in the tooth was left unfilled
they would have been vulnerable to chronic infections.
This rudimentary dental treatment shows us that Neanderthals had the capacity
to identify the source of pain, determine how to treat it,
the dexterity needed for such an efficient operation to fix it
and could control themselves to endure painful treatment
clearly understanding the concept of short-term pain for long-term gain.
This is the first time dental drilling has been demonstrated outside of Homo sapiens
and it is the oldest example of this kind of behavior by more than 40,000 years.
Next up is an update on the Monteverde drama.
In case you need catching up, this site is located in Chile
and it was found in 1976 and excavated by Dr. Tom Dillehay for nearly 50 years
during which time he recovered stone tools,
preserved wood, bones and skin of extinct animals,
a human footprint, edible plant remains, hearths and natural rope.
The occupation of the site was radiocarbon dated to 14,500 years ago
making it the only securely dated late Pleistocene archaeological site in South America
which upended the Clovis first theory.
Then in March 2026, Dr. Todd Suravel published a controversial study
claiming that the dating was wrong and in fact Monteverde was only 8,200 years old.
His hypothesis was based on newly collected soil samples
and the identification of a well-dated layer of volcanic ash aka tephra adjacent to the site.
It's worth noting that retesting the site itself is not possible
because it's actually been destroyed by flooding slash erosion
from the creek along which it sat.
The new work was done on material from the surrounding area.
Now three scientific letters totaling more than a hundred pages
have been published in response critiquing Dr. Suravel's work
and systemically dismantling his claims and refuting their conclusion.
In addition to the tephra layer identification
which Dillehay and company claim doesn't exist at Monteverde,
another reason Suravel and colleagues believe that the site is younger than it's claimed
is because of the complex geology of the creek bank.
They think that the older radiocarbon dates come from material that was washed onto the site
and redeposited in the younger layers making it seem older than it actually is.
In the response letter it's noted that the Suravel study provided no evidence
that any of the dated wood or bones had ever been moved
and the stratigraphy aka the layers of dirt that they described
don't match the stratigraphy of the Monteverde site.
The response also pointed out that further genetic studies
fully support an age of 14,500 years for the site
and has shown that all ancient and present-day Native Americans
trace their ancestry to three lineages.
Ancient Beringians who split off around 20,000 years ago
and then Northern and Southern Native Americans who split off around 15,000 years ago.
This proves the pre-Clovis presence of humans south of the continental ice sheets
earlier than 13,000 years ago which is what Clovis is all related to.
One particularly scathing clapback points out that Suravel's team
came to their conclusions after and I quote
a few hours of field work with no excavation.
That is a that is a sick burn in the world of archaeology.
Suravel has said he is planning his own formal response to these letters
and it seems that this fiery war of publications
and argument over which layer of dirt came first
that is effectively what it amounts to isn't going to be over anytime soon.
Next up on our time traveling adventure we head to the Giza Plateau in Egypt
where research into the 4,600 year old Great Pyramid of King Khufu
has given us new insights into its architectural features
and specifically its remarkable resilience to earthquake damage.
In fact most of the reason it's not survived 100% intact
is because humans took the outer stones and repurposed them to build modern day Cairo.
Since it was built the pyramid has lost only about 10 meters or 33 feet of height
despite experiencing strong earthquakes
that have caused significant damage to other historic Egyptian monuments.
To understand this resilience geoscientists placed 37 vibration sensors
in and around the pyramid and recorded ambient vibrations when there were no tourists inside.
The sensors found that throughout the pyramid vibrations were remarkably similar
ranging from about 2 to 2.6 hertz.
This was quite different from the frequencies on the ground nearby
which was usually around 0.6 hertz.
This gap means that during earthquakes the pyramid sits apart
from the vibrations that were then traveling through the ground.
Other features contributing to the pyramid's stability include its massive base
strong limestone foundation and symmetrical geometry.
Effectively a pyramid is the best kind of shape to resist this kind of damage.
The vibrations do increase towards the top of the structure
which is typical in most buildings even modern ones
but this pattern is interrupted by the pressure relieving chambers
above the king's chamber inside
which are thought to have been built to take some of the weight
off of the roof of the king's final resting place.
As it turns out they also dampen vibrations
that otherwise might travel towards the structure's apex.
All of this suggests that the ancient Egyptian architects
possessed quite an advanced geotechnical understanding
and were able to optimize design and site characterization
to protect the structure against seismic hazards across literally thousands of years.
This advanced geotechnical and architectural understanding
is something that they gained over time
as it's clear from earlier pyramids like the collapsed one at Meidum
that they experimented with slope geometry and internal layouts
before really perfecting their craft at Giza.
If you want to learn more about the evolution of the pyramids
you should really watch my video on it.
The researchers plan to take more measurements at Giza
and hope to use similar methods at other sites and pyramids in Egypt.
Our next find takes us to the site of Pompeii in Italy
which was engulfed and preserved in volcanic ash
from Mount Vesuvius around 2,000 years ago.
In 1961 archaeologists identified an outdoor garden
which contained the remains of 14 adults and children
who were trying to find a way out of the Nosura gate
and were fatally caught by an avalanche of hot gas, ash and rock.
Their flesh had rotted away but left behind were hollow cavities
that the archaeologists filled with plaster
preserving these people's final moments.
And now a new discovery has allowed us to learn a little bit more about their story
by giving a professional identity to one of them.
A doctor struck by tragedy while attempting to escape
taking with him the tools of his trait.
This breakthrough came from the study of a small case
hidden inside the plaster of one of the cast.
X-ray and CT scans of it revealed that it was a small box made of organic material
with metal elements inside.
A fabric bag of bronze and silver coins and a series of metal instruments
including a small slate slab that could have been used
for mixing ingredients for medicine or cosmetics
and the small metal instruments are have been interpreted as being surgical tools
based on their similarity to other excavated and known Roman doctors kits.
These elements support the hypothesis that the victim was a medicus, a Roman doctor.
The use of these advanced diagnostic technologies
including AI-assisted CT scans and 3D reconstructions
allowed the cast contents to be analyzed without compromising its integrity.
It's a non-destructive approach which is ideal in archaeology.
This approach opens up new perspectives for further study
of the other casts of people from Pompeii
and has also revealed previously unseen details
of the refined mechanical structure of the box
which featured a sophisticated locking system with a toothed wheel.
It would seem as though this man took his tools with him
to be ready to rebuild his life elsewhere
but also perhaps to help others who had been caught in the deadly explosion.
This discovery shows us how Pompeii's cast can still produce new archaeological information
when studied with modern tools
and underlines the importance of museum storerooms
where objects excavated decades ago can still give us new information and stories.
Now we head to Tula de Allende in the state of Hidalgo, Mexico
where archaeological salvage work on the route of the Mexico-Queretaro train project
has uncovered a series of funerary contexts
including five shaft tombs dating to the Teotihuacan period.
The site appears to have been occupied between roughly 225 to 550-600 CE
with smaller scale reoccupations during the late post-classic period.
The first hint of this find came from ceramic material scattered across the surface
and test excavations subsequently revealed foundations of ancient walls.
Aerial photography then identified a pattern of small residential compounds
linked by courtyards with houses oriented along north-south and east-west axes.
Most of the structures belong to phases associated with the civilization of Teotihuacan
whose capital is just 90 kilometers away.
Numerous burials were found within the rocky substrate beneath the settlement.
Surface kists and shaft tombs were even found inside several rooms.
In one of them archaeologists found the remains of eight individuals
most of them adults alongside 47 miniature ceramic vessels.
Six of the individuals were placed in a seated position
with ceramic offerings at their feet while two had been disturbed.
It appears that the tomb was reused and when the final person was put inside
the funerary bundle of a previous person was removed or moved.
Among the grave goods were small shell fragments of a semi-circular mother of pearl pendant
and a small plaque made from the same material.
Inside ceramic vessels were also found and removed
with the surrounding soil for micro-excavation to see what may have been inside them.
This region had been exploited for raw materials since the pre-hispanic times
particularly for lime which may have been essential for producing the stucco
used in Teotihuacan's monumental architecture.
The discoveries are expected to provide important insights into the beliefs,
social structure and culture of communities that flourished during the height of this civilization.
Our feature interview this month takes us to the upland valleys and lower foothills
of the central plain of the plateau in Laos known worldwide as the Plain of Jars.
Archaeologists have been trying to solve the mystery
of what these megalithic monuments were used for for almost a hundred years.
Local legends say that they were made by a race of giants
brewing and storing rice wine to celebrate a victory in battle.
New archaeological work paints a very different picture
and Dr. Nicholas Skopel is here to tell us all about it with the results of his recent research.
Let's dig in to what he has to say.
Hi and welcome to the channel Dr. Skopel.
Can you please start by introducing yourself and your relation to the Plain of Jars project?
My name is Nick Skopel.
I'm an archaeologist at James Cook University
and I am co-director of a project called the Archaeology of Northern Laos.
So effectively if you've sort of got PNTR it's anything north of that
and I do a lot of work at the Plain of Jars.
More recently in the sort of peripheral areas of the sites.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
Can you give us and anyone watching who's unfamiliar a brief history of the Plain of Jars?
It is actually one of Southeast Asia's most amazing megalithic landscapes
because it's huge.
You've got, I call them the glorious sites,
but there's the main sites sort of sites one, two and three
and they're these large stone jars.
Some go up nearly three metres, two metres wide,
way up to like 20 tonnes.
Not all of them but and then you just have you have hundreds of some of these sites
but altogether there's about two and a half thousand I think recorded out there so far.
Sort of littered throughout the landscape in the mountains,
the jungles and things like that.
They're first reported by early explorers,
like British, French explorers in the late 1800s, early 1900s,
but there was this French lady, Madeleine Kalani,
she did all the formative work there and she excavated quite a few sites
and really and now she's got these two big books that she wrote everything up in
and that sort of talks to it all.
But the big thing is we actually don't know that much about the stone jars.
They're mortuary sites but the big thing is we don't know who the people are who made them.
We don't really know the chronology,
though I think we're starting to understand that better
and we don't exactly know how they were used.
And that's an excellent segue into the fact that you have recently published a discovery
that helps illuminate a little bit more about what the jars might have been used for.
Can you tell us about what you've found?
So what you've got is up at this site, Site 75,
it's the most north-easterly site.
It's actually not a very spectacular site to be honest.
It's this big broken jar that is one of the jars there
and I've never seen this jar like a jar like this and I have seen a lot of jars.
And then about 500 meters away along this same ridge line,
there's seven smaller jars and just more like the normal size jars
you might get at like Sites 1 and 2 and things like that.
Most of the excavation is focused on inside and around this big jar we found.
What we found inside, after about three seasons digging there,
the remains of 37 people inside dating to about a thousand years ago.
So it's super spectacular because when you actually look at all the stone jars,
the issue is most of the work has happened at Site 1.
No one's really found anything inside the jars.
So Kalani, back in the 1930s,
she found some cremated human remains inside some of the jars.
But we've never really found that since.
But there's been teams working around the jars there
and they've found human burials around these jars.
So it's been like collections of secondary burials
or there's pot burials as well, buried in the ground.
And around these stone jars you also get these stone discs
and there's some place boulders and things like that.
But just at Site 1 you get all these different mortuary treatments.
So actually there's one primary burial, secondary burials
and then you get some cremated remains.
So already there's a lot of sort of confusion as to like,
OK, what's happening with these jars?
Having been to so many sites because I went and surveyed as part of my PhD,
I found a whole lot of new sites and this Site 75 is one of them.
They aren't really full of human remains, like a cursory look.
So finding this site and the fact it's just like full of these skeletons is what's so unique.
However, it does not answer the question.
It is quite a unique jar.
It actually is more like a big, like, it's probably more like a cauldron.
It's just a little bit different.
Look, it's made of stone conglomerates that could impact how it was shaped.
But it's just, it's still, I haven't seen a jar like this.
So as a bit of a follow-up, is one of the reasons why
perhaps it's so difficult to determine the purpose of these jars in relation to human remains maybe
because since the tops of the jars and they themselves are basically exposed,
that means that if there are human remains, they're more vulnerable to
environmental processes that would make them degrade more quickly.
So even if there were human remains in some of these jars,
they're not now because they, the bones have effectively
disappeared because of, you know, exposure or predators, et cetera, et cetera.
Definitely something that could have happened if they're at least a thousand years old.
Like that's it.
And then the stories of like people coming down from the north and like emptying the jars out
or some of the main sites, but there's still, there's sites and the sites have found like
very remote ones, like right up in the mouth of the jungle, tiger country, like,
and they they're pristine and there's sediment still all through the jars.
So there's a large chance that if you find these undisturbed sites,
that there might actually be like more human remains inside.
What it is, is I think it provides more of a clue as to how
the jars may have been used in some instances.
Our hypothesis is this group of jars, like 500 metres away,
we're getting similar dates.
It looks like they're the same time as this large jar.
And what it could be is that when the person dies,
they take the person and they put them inside the stone jar
and it sort of distills all the flesh of them.
And then they take the bones and then they're transported to this large jar
and placed in there.
And that might explain why we're not finding all these human remains inside the jars
in a lot of these other areas.
Like there might just be a temporary thing for the dead
where they're only used for like part of the mortuary process.
Potentially, but like, we don't know.
And then when you actually go to the...
I'm also working on the other side of the province
and you get different type of jars there.
Like they're quite different.
And clearly there's a different mortuary treatment
probably happening up there as well.
So you can't look at these jars and suddenly be like,
right, everything, it must be like this.
I think there's like regionalism happening or things might change over time,
which is what makes them so fascinating.
What has your preliminary analysis of the bones of the individuals
from Site 75 told you about them so far?
It's a range.
We're getting infants, like, you know, all the way up to like,
you know, children and through to adults.
So we're sort of getting the whole spectrum
and it looks like, you know, male and female as well.
Although that has been a bit difficult to tell based on the preservation.
And some of the dates based on the bones
suggest they were using this over a long period.
So, you know, they keep coming back.
And something that's very fascinating,
but we just can't quite work out how it's happening is,
so when we're inside this jar,
based on the skulls we found, we found 19 skulls in there.
However, the teeth we found right at the base
showed that there's an MNI of the 37 people.
So you can see there's this discrepancy.
So the idea is that, okay,
maybe when they're putting the bones inside,
they're also actually removing bones as well over time
and placing them somewhere else.
So like, maybe it's this huge mortuary process
or they're only putting select bones inside in the first place
or something's changed over time.
So there's a whole nother question there.
Around the jar, there were like pots and things like that,
likely for like offerings.
And there's some suggestion there's these sort of stone slabs,
you can find with burials underneath.
But what we find with a lot of the soil around this area
is it's acidic and it could be eating,
like destroying the human remains.
So if there were any,
maybe there were some around the jars
or they're taking these bones to where they live
or they're putting them somewhere else.
So there's still those sorts of questions,
but really interesting.
So a question that I have as somebody
who doesn't really know a lot about the history of Laos
or a lot about Southeast Asia,
Asian archaeology in general.
A question that I have
and I think other people would have as well
is the dates that you're getting back for this
are between 800 to 1250 CE.
This is a time in history
where there's a lot of other civilizations
going on around Laos that write things down
that we know a lot about them.
So can you explain a little bit more
about why exactly there's this kind of gap in knowledge
for what we know about what's going on in Laos
at this pyramid period
and what's happening in kind of like the world around it
that would maybe affect it
and the behaviors of these people?
I actually don't know.
And this is what's exciting is as I look at this,
I'm like, I personally think that these stone jars
are like from this time period
and this was a thriving period.
One of the issues, we can't date the stone jars.
This is one of the problems.
But sort of based on the archaeology
and things that we're finding,
it's just starting to suggest that,
look, I think it is during this time.
But you've got to think this time period,
you have the Song Dynasty in China,
you have the Dali Kingdom in Yunnan province
in modern day China,
you have Pagan in Myanmar, Burma,
and then you have these kingdoms in Thailand and Vietnam
and you have the Angkor, the Khmer Empire down south.
So it is thriving.
Like everyone was doing their thing
sort of throughout this period.
And what's interesting is a lot of the dates,
so say around this sort of 1250 time,
that's when the Mongols are moving down
and that's when Song Dynasty collapses
and that's when Dali Kingdom gets conquered
and all this sort of, and it's interesting.
So potentially, this is just like an idea I had
is potentially, does this explain,
was there mass migration?
Something pushed these people down
and that's why a lot of the dates
we get around the stone jars finish around that time.
What are some of the challenges
that you guys have come across
in excavating this jar and other jars on the plane of jars?
In particular, I remember reading about
how there's a lot of unexploded bombs
in Laos left over from modern day war.
So I can imagine that can make
for a quite tense environment
and a difficult place to try and find stuff
when you have to be so much more vigilant
about where you're walking.
It is a problem.
So Laos during the secret war,
so in the, I think it was the seventies,
it's actually the most heavily bombed country
ever in the world.
And specifically like Jingquan province,
which is where all these, most of the stone jars are,
that's where they hit a lot of.
So everywhere when I was surveying for jars
and trekking through,
we always had to be careful where we're standing.
So you get what is called UXOs, unexploded ordnance.
They're not mines,
they're like cluster bombs and things like that.
And yeah, it's devastating.
Like for the local people,
it is hard because they're all through the farmland.
There are teams out there,
MAG who go out and clear areas.
When I'm excavating at a site,
most of the time we'll get the MAG team in to clear
because otherwise, yeah,
when you're digging along,
you don't really want to dig up a cluster bomb.
At this site 75,
there's actually massive craters around there
from where they're bombing.
So what are the next steps for the project?
Then you've done your kind of preliminary publication
of your paper.
Are you going to do some more analysis of the bones
like ancient DNA or stable isotopes?
We're doing the ancient DNA work on them,
which they still be incredibly cool
because it hasn't been done yet.
And I think there might be some teams
trying at some of the other sites,
but to get an idea of who these people were,
because we have no idea
because we don't know where they live either.
We can't find where they're living,
these habitation sites.
That would be fascinating if we get the results,
if we can.
It's always hard though,
because in the tropics,
it is really hard to get DNA,
like have it preserved.
That is one of the conundrums we have.
So let's like fingers crossed.
So last question then is,
since there's clearly more to come from your project
and from the Plane of Jars,
how can people follow your work,
what you're doing and keep updated on the project?
I have finally set up an Instagram account,
which I am slowly trying to put things on,
so you can follow me there.
But otherwise, look,
I will make sure publications are coming out.
I do try to do like outreach things like this,
so like the broader public,
because if you don't bring the public along,
like there's not much point.
Well, what do you think?
Do you still have questions?
Let me know in the comments below.
Thanks so much to Nick
for taking the time to speak with me.
And I look forward to more exciting stories from his team.
I'm going to briefly pause this video
to speak about its sponsor, Mantasleep.
Now I have always valued a good sleep.
What's your favorite part?
Nap time.
Even more so since I became a parent.
So I jumped at the chance to try their silk sleep mask
and pillowcase bundle,
plus the accessory cooling pads
that you can actually switch out into the mask.
When they say these are blackout,
they are not kidding.
Here, let me show you.
See, I really like how the iPads,
the way that they're designed,
doesn't put any pressure on your eyes,
especially with the weighted cooling pads.
The pillowcase is so soft and cool,
which makes it extra appealing in a hot summer.
So if you're looking for a nice wee treat
to upgrade your sleep,
head on over to their website
and use the code INSIDEARCHEOLOGY for 10% off.
Happy snoozing.
Now we head to the forests of Northern Denmark,
where archaeologists have uncovered
one of the most important
Viking Age gold hordes in decades.
This story begins in April
when a local resident brought two heavy gold rings
to the archaeological department
at the North Jutland Museums
after noticing them partly exposed in the soil
along a farm track in a wooded area.
The objects were quickly identified
as Viking Age gold arm rings,
an unusual and highly significant find.
A field investigation followed
with archaeologists returning to the site
and doing a metal detecting survey across a wider area.
This soon found a third gold ring
close to the original spot
and three more appeared just 15 meters away,
bringing the whole total of what was found to six.
All of them are intact and made of solid gold.
Together they weigh 762.5 grams
or nearly 1.7 pounds.
The collection includes both twisted and smooth rings
showing different forms of advanced metalworking.
Three were made by twisting together two gold rods
and one includes a thin inlaid gold wire
and a knob-shaped clasp.
The remaining pieces were shaped from gold rods or wire
and finished with tightly wrapped closures
known as running knots.
One ring stands apart from the rest
with flattened joined ends
decorated with zigzag patterns and triangular designs.
The rings date to the late Viking age,
so roughly a thousand years ago,
a period when Denmark was moving
towards political unification under a single monarchy.
Arm rings of this type have been found before in Scandinavia
but they're usually made of silver
because during this time,
gold was largely controlled by the social elite.
This and the fact that all the rings are intact
makes this find incredibly rare.
Because the hoard was buried intact,
we think that their deposit was deliberate.
The hoard has now become state property under Danish law
and the rings are undergoing further analysis,
documentation and conservation
before being transferred to the National Museum of Denmark
and will hopefully be on public display soon.
It would appear that May is a popular month for Viking hoards
as our next find is very similar
and I was alerted to its existence
by several commenters last month.
It brings us to a field near Rina in Norway
where more than 4,000 silver coins
have been found in a single hoard,
the largest such ever found in Norway.
The discovery was initially made by two metal detectorists
who found 19 coins
while conducting detecting over some farmland.
After finding the first group,
they stopped their search and contacted archaeologists,
which is 100% what you should do in this case.
Their decision allowed the professionals to secure the area
before uncontrolled searching damaged the site.
At first, the team expected to find a small hoard.
On their first day, they found 70 more coins
but then more of them just kept on appearing.
The count soon passed 500, then 1,000
and now it's more than 4,000.
Most of the coins were minted in English and German territories.
A smaller number come from Denmark and Norway.
The hoard includes coins linked to rulers like Knut the Great,
Æthelred II, Otto III and Harald Hardrada.
The Norwegian coins in particular have drawn special attention.
Harald Hardrada ruled Norway from 1046 to 1066.
He famously died trying to become king of England
fighting against Harald Godwinson
who then went on to be killed by King William the Conqueror.
He introduced a national coinage system to Norway
after returning from working in Byzantium around 1045.
Before his reforms, foreign silver coins dominated trade in Norway.
Since some Norwegian coins in the hoard appear to be newly minted,
archaeologists believe the deposit belongs to the early years of this monetary shift.
Overall, the coins are in very good condition
with sharp details and clear inscriptions
even after nearly 1,000 years in the ground.
The silver was probably originally buried
inside a leather or textile pouch that has since decayed.
Farming later scattered them throughout the field via repeated plowing.
The area had never been searched by detectorists before.
Archaeologists also use ground penetrating radar
to look for buried buildings, graves or other features
but so far they haven't found anything else connected to the hoard.
This suggests that, like the rings, they were intentionally hidden
as during this time people often buried silver and other valuables
for safekeeping during periods of instability or conflict.
The site is now protected under Norwegian cultural heritage law
and the coins will be sent to the Cultural History Museum
and Coin Cabinet for conservation and identification.
Now we head to the exaltation of the Holy Cross Cathedral on Opole, Poland
where ancient DNA analysis has shed new light
on two 800-year-old medieval skeletons buried in a mutual embrace.
Perhaps I should be hugging Emma for this story.
One moment.
Double and multiple burials like this offer archaeologists valuable insights
into the cultural practices and social structures of past societies
as people buried together are often interpreted as having been connected in life
through social ties or biological kinship.
For example, when an adult and a child are buried together
they are assumed to be related
while mixed-sex adults buried together are treated like married couples.
However, these conclusions have traditionally relied on things
like body positioning and determining sex
from just looking at the features of a skeleton
which can sometimes be misleading, not there, or indeterminate.
Ancient DNA analysis can accurately determine both genetic sex and biological kinship
allowing archaeologists to either confirm or challenge
previous assumptions made about relationships among people who are buried together.
In this case in Poland, it really challenges the narrative.
In 2022 and 2025, excavation work at the church uncovered multiple human remains
but one double burial stood out.
In it, the first person was buried according to Christian rites
lying on their back with their arms placed along their body.
A second person had been buried beside them on their side
with one arm beneath the first person's head as if embracing them.
Based on these positions, the researchers think that they were interred at the same time.
Notably, there was no coffin and both of them were placed on byers.
The preservation of the skeletons was poor especially with regards to their lower limbs
which is probably due to how deep they were buried
and the fact that there was a high amount of use of the cemetery for other burials.
This meant that our traditional morphological analysis of sex
where you look for markers of sex on the bones
which are mostly found on the pelvis and the skull was inconclusive.
So it was decided to conduct ancient DNA to help paint a fuller picture
and what came back is not what the researchers expected.
The analysis determined that both of the skeletons were female
and they were not closely related
making this grave the first genetically confirmed same-sex double burial in medieval Poland.
But does that mean that we can now say confidently that these two people were lovers?
Unfortunately, this will probably remain a mystery
because the historical and the archaeological evidence contradict each other.
The women were buried next to the cathedral walls,
a position often reserved for kings and local elites
and there is no evidence that they were shunned or marginalized by their society.
However, historical legal and religious sources from this time
harshly condemned same-sex relationships punishing them with execution.
The archaeologists think that if these women had been suspected of being lovers
then they would not have been given such a prominent high status grave.
So while this is inconclusive, it does show us that how past relationships
were expressed after death is more diverse than we previously thought.
What do you think?
Were they secret lovers?
Best friends?
Sisters-in-law who died at the same time?
Let me know in the comments.
The last destination in our travels today is the coast of Singapore
where a four-year excavation has produced the earliest known shipwreck in the country's waters
as well as strong evidence for the existence of a busy trading port over 700 years ago.
Over the course of the dig,
the archaeologists recovered around 2,300 ceramic shards from the wreck
along with several intact or nearly intact pieces.
However, the remains of the ship that carried them are completely gone,
scattered by waves and currents,
or consumed by naval shipworms aka the termites of the sea.
Analysis of the ceramics found that the assemblage consisted of Yuan dynasty blue and white porcelain,
green glazed longquan celadon,
chengbai slash shufu ware,
dehua whiteware,
olive toned greenware likely from Fujian provincial kilns,
stoneware storage jars,
and small mouse jars from Xizhou.
When looked at together,
this cargo reflects a coordinated export system of large-scale trade
drawing from multiple kin complexes in southeastern China.
This prompts the question of when did this ship sail and where exactly was it going?
The first question was answered with historical analysis of the ceramics.
Blue and white porcelain was first produced in the late 1320s to early 1330s.
One motif in particular, mandarin ducks swimming among lotus blooms,
became widespread after 1340.
Production appears to have been severely disrupted by the red turban uprisings around 1352.
Since we have pieces with the mandarin swimming ducks on the ship,
it means that the wreck's final voyage was probably between 1340 and 1352
at the height of Singapore's historical Temasek period.
As for the ship's intended destination,
this becomes clearer when the ceramics are compared
with finds from land excavations in Singapore.
Decorative patterns on smaller bowls and vases
match fragments found at the nearby Fort Canning and other sites.
However, large blue and white platters that were popular in India and the Middle East
during this time are missing from the cargo.
And it was concluded that the ship was probably a Chinese junk,
that is a type of ship,
that was loaded in Kwanzo and was bound for the thriving trading home of Temasek.
This find is significant because for decades,
popular narratives have portrayed pre-1819 Singapore as a minor settlement.
Archaeology has been steadily dismantling this impression,
but this wreck provides one of the most decisive pieces of evidence that we found.
It's tangible proof that Singapore's global story
began long before colonial maps drew its outlines.
All right everyone, time to pack up our finds and hang up our shovels.
That's everything for this video.
Did you like it?
Which discovery was your favorite?
Is there anything important that I missed?
Don't forget to comment, like the video, or subscribe to the channel before you leave.
If you're feeling extra generous, you can give me a super thanks
or go to my Ko-fi page and support me with a small donation.
If you like the look of my bookshelf or perhaps you're curious as to what's on it,
I have an Amazon storefront as well where you can shop my shelf.
I also have a Redbubble store where I have made a few archaeology themed
designs that you can get put on a variety of different kinds of merchandise.
I hope that you have come away from this video knowing that despite what,
you know, the crazy nonsense the algorithm might be shoving down your throat,
real archaeology is alive, it's well, it's everywhere,
and it's working hard all the time to expand what we know about the past.
Every watch, like, subscribe, and click helps my channel connect you
directly to the source of exciting archaeological news.
It shows the algorithm that people are interested in real archaeology.
Thank you so much for watching, stay curious,
and I hope to see you on my next adventure inside archaeology.