Marc Benioff vs. Verizon CEO Dan Schulman on AI, Blue Origin’s Latest Flight | Diet TBPN

Marc Benioff
1 follower
Oct 12, 2026
Sign up for TBPN’s daily newsletter at TBPN.com
AI Generated·May contain errors
Absolutely incredible edition of the Wall Street Journal.
Over the weekend, I saw these in the app,
but they're in print today, Monday, April 20th.
There's two articles from two tech CEOs
that run companies that are almost identically valued.
Salesforce is, I think, $150 billion.
Verizon's $190 billion.
They're right in that sweet spot.
And I'm assuming they have the exact same point of view,
kind of same market outlook.
They have exactly opposite points of view.
And I thought it was interesting seeing
what does a victim of the saspocalypse
have to say about AI?
And then what does someone who is the most resilient
to the saspocalypse have to say?
And potentially is like, let me in.
I want some of the drama.
I want the smoke.
And so Mark Benioff is who I'm talking about at Salesforce.
So he says the software bears are all wrong about Salesforce.
we had a bear hat but it was it was too terrifying yeah it was too
so so we skip it but uh he says
people think we have our back against the wall
but customers aren't replacing offerings with ai
they aren't replacing salesforce
with ai they aren't ripping it out of course everyone will
say well yet but let's dig into mark benioff's argument
and how he's processing the sass
apocalypse and what he's going
to do about crazy opening mark benioff has some problems
His enterprise software company, Salesforce,
is the biggest name in a category that Wall Street
thinks may get decimated by artificial intelligence.
Its business model is centered
on selling software to large companies
on a per-employee basis, but many of those firms
are expected to downsize as AI agents become increasingly proficient
at performing real-world
tasks. It's a daunting double bind,
and it isn't even the worst-case scenario. Salesforce stock
is down a mere 28% year-to-date.
The hardest-hit software-as-a-service companies are down about
twice that much on similar fears
but benioff thinks the bears have it wrong about the saspocalypse
thesis generally and especially about salesforce ai he says
is making salesforce more valuable to
its customers than ever the leading ai labs
couldn't replace what salesforce offers even
if they wanted to and they would rather partner
with them for now anyway nor could yeah he's like
i dare you i i dare you he's uh
nor could customers i i wish i wish we had benioff on right now yeah
It's a joy to speak with him.
But continuing, nor could customers easily vibe code
their own sales management software
that could compete with Salesforce on security,
compliance, and other vital features.
People think we have our back against the wall when,
in fact, the opportunity has never
been greater, Benioff said in an interview.
An early investor in Anthropic,
Salesforce has been developing and pushing its own AI
tools for years.
By the end of this year, it plans to unveil
a new AI platform that automatically studies
its users and takes actions on their behalf.
codename agent albert it's kind of cool
to put agent in the name instead of just albert
agent well they had they had einstein right
so albert einstein is their whole
shtick here agent albert is the culmination
of an effort that began three years ago when
benioff galvanized by the debut
of chad gbt instituted a standing saturday meeting to
accelerate salesforce ai efforts saturday stand up everyone
an earlier flagship product of that
push agent force has been somewhat slow
to gain traction launched in 2024 it is used by
23 000 customers of a total base of 150 000
so what is that a little little under 20 percent
of the customer base is using uh agents they're
building remember jason lemkin came on the show
and he was like i use agent force it's solid yeah
like he's like it won us back a customer that like
we weren't reaching out to and it like it made me money yeah
so he was an agent force um yeah
enthusiast and so uh salesforce's yearly revenue growth
at 10 is down somewhat from recent years
but interestingly the the deceleration in uh
in salesforce's revenue growth started back in 2022
maybe even a little bit earlier if we scroll down
on this on this image you can see back in 2012
they were growing 36%.
Then as recently as 2020, they were growing 28.7%.
There was acceleration
in 2022 to 24%, but then 2023, 18%, 2024, 11%, 2025, 8%.
And then we're actually seeing some
re-acceleration this year from 8.7 to 9.6 to 10.8.
And so it feels like definitely too soon
for the sas apocalypse narrative to show up
in the actual uh revenue growth rates of these sas
companies i pulled together uh the recent earnings
from a variety of uh public cloud software names
and they're all still growing
which you would expect i mean of course like you know you want
to be growing fast and there's a lot of things
and there's like the long-term durability of the value
that of the stock that actually informs enterprise value today
but we're certainly not seeing like
okay, there's so much churn at GitLab,
for example, because people are forking it because
it's open source and vibe coding on top of it.
And they don't need to pay GitLab that you would
expect GitLab's revenue to actually be shrinking.
It's not. GitLab is growing at 23%. Adobe's at
12%. PagerDuty, 2.7%, a little low, but UiPath at 14%.
Box is at 9%. Asana is at 9%. Asana feels
like you know textbook like you could just vibe code
this it's a you know it's a kanban board a
task list but it's still growing zoom
at 5.3 percent snowflakes growing 30 percent work days
at 14.5 percent hub spots at 20 percent data dogs
at 29 percent cloud flare 34 percent uh monday.com
25 percent like there is really really strong revenue growth across
the sas category of course
the expectations have been very high
so when there's a readjustment in expectations you see
a sell-off in the market. But this idea
that the companies aren't growing anymore because
they're being replaced so rapidly,
that certainly hasn't taken hold just yet. Partner at Salesforce
investor Chicago Capital has been impressed
with some of its recent moves. But what Salesforce
really needs, he says, is positive word of mouth
from clients talking up the value they derive from
its AI products. Like Jason Lemkin,
they need to show revolutionary jumps. Benioff has said
Salesforce was destined to be an AI-first company as far back as 2014
when it launched its AI
research unit i didn't realize that ai research unit all
the way back then but it makes sense
just for like tagging and classifying different records inside
the crm uh still it was caught
flat-footed by the arrival of high-functioning chat bots
in the form of chat gpt customer
super intelligence customer super intelligence i mean
this is it is it is funny because uh a lot
of this the agentic enterprise it is a little like boring
and it's not as like sexy as some of the
the more like crazy sci-fi scenarios
but in terms of just incrementally improving the value that is
delivered to the customers it seems like things
are doing okay uh early reviews were tepid though
customers complained of having to spend half their time preparing data
so the ai could understand it
limiting the platform's effectiveness uh to help fix
the problems built salesforce built a layer
into its tech stack that automatically pulls
in customer data from external sources and purchased
a string of companies that include firms specializing
in data management ai powered
sales. At education company Pearson,
agents now autonomously handle queries about order statuses,
refunds, and lost access codes for its customers.
This has increased the percentage of customer
questions that don't involve human interaction by 40%.
Where AgentForce has been lacking in
its addressing complex customer problems
and those require human touch, David Wemsley,
Chief Digital Officer at Pandora Jewelry,
said AgentForce hadn't been able to reliably recommend
products on its own based on the vague context
that customers share through its website,
like my wife likes dogs what should i buy
her that's such a funny funny question but i mean
i guess the natural text natural language interface should
be able to find you jewelry
based on a love of dogs although i think that a lot of people
who are dog lovers might have
different tastes that appeal to their jewelry like why
not just get her a dog or multiple dogs
yeah i don't know uh
so how does this how does how does salesforce's view compare
to the verizon ceo so so uh verizon has a new ceo
his name is dan shulman i don't think he's
related to john shulman
but he is stepping into the ai debate uh he says for uh the wall street
journal says for a big company ceo
with big ai ambitions verizon communications dan shulman
doesn't pull punches about the pain
the technology could unleash on america's workforce just months
into the job he has predicted 20
to 30 percent unemployment within the next two to five years
which is staggering staggering i can put
that into some context he says he warns that advancements
in humanoid robots could upend the manual labor jobs still seen
as safe today and he has pushed
for more education and reskilling to help workers adapt
to intensifying tech okay disruption put
this into context for me he's uh so uh this is an insane
and yes and so this is like potentially
the most aggressive stance i mean there are even even even dario
so dario had the clip going viral
this weekend it was a clip from last year talking about risks
to entry-level white collar job yeah
and dario which is like you know i would say like
on the frontier around being concerned around
AI job loss, was not calling for 30% unemployment, right?
He was saying there's a risk to entry-level white-collar work.
And that sounds really bad until you actually dig
in and you realize that America only has
5 to 7 million entry-level white-collar workers,
and the U.S. labor force is 170 million people.
And so if the Dario prediction came true,
the overall unemployment rate would sit somewhere
between six and nine percent which is not great
and it serves and it's obviously deserving of
intervention but it's far from the 20
to 30 percent outlined by dan shulman and it's it
wouldn't even be even if the dario scenario 50
of early stage white collar work uh unemployment
that happens you're still below covid below the great depression uh
and i think that there's a
whole bunch of uh government interventions that could
that could offset that pretty quickly like
20 to 30 percent is truly like the do nothing
the government never engages there's never any
sort of uh you know incentive to to keep hiring people
and there's this like fast takeoff in
in AGI and also humanoids
which I think people are you know worried about but if you look at
the deployment rate of self-driving cars people have
been saying that all the truck drivers were
going to go out of a job uh and you know
this is a very very slow takeoff the number of self-driving
cars on the road is well below 1% of overall cars on the road still.
And this is just the case across the board.
I was listening to a podcast with someone
who was very worried about unemployment internationally,
and he was saying that AI could upend the Philippines
because the Philippines does a
lot of customer service.
Which we haven't seen at all yet.
No, none of this is showing up in the unemployment data.
It's not showing up in U.S. unemployment data yet.
I mean, that doesn't mean that you shouldn't
be aware of this stuff, but it's certainly
not true.
just like the saspocalypse is not showing up
in revenue yet uh you know ai unemployment is not
showing up in any of the employment statistics yet
but uh this individual was on a podcast it
was saying that uh something along the lines
of ai could be devastating to the philippines economy
because the philippines is very dependent on customer service
and the stat he quoted was that
90 of the philippines economy is based around customer service
and customer support and and
handling people on the phone.
And I was like, 90%, that seems really, really high. Like they
have to do other things in the Philippines
because sure you go to work at your, at your
customer service job, but then you go home
and you buy food and you live in an apartment.
There must be real estate agents.
There must be home builders. There must be people who work on
roads. There must be doctors. There must be lawyers.
Like, like the, an economy requires
more than just like a single 90% feels like
incredibly concentrated. So I looked it up and
And I was like, how, how big of an issue is,
how big of a, of a, of a, of an industry is
customer service in the Philippines?
Like, is it 90% that feels high?
Maybe it's 50, maybe it's 40.
It was like 6%, 7%.
It's really, really small.
Now it's like huge in terms of like-
You don't want it to go away.
You don't want it to go away, of course.
And you do want, you know, you want a number
of industries that are flourishing.
And that is probably more concentrated than many other countries.
It's probably many.
It might be, it might be the country
with the highest percentage of customer service
intensivity in the economy, but it's not 90% of their economy.
And so there's a little bit of this,
like people don't seem to go back to the raw numbers
because if you go back and you try and understand like,
okay, what would 30% unemployment really
look like?
Well, that's like, you know,
great depression level with no intervention, no, no action
from the fed, no action from the government.
And it seems a little bit, a little bit crazy.
So I can't tell if this is just like saying the biggest number.
There's a little bit of that going on here where
if you want to grab headlines and you
go out and you say, okay, well,
someone predicted, you know, 5% unemployment.
I'm going to predict 10% and then I'll jump
to the front forefront of the discussion.
That seems to be a way to get earned media.
I mean, let's unpack a little bit more of his discussion
because we will see if there's
a way to steel man his take around 20 to 30% unemployment.
He said, coached in the blunt AI talk is a warning for other CEOs.
Be candid about the coming disruption or risk of public backlash.
It's a very difficult time, and everyone knows this.
Shulman said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal.
I don't even agree with that stance.
Everyone that's being candid
or even talking about it is immediately getting backlash anyway.
Oh, yeah.
So I think being authentic, being realistic,
telling the truth as best you can is key.
that belief he said is why verizon created
a 20 million dollar career transition retraining fund
for the age of ai he's like began laying off we
are gonna have greater unemployment than in the
great depression and i'm gonna you know he's taking
the piece of duct tape you know there's
water pouring out he's i know exactly what you're talking about
and to be clear to be clear this is
not our view like this is not our view at all
no but i mean at the same time like they did layoffs
They probably hired a lot during COVID and beyond,
and a $20 million career transition
and retraining fund is great.
It's a good start.
That is good.
This is a good thing.
But he says, this is from the journal,
the warnings are a departure from the messaging
of other public company CEOs,
many of whom have been bullish about AI's potential to
unlock new levels of growth,
but demur on or even reject the idea of job losses.
A lot of people are saying AI is coming.
We're going to run out of jobs.
It's exactly the opposite.
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Wang said last month,
pointing out that every other technological advancement
has brought more productivity and more prosperity.
And there is some new data showing that
productivity might be climbing, which is very exciting.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy is similarly
sanguine about potential job losses to AI.
Though some roles will be replaced, there will be other
jobs created. In the short term, though,
a cavalcade of companies from Snap to Amazon have invoked AI
or a desire to find efficiencies
as they slash large portions of their workforces.
Block, which cut nearly half of its staff,
predicted other companies would soon follow suit.
A new Boston Consulting Group report predicts
that AI will shape roughly half of U.S. jobs
in two to three years,
and that up to 15% of jobs could eventually be eliminated outright.
Again, that's reshaped
and eliminated would be offset by the creation of new jobs.
So even in this BCG report,
you're probably looking at like maybe a transition of like
six, seven, eight, nine,
10% unemployment while there's an adjustment period.
Many Americans fear that will happen too.
In a Quinnipiac University survey of 1,400 adults,
55% said they felt AI would bring
more harm than good, up from 44% in a poll last year.
And so the average American is dooming for sure.
CEOs are not thinking about this the right way,
said Bill George, the former CEO of Medtronic,
who is now an executive fellow at Harvard Business School.
Too many, he said, are focusing on productivity instead of laying out
a strategy for how companies can find new business models to grow
or on how workers can best use AI.
They should be very candid with them and paint a big picture.
Schulman's big picture also included sweeping job cuts,
the 13,000 layoffs he announced
shortly after his appointment as CEO in October
were Verizon's largest ever, but necessary
to make Verizon more efficient, he said.
Altogether, he's seeking to cut $9 billion of costs.
Verizon said its layoffs were not related to AI.
The carrier was too hierarchical, too bureaucratic,
way too process-oriented as opposed to outcomes-oriented.
And the CEO is saying, this is already happening.
in a big way but the layoffs we're doing are just
that we're bloated yeah so verizon has 90,000
employees and they laid off uh 13,000
so maybe like a little over 10 percent uh riff verizon's
a weird one because the stock
is basically completely flat over the last it's actually
up 15 percent year to date and uh it is an incredibly stable stock
and it's also just like should not
be a victim of the saspocalypse
because they own spectrum allocation cell towers they own cell
towers exactly and that's just where they
or they have like very very long-term lease agreements
yeah and i mean there is there is the case
that like you know if starlink direct to cell gets
really good and even elon saying like it's
not gonna be that good inside buildings like it's
pretty difficult to get to a point where all
of a sudden there's a new technology that's just
wildly disruptive like maybe
if you're like somehow transitioning from starlink when you're
outside to wi-fi when you're inside like you could cut
the cord with verizon but that just feels so
so far away for something that is a pretty key utility
in most people's lives like their water
bill or electricity bill like now they might move to Sprint
or AT&T and there's going to be some
competitive dynamic it is an oligopoly after all
but uh it it doesn't seem like there's going to
be some massive disruption moment where people
are vibe coding their own cell carriers necessarily
So, in meetings, he has repeatedly told Verizon staff they must
embrace AI, describing it as core to the company's future.
He used it himself to comb through some 8,000 responses after asking...
This is the future. Trust me, I used it once.
Shulman's embrace of AI goes deeper than cost-cutting.
He envisions a company wholly reshaped by the technology, from improved
customer service to more personalized options for consumers.
And he has encouraged staffers to talk
to their children about AI at the dinner table.
In one all-hands, Shulman recommended that staff ask AI to write their
obituary to see how the technology works and how it frames their lives.
Just dig your own grave.
He's literally, the title of this article,
he's saying AI is coming for your job and everyone knows it.
In tech, we're starting to, every company is adopting this technology.
at a rapid rate yeah but everyone's like hey
this you know basically like jobs aren't tasks right
this sort of narrative is building like we need
to figure out how to we've built a bunch of very
useful tools yeah and they are going
to have powerful effects in our economy yeah but uh we
have to kind of change the narrative around
this because like a fear-based approach is not working
and and meanwhile he's like AI is coming
for your job everyone knows it write your obituary
so not so not helpful and and and they're
not even doing AI related job cuts, no I love I just
don't understand, I don't understand
this whole press cycle, I love I love I love that he just
comes in just immediately starts blackpilling, it's
so wild to just get this job and immediately
start blackpilling
so do you think this is a setup for for a much like deeper layoff than
they've done historically, I don't know, I mean it's possible
but I like I think that they would
need to do some serious like AI tooling
and implementation and actually like I want to know
more about the breakdown of those 90,000 employees
or 80,000 employees, like what are they actually
all doing, which ones are actually just sitting there being like I just
do tasks all day long
like form comes in, I type it into an Excel sheet
and I email it to somebody, like that type of job
yeah that's probably going to be automated in some way
and that person will have to find a
different way to make a play inside the organization, uh
but for a lot of, but for a lot
of the folks at Verizon, I imagine that they're
that they're working on bigger projects than just
uh you know just throwing throwing tons
and tons of people at a single problem at the same time
who knows, maybe maybe it's 50, maybe half the company
is uh customer support reps, I don't know
it's like we all wanted to live in the Renaissance
or like when fire was first invented how cool would
that be he continued we're in that stage we're
not just appreciating it for what it could be
that's a very optimistic take i like that i like
that sentence that's good blue origin rocket
stumbles on first commercial mission uh AST SpaceMobile
who we've talked about a few times here
jeff bezos's rocket company said the satellite
from AST's was deployed into an incorrect orbit
and so uh a little bit of a setback for them uh i think
the stock traded down in the news a bit
The launch of the company's New Glenn rocket started smoothly,
with the vehicle shooting into the sky
from the Blue Origin launch site in Cape Canaveral, Florida.
During the flight, New Glenn's third ever,
the vehicle's huge booster returned safely to Earth, a feat only Blue
Origin and Elon Musk's SpaceX have ever achieved with orbital rockets.
But the mission later suffered a mishap.
A satellite the rocket was carrying into orbit for AST SpaceMobile,
a company building cellular broadband networking in space,
wasn't deployed correctly.
In a post on X, Blue Origin said its rocket delivered AST's satellite
into an incorrect location in space.
The payload was placed into an off-nominal orbit.
AST said the satellite's altitude was too low to sustain operations
and that it will be taken out of orbit.
The cost is expected to be covered under its insurance policy.
The stumble comes as Blue Origin works
to ramp up flights with New Glenns.
Yeah, I saw some of the AST retail army saying,
like, don't worry, keep holding.
Keep holding.
it's covered under insurance very unfortunate
but it seems like it's somewhat rebounded a little bit
somewhat to be expected right as blue origin like figures out
their commercial business yeah
it traded down like 16 overnight
but it's down uh just six percent today so a little bit of a
rebound and we got a fantastic video
of the booster landing that we can pull up here yeah
tyler you dug into why doesn't ASTS just uh launch on SpaceX well
so there are two things
I think one thing I thought was interesting is, like,
there's this whole press cycle about it, like, oh,
it was, like, a failure of a launch or something.
But this has, like, happened a number of times before.
Like, SpaceX in 2024,
there was Falcon 9 that kind of the upper stage, like, failed.
And then a few, like, Starlink satellites.
Just went into the wrong orbit.
Yeah, basically.
And then they're too low, and then they just get burned up.
Yeah, companies don't typically like to talk about
when they send something into space and lose it, basically.
But that happens, too.
I remember at the beginning of last year,
there was a launch for a venture-backed space
company, and they basically put a satellite up
and almost immediately lost contact with
it.
So it's not unusual, unfortunate, but they'll be back.
In 2016, SpaceX blew up a Facebook rocket.
Mark Zuckerberg laments the loss of internet.org satellite.
Facebook's CEO said he was deeply disappointed
in the explosion of Falcon 9 rocket-carrying
satellite intended to provide internet coverage
to parts of africa writing on his facebook page
zuckerberg said as i'm here in africa i'm deeply disappointed
to hear that spacex's launch failure
destroyed our satellite that would have provided connectivity
to so many entrepreneurs and everyone
else across the continent the accidental explosion
of the falcon 9 rocket early thursday morning this
is back in 2016 referred to as an anomaly
by spacex engineer destroyed both the rocket and
its cargo the Amos-6 satellite dolly bolly says uh
is showing a screenshot from i believe is biz
biz by sal of a laundromat
which is selling uh it's got 421,000 of EBITDA asking just under
three million so getting a better multiple
for your laundromat than most than most public
SaaS companies out there right now
and it was established in 2024 wow they just made this
business in a couple years
and they're like i would like three million dollars for it now
okay a couple more posts uh john fio friend
of the show says the sphere is probably the most
important piece of architecture
in the last hundred years it's a hot take it's what the VR
trade was trying to be but manifested in the real world
with a real novel experience instead it's
what apple and meta were trying to go after
but failed because they tried to shove it into a
scalable box instead of building for real life
a sphere in every major city will be a proprietary
technology for a new kind of stadium it will suck in only the best acts
and they'll stop playing
regular stadiums it's the perfect example
of mixing real novel tech with real novel life this
is how you capture value over the next cycle
and i agree with this i think this is a great take so
So, uh, yeah, rewind a year ago,
you're like companies are going to announce hundreds and
hundreds and hundreds of billions of NVIDIA orders.
Meanwhile, we have the sphere, which
they built the sphere. It's one concert venue.
They built a, they built a really cool concert
venue in Vegas. They got a bunch of debt, but it's awesome.
Which one do you want to own?
And of course on NVIDIA, you were,
you were still up a hundred percent over the last 12 months,
but if you had bought the Sphere, you were up 442%.
Yeah, did very well.
I made a whole YouTube video about the Sphere two years ago
and was pretty bullish on it.
Had dug into the founder and how it got built.
And it was just a fascinating, fascinating story.
But I think he's right that there will be a Sphere in every major city.
There is technically a Sphere-like location
in Los Angeles over by SoFi Stadium.
it's not technically a full sphere with LEDs on the outside
but it has a big screen you can go
and watch a football game there
and i think it's doing well it's kind of a miss that we've never
done anything with the Sphere no last
a little white pill here meta announced level up a free
four-week training program that takes people
with no prior experience and prepares them to work as
fiber technicians on data center construction sites across
the u.s we built this program with
CBRE because the fiber technician field
and the broader construction industry is facing a
nationwide shortage at a time
when data center demand is higher than ever and i'm sure people
will come up with reasons why this is bad actually
but uh i think this is i think this is great great
opportunity and tyler uh uh we didn't get a chance
to talk with you about uh with talk with you about
this before the show but you're actually going
to be going through the program um starting tomorrow
we got you a slot and uh so get
this actually seems fun i would be interested in doing this
They made Data Center Simulator in real life.
They made Data Center Simulator in real life.
That's amazing.
Tyler, do you ever play Elden Ring?
No.
No?
Oh, it's such a good game.
More like online games.
Elden Ring can be online.
Okay, I don't know.
You can play with people.
They're making a movie about it.
The live-action adaptation of Elden Ring,
produced by A24 in partnership with Bandai Namco,
and filmed for IMAX is slated for release March 3, 2028.
Wow, that's a long ways away.
production will begin in spring uh
but if you haven't played Elden Ring it's a fun time it's
really really hard and uh sometimes it just gets like
a little bit too much but well folks thank
you for tuning in we will be it's been an honor
and a privilege leave us five stars on apple
podcast and spotify sign up for a newsletter
at tvpn.com and flashbang out we'll see you later
there we go throwing flashbang we love you goodbye
