Potus Reveals Conflicting Intelligence on Iran - Joe Kent Sounds the Alarm Over Who's Feeding Potus

President Trump was asked a question recently about the situation in Iran, and he actually admitted that he's getting two very different sets of intelligence on the situation. Take a listen. on Iran. Did that strike you as very different from what you read on Iran before? There are two very different sets of intelligence reports. I have them both, but they're very different. I mean, that's a huge data point for the commander-in-chief of the United States military to essentially say. He's getting intelligence of two entirely different scenarios. So you have to ask yourself, if you're president, what do you do in that situation? Someone is clearly giving you bad intelligence because if they're contradicting, if they're totally opposite. Then they can't possibly both be honest, right? Somebody has to be lying and giving the president bad intelligence. And this is exactly what the former National Counterterrorism Director Joe Kent said to the president in his resignation, probably a little less than a year ago. But he resigned essentially saying that the Israelis, this was his accusation, were giving the president bad intelligence. And that there was a problem with the intelligence channels. And so he resigned. And I wanna go ahead and put up this tweet that he shared in response to that video of the president. He said, intelligence community reform is long overdue. President Trump set out to get it done at the beginning of his second term. But it seems those efforts have been abandoned. The American people deserve a strong DNI who is empowered by POTUS to provide legitimate oversight of the intelligence community. It's why the role was established in the first place after the abject failures of 9-11, appointing Tulsi Gabbard as DNI was a shot across the bow that kicked the intelligence community's machine into overdrive, subverting and resisting any attempts for positive change every step of the way. Maybe POTUS got tired of the fight. The DNI is meant to serve as the final check on any intelligence coming from intelligence community elements like the CIA, NSA, Department of War to ensure the intel is presented to POTUS in its proper context. For example, did we get this intel from a partner nation? How did they collect it? Why are they sharing it with us and why now? In the lead up to the Iran war intelligence was consistently presented to POTUS as quote our intelligence when in fact it came from the Israelis. This is why DNI Gabbard's public testimony was at times different than the CIA directors. She testified to the US Congress the consensus of the US intelligence agencies not a foreign nations. Real Intelligence Committee reform cannot happen without an empowered DNI who is able to exercise the full scope of the role. The CIA is too proficient at handling the president's appointed directors. It's easy to get distracted once you're caught up in the thrill of espionage and covert operations. Conversely, the DNI has the slightly more removed vantage point to assess operations and intelligence without being part of the operations. Without a DNI looking into all covert action and special access programs to access whether they're aligned, these programs will continue to operate in the shadows, out of sight from POTUS, the public, and even most of the intelligence community, all the while undermining the president's agenda. So this is pretty... Pretty powerful stuff here when you now have President Trump himself saying he's getting two totally different sets of intelligence. It actually adds some credibility to what Joe Kent has been saying all along. And this has to be something that we start to address and we have to start asking the tough questions.