'A clear penalty' - Iraola bemoans referee decision to deny Isak spot kick in 1-0 defeat to Arsenal

SNTV
4 followers
Nov 1, 2026
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe speaker analyzes a match against Arsenal, criticizing the team's poor start but praising their strong reaction after conceding the first goal. Despite creating numerous scoring opportunities and putting the opponent under significant pressure, the team failed to convert their chances. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on disputed refereeing decisions regarding potential penalties.
Yes, overall, I think
We have to blame
especially the beginning of the game
until we conceded the goal.
I think the beginning
hasn't been on the level of the game.
But from that 1-0
I think it's 15 or 16 minutes.
I've loved the team's reaction.
I have loved even in the first half
I think we reacted really well.
and I think we put
Arsenal is under great pressure.
I think we've done enough.
to score
but obviously we haven't
but we had
For me, a crossbar,
We have McAllister's header
which, for me, is a clear opportunity.
I think we have a clear penalty
for us
And I think we have a lot of situation
inside the box
not even around the box
inside the box
that definitely
We haven't properly finished yet.
How do you say it?
What a pity,
You ask me this question,
but honestly,
We have to tell him.
because they will not call it in any other way.
Hey, the referee's complicating things because they won't come to call.
If they're not going to call, they're not going to call.
And it's like he's calling out all the time.
But I think Alex is honest,
He tries to go for the ball,
Everyone can see life directly.
There is a clear, distinct pulse.
And even Cody on Monday.
But I understand the exploitation
What did they say on the second one?
I think there are two situations, and they are somewhat related.
I think Isaac is clearly a penalty.
The ball will fall in front of the goal.
They grab him where everyone sees the ----.
It's not necessary to do much, just to avoid
that Alex would drop the ball in front of him.
I think you don't know the reason why.
Probably because he wasn't falling or going down to the floor.
That is not a reason not to consider the penalty.
And then, after Gagpo,
I think it is a livelihood,
But I understand the argument
And I think that's true.
They said the ball was longer
and that Cody wouldn't have arrived at the ball,
but then, after that,
you basically accept
that the first one is a pen,
No?
So,
You cannot use that argument
In every possible way different.
So, I think it's,
Yes
It's a pen.
Oh Alex,
Yes.
