--------------------- If you'd like to share our stories with friends, you can find those stories on our website: https://www.ntd.com/
--------------------- ⭕️BYPASS Censorship: Watch our videos for FREE directly on https://www.ntd.com ⭕️Watch NTD on cable: http://www.NTD.com/TV - 💎Looking for real news that doesn’t spin the facts? Try our sister media The Epoch Times digital for $1: http://ept.ms/EpochNews1 💎Sign the petition to investigate, condemn, and reject the Chinese Communist Party ▶️https://rejectccp.com
On Christmas Eve in 2021, NASA's InSight lander received a gift of sorts.
A new discovery. InSight recorded a significant Mars quake.
That's what we call quakes on Mars. But scientists learned only later the cause
of that shaking. Because the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter,
also known as MRO, was able to see from space
what the lander detected. I'm Raquel Villanueva
and I'm your host today here at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Today's science team members from the InSight lander and MRO mission
will explain how data and images from their spacecraft
contributed to the discovery. Joining us virtually are
Bruce Bannert, InSight Principal Investigator
at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Lilia Posiolova, Orbital Science and
Operations Lead at Malan Space Science Systems.
Ingrid Daubar, InSight Impact Science Lead
at Brown University. And Lori Glaze, Director of NASA's
Planetary Science Division from NASA Headquarters.
We'll be taking questions after hearing from our speakers, so
if you're a member of the media on the phone lines, press star one to be put in
the queue. And if you're on social media, use the
I'll now hand it over to Bruce. Hi everyone, I'm Bruce Bannert. I'm the
Principal Investigator of the InSight mission.
I'm speaking to you here today from Lockheed Martin Space,
where the Spacecraft Operations Center is located.
InSight has been on the surface of Mars since November of
2018, listening with its seismometer and various other instruments, weather
instruments and so forth, to what the goings on on Mars. And we're
here today to talk about some new discovery that we're really
excited about, in terms of the first time that
impact's actually been observed as it happened by a seismometer,
and then observed also from space by the orbital cameras. Before we
get into that though, I'd like to tell you a little bit about the
spacecraft status on Mars. Can we have the first image please?
As you probably know, as InSight's been sitting on the surface of Mars for the
last four years, it's been collecting a lot of dust on its solar
panels. This is a picture of the solar panels
a couple of months ago, and you can see that it's really, really dusty,
and that's cut down our solar power. And we've been sort of cutting back
on the operations of the spacecraft as that's happened,
in order to squeeze out as much science data as we can.
About a month ago, we got an additional challenge to the spacecraft.
If I have the next image, this is a global mosaic
of Mars. It was taken over the course of a day, and it shows
a large dust storm in the southern hemisphere that started kicking up
about a month ago. If you go to the next image, you can see
the dust storm shown in the orange, so you can see
where it is. Fortunately, that dust storm did not move
over InSight itself. InSight is over on the right side of
this image, one of those little spots on the right side of the image.
And so that was really fortunate, because if it had passed over the spacecraft,
it would have darkened the solar panels, and we probably would have lost the
spacecraft. But unfortunately, since this is such a
large dust storm, it's actually put a lot of dust up into the atmosphere,
and it has cut down the amount of sunlight reaching the solar panels by
quite a bit. We went down, we went from about 400 watt
hours per sol, which is the the units that we
measure the spacecraft power in, down to less than 300.
We had to cut off the seismometer for a few weeks.
We are now operating the seismometer again,
only one day out of four at this point, to
conserve our power. But even at that
relatively small amount of use, the batteries are still
slowly being depleted. And so what we believe is, in the next
short amount of time, perhaps somewhere between
four and eight weeks, as best we can can predict,
we expect the lander to not have enough power to operate any longer,
and we'll lose contact with the spacecraft. So
that's a sad thing to contemplate, but InSight has been
working marvelously for the last four years. We've gone
well beyond the intended lifetime of the
mission, which was two years. We've been collecting data,
and even now, as we're winding down, we're still getting
these amazing new results. If I can have the
the next animation, this is an image showing that
the relative locations of the InSight lander
over on the left-hand side of the image, and this impact that
caused a crater that we were able to pick up with our seismometer
and that was later imaged with the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.
I can show you the the seismic data, and actually you can hear
the seismic data. What we've done here is we've speeded up
the vibrations that we measured with the seismometer
up into the range that we can actually hear with the human ear.
So we've sped it up about a hundred times. If you were
actually on Mars, you would feel the shaking, but you wouldn't be
able to hear it. But this way, we can actually, you know,
transmit it over the internet, and you can experience it.
This is about 45 minutes of seismic data,
and you'll be able to hear it in a little less than half a minute.
So if we can go ahead and roll that animation now,
you can listen closely to the sounds of Mars.
And what you've experienced there is the first bulge,
and you can see in the image with the P-wave coming in,
the first wave that comes from any seismic event,
and then the big bulge there is the S-wave,
and then buried in that is actually the surface wave,
which is one of the real interesting findings from this new event,
and we'll be talking about that a little bit more later.
So with that, I'd like to hand it over to Liliya Posilova
to talk about how this really interesting discovery was made.
Hello, everybody. My name is Liliya Posilova,
and I work at Mail and Space Science Systems.
We design, build, and operate cameras on spacecraft.
May I have my first image, please?
I oversee operations of CTX, Contax, NMAR-C, Mars Color Imager,
on board of MRO, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft.
In December of last year, a meteorite struck Mars
and created the largest fresh impact crater
we have observed in 16 years of MRO mission.
May I have my next image, please?
When we first saw this image, we were extremely excited.
This was nothing like we've seen before.
It took entire view of the CTX image.
It's a 30 kilometers width,
and even we needed to take two more images on the side
to capture the entire perturbance area.
We do see regularly small craters in our CTX field of view.
How do we do it?
We acquire CTX images based on our various scientific objectives,
and we inspect them for any changes.
Typically, what we see, it will be like a little smudge,
and then we compare to all the available previously data sets
to confirm that it is fresh or not fresh crater.
And typically, they are on the size of up to 20 feet,
small craters.
And time constraint, we can do a few years,
maybe occasionally down to one year.
The perturbance that this impactor created was so large,
then we thought maybe we could see it in our other camera view.
May I have my next image, please?
It's our lower resolution weather camera,
but it takes daily global images of Mars.
On the right, you see feature that created by this impactor.
And to see that strong of a signal in that camera view,
it's huge, very rare.
We were able to time constrain this impact
down to about a day, slightly over 24 hours.
And then I recall that InSight reported back in December
that they recorded this large seismic event on Christmas Eve.
When we compare seismic epicenter with location
that we pinpointed from the orbit and the time,
we were able to match this large seismic event
to our large impact crater.
This is by far the largest jointly observed crater
recorded seismically and observed from the orbit.
May I have my next slide, please?
As ball light travel through the Mars atmosphere,
it creates a muck cone.
And as a result of it,
you see dust perturb on the left of the crater.
A lot happens as the meteoroid strikes Mars.
Rock gets fractured.
There is atmospheric blast.
Ejecta gets thrown out.
Crater gets excavated.
And effect of that dynamic all got preserved
in the Martian surface.
And we captured it in our CTX image.
We see the crater itself at about 150 meter in diameter.
We see bright patches of ice.
This is most equator word ice we've seen on Mars.
The ability to tell what happened when
and what activity occurred
along with the largest impact crater
are two huge discovery
and demonstrates the value,
increased value that joint work of two mission brings.
And I will turn to Ingrid
to look at more details of the impact itself.
Thanks, Lilia.
My name is Ingrid Daubar.
I'm on the team for the HiRISE camera,
which is another camera orbiting Mars on MRO.
If I can have the first visual, please.
HiRISE is a high resolution color stereo camera
that lets us see things as small as a desk on Mars.
I also help lead the impacts working group
on the InSight mission.
HiRISE and CTX have been showing us new craters,
as Lilia said, forming on Mars for a while now.
So we were hopeful we could detect some of these
with the InSight mission.
We want to study impacts with InSight
because they can tell us not just about the craters themselves
and the cratering process,
but also about the interior and the atmosphere of Mars.
Sources with a known location and size
can help calibrate all of the other data
we've gotten from InSight.
All those quakes where we don't know the exact epicenter.
After three years of listening,
we thought impacts probably have to be
either very close to the lander
or very large to be detected seismically.
We recently found four small impacts close to InSight,
but we never thought we'd see anything this big.
So we were super excited to hear about this discovery
by Lilia and her team
and have the chance to study it in more detail with HiRISE.
Can I have the next image, please?
From this HiRISE image, it was immediately clear
that this is the biggest new crater we've ever seen.
It's about 500 feet wide, about two city blocks across.
And even though meteorites are hitting the planet all the time,
this crater is more than 10 times larger
than the typical new craters we see forming on Mars.
We thought a crater this size
might form somewhere on the planet
once every few decades, maybe once a generation.
So it was very exciting to be able to witness this event.
And to be lucky enough to,
it happened while InSight was recording seismic data,
that was a real scientific gift.
For comparison, the Mars quake this crater caused
was a magnitude four quake,
which on Earth is big enough to be felt,
but not big enough to cause a ton of damage.
About a thousand or so quakes of this size
happen on the Earth every year.
But Mars is less tectonically active than the Earth.
So for Mars, this was a pretty big one.
Can I have the video, please?
Most exciting of all,
we saw clearly in the high resolution images
that a whole lot of water ice
had been exposed by this impact.
You can see in this flyover video of the 3D data,
boulder sized chunks of ice in the crater's ejecta,
as well as splotches of ice
thrown across the landscape outside the crater.
This was surprising
because this is the warmest spot on Mars,
the closest to the equator we've ever seen water ice.
So scientists are going to be able to use this
to constrain the past climate conditions on Mars,
when and how this ice was deposited,
buried and preserved up until now.
This is a huge opportunity to study
a really large impact event
from both the orbit and the ground.
A reminder of how privileged we are
to have multiple missions
studying Mars at the same time.
It's been really exciting and fruitful
to be part of these two projects working together.
And now I'll hand it over to Lori Glaze.
Thank you so much, Ingrid.
So InSight, what an amazingly successful mission
where we've learned so much about Mars's crust,
interior and more.
As you heard from Bruce,
sadly, we're likely nearing the end of the InSight mission,
but what an awesome capstone science result to end on.
I mean, literally going out with a bang.
You know, the observation of the December 24 impact
by the InSight seismometer,
as well as the orbital imaging
is really exciting,
not just for gathering important new information
that will refine our understanding
of the crustal structure,
but for other really important science as well.
As you heard, it's the largest impact crater seen on Mars
since we've been observing and watching.
You know, asteroids are found
throughout the solar system
and they play a really important role
in planetary surface processes.
So these observations are going to help contribute
to that knowledge.
To give a little context on this particular asteroid,
the expected size range of the object
that created the crater
was likely between about five and 12 meters across.
And you know, asteroids of that size
actually enter Earth's atmosphere
on the order of about once a year.
We see those really regularly,
but because Earth has a thicker atmosphere,
asteroids of this size burn up
and are generally pretty harmless.
If I could have the first graphic, please.
I just want to speak for a moment
about the importance of the discovery of ice,
you know, just below the surface.
This is really an exciting result.
We know, of course,
that there's water ice near the poles on Mars,
but in planning for future human exploration of Mars,
we'd want to land the astronauts
as near to the equator as possible
and having access to ice at these lower latitudes,
that ice could be converted
into water, oxygen, or hydrogen.
That could be really useful.
If I could have the second graphic, please.
So let's just go back to where Bruce started.
You've heard that the power production on InSight
has been dropping.
The mission will likely end sometime
in the coming, you know,
four to eight weeks in the next couple of months.
This mission has been a really big success
in the four years it's been operating.
I want to take a moment to acknowledge
this incredible team
that has met many challenges along the way.
They've met the challenges of the soil
of Mars not cooperating
and the challenges of trying to deploy the mole
with the heat probe,
challenges of waiting,
waiting for those quakes, those first quakes,
and waiting for the data
to really start delivering what we were looking for.
And of course, the dust accumulation
and the valiant attempts by the team
to extend the lifetime of the mission
by cleaning some of that dust off the solar arrays.
I've known Bruce and several of the science team members
for many, many years,
and I know how much emotional energy
goes into those years of planning
and execution of a mission like InSight.
And I know it's going to be hard for the team
and for all of us to say goodbye,
but I just want to say I couldn't be prouder
of all this team has accomplished.
I want to close by saying thank you to Bruce
and the entire team for all they've done
to advance our understanding of Mars.
And with that, we'll go back to Raquel.
Great. Thank you so much, Lori.
Now we'll move it on to Q&A.
So if you're a member of the media on the phone lines,
you can press star one to get put in the queue.
And for social media,
you can use the hashtag AskNASA.
And we do have some social media questions coming in.
First off, MrsWhiskers1 on Twitter asks,
has there been anything that surprised you?
And Bruce, I think she is talking about InSight in general.
Well, there's been a lot of things that surprised us, actually.
It would have been a pretty boring mission
if we didn't get surprised.
We were surprised at first by how quiet Mars seemed to be
in terms of seismic activity.
It was three months before we actually even saw an earthquake.
And that was my fingernails were getting pretty short
by the end of those three months
because we were really depending on getting Mars quakes.
Once we started getting Mars quakes,
we realized that what we'd done is we'd landed
in the windy part of the year.
And so all the Mars quakes were getting covered up by the wind.
And so that was a big relief.
The next big surprise was the issues with the mole.
We were surprised by the properties of the Martian soil.
It was unlike the properties of the soil
that we had seen previously at the Viking landing sites,
at Spirit and Opportunity and Curiosity.
InSight landed in a spot where the soil
was a little bit different than what we expected.
And that made it impossible for our mole to penetrate.
So that was an unpleasant surprise,
but scientifically it was actually very interesting
because that showed that Mars was a lot more varied
than we had thought before.
And finally, some of the results from our seismic experiment,
the results of the deep interior surprised us.
The core appears to be quite a bit larger
than we had imagined.
We thought it was going to be about 1,700 kilometers or so,
and it was actually over 1,800 kilometers in radius.
And that has some really important implications
for the evolution of the planet Mars itself.
And so that's a big surprise,
one that we haven't actually been able
to incorporate into our theories yet.
And so this impact was sort of the latest
in a long series of surprises that we've had
over the mission.
Thanks, you summed it up well.
Mars is full of surprises.
Thank you, Bruce.
Now we do have a caller on the line,
and if you could please direct your question
to one of the speakers.
We have Megan Bartels from space.com.
Hi there, can you hear me okay?
Yes, we can.
Thanks for taking my question.
I was hoping, Bruce, if you could go into
a little more detail about the significance
of detecting surface waves for the first time,
and then sort of how to use that information
to better understand the crust.
Yeah, I would love to do that.
I mean, the surface waves were something
that we had anticipated using in our data analysis
from the very beginning of our planning.
We thought we were going to use surface waves
to locate quakes, use the surface waves
to probe the structure of the crust,
the upper few tens of kilometers of the planet.
But for the first three years of the mission,
we saw no surface waves.
And we believe that that's because the Mars quakes
are a little bit deeper than we anticipated.
And so the surface waves aren't really developed
large enough to be able to detect with our seismometer.
So now that we do have surface waves,
it's already telling us a lot of really interesting stuff
about Mars.
The nice thing about surface waves
is they tell you about the crust,
not just where the lander is sitting,
but they look at the crust
as they're moving across the planet.
So the whole path between the event,
in this case, the impact and insight,
is sampled by these surface waves
as they move across the planet.
And so we have an idea of what the crust is
over this fairly long path.
It's about 3,500 kilometers for one of these events
and almost 7,500 kilometers for the other one.
And we find that the crust is different.
Again, the InSight landing site is a little bit unusual,
or at least different than the pathway
that these surface waves took.
And so we found that the crust under InSight
has a layer about 10 kilometers deep
that is a little bit lower velocity,
lower density than what's indicated by the surface waves.
So surface waves are telling us about the crust,
not just at our one point,
but over a wide area on Mars.
The other thing that is great about the surface waves
is that they help us to refine our location,
refine our seismically determined location.
And we find that by incorporating that
with the body waves, the P and the S waves,
that helps us again to zero in on the location
in which the impact was found.
Okay, thank you for your answer, Bruce.
Now, remember, if you're a member of the media
on the phone lines,
you can press star one to get put in the queue
and social media use the hashtag AskNASA.
And we do have some more social media questions coming in.
We have Andrew on Facebook who asks,
how often do you discover a new impact crater?
Lilia, Ingrid, would you like to both take that?
Sure, I can take that.
So CTX has been looking for these
ever since MRO went into orbit about 16 years ago.
And Lilia can tell you more about the CTX process
to find them.
But since then, we've found about 1200 new impacts.
Sometimes there's a couple of craters there.
Sometimes there's just one.
But again, they're much, much smaller than this one.
Yeah, thank you for the question.
So yeah, indeed, we relatively regularly do find them.
But again, they are much, much smaller.
And on our CTX field of view,
they look like a little smudges.
So when we compare to all the previous data sets,
we're looking for that change.
And sometimes we see what might be
looks like a fresh crater.
But then if we look at all the previous data sets
and we find that, say, previous image
was taken three years ago,
oh, it's still there.
And then five years ago.
And if that's all the previous images we have,
we can call them a fresh crater.
But yeah, we find that many fresh craters
and as Ingrid mentioned.
Great, thank you.
And we have another caller on the line,
Mark Corot from Aviation Week and Space Technology.
Thank you.
And I apologize if you already answered this,
but what was the distance
or what is the distance between InSight
and the impact crater?
That's about, so yeah, thanks for your question.
It's about 3,500 kilometers
where InSight is located
and the location of this crater.
Great, thank you, Mark.
And also on the line,
we have Ken Kramer from Space Up Close.
Hi, thank you for doing this.
Thanks for taking my question.
I want to ask you about the ice that you found.
I'd like to know,
how surprising was it to find ice
at that particular location?
How long did it remain on the surface?
Because I know ice melts,
evaporates pretty rapidly there.
And I'm wondering,
you have radar instruments there too.
What did the radar instruments tell you
about subsurface ice in that location?
Thanks, bye.
I can take that.
So yeah, so this was a big surprise
because this is the closest to the equator
that we've seen ice exposed in an impact.
However, there have been a number of other of these,
all these other impacts that we found,
much smaller and closer to the poles
that have also exposed water ice.
Before this, I think the closest one
was a few degrees north of this.
So it wasn't totally out of range
of what might be expected,
but it was still very surprising.
Of course, this crater is so much bigger
than all the other ones we've seen.
And it excavated so much deeper
that we're getting down deeper
in the shallow subsurface.
And then your other question was about,
oh, how long the ice lasts?
Yeah, so we do see evidence of sublimation of ice
that's been exposed in this way.
When we use HiRISE to take images
over and over again to monitor the sites,
and we can actually see the ice
disappearing in most cases.
And it doesn't last long.
It's not actually stable at the surface
at these locations.
This one, again, it's fairly new,
but we have seen some evidence of that happening,
but I don't think it's really been studied in detail yet.
Anything about the radar results
from that area about ice?
Not to my knowledge.
Thank you.
And we also have another question
coming in on social media that is related.
Bart on Twitter asks,
how would you know if the ice
wasn't contained to the meteorite itself?
I can take that too.
Yeah, that's a really good question.
We thought about that.
Like maybe this was a commentary impactor
that was just made of ice.
And what we're seeing on the surface
is just splashed out from the impactor itself.
But an impact of this size
would actually destroy the meteorite
that came in to hit the surface.
We wouldn't expect much,
if any, of the original impactor
to survive this high energetic.
It's a high energy explosion.
So we can look at that.
And we can also look at the locations
where the ice is found.
And that also shows us evidence
that it's probably not from the impactor itself,
but rather was excavated from below the surface.
Thanks, Ingrid.
We have one more.
Okay.
We actually are out of questions for today.
So that is all the time we have today.
Thank you.
And I'd like to thank all the speakers
for their time today.
So to stay up to date with InSight,
visit mars.nasa.gov slash InSight
and follow at NASA InSight on Twitter and Facebook.
And for more information
on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter,
visit mars.nasa.gov slash MRO.
I'd like to thank everyone for watching today.