The case for plant-based diets: are they really the most sustainable?
[Spoiler Alert] The short answer is: generally, yes - especially from an environmental perspective. But eating a plant-based diet isn't a cure-all - they come with their own ecological and social challenges which we need to be aware of when choosing our plant-based alternatives.
But for those who can't or don't want to remove animal products from their diets completely, reducing our consumption of animal products is still the most efficient way to cut our environmental footprint. How do you feel about reducing your consumption of meat and dairy products?
Reconnect to the origins and future of your food. FoodUnfolded is powered by EIT Food, an extended body of the EU. This project is co-funded by the European Union.
Hi, I'm Silvia. I'm an editor here at Food Unfolded. Today we will tackle a difficult
question. Are vegetarian and vegan the most sustainable diets? It's challenging because
many of us have our own strongly held beliefs around this topic and different actors in the
food industry have a vested interest in the answers. It is clear that the reason to eliminate
animal products from one's diet can be many, for example animal suffering or health, but we will
try to compare the various diets only in terms of environmental, social and economic impacts.
By and large, vegetarian and vegan diets would really seem to be the most sustainable. The impact
of animal products on the environment is much higher than that of plant products. A few numbers
make this clear. The production of meat, fish, eggs and dairy uses about 83% of the world's
agricultural land and almost 70% of the forested land is used for the production of feed and for
livestock. Animal products also contribute to more than half of the greenhouse gas emissions of the
entire food system. The scientific community is unanimous. Avoiding or at least reducing the
consumption of meat and dairy products would bring great benefits for the environment. However,
this doesn't mean that any vegetarian or vegan diet is automatically sustainable.
Many plant products are actually responsible for very serious environmental and social damage.
For example, from an environmental perspective, almond milk is often considered a more sustainable
choice than cow's milk because it would allow us to cut on greenhouse gas emissions. But almonds
are often grown in hot and dry climates and so they require huge amounts of water, fertilizers
and pesticides to be produced. In other words, almond milk is more sustainable than cow's milk,
but not the most sustainable alternative choice you could make. Then let's look at avocados.
Europe imports them mainly from Peru, but also from Chile, Mexico, South Africa, Kenya and Israel,
all countries with quite dry and hot climates. For this reason, avocados require huge amounts
of water to be produced, so much so that in regions like Petorca in Chile, the owners of
some big plantations have installed illegal pipes and wells to divert water from rivers
and irrigate crops, taking away water from citizens and causing regional droughts. The
Mexican cultivation of avocado is also often in the hands of local mafias who extort the income
from farmers by keeping them to work in the fields under exploitative conditions. The situation
around avocado is so controversial that it was suggested it could become a new conflict commodity.
But we don't even need to go too far to find serious social and economic issues. In many
European countries, we could be buying cheap fresh fruits and vegetables, such as tomatoes,
sometimes harvested by exploited laborers, who are kept in a state of legal, social and economic
invisibility. So buying sustainably is less straightforward than we might think. This means
that even those who have already removed animal products from their diets should still try to
consider these other factors when buying products. For example, we could buy food labeled fair trade,
which means it was produced in an ethical way respecting the rights of workers. But what to do
if we don't want or cannot yet remove animal products from our diet? Several studies have
shown that a flexitarian, meaning a semi-vegetarian, flexible approach could help us reduce our
environmental and social impact as well as combat waste. This could mean buying meat or fish
occasionally and only when they're close to their expiration date, or buying those usually
discarded parts such as tongue or liver. This approach would allow us not to waste food that
was produced at a great cost for the environment, but also to use our purchasing power to discourage
its production. A study published in Science in 2018 suggested that if we halved our meat
consumption and we only bought from low environmental impact producers, our effort
could achieve up to 70 percent of the ecological results of a vegan diet. But all things considered,
if our goal is to follow a more sustainable diet that respects people and ecosystems,
then reducing our consumption of animal products is a fundamental step to take.