Надо сказать, в последнее время набирают обороты критические настроения по поводу “Теории относительности” Эйнштейна. Если мировые жандармы упустят момент и не предпримут никаких действий, чтобы это пресечь, то им потом придётся или придумывать новые, адекватные нашей информационной эпохе способы “затыкания” таких альтернативщиков, либо придётся придумывать новую физическую теорию, которая бы также скрывала существование эфира, но при этом была лучше проработана и избавлена от старых ошибок.
Но и в те далёкие времена, когда теория “Великого Э” только продвигалась среди физиков, многие говорили о том, что она содержит в себе теоретические изыскания других учёных, на которых в своих работах Эйнштейн не ссылается и, таким образом, фактически присваивает их исследования себе, своему авторству. Кроме того, его теория противоречит электродинамике Максвелла, экспериментам Фарадея и Ампера, а также выводам Хэвисайда, который вывел свои формулы (позже их назвали релятивистскими, т.е. относящимися к “Теории относительности”) ещё в конце XIX века.
Хэвисайд значительно опередил и Лоренца, и Пуанкаре; при этом, его работы, согласно многим современным учёным, оказались более полными и точными в этой области физики, и, вместе с тем, противоречили основным пунктам “Теории относительности”.
И с течением времени благодаря результатам новых экспериментов и вычислений, всё больше физиков стали замечать несуразности в постулатах теории Эйнштейна, но всякий раз, когда эти учёные выступали со своими разоблачениями, на них находилась управа в виде травли в печати и научной среде,в виде подозрительных преждевременных смертей и т.п.
Глубоко заглянул в историю пропаганды теории “E=mc2” Сергей Сааль, доктор физико-математических наук.
Практически все сведения об истинных уравнениях Максвелла и теории эфира были изъяты из учебников физики ещё в 20-е, 30-е годы XX века, а все новые опыты, противоречащие “Теории относительности”, в них просто не допускались”, - рассказывает исследователь, - “В те годы складывалась совершенно новая физическая элита из молодых и амбициозных людей. Сначала вокруг Эйнштейна, а затем - Бора, стали расти школы, не признающие никакого инакомыслия. Главным их девизом стало “Кто не с нами - тот против нас”. Достаточно вспомнить призывы Эйнштейна к объединению всех своих сторонников, его отказ рассматривать другие теории, не удовлетворяющие своих (т.е. его) постулатов.
Сергей Сааль уверен: на то, что происходило на олимпе физической науки в то время, сильно повлияли принципы политической целесообразности. Когда складывалась известность Эйнштейна и его спорной теории, главным международным языком науки был немецкий. Поэтому “фундаментальные работы Максвелла, Хэвисайда, Джозефа Томсона и других классиков британской школы оказались неизвестны новому поколению классиков. Теория относительности приняла за язык электродинамики уравнение Герца”, - отмечает Сергей Сааль и тут же обращается внимание на то, что позже сам Герц, уже в конце жизни, под влиянием работ Хэвисайда отказался от этих уравнений и попытался доработать свою теорию электродинамики.
Революция физики происходила в преддверии и во время первой мировой войны, когда в немецкоязычной среде очень сильны были антибританские настроения.
Первое время Эйнштейн жил в Швейцарии, где в 1898 году была основана Всемирная сионистская организация; позже она стала своеобразным трамплином в научной карьере для молодого еврейского учёного, который своими “открытиями” был обязан первой жене, сербке Милеве Марич.
О том, как и у кого Эйнштейн заимствовал научные идеи, читайте на Крамоле в статье “Эйнштейн — плагиатор?! Он такая же "еврейская звезда" как Казимир Малевич, автор картины "Чёрный квадрат"!”.
Ещё в студенческие годы Альберт попал под опеку активистов радикальной иудейской организации.
“Вскоре после приезда Эйнштейна в Прагу состоялась его встреча с лидерами сионизма. Было принято решение о продвижении Эйнштейна на место национального лидера всех евреев. Эйнштейн подходит на эту роль как никто другой. Он был молод, а значит, имел все шансы дожить до основания еврейского государства, а эта дата 1947-ой или 48-ой год уже была определена в работах Герцля, создателя сионистского движения”, - рассказывает Сааль, - “Он (Э.) не примыкал ни к одному крылу сионистскго движения, между которыми возникли серьёзные разногласия. Таким образом, он мог стать объединяющей силой. Задача состояла только в том, чтобы сделать Эйнштейна мировой знаменитостью”.
Let's take a look at what's wrong with Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
When you have a hot pan in your hand, a second is like an hour.
When you have a hot beauty, an hour flies by in a second.
Everything is relative.
This naive explanation has at least some sense,
unlike the scientific explanation of Einstein's Theory.
The foundation of the special and general Theory of Relativity
consists of only two postulates.
The universe is homogeneous, and the speed of light is a constant value.
But before we move on to such postulates, let's turn to history.
Einstein's Plagiarism
The whole world knows that Albert Einstein is a Nobel laureate,
and few people doubt that he received this award
for creating the special and general Theory of Relativity.
French mathematician and physicist Jules-Henri Poincaré
and Dutch physicist Hendrik Anton Lorentz
have worked together for several years
on the creation of the general Theory of Relativity.
It was Poincaré who proposed the postulate about the universe's homogeneity
and the postulate about the speed of light,
and Lorentz came up with the famous formula.
The German physicist of Jewish origin,
working in the patent office,
had access to their scientific work
and decided to name the new theory after him.
He even preserved the name of Lorentz in his theories.
The main mathematical formulas in his theory
are called Lorentz transformations.
But Einstein does not specify what relation he has to these formulas,
and does not use the name Poincaré, which he proposed in the postulates.
Poincaré himself, 5 years before Hilbert,
in 1895,
published the Theory of Relativity, 10 years before Einstein.
And Einstein read Poincaré's work
and added the formulas that were missing in it.
And this is Einstein's work, from 1905,
but there is no reference to Poincaré in it.
Einstein's reference to Poincaré appeared
in 1940, I think, or even later,
when he began to recall the history of how it was.
And he said, of course, I used Poincaré very much,
but for some reason I did not quote it in my youth.
Plagiarism, or in other words, Einstein's theft
and the scandal that erupted around this theory
did not allow the Nobel Committee to award him a prize.
They found a very simple solution.
Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize
for the discovery of the second law of the photo effect,
despite the fact that the photo effect itself was discovered by the Russian physicist Alexander Stoletov.
Thus, the image of the genius of all times and nations was created.
And now, almost any person is sure
that Albert Einstein received the Nobel Prize
for his great, special and general Theory of Relativity.
Well, now it's time to move on to the postulates themselves.
What is wrong with these brilliant advanced ideas,
which, with the help of the trademark of Einstein,
reveal the secrets of the universe to all of humanity?
Postulate of the speed of light.
The speed of light,
which is the maximum speed of movement of matter in the universe,
is constant and equal to 300,000 km per second.
Without this condition,
the transformations of Lorentz become senseless,
since at a speed of movement with a speed greater than 300,000 km per second,
according to these equations,
even the mass of a photon becomes infinite.
By the way, during his lifetime, Einstein was told
that the speed of light is not constant.
Experimentally registering the so-called
etheric wind of light waves,
the American physicist Dayton Miller in the 1930s
proved the incompetence of the experiments of Michelson-Morley,
which allegedly confirmed the constancy of the speed of light.
Miller wrote letters to Einstein.
In one of his letters, he reported the results of his 24-year work,
confirming the presence of the etheric wind.
However, this information was simply ignored.
And after Miller's death, the greatest physicist of that time,
his works were never printed anywhere else.
In 2000, the doctor of science Liu-Jing Wang
at Princeton Research Institute
conducted the following experiment.
Light pulses were passed through a container
specially treated with CERIA gas.
The speed of light pulses was 300 times greater
than the permissible speed of Lorentz transformation,
that is, it reached 90 million km per second.
In the same year, in Italy, another group of physicists
in their experiments with microwaves
obtained a speed of 25% greater,
almost 400 km per second,
than the permissible speed of Albert Einstein.
From Lorentz transformation, it follows
that if the speed of light or another material object
is at least 1 mm per second
exceeds the speed of 300 km per second,
the mass will become infinite.
In other words, in the above experiments,
the mass of photons and microwaves
should be greater than the mass of any black hole.
Despite this, in the whole world,
people continue to study Albert Einstein's theories
in schools and institutes with universities
as a reflection of the objective reality.
This is how the media presented this news.
A bunch of elementary particles, neutrinos,
unexpectedly exceeded the speed of light for the testers themselves,
which, according to Einstein and the modern idea
of the structure of the universe, simply cannot be.
What if you can still overtake the light
and go back to the past?
And now the experimenters took
and shook the foundations of the familiar world.
Is it a joke? Did they overtake a bunch of neutrinos?
So elementary particles,
in violation of all the rules of modern science,
exceeded the permissible speed limit.
Einstein's special theory of relativity states
that no one and nothing can move faster than light.
The value of its speed is laid down in the formula
of the equivalence of mass and energy,
known to every physicist, and is equal to mc2.
A standard model of the universe is built on this formula,
and physicists from CERN put it under doubt.
It's such an unexpected,
such an amazing result,
that if it turns out to be correct and confirmed,
then it will be a revolution in physics.
No one has yet tried to explain the phenomenon,
taking it for real,
since the result clearly contradicts the general theory.
If Einstein is wrong,
we will have to change our perception of everything in the world,
from the Big Bang to black holes.
According to Einstein's theory,
particles cannot move faster than the speed of light.
This is what our ideas about time and space are based on,
and if we get other results,
then reality is not at all the way we expected it to be.
Now there is a chance that Einstein's theory of relativity,
which has lasted for 100 years, will have to be rewritten.
Scientists from the European Center for Nuclear Research
have discovered particles that can move faster than light.
A bunch of neutrinos was released
from the center located in Switzerland
in the direction of the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy.
It traveled 730 kilometers and was measured.
The speed of movement of particles
was 1.6 billionth of a second more than the speed of light.
The results of the experiment contradict
Einstein's theory of relativity,
according to which the speed of light in the Universe
is limitless and it is impossible to surpass it.
This idea is based on all modern physics.
That is why the researchers themselves
are not yet in a hurry to declare other experiments
as a new scientific discovery.
The management of the Swiss laboratory
is in some confusion
and calls the results incredible.
The results of the experiment
scientists promise to post on the Internet soon
so that all the experts who wish to study them can study them.
Well, now let's look at the second postulate of the universe's uniformity.
Astronomers and astrophysicists know that
during a full solar eclipse
you can observe objects that our Sun covers with itself.
Based on the position of the uniform space
it is simply impossible,
since electromagnetic waves in a uniform space
should spread in a straight line.
The explanation for this phenomenon was given as follows.
A massive space object, which is the Sun,
affects the straight-line spread of light waves,
distorting their trajectory,
as a result of which we are able to observe what is behind it.
But if we consider that the space is uniform,
its properties and qualities are unchanged,
it becomes impossible.
Here is another study
that leaves no stone unturned
on the basis of the uniformity of space.
Astrophysicists George Nodland and John Ralston
published in 1997
in the scientific journal Reviews of World Physics
unique data.
After analyzing the radio waves
coming from 160 distant galaxies,
they concluded that the radiation
rotates as they move through space
in the form of a barely noticeable pattern
and the rotation axis from the Earth
rotates in one direction
towards the constellation Sextans
and in the other direction
towards the constellation Aquila.
In fact, this is an experimental confirmation
that the universe has ups and downs.
Here is the situation.
Do you think it was a coincidence
that all of humanity
was forced to have a false idea
about the nature of the universe?
Or maybe it doesn't matter?
What's the difference?
Is there any benefit from this at all?
After all, it did not prevent us
from creating digital technologies
thanks to which you are watching this video.
Write in the comments what you think about this.
Maybe under the video there will be
the one who will answer the main question of life,
the universe and all that.
Set up notifications
and we'll see you in the next video.
In the meantime, you think about it.
Here are a few more interesting shots.
The vacuum was nothing.
I mean, it was a heavy nothing.
Am I understanding you correctly?
That the universe was spread by its own fabric,
by its own space,
by its own emptiness.
It spread it to the sides.
That's right.
It is important that it was a heavy emptiness.
This is very important.
What the hell are you talking about?
