Besorgniserregende Fakten rund um Elektroautos | Dr. med. Kurt E. Müller | QS24 Gremium

Are you already on Wikisana? Welcome, dear viewers, here in our format of the Science Committee. Today we would like to look at the topic of magnetism and electrosmog within electric cars and discuss and see if there are actually health problems and risks that we should also focus on and not only focus on the topic of electricity or CO2, but also on health. I would like to do this today with a scientist who has dealt with it. After the intro, I'll show you who it is and we'll get down to business. Stay tuned. Here we are again and now I can also show you my guest, Dr. Kurt Müller. Welcome, dear Kurt. Yes, thank you very much for your invitation to a topical topic. Yes, because we are all pushed into this. Everyone has to do this now and drive such a car. Otherwise you have some kind of climate glue on the car or you will be put in a drawer as an environmental offender. But we don't want to look at that now. I really want to look at the health aspect. Yes, of course we are talking about the current solution of climate problems in a bad way. Politics has nothing that can be done faster than the electric car. And so, of course, it is also quickly pushed to the market. And as so often with such hasty introductions, the risk of a method is not considered. I have experienced the whole thing, I don't know how often, in the decades of my doctorate, that you do something without actually knowing exactly what you are doing. And we'll take a look at that a bit. Together with Diana Hentz, we have done a bit of research on this problem. And she actually investigates a lot more than I do. I will point out later what things she has brought in. First of all, one thing is important. There is no such problem with electric cars. Instead, every car has its own problem of an electromagnetic field. That means that the individual vehicle types have different ones. Within a vehicle brand, you could think that the brand anyway has this problem and the brand Y has this problem. No, that's not the case. The individual vehicles of the manufacturers have very individual problems. Also gasoline, right? Or are we only talking about electric cars? No, basically every car has an electromagnetic field. But of course the electric car especially, also due to the size of the batteries, all these things. And then because a lot more power lines have to be laid, because the drive via electricity also takes place. So there is a weighting to the electric cars. But it is not the case that a gasoline or diesel car does not also have an electric field. So the seat adjustment, the electric one in a diesel car, is also a field problem. This must not be overlooked. But with electric cars it is special. And we have shown here in the first picture how time-consuming it is to equip a vehicle. And we see from Gabriel Tech, with whom we have worked together, how such measuring technology is prepared. That it is time-consuming in a workshop, that the vehicle is prepared, that you can then measure the whole thing under operating conditions. And as I said, every vehicle or every vehicle type has to be measured individually. I see a missing of a great opportunity, also with the German manufacturers. It is lamented that the Chinese simply have this market of electric cars in their hands and that the European manufacturers hardly have a chance to deal with it. And there you have another example of short-sightedness. Because, of course, they have no chance to compete with the Chinese in the value of money, because they simply produce cheaper. But what they could do, they could argue about the safety phenomenon, which has always been the advantage of European production. We have made finer things technically, more versatile things, more complex things. In technology, thinking, better thought out. That was our market chance compared to the cheap products from the Asian region. That means, if the German car industry wants to resist it, it is good to actually deal with it and to bring the cars already equipped and protected to the market, so that this topic plays a significantly smaller role. And again, you have no open ears for what we say, what Gabriel Tech says, also the possibilities they have, because they are finished. They don't have to be created anew. They are simply ready and can be immediately put into production. That might increase the price a bit. But I think there are a lot of consumers who say, okay, if I have more security for that, then I'll do it. And if we look at what consequences can arise through the fields and we can present that transparently to the public, then you will find a large number of people who say, okay, I'll spend a little more money for that. I have more security for that. And these are now the preparations for the measurements for the car. And there we see that the driver has such a red cap on. And that's the cap we use to write an EEG, an electroencephalogram, in which the brain activity is recorded. On the right picture we see the same experiments when we do them in the laboratory. There we see the whole damping against external influences, all the measuring technology. And what we see on the right picture, we have to get into the car when we carry out such tests. Then you have to say, this EEG that we are writing is a special one. It is not written in curves like an EKG, but in these experiments in the car it still has 200 admission points. We later worked with 256 admission points. As a result, a computer was able to generate a picture from the data of the recording. And afterwards we see the picture, similar to an MRT, in a good visual representation and can then show the consequences, we'll look at that later, what develops when driving. When we see later how much the brain changes its function, then we have to talk about how responsive drivers remain, how concentrated drivers remain. All of this has an impact on brain functions, but we'll get to that in a moment. Just that you can see here how complex such measuring technology is and that everything we say does not happen so often. This has really been done with complex technology and also with great experience of the performers. Both from the technical installation, then all the research has been supported by SALUS, who have participated in the costs that have arisen and also in the publication of the research works. You can no longer vote that alone as a private person. This is again this hat shown. It takes about 1.5 hours for the individual points to sit optimally. And then of course that is also an incentive for the test person. To simply wear this closed cap for a longer time while driving. What has also been shown in these trips under 5G influences, it has also been shown that the companions who were there for the measuring technology, that they all did not feel comfortable afterwards when they were constantly exposed to this 5G. When the test day ended, it was no longer good for the test person, because of course they were just as exposed as the test person. And then there are such picturesque results. And that's the nice thing. A critic wrote somewhere, that can't be true at all, because an MRT is so big and so heavy, you can't take that in the car. And of course that's not an MRT at all, it's an EEG, which is almost smaller in size and of course can also be carried in a car. I only say that at this point, so that no one gets the same idea. And then we see in the upper picture, we see the changes within the brain, which takes place especially in the hypothalamus region of the brain. And below we see the representation, when a shielding occurs, as Gabriel-Tech can do in the vehicles. And of course we see that the driver is much less burdened with the shielding. It's not nothing at all. I don't know if you can see the red dot. Did you fall out of there? I'll go to the front. Close that. Exactly. I'll try to show it again with the red dot. That's not possible. In the lower second picture on the left, you can see a slight light blue tint on the right. So it's not zero, but of course that's incomparably better compared to what we see above. So that can actually be shielded very well in automobiles in this way. That would be a sales argument, right? Exactly. And if you include such technology in the vehicle and also achieve measurable effects, then that is a sales argument. And that is also something that the German automotive market can position itself. We will talk at the end. In general, the electric car is a smart solution. But if we already use it, then we have to see how we can minimize risk. I used to say this again and again when it came to the use of chemicals. I said we are not opponents of the industry, but actually partners. So that we can contribute to product development. How can products be brought to the market and the product immanent risks be kept considerably low? You don't do that until today. That means you bring a product under technological possibilities to the market and they have to be cost-effective. And don't include the risk issue in the planning. If you include it in the planning, the solution is much cheaper. If you want to solve it afterwards, when the problem is already there, it is always costly. Resistances are also created. You have to deal with such issues in a completely different way. You have to approach each other. You have to say which ideas you can incorporate into our product. And how can we bring a product to the market where the risks of other manufacturers, which are competitors on the market, remain. How can we avoid that? But I think it's a political issue. That you look at the topic of electors critically, with critical eyes, would ultimately, if it were so, trigger a wave of frustrations. A problem generator, Alexander, is hatred. Whenever I do something hateful, because I want to eliminate lost 20 years in one year, at that moment mistakes are made, because nothing is carefully thought out. The feasible is done. And that should be as fast as possible. And if it is as fast as possible, it is rarely thorough. And we see that here with such products. And we also see it in the working group we are in together, how little is given to us, although we express ourselves. Also with you, we have already spoken about 5G. And at congresses, Diana Henz and I speak. We speak at congresses on this topic. So we don't hold back. But we also have a limited manpower to bring this to the people. And that's a shame, that simply a preventive thinking has no place in the health care system and not at all in the industry. The doctors are unable to pay enough attention to preventive thinking. They are used to treat a disease. They are not used to prevent the development of the disease. And that is not rewarded. I had already mentioned this in another program. We need a reward system for the prevention of disease. And not a reward for the one who treats the most afterwards. That creates a market. The patient becomes a market. And there is no interest in destroying the market by avoiding disease. A disease avoidance is a damage to a market. As perverse as that sounds, what I am just saying, so it is true. And this is an impressive example. This is the book in which Diana Henz has published the first publications. This means that this is also internationally verified and is not speculation from us. And we now have other publications in the pipeline that have to come out with the latest data, which are then also immunological. And there I am leading, what the immunology is about. And that was surprising at what pace the immune system is changing. And I had encouraged that we interleukin-1-beta, we do a large factor alpha examination and interleukin-6 and 8. And here we see the picture of interleukin-1-beta. The left lower column, where the red line starts, that is the value before the start of the trial. And then the experimental people were exposed to electromagnetic fields. In this case, water in 5G field. And then within 30 minutes, the excretion of this interleukin-1-beta increased rapidly. That surprised me myself. I would have thought it takes longer. But within 30 minutes it was significantly pathologically increased. What does interleukin-1 mean? It is an inflammatory substance. So with it the body controls inflammation. Thank you for the question that I explain this a little more precisely. And it is an inflammatory substance that occurs in the body and which is then also formed by the brain via bodily signals to the brain. That can explain to us why Diana Hinz in the EEG sees this. I'll get to that in a moment, why there are differences between my immune response and her EEG response. Nevertheless, it was surprising. The back light gray columns indicate the upper limits of the norm. And then we see that all levels of disease were increased until the second hour. They then gradually decreased, but remained pathologically increased. Then we have a second substance, that is the tumor necrosis factor alpha, also an inflammatory substance. Since it was found for the first time in tumors in general, it was called tumor necrosis factor. That's an unfortunate name, because when I tell a patient that he has tumor necrosis factor alpha, he thinks he has a tumor. This value is not associated with tumors, but occurs in many other infections. It would have been better to call him differently at the time, but because it was found at the time, he got the name and kept it. I only emphasize that if someone is told that tumor necrosis factor alpha is increased, he does not have a proven value for a cancer. This value increases more slowly and is then increased from the 90th minute. Again, the gray columns are the upper limits of the norm and increases until the second hour. We will now check in future trials beyond two hours, because I think that TNF alpha, this tumor necrosis factor alpha, remains increased for much longer. In the time investigated, the substances interleukin 6 and 8 have not increased dramatically, probably because they only come later. We have to investigate that. But now let's look at the hypothalamus. Here I have a picture from a publication from the end of the 90s. We see that interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha are already known as important infectors of the hypothalamus for over 20 years. This means that with this inflammation that occurs in the body, we also intervene in the brain function. This is exactly what Diana Hinz found in the EEG disc. There you can see that there is a change between the immune system and the brain function. What amazed me in such a short time, let's say 30 minutes, was still in the city traffic. Anyone who drives from Munich from one side to the other has this time. Anyone who drives a long-distance motorway in Germany is completely in the area within the fields that he is exposed to. We have shown this again correlated together. We wrote at the same time. So we could see how the hypothalamus changes and how the inflammatory substances go up. And then of course it doesn't matter in which situation I do that. If the patient now has a flu-like infection and I then increase the inflammatory substances via electromagnetic fields, then of course gasoline is the fire poured into the burning fire. Then the question was asked whether there could be side effects. They were immediately swept off the table. That would be nonsense. I can say no, because of this knowledge it is not nonsense. The layman asks this question correctly and makes it right. And because of these findings side effects are quite possible. Then there were still investigations I always call him the Methuselah of this research technology. He is even older than me. We used to work a lot together in the investigation of the effects of chemicals. This picture shows the general bleeding of the brain. He could show that electromagnetic fields change the supply of the brain because the exchange of oxygen decreases. We have so many in society who say I'm tired, I'm exhausted. These are exhausted brains. They no longer get the energy supply they need. The brain is a high-performance engine. It does not get 30 percent of the total energy supply of our body to the brain. If we have a lack of supply there, we always have a reduction in overall performance. The body is tired, it is exhausted, it is restless, it is desperate, it is hopeless, it is not psychogenic, but it is a functioning downregulation. And this is what Heuser showed in his publication a few years ago. What we know is that inflammation stimulates the Sympathicus nerve. We can measure this with such fields. The moment the Sympathicus goes up, that is the red line above that we see, the inflammation in the body is intensified again. And I'm in stress, right? In the middle is a vertical line, the dotted line. Up to this line, and the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system parallel. And all of a sudden they go apart. And Professor Straub from the University of Regensburg says, the moment they go apart, disease starts. Then this Sympathicus dominates, the inflammation so much, it attacks. And in the small picture on the right we see a normal Sympathicus activity in this red column, in the middle three columns, purple, red, blue. And then we see the red column suddenly very high, below that happens when the Sympathicus becomes highly active. And we can measure that with such fields. And at the same time it is connected with high energy consumption. And I measured the whole thing with myself, because in my penthouse apartment 5G suddenly was very strongly exposed. And then we see my findings before and then below, under the exposition. And there we see how high it can go. At night I was awakened, then I measured how it increased at night. These are the narrow columns. The Parasympathicus went down strongly. I had a high heart rate and also high blood pressure values, which were up to 240 in the night. We don't talk about these risks that we are talking about. We don't talk about how many strokes happen on this path. And what can happen there. There is a lot to talk about and that is the last thing I want to address about the mechanisms. The so-called ion-controlled electrically controlled ion channels are changed in the circuit. What does that mean? In English we call them electricated channels. That means they basically have an electric switch to open and close. And there it shows that they are susceptible to such field influences from the outside and can be switched against the need. Then it comes to calcium infusion into the cell, which can then damage the cell and at the same time the calcium outflow. We are now starting to measure this, because we believe that this can be a good parameter for electrosmog load also in vehicles. Whether then the calcium suddenly goes up into the outer cell and the calcium into the cell, because then we have damage processes from mitochondria that then run off. And it would be important to know that. The problem is a bit the measuring technique, because the calcium value can be distorted by many external influences when measuring. Even the shaking of the blood, the transport, changes the value of the calcium. So that's a bit difficult from the measurement technology challenge. But basically it's just a way. But we must not forget the ecological balance in all this. What else do we have of technological problems? We have to say that we replace a scarce resource, the oil resources of the world, by a substance that is even more scarce. We use lithium for the production of batteries. This substance is much more scarce than oil. It is also won with child labor and under the worst conditions worldwide. And what solution do you see when we compare the cars with petrochemicals, when we want to replace them completely with electric cars and everyone should get lithium batteries? What do we think? How quickly we have exploited the world for all descendants and can no longer recreate the whole thing. Then the necessary power supply is currently due to very insufficient sources. This has just been addressed in today's debate. Due to a lack of electricity, we are now buying the electricity from bad French nuclear power plants. The gas that we partly use for electricity production is made from fracking technology. On the way, 30% of the amount of gas is already lost. It is a very un-ecological form. Or reactivate like the coal power plants. Then we have a very lacking solution of risk management. We know that when lithium batteries burn, a conventional extinguishing of the fire is practically impossible. If you don't get out of the car, it will burn in no time. The heat development is extremely massive. We need a submersible to extinguish. This means that the burning object must be lowered. Only then can it be extinguished. We don't even have an infrastructure for this. And what happens when an accident with 30 vehicles, as we experience again and again, happens? And if then under the 30, 2-3 start burning and then it starts? It is an unsolvable situation from my point of view, which we take for granted. We do the charging facilities. We install in new buildings that we build. What happens when a car in the garage starts to burn under the residential building? These fires can hardly be extinguished. We have accepted many things without having a solution ready. In addition to the health issues, there are also ecological issues. And this euphoria that is spread here, I can't quite share. Apart from the fact that, of course, the density of the charging stations is not up to the real demand at the moment. So there are many problems. There are technological problems. But there are also ecological ones. And overall, the euphoria that you have with this technology is not really well justified. And prevention is not included. It would still be a possibility for the industry to intervene. I would very much like that. Because it is not a market deterioration, but it is an improvement of the market for the industry to have open ears for some things. Again, these incineration processes are increasing. That means, shortly or for a long time, because of this mismatch, when the sympathic is constantly in stress, adrenaline outburst, the body has to fight against it all the time. So in the end, there is the potential for disease. Yes, of course. Two things happen. We heat up inflammation and are constantly inflamed when we are constantly exposed to these fields. We also generate more energy, as we discussed with hypothermia. We generate energy consumption there. But we also generate increasing energy consumption here. And we have a population that constantly complains about exhaustion, performance impairment to an unprecedented extent in a society that apparently gets everything in supermarkets in terms of nutrition, that lives in social housing that was completely unthinkable, that is in social security. And yet people are no longer happy, no longer alive. They sneak through life and complain about fatigue, exhaustion, unhappiness to a high degree. We just have to think about such effects. And what do we generate through simply unthinkingly introduced technology? Thank you very much. Dr. Kurt Müller, this was for you, dear viewers. And I think if we are talking about prevention and health preservation, what should be the main focus in a far-sighted analysis, so that we really don't slip into an illness, then this topic simply should not be missing and should really be discussed in the industry. So that we should actually save the world with it and on the other hand also go back into a lot of dangers. In this sense, thank you for watching. See you next time and take care.