Le basculement de l'écorce terrestre

Well, remember to subscribe, to activate the notification bell and to like, for you it's free, it costs nothing, but for the channel it's really a lot. So, thanks in advance. If I tell you that there is a link between Charles Hapgood, the last ice age, the mammoths, Albert Einstein and the flood. Do you believe me? Well, however, even if all these subjects seem to have nothing in common, there is indeed a link between them. And their convergence could well push us to have to change our vision of history. It all started in 1955, when Charles Hapgood, a graduate of Harvard University, having worked for the CIA's strategic services during the Second World War and executive secretary of the American president, Franklin Roosevelt, published his first book, The Movements of the Earth's Scales. This book was prefaced by the most famous physicist in history, Albert Einstein, who strongly supported Hapgood's work. In this book, as well as in the two that will follow, in 1966 and 1970, Charles Hapgood proposes an innovative theory concerning the geological past of our planet. He thus advances the hypothesis that the Earth's Earth's crust would have tilted like a shell on the Earth's magma, causing a rotation of the entire continents of about 30 degrees. This Earth's crust's tilt would have occurred about 12,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene, marking the end of the last ice age. Our planet is made up of an internal core burning at more than 6,000 degrees, covered by a magmatic mantle of about 5,000 km in thickness, on which rests the solid Earth's crust of 35 km in thickness, composed of the different continental tectonic plates. The Earth's crust, on which we live, therefore floats on a bed of viscous magma. According to Charles Hapgood's theory, supported by Albert Einstein in 1955, the entire solid Earth's crust would have tilted about 30 degrees about 12,000 years ago. The Earth's core, as well as the internal mantle, would not have moved, remaining on their axis, and now the magnetic field of the Earth. Only the external solid Earth's crust would have undergone this rotation, moving on nearly 3,000 km the different continents. To give you an idea, it's as if the city of Paris was suddenly located at the level of the south of Algeria. Since the Earth's axis of rotation was not modified during this tilt, the anterior location of the poles would therefore have nothing to do with the one we know today. The North Pole is now located in the center of the Arctic Ocean, but before the Earth's crust moved, it would have been in northern Canada. In contrast, the South Pole, now in the center of the Antarctic continent, would have been located on the eastern coast of the latter. This modification of nearly 3,000 km of the poles of the Earth directly influences the Arctic and Antarctic polar zones. As a result, the climate of our planet was necessarily totally different. Most of the North American continent was then frozen, while the western coasts of the Antarctic were in a temperate climate, just like Siberia. The Earth's equator at this time would have formed a line passing through Giza, Easter Island and Cambodia. The face of our beautiful blue planet was then very different from the one we know today. But for what reason could the Earth's Earth's crust have shifted so suddenly? The most probable hypothesis rests on the fact that 12,000 years ago, under the influence of the climate warming of the end of the Pleistocene, leading our planet to the end of the last ice age, a gigantic part of the ice sheet would have detached from the Antarctic continent to sink into the oceans of the Southern Hemisphere. Since the South Pole of the Earth was not in the center of the Antarctic continent, but 3,000 km eastwards, the polar zone also extended 3,000 km eastwards. Thus, like today's Greenland, a large part of this cold zone extended over the oceans, forming a colossal layer of floating ice attached to the Antarctic continent. The warming of the planet and its oceans would have caused the rupture of this ice sheet of the South Pole, releasing an amount of several million cubic meters of ice into the oceans. The volume thus released would then have unbalanced the distribution of masses to the surface of the Earth's crust floating on the magmatic mantle, causing the entire crust to tilt around its axis of rotation. Polar zones of several million square kilometers would then have suddenly found themselves under a temperate climate, meaning that regions with mild climates would have been plunged into a polar cold, all in a cloud of devastating earthquakes and terrifying volcanic eruptions. This new configuration of the Earth's surface would have given birth to the current geography as we know it today, with a North Pole in the center of the Arctic Ocean, a South Pole in the center of the Antarctic, and an equator passing through the Galapagos Islands, Gabon and Sumatra. All this would have happened because, following the warming of the end of the last ice age, a huge part of the Antarctic ice sheet would have been released into the oceans of the Southern Hemisphere. And what happens when you immerse an ice cube in a glass of water? Well, yes, the water cools down. With several million cubic meters of ice released into the waters of the planet, it resulted in a brutal cooling of the oceans and, consequently, of the atmosphere, causing flooding. The climatic result of this hypothesis can only make us think of the legendary myth of the biblical flood, which tells of an ancient flood and massive rainfall all over the globe. And since in the texts of the Old Testament, the world after seems to be very different from the world before, the shift of the Earth's crust, as proposed by Charles Apgoud, could perfectly, and in a rational and scientific way, explain the biblical events of the flood. But if such a planetary cataclysm took place during the Dryas, can we find any traces of it? Well, yes. In 2020, a study conducted jointly by the Universities of Texas, Baylor and Houston, entitled Volcanic Origins of Geochemical Anomalies of the Recent Dryas About 12,900 B.C., attests that sedimentary layers found in the Hall Cave in central Texas testify to an intense volcanic activity about 12,000 years ago. These massive volcanic eruptions, which left their mark on the soils of the planet, can perfectly correspond to the result of the shift of the Earth's crust, which inevitably led to major seismic and volcanic consequences. But other evidence can attest that a radical and sudden change struck the Earth about 12,000 years ago. The discoveries of mammoths kept frozen in the permafrost are not uncommon. The analyses of the bodies of these antediluvian pachyderms have however revealed very interesting facts. In 2002, the Yakujir mammoth, discovered in Siberia, revealed the presence of undigested frozen vegetal remains in its stomach. Composed of tall grass and granite, these stomach remains not only attest to a relatively mild climate at the time, for a polar region today, but moreover, the freezing of these vegetals in the stomach of the pachyderm testifies to the speed with which the animal was caught by the cold. Seven years after the discovery of Yakujir, in 2009, Kroma, a mammoth baby aged only two months, was discovered in an exceptional state of conservation, also in Siberia, frozen in the permafrost. The advanced analyses of the remains present in its stomach revealed the presence of frozen breast milk. Just like for the Yakujir mammoth, the discovery of Kroma demonstrates that Siberia 12,000 years ago was not in a polar climate, devoid of vegetation, but enjoyed sufficiently mild and pleasant conditions to allow the proliferation of plants in sufficiently abundant quantities to feed its colossal pachyderms. In addition, the freezing of the food remains in the stomach of these mammoths demonstrates a brutal change in the thermal conditions of this region. The intensity of the cold necessary for the freezing of the body and its bowels goes against an environment where vegetation would be present enough to feed these animals. Just as proposed by the theory of the tipping of the earth's crust, Siberia therefore experienced a brutal and sudden cooling, propelled during this cataclysm by temperate regions towards Arctic areas in the north, and imprisoning in the ice of the permafrost the mammoths that were present during this tragic event. The carbon-14 dating carried out on these two animals estimated that they were aged respectively 20,000 years for Yakujir and 50,000 years for Kroma. If this official dating seems far from the supposed period of the tipping of the earth's crust, which occurred about 12,000 years ago, a 2012 study proved by demonstration to experts that the reactivity of the isotope used for carbon-14 dating could be strongly altered by some chemical components contained in water. If the validity of the carbon-14 dating beyond 30,000 years was already subject to caution, the discovery undermines all archaeological chronologies, since an altered organism can then be anti-dated to carbon-14 for several hundred thousand years. The official age of the Yakujir and Kroma mammoth cannot therefore be a determining factor that annihilates Charles Abgood's theory. The Dryas, this glacial period that closes the era of Pleistocene 12,000 years ago, also saw the great extinction of giant mammals. In a sudden and brutal way, the entire megafauna of the planet seems to have been eradicated. If mammoths are the standard bearer, the saber-toothed tigers, rhinoceros, or megatherium have also seen their species die out at this time. Obviously, a major cataclysm, as violent as sudden, seems to have hit the planet 12,000 years ago. Rainfall, volcanic eruptions, sudden climate change, and mass extinction attest to this event, which, if Charles Abgood is right, could well be explained by the turning of the Earth's crust.